Vehicle Control Apparatus Using Coordinate Transformation for Six-Degree-of-Freedom Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle control methods fail to accurately account for six degrees of freedom motion, leading to discrepancies between control targets and actual vehicle behavior due to acceleration, steering, and inertia forces, and impose a high calculation load on vehicle control devices.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus that calculates the center of gravity six-component and tire three-component using a coordinate transformation with normalization by driving and cornering stiffness, allowing for high degree of freedom control calculations while reducing computational load, and selects appropriate calculation methods based on the number of control requests and actuator degrees of freedom.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the Lagrange multipliers method and constraint conditions are used to calculate driving force of each wheel, then the control precision is improved, but the calculation load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcalculation load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the calculation parameters from using Lagrange multipliers with constraint conditions to using coordinate transformation with normalization. This parameter change maintains control precision by still considering six degrees of freedom motion while reducing computational complexity through a more efficient mathematical approach that avoids iterative optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the mechanical calculation system (Lagrange multipliers method requiring iterative optimization and constraint satisfaction) with a coordinate transformation system that directly computes wheel forces through matrix operations. This substitution eliminates the need for complex iterative calculations while preserving the physical accuracy of six-degree-of-freedom motion modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If the conventional method is used to calculate vehicle motion, then the calculation process is simplified, but the control accuracy deteriorates due to ignoring six degrees of freedom motion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation process complexityVSAvoidcontrol accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces six-degree-of-freedom motion parameters (including pitch, roll, and vertical acceleration) into the calculation model, transforming it from a simplified two-degree-of-freedom plane motion model. This parameter expansion captures the actual vehicle dynamics under acceleration and steering conditions, significantly improving control accuracy without requiring complex iterative methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses coordinate transformation as an intermediary mathematical tool to bridge the gap between the simplified control input and the complex six-degree-of-freedom vehicle motion. This intermediary transformation enables accurate calculation of wheel forces while keeping the overall calculation process efficient and suitable for real-time control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If the coordinate transformation with normalization is used, then the calculation efficiency is improved, but the adaptability to different control scenarios may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalculation efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to control scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the coordinate transformation with normalization to be a universal calculation framework that can handle multiple control scenarios (acceleration, deceleration, steering, and combined operations) through a single unified mathematical model. The normalization process automatically adapts to different operating conditions, maintaining calculation efficiency across diverse scenarios without requiring scenario-specific algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11679775B2Vehicle control apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11679775B2 patent drawing
  • US11679775B2 patent drawing
  • US11679775B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control apparatus comprising, a center of gravity six-component calculation unit for calculating a center of gravity six-component as vehicle motion targets based on a driver input, a tire three-component calculation unit for calculating a tire three-component of four wheels of a vehicle based on the center of gravity six-component, a vehicle control unit for performing vehicle control by the vehicle control, actuator group based on the tire three-component of the four wheels, and wherein the tire three-component calculation unit calculates the tire three-component of the four wheels from the center of gravity six-component by a coordinate transformation without repetition, which is normalization with the driving stiffness of each wheel and the cornering stiffness of each wheel, when the number of control requests in the vehicle control is less than degrees of freedom of the vehicle control actuator group.