Vehicle Safety System Prognosis Data Interface

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current safety systems and automated driver assistance systems operate independently, leading to ineffective interventions in fully automatic vehicle operations, as they are designed for manual driving and lack accurate prognosis data for future vehicle guidance measures.

Innovation Solution

A standardized data interface is introduced to transmit prognosis data from a driver assistance system or independent prognosis module to the safety system, allowing for accurate prediction of future vehicle guidance measures and degree of automation, enabling early and appropriate interventions in fully automatic operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a standardized data interface is introduced to transmit prognosis data from driver assistance system to safety system, then the safety system can function effectively in fully automatic mode with accurate future vehicle guidance measures, but the device complexity increases due to additional interface and data transmission infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety system effectivenessVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized data interface is designed to serve multiple functions: it transmits prognosis data from the driver assistance system to the safety system, and also supports data exchange in both manual and fully automatic driving modes. This multi-functional interface reduces the need for separate communication channels for different operating modes, thereby limiting the increase in system complexity while achieving reliable safety system operation across all modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized data interface acts as an intermediary component that bridges the driver assistance system and the safety system. This mediator enables accurate transmission of prognosis data about future vehicle guidance measures, allowing the safety system to make informed decisions without requiring direct integration or complex point-to-point connections between systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If prognosis data transmission is implemented for early interventions, then accident risk is reduced through timely safety system responses, but the loss of time for data processing and transmission increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident riskVSAvoiddata transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The driver assistance system continuously generates and transmits prognosis data about future vehicle guidance measures before critical situations arise. By having this data available in advance through the standardized interface, the safety system can evaluate potential hazards and prepare intervention strategies without waiting for actual emergency conditions, thus reducing response time despite the added data transmission step.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The standardized data interface enables continuous feedback loops where prognosis data flows from the driver assistance system to the safety system, which then monitors and evaluates this data in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the safety system to maintain an up-to-date understanding of future vehicle guidance measures and intervene promptly when hazards are detected, minimizing the effective response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the safety system monitors driver activities in manual operation, then driver autonomy is maintained with late interventions, but the loss of information about accurate future vehicle guidance measures occurs in fully automatic mode

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation mode adaptabilityVSAvoidfuture vehicle guidance information
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The standardized data interface dynamically adapts to different operating modes. In manual driving mode, the safety system monitors driver activities and intervenes late to preserve driver autonomy. In fully automatic mode, the same interface provides the safety system with accurate prognosis data about future vehicle guidance measures from the driver assistance system, enabling the safety system to have the information it needs without requiring separate monitoring mechanisms for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3036144B1Method for operating a motor vehicle having a safety system and a fully automatic driver assistance system and motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.06.14 AUDI AG
  • EP3036144B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3036144B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Method for operating a motor vehicle (14) having a safety system (1) and a fully automatic driver assistance system (3) which is designed to operate the motor vehicle (14) completely automatically, wherein the safety system (1) is designed to perform an autonomous driver intervention when at least one intervention condition which evaluates the current driving situation, described by driving situation data which contain prediction data about the future vehicle control measures of the motor vehicle (14), is met, wherein in the case of fully automatic operation by the driver assistance system (3) and in the case of at least partial operation controlled by a driver the prediction data is determined by means of a prediction module (6) which is independent of the safety system (1) and is transmitted to the safety system (1) via a single data interface (2) which is used by the driver assistance system (3) and the prediction module (6).