Vehicle Network Wiring Harness Layout Using Matrix Couplers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of vehicle network systems, particularly in wiring harness production, leads to quality and safety issues due to deep interdependence of connections, making manual production time-consuming and error-prone, and challenging to meet the demands of functional safety requirements.

Innovation Solution

Applying graph theory to divide the vehicle network into topology levels, using a matrix coupler to simplify connections into a bipartite graph structure, which reduces complexity and enables automated production by representing connections as point-to-point links, eliminating the need for manual re-plugging and complex assembly processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual production of wiring harnesses is used, then flexibility in handling complex connection configurations is maintained, but production time increases and error rates rise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in handling complex connectionsVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The wiring harness production is divided into modular segments corresponding to different topology levels. Each module can be independently produced and tested, then automatically assembled with other modules through standardized interfaces, enabling both handling of complex configurations and improved productivity through parallel production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the complex multi-to-many connection relationships into a standardized topology-level parameter system where connections are defined by hierarchical levels rather than individual wire mappings. This parameter transformation enables automated production systems to handle complexity through systematic rules rather than manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If manual production of wiring harnesses is used, then complex connection configurations can be handled, but quality and robustness control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling of complex connection configurationsVSAvoidquality and robustness control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the wiring harness into topology-level modules, each module can be independently quality-checked and tested before final assembly. This modular approach enables systematic quality control at multiple stages rather than relying solely on final inspection of the complete complex harness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements automated testing and validation systems that provide feedback during the production process. Each topology-level module undergoes automated continuity testing and connection validation, with results fed back to control the assembly process, ensuring quality control without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the wiring harness structure with deep linkage of connections is maintained, then functional requirements are met, but complexity increases making production error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional requirements fulfillmentVSAvoidwiring harness complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The deep linkage connection structure is segmented into hierarchical topology levels. Each level represents a specific functional grouping of connections, reducing the apparent complexity while maintaining the underlying deep interconnections needed for functional requirements. The segmentation makes the complex structure manageable through systematic organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Topology-level modules act as intermediaries between the power source/control units and the final loads. These intermediary modules simplify the connection interface while maintaining the complex functional linkages behind them, allowing automated production systems to work with simplified interfaces rather than complex point-to-point connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If automated production is implemented, then productivity increases and errors are reduced, but the system requires simplified connection structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidconnection structure simplification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms complex multi-to-many connection relationships into a standardized topology-level parameter system. This parameter transformation enables automated production systems to handle what appears as simplified hierarchical connections while actually representing the full complexity of the original wiring harness through systematic parameter mapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11904782B2Production method for a vehicle network of a vehicle, and vehicle network
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 LISA DRAXLMAIER GMBH
  • US11904782B2 patent drawing
  • US11904782B2 patent drawing
  • US11904782B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A network for a vehicle and a method of making the network is described. The network is suitable for a number of vehicle network subscribers in at least two topology levels which can be distinguished spatially or functionally. An energy supply device, at least one control unit, at least one interface module, a communication interface; a number of load interfaces, at least one load interface, at least one matrix coupler are provided. The matrix coupler is set up to represent an unbundling task for linking the vehicle network subscribers, where nodes of a line-connector relationship of the graph representing the matrix-coupler in each case denotes a load interface of the number of load interfaces at the end of a line. Here, an edge of the graph denotes a connection relationship of at least one line between a first load interface and a second load interface.