Vehicle Start-Up Control Using Driver Presence and State Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle start-up systems struggle to accurately determine a driver's intention and vehicle control state, leading to unintended ignition or failure to turn off the engine when the driver is present.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that automatically control vehicle start-up based on a driver's intention and vehicle control state, utilizing modules to check operation conditions, determine control conditions, and transmit signals to the vehicle control unit (VCU) for precise ignition management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If automatic start-up control is implemented based on driver boarding/disembarkation detection, then convenience is improved, but unintended ignition or failure to turn off ignition may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic start-up control convenienceVSAvoidignition control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of driver boarding/disembarkation status before executing ignition control. By detecting seat occupancy and door opening/closing actions in advance, the system prepares for appropriate ignition control while verifying multiple conditions to prevent unintended ignition or failure to turn off ignition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors driver presence through seat sensors and door sensors, using this feedback to dynamically adjust ignition control decisions. The feedback mechanism ensures the system responds accurately to actual driver actions while preventing erroneous ignition control through multiple condition verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If simple boarding detection is used for automatic start-up, then device complexity is reduced, but control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoiddriver intention detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple simple detection functions (seat sensor, door sensor, gear position sensor) into a unified automatic start-up control system. By combining these basic sensors and logically integrating their signals, the system achieves precise driver intention detection without requiring complex individual sensing mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Existing vehicle sensors (seat sensors, door sensors, gear position sensors) are utilized for multiple purposes - their primary functions remain intact while they simultaneously contribute to automatic start-up control decisions. This multi-functional use improves detection precision without adding dedicated complex detection hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automatic start-up is enabled without conditional checks, then productivity is improved, but safety deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestart-up control efficiencyVSAvoidunintended ignition risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary safety checks including gear position verification (must be in P position), door closure confirmation, and seat occupancy detection before enabling automatic start-up. These preliminary actions ensure safety conditions are met before productivity-enhancing automatic control is activated, preventing unintended ignition risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors safety conditions (gear position, door status, seat occupancy) and uses this feedback to enable or disable automatic start-up functionality. When safety conditions are not met, the feedback mechanism prevents automatic ignition, eliminating harmful factors while maintaining productivity when conditions are appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260043384A1Method and device for automatically controlling vehicle start-up
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260043384A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043384A1 patent drawing
  • US20260043384A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a method and device for automatically controlling vehicle start-up based on a driver's intention and a vehicle's control state, the method for automatically controlling vehicle start-up may include checking setting of a vehicle start-up automatic control mode, when the vehicle start-up automatic control mode is activated, determining whether an operation condition of the vehicle start-up automatic control mode is satisfied, when the operation condition is satisfied, determining a first control condition for automatically starting the vehicle's start-up, and when the first control condition is satisfied, transmitting a first start-up control signal for automatically starting the vehicle's start-up to a vehicle control unit (VCU).