Vehicle Engine Stop Control Device Using Average Charging Current

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control devices for vehicles with engine stop and start systems struggle to determine the optimal time for engine stop and restart based on battery charging state, leading to potential engine failure due to insufficient battery power during restart.

Innovation Solution

A control device that includes a battery current detecting unit, battery temperature detecting unit, deceleration state detecting unit, fuel supply stop unit, average charging current calculating unit, and SOC estimating unit to determine the State of Charge (SOC) of the battery and calculate engine stoppable time, allowing for automatic engine stop and restart based on the charging state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the engine stop and start device is used to improve fuel efficiency, then fuel consumption is reduced, but the battery may not have sufficient charge for engine restart

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidengine restart reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting deceleration states and calculating average charging currents before engine restart is needed. It estimates SOC in advance and determines engine stoppable time, ensuring the battery will have sufficient charge when restart is required, thus preventing restart failures while maintaining fuel efficiency benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring battery current during deceleration, calculating average charging current, and estimating SOC. This feedback loop allows the control device to adjust engine stop decisions based on real-time battery charging state, ensuring reliable restart while maximizing fuel efficiency through intelligent stop timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the engine is stopped frequently to improve fuel efficiency, then fuel consumption is reduced, but the battery charging state becomes unpredictable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidbattery charging state prediction
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of average charging current during deceleration phases before engine stop decisions are made. By calculating the average current over the deceleration period and using it to estimate SOC in advance, the system achieves precise prediction of battery charging state, enabling reliable fuel efficiency optimization through accurate stop timing control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If regenerative charging is used to charge the battery during deceleration, then fuel efficiency is improved, but the battery current varies making SOC estimation difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidSOC estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of average charging current during the entire deceleration phase before making engine stop decisions. By integrating and averaging the variable battery current over the deceleration period, the system obtains a stable representative value that accurately reflects the charging state, enabling precise SOC estimation despite current variations during regenerative charging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate determination of engine stop and restart feasibility and calculates the optimal engine stop time, ensuring reliable engine operation and improved fuel efficiency by utilizing regenerative energy for battery charging during vehicle deceleration.

Implementation Method 1

a battery current detecting unit configured to detect an electric current of the battery

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical current detection: Ohmmeter

Implementation Method 2

a battery configured to supply electric power to the engine stop and start device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBattery electrochemical conversion: Battery (electricity)

Implementation Method 3

a regenerative charging device which charges a battery using energy during deceleration of the vehicle

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9140227B2Control device for vehicle
Publication Date: 2015.09.22 SUZUKI MOTOR CORP
  • US9140227B2 patent drawing
  • US9140227B2 patent drawing
  • US9140227B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control device for a vehicle including an engine stop and start device includes a battery and a vehicle speed detecting unit and includes a battery current detecting unit, a battery temperature detecting unit, a deceleration state detecting unit, a fuel supply stop unit, an average charging current calculating unit, and an SOC estimating unit. The control device calculates, with the average charging current calculating unit, an average of a battery current in a predetermined time from detection of a stop of fuel supply to an engine in a deceleration state of the vehicle. The control device permits a stop of the engine when an SOC calculated by the SOC estimating unit is larger than a predetermined value.