Vehicle Stabilization via Non-Gaseous Mass Ejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Armored vehicles face significant trauma and instability due to explosions, which can cause rapid upward acceleration and damage, especially when explosions occur underneath or beside them, leading to potential injury to occupants and structural damage.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle stabilization system that includes detectors to sense explosions, a control system to rapidly eject non-gaseous masses using exploding detonators or pressurized gas, and force channeling and distributing mechanisms to apply a groundwards force, stabilizing the vehicle and mitigating damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If armor is added to protect against explosions, then protection capability is improved, but vehicle weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidvehicle weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The stabilizing system is pre-installed on the vehicle with detonators, non-gaseous masses, and sensors in place before an explosion occurs. Upon detection of an explosion, the system immediately activates to eject masses and generate counter-forces, preventing the vehicle from being thrown without requiring heavy armor plating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If rapid ejection of non-gaseous mass is implemented, then vehicle stabilization speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization response speedVSAvoidstabilization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the explosion's own energy to trigger stabilization. Sensors detect the explosion and automatically activate detonators that eject non-gaseous masses, creating counter-forces without requiring external power sources or complex control systems. The system serves itself by using the harmful explosion energy to activate the stabilization mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the essential stabilization function from complex active protection systems. By using simple detonators to eject non-gaseous masses rather than complex rocket motors or hydraulic systems, the patent achieves rapid stabilization with minimal system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Stability of the object's composition

If force channeling means is added to direct force to the base, then stabilization effectiveness is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle stabilityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies counter-forces through the vehicle base that oppose the explosive force. By channeling the force from ejected masses through the base structure, the system creates stabilizing counterweights that prevent the vehicle from being thrown without requiring complex active control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces upward acceleration and stabilizes the vehicle, minimizing trauma to occupants and maintaining the vehicle's integrity by applying a controlled groundwards force in response to explosions, thereby preventing or limiting injury and maintaining the vehicle's operational condition.

Implementation Method 1

The vehicle stabilizing means may comprise at least one exploding detonator for causing at least one non-gaseous mass to be ejected. The at least one exploding detonator may comprise at least one explosive which is arranged to cause at least one other explosive, external to the at least one exploding detonator, to detonate in order to eject at least one non-gaseous mass.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Implementation Method 2

The vehicle stabilizing means may comprise at least one chamber containing pressurized gas. The at least one exploding detonator may be arranged to break at least one wall of the at least one chamber to eject at least one non-gaseous mass.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 3

The vehicle stabilizing means may comprise at least one chamber containing inflammable gas. The vehicle stabilizing means may be arranged to ignite the inflammable gas, in response to input from the control means, to eject at least one non-gaseous mass.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS9163911B2Vehicle stabilization in the event of large detonation
Publication Date: 2015.10.20 INTEGRIS SYSTEMS APS
  • US9163911B2 patent drawing
  • US9163911B2 patent drawing
  • US9163911B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle, apparatus, method and computer program are provided. The vehicle comprises: vehicle stabilizing means for ejecting at least one non-gaseous mass; means for detecting an explosion local to the vehicle; and control means for controlling, in response to detection of an explosion local to the vehicle, the vehicle stabilizing means to eject at least one non-gaseous mass in order to apply a force to the vehicle and stabilize the vehicle in response to the explosion.