Vehicle Motion Control for Longitudinal Force Saturation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle motion control systems face challenges in managing longitudinal forces within controllable ranges, leading to potential excessive increases or decreases in control amounts when requests exceed these ranges, resulting in prolonged convergence times for actual acceleration to match target acceleration.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle motion controller that includes a feedback controlling unit to calculate a control amount based on the difference between target and actual acceleration, a request outputting unit to determine a request longitudinal force, and an obtaining unit to assess the actuator's availability, prohibiting control amount adjustments when requests fall outside the controllable range or when certain vehicle stability controls are active.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback control is continued when the requested longitudinal force exceeds the controllable range, then the control system attempts to eliminate the acceleration difference, but the control amount excessively increases or decreases without achieving the target acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidconvergence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks to determine whether the requested longitudinal force is within the controllable range before executing feedback control. By anticipating the feasibility of control actions and preventing invalid control amounts from being applied, the system avoids excessive accumulation of control errors and ensures timely convergence to target acceleration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the feedback control amount is allowed to change freely to eliminate acceleration difference, then the control response is aggressive, but the control amount may excessively increase or decrease when the request exceeds controllable range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol response speedVSAvoidcontrol amount stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates a feedback mechanism that monitors whether the requested longitudinal force is within the controllable range. When the request exceeds the range, the feedback loop prevents excessive changes in control amount while maintaining stable and reliable control behavior, avoiding oscillations or runaway control values.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Stability of the object's composition

If the system prohibits control amount changes when request exceeds controllable range, then excessive changes are prevented, but the actual acceleration cannot converge to target acceleration rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol amount stabilityVSAvoidconvergence speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the controllability determination based on current vehicle conditions and actuator capabilities. By continuously updating the controllable range assessment, the system can permit control amount changes when conditions allow rapid convergence while prohibiting changes only when necessary to prevent excessive deviations, thus adapting control behavior to real-time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4151484B1Vehicle motion controller
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 ADVICS CO LTD
  • EP4151484B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4151484B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4151484B1 patent drawingFigure 3(a)~4(c)

AI summary

A vehicle motion controller includes a feedback controlling unit that executes feedback control in which a difference between a target acceleration corresponding to a request value from a driver assistance device and an actual acceleration of a vehicle is an input, thereby calculating a control amount used to reduce the difference, a request outputting unit that calculates a request longitudinal force based on the control amount, the request longitudinal force controlling an actuator, and an obtaining unit that obtains, as availability, a range of a longitudinal force capable of being generated by the actuator, the availability being a controllable range of the longitudinal force. The feedback controlling unit prohibits the control amount from decreasing when the request longitudinal force is less than a minimum value in the availability.