Vehicle Integrated Control Arbitration for Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle integrated control apparatuses face reliability issues due to information overload and potential abnormalities in the host command section affecting sub-command sections, leading to increased information exchange and reduced reliability.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle integrated control apparatus with driving support calculation control, driving amount calculation control, and braking amount calculation control means that calculates and arbitrates target control amounts to reduce information exchange, enhance reliability, and enable autonomous control of driving and braking forces based on driver inputs, while preventing abnormal influences from the driving support calculation control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a host command section and sub-command sections are used for integral control, then vehicle motion control capability is improved, but the amount of information exchange increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle motion control capabilityVSAvoidamount of information exchange
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the arbitration function from the host command section and places it in a dedicated arbitration device. This separation removes the information processing burden from the host command section, reducing the amount of information that needs to be exchanged between control sections while maintaining the integral control capability for multiple vehicle motion controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a host command section and sub-command sections are used for integral control, then vehicle motion control capability is improved, but reliability decreases due to abnormality propagation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle motion control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control system into independent control sections, each with its own arbitration capability. This segmentation isolates abnormalities within individual sections, preventing them from propagating to other sections. Each section can independently arbitrate its own control commands, ensuring that a failure in one section does not compromise the entire system's reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an arbitration device as an intermediary between the host command section and sub-command sections. This intermediary processes and arbitrates control commands, acting as a buffer that prevents direct abnormality propagation between sections. The arbitration device ensures that even if one section experiences abnormalities, the other sections can continue to function reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If multiple control sections exchange detailed information for arbitration, then control precision is improved, but information exchange volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidinformation exchange volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential arbitration-related information from detailed control data. Instead of exchanging complete control command sets between sections, each section extracts and transmits only the critical parameters needed for arbitration decisions. This reduction in information volume maintains control precision while significantly decreasing the amount of data exchanged between control sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS7885751B2Vehicle integrated control apparatus integrally executing vehicle driving support control, driving force control, and braking force control
Publication Date: 2011.02.08 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US7885751B2 patent drawing
  • US7885751B2 patent drawing
  • US7885751B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving support target braking/driving force is calculated by a driving support electronic controller, and transmitted to a first arbiter of a driving force control electronic controller. A vehicle driver requested target braking/driving force and the driving support target braking/driving force are arbitrated by the first arbiter, whereby a vehicle total target braking/driving force is calculated, and the vehicle total target braking/driving force is distributed to a vehicle target driving force and a vehicle target braking force by a braking/driving force distributor. A final target driving force is calculated by a second arbiter on the basis of the target driving force, and a driver requested braking force and the target braking force are arbitrated by an arbiter of a braking force control electronic controller, whereby a vehicle total target braking force is calculated.