Vehicle Sailing Control History Classification for Fuel Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing control methods for sailing and idle stop controls in vehicles face challenges in accurately assessing failure rates, leading to potential worsening of fuel efficiency due to diverse cancelation factors, including driver operations and system requirements, which are not accurately reflected when solely based on engine stop time.

Innovation Solution

A method is implemented where sailing control history is stored and classified based on specific situations of cancelation, including driver operations and system requirements, allowing for more accurate assessment and decision-making on whether to allow or disallow sailing control, using a controller that integrates navigation, communication, and sensor data to determine the current travel situation and corresponding history information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If sailing control is executed based solely on engine stop time assessment, then the control system is simple, but the accuracy of failure rate assessment declines due to diverse cancelation factors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidfailure rate assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the assessment of sailing control failure by classifying different cancelation factors into distinct categories (driver operations, system requirements, road status). Instead of using a single unified assessment metric based only on engine stop time, the system divides the evaluation into multiple dimensions, storing history information separately for each type of cancelation factor. This segmentation allows for more precise assessment of failure rates by considering the specific context in which sailing control was canceled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If history information is classified by cancelation situations, then the accuracy of failure assessment improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure rate assessment accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adds a new dimension to the history information storage by introducing classification based on cancelation factors. Instead of storing only the duration of engine stop as a single-dimensional metric, the system creates a multi-dimensional storage structure that includes the type of cancelation factor (driver operation, system requirement, road status). This dimensional expansion enables more accurate failure rate assessment while managing complexity through structured classification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification of cancelation factors before assessing failure rates. By pre-categorizing the reasons for sailing control cancellation into distinct types (driver operations, system requirements, road status), the system prepares the data in advance for more accurate analysis. This preliminary action allows the assessment to focus on relevant factors rather than processing all possible variations, thereby improving accuracy without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If sailing control is allowed without accurate history assessment, then the ease of operation is high, but fuel efficiency may worsen due to short engine stop duration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol execution simplicityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism that uses history information about previous sailing control outcomes to inform future control decisions. By storing and analyzing past performance data classified by cancelation factors, the system learns from previous experiences and adjusts its sailing control execution accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that sailing control is allowed only when historical data indicates a high probability of achieving sufficient engine stop duration, thereby preventing fuel efficiency deterioration while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11453396B2Vehicle control method and control device
Publication Date: 2022.09.27 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11453396B2 patent drawing
  • US11453396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle control method for controlling a vehicle in which a sailing control for traveling under inertia is executed when a vehicle is traveling. Each time the sailing control is executed, a history of sailing control is stored as history information classified according to situations in which sailing control was canceled. Also, a current travel situation is specified, history information corresponding to a current travel situation is specified from the stored history information, and whether to allow or disallow sailing control is determined based on the specified history information.