Vehicle Deceleration Control for Trailer Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

When towing a trailer, vehicles face stability issues during braking, especially under non-ideal road conditions, due to the lack of anti-lock braking systems (ABS) or electronic stability programs (ESP) in trailers, leading to limited deceleration and potential instability.

Innovation Solution

A system that dynamically assesses real-time vehicle dynamics and external conditions to generate appropriate deceleration values, using sensors, a correlator, acceleration limiter, jerk limiter, and selector to control braking and maintain stability, by determining vehicle parameters and correlations to calculate achievable braking and jerk values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a vehicle tows a trailer and applies brakes, then deceleration is achieved, but stability deteriorates due to trailer swinging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeceleration rateVSAvoidvehicle-trailer stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system dynamically adjusts the deceleration rate based on real-time vehicle and trailer conditions. The controller continuously monitors vehicle parameters and modifies the braking force applied to the towing vehicle to prevent trailer swinging while achieving necessary deceleration, making the braking process adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from vehicle sensors to monitor the operational state and trailer behavior. Based on this feedback, the controller adjusts the braking force in real-time to maintain stability. The feedback loop allows the system to respond to changing conditions and prevent instability before it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If ABS and ESP are installed in trailers, then braking stability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrailer braking stabilityVSAvoidbraking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The towing vehicle's braking system acts as an intermediary to control trailer braking stability. Instead of equipping the trailer with its own ABS and ESP systems, the controller on the towing vehicle adjusts the braking force applied to the trailer brakes through the existing mechanical linkage, using the vehicle's electronic control capabilities to stabilize the trailer without adding complex electronics to the trailer itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The towing vehicle's braking system is made multi-functional by enabling it to control both the vehicle's own brakes and the trailer's brakes through a unified electronic control system. This allows the existing vehicle braking system to perform the additional function of trailer stability control, eliminating the need for separate trailer ABS and ESP systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of time

If braking force is increased to reduce stopping distance, then stopping time decreases, but stability worsens due to excessive braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping timeVSAvoidvehicle-trailer stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The braking system dynamically adjusts the deceleration rate based on real-time vehicle and trailer conditions. The controller continuously monitors vehicle parameters and modifies the braking force applied to the towing vehicle to prevent trailer swinging while achieving necessary deceleration, making the braking process adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the braking parameter (deceleration rate) dynamically based on road conditions, vehicle load, and trailer configuration. Rather than applying a fixed high braking force, the controller adjusts the deceleration parameter in real-time to optimize the balance between stopping distance and stability, preventing trailer swinging while achieving reasonable stopping times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8256851B2Deceleration control for a vehicle
Publication Date: 2012.09.04 ROBERT BOSCH CORP
  • US8256851B2 patent drawing
  • US8256851B2 patent drawing
  • US8256851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a vehicle using the method, and a system using the method, of controlling the vehicle configured to tow a trailer. The method includes determining first and second vehicle parameters indicative of first and second conditions of the vehicle, and determining a trailer presence from at least one of the first and second vehicle parameters. The method also includes updating the first vehicle parameter when the trailer is present, generating a third vehicle parameter, and determining first and second braking control parameters from the first, second, and third vehicle parameters. The first braking control parameter corresponds to at least one of the second and third vehicle parameters, and the second braking control parameter correspond to at least one of the first and second vehicle parameters. The method can further include generating a braking signal based on one of the first and second braking control parameters.