Vehicle Feedback Control for Lane-Keeping and Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in ensuring driving safety due to the complexity of driving environments, particularly in maintaining lane position and avoiding collisions.

Innovation Solution

A computer program product is implemented in an onboard vehicle computer system that receives command data, corrects driving commands to generate modified command data, and modifies the vehicle control system's operation to ensure the vehicle operates within an intended lane and maintains a safe distance from other vehicles, thereby avoiding potential collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If autonomous vehicle uses machine learning system to generate driving commands, then the vehicle can navigate autonomously, but driving safety cannot be ensured in complex scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous navigation capabilityVSAvoiddriving safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a feedback system as an intermediary component between the machine learning system and vehicle control system. This feedback system receives driving commands from the machine learning system, evaluates their safety using trained feedback models, and provides feedback signals to modify commands that fail safety checks. This mediator architecture allows the autonomous navigation capability to be maintained while adding a safety verification layer that ensures driving safety in complex scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the vehicle strictly follows machine learning commands, then the navigation efficiency is maintained, but the vehicle may deviate from intended lane or collide with other vehicles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidlane deviation and collision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the feedback system continuously monitors driving commands and vehicle state, compares actual trajectory with intended trajectory using trained feedback models, and generates feedback signals to correct deviations. This closed-loop feedback approach maintains navigation efficiency by only intervening when necessary while preventing harmful outcomes through continuous safety verification and command adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the vehicle modifies driving commands to ensure safety, then collision avoidance is achieved, but the navigation route may be disrupted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidnavigation route consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively modifying only those driving commands that fail safety verification while leaving compliant commands unchanged. The feedback system performs minimal necessary interventions - adjusting steering angles, speeds, or trajectories only when safety risks are detected - thereby maintaining collision avoidance capability while preserving the overall navigation route consistency and minimizing disruptions to the planned path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12266265B2Feedback system for vehicular end-to-end driving
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12266265B2 patent drawing
  • US12266265B2 patent drawing
  • US12266265B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments for improving driving commands for vehicular end-to-end driving include a method for a connected vehicle that includes receiving command data describing one or more driving commands for the connected vehicle. The method includes correcting the one or more driving commands to generate modified command data that describes one or more modified driving commands. The one or more modified driving commands control an operation of the connected vehicle to satisfy a trajectory safety requirement. The method includes modifying an operation of a vehicle control system of the connected vehicle based on the modified command data so that the connected vehicle operates based on the one or more modified driving commands.