Vehicle HMI Tailoring via Dynamic Sensor Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle Human Machine Interfaces (HMIs) lack the ability to dynamically tailor driving experiences based on various driving factors, such as environmental and occupant conditions, leading to suboptimal user engagement and safety.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that determine optimum HMI tailoring options by analyzing static and dynamic environmental conditions, vehicle occupant states, and predicted driving factors, using sensors, location data, and databases to adjust interior settings like lighting, music, and voice interfaces to enhance driver and passenger experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the HMI system provides multiple tailoring options to adapt to different driving factors, then the adaptability and user experience are improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveHMI adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The HMI system dynamically adjusts interface parameters (display brightness, audio volume, haptic feedback intensity) based on real-time driving conditions detected by sensors. The system transitions between different HMI states (calm, alert, relaxed) depending on environmental factors like light levels, noise, and temperature, allowing adaptability without requiring complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects driving factors using onboard sensors and autonomously selects appropriate HMI tailoring options without requiring user intervention. The processor analyzes sensor data and independently determines optimal HMI configurations, reducing the complexity burden on the user while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If the system analyzes multiple driving factors in real-time to determine optimum HMI options, then the driving safety and user engagement are improved, but the processing requirements and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving safetyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements selective analysis of driving factors based on current driving conditions. Not all sensors operate at full capacity simultaneously; instead, the processor prioritizes analysis of the most relevant factors for the current context (e.g., focusing on light and temperature sensors during daytime driving, or noise and vibration sensors during adverse weather), reducing overall processing load while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-establishes HMI tailoring rules and decision logic during system initialization or offline programming. By pre-configuring response strategies for common driving scenarios, the processor reduces real-time computational requirements during actual driving, as it只需 executes pre-determined logic rather than performing complex analysis from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the HMI system continuously monitors and adjusts interior settings based on driving factors, then the user experience is improved, but the loss of time for processing and response increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors driving factors continuously but updates HMI settings at optimized intervals rather than in real-time for every parameter change. The processor evaluates whether environmental changes warrant HMI adjustments and implements updates periodically when significant changes are detected, reducing processing overhead while maintaining responsive user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where HMI adjustments are evaluated for their effectiveness, and the system learns from user responses. This allows the processor to refine its monitoring and adjustment strategies over time, reducing unnecessary processing while maintaining or improving user experience through increasingly accurate and timely adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9507413B2Tailoring vehicle human machine interface
Publication Date: 2016.11.29 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US9507413B2 patent drawing
  • US9507413B2 patent drawing
  • US9507413B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for analyzing communication options, including determining one or more driving factors, being provided with one or more HMI tailoring options, and analyzing the one or more driving factors and the one or more HMI tailoring options to determine an optimum HMI tailoring option.