Vehicle Integrated Control System for Split-Braking Yaw Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional anti-lock braking systems (ABS) face challenges in maintaining stable braking performance when the friction coefficients of the left and right road surfaces differ, leading to excessive chattering and deterioration of braking performance due to uneven braking forces.

Innovation Solution

An integrated control system that calculates the friction coefficients of both road surfaces and adjusts braking pressures using a feedforward control method, combined with rear wheel steering to compensate for yaw behavior, ensuring stable braking and improved vehicle control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional ABS control is performed based on insufficient wheel slip rate information, then the control system is simple to operate, but excessive chattering phenomenon occurs in braking force and braking performance is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary estimation of road surface friction coefficients before braking occurs or at the beginning of braking, using wheel acceleration and slip rate information. This preliminary action allows the feedforward control to provide appropriate braking pressure from the start, preventing excessive chattering without requiring complex real-time adjustments during braking

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring wheel slip rates and wheel accelerations during braking, then using this information to adjust the estimated friction coefficients and refine braking pressure calculations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves braking performance while maintaining manageable system complexity through iterative refinement rather than complex upfront modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If ABS operates on the wheel of the low friction road surface in split braking situation, then the ABS function is activated, but unnecessary yaw behavior occurs due to difference between left and right braking forces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveABS operation stabilityVSAvoidvehicle yaw stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by independently estimating friction coefficients for left and right road surfaces based on individual wheel performance characteristics. This allows each side of the vehicle to have customized braking pressure adjustments tailored to its specific road surface conditions, preventing yaw instability caused by asymmetric braking while maintaining ABS functionality on both sides

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system deliberately introduces asymmetry in the control approach by treating left and right wheels differently - each side's braking pressure is calculated based on its own friction coefficient estimation and wheel performance. This asymmetric control strategy compensates for the natural asymmetry in road surface friction, balancing the overall braking forces and eliminating unwanted yaw behavior

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Stability of the object's composition

If control for reducing wheel braking amount is performed on high friction road surface for yaw stabilization, then vehicle yaw behavior is stabilized, but braking performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle yaw stabilityVSAvoidbraking performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies the counterweight principle by using rear wheel steering to generate a compensating lateral force that opposes the yaw moment created by asymmetric braking. Instead of reducing braking force on the high-friction side, the system maintains optimal braking pressure while introducing an opposing steering moment, thus stabilizing yaw without sacrificing braking performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The rear wheel steering system acts as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the conflicting requirements of maintaining high braking force and stabilizing yaw behavior. By introducing this intermediate control element, the system can achieve both objectives simultaneously - the steering intervention provides the necessary yaw correction while the braking system operates at optimal performance levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11260840B2Integrated control system for vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11260840B2 patent drawing
  • US11260840B2 patent drawing
  • US11260840B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrated control system for a vehicle is provided. The system includes a friction coefficient calculation unit that calculates friction coefficients of left side and right side road surfaces, respectively, based on vehicle wheel state information and a predetermined setting information collected during ABS operation. A feedforward braking pressure calculation unit calculates a feedforward braking pressure of each vehicle wheel using the friction coefficients. An ABS braking pressure calculation unit calculates an ABS braking pressure of the each vehicle wheel based on the feedforward braking pressure and slip rate information. A rear wheel steering control amount calculation unit calculates a rear wheel steering control amount for yaw compensation using the ABS braking pressure of each vehicle wheel and a rear wheel steering controller executes a rear wheel steering control according to the rear wheel steering control amount.