Vehicle Stability Control via Independent Front Rear Wheel Steering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle stability control systems rely on simplified rear wheel steering strategies that fail to effectively manage yaw rate, leading to inadequate vehicle stability, particularly when combined with front wheel steering.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a controller that synchronizes front wheel steering and rear wheel steering by calculating a target yaw rate and side slip angle, distributing the desired steering angle between the two axles to correct for yaw rate errors, thereby decoupling yaw control from side slip angle control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If simplified rear wheel steering strategies are used, then device complexity is reduced, but vehicle stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering control complexityVSAvoidvehicle stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments the steering control into independent front wheel steering and rear wheel steering channels. Each channel has its own control loop that independently manages steering angle, allowing complex stability control to be broken down into manageable segments that can be optimized separately while contributing to overall vehicle stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously measuring actual yaw rate and side slip angle, comparing them with target values, and adjusting steering angles accordingly. The controller receives real-time feedback from sensors and modifies steering commands to maintain desired stability characteristics, resolving the contradiction between control complexity and stability performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If front wheel steering and rear wheel steering are combined, then vehicle stability is improved, but control system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system separates front wheel steering and rear wheel steering into independent control channels, each with its own steering angle calculation and execution mechanism. This segmentation allows the complex combined steering control to be managed through modular, independent controllers that can be designed and tuned separately, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining stability benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system uses a universal controller that handles both front wheel steering and rear wheel steering functions through a single integrated architecture. The controller calculates target steering angles for both axles based on common inputs (yaw rate error, side slip angle) and coordinates their operation, providing multi-functionality that reduces complexity compared to separate independent control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If yaw rate control and side slip angle control are coupled, then control effectiveness is improved, but control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol effectivenessVSAvoidcontrol precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments yaw rate control and side slip angle control into independent control loops. Each loop independently calculates its target steering angle based on its specific error signal, allowing precise control of each parameter without interference from the other. This segmentation maintains control effectiveness while improving precision through independent optimization of each control path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that processes yaw rate error and side slip angle error separately through distinct calculation paths, then combines the results to determine final steering angles. This intermediary approach allows precise independent control of each parameter while maintaining their coordinated effectiveness through the unified steering system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240367716A1Vehicle, in particular motor vehicle, and method for controlling the stability of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.11.07 THYSSENKRUPP PRESTA AG
  • US20240367716A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367716A1 patent drawing
  • US20240367716A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A motor vehicle and method for operating the same comprises two front wheels with front wheel steering, two rear wheels with rear wheel steering, and a driving stability device with a controller. The driving stability device, in particular the controller, is designed to synchronize the front wheel steering and the rear wheel steering such that the front wheel steering and rear wheel steering are involved independently of one another in controlling the driving stability.