Vehicle Wing with Internal Ducts for Thrust Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle wings are heavy, complex, difficult to manufacture and maintain, and worsen aerodynamics and aesthetics due to external ducts and air intakes, while also being inefficient in airflow control and thrust generation.

Innovation Solution

A wing design with compact, aesthetically improved ducts integrated into supports, featuring a valve and actuator system for airflow control, and an electronic control system that adjusts operation based on vehicle parameters detected by sensors, optimizing aerodynamics and reducing weight and assembly risks through shell structures with internal ribs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If external ducts and air intakes are used to control airflow through the wing, then airflow control is achieved, but aerodynamics and aesthetics are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow controlVSAvoidaerodynamic deterioration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the air intake function with the existing front air intake of the vehicle, eliminating the need for separate external ducts. The wing's internal ducts connect directly to the vehicle's front air intake, integrating multiple functions into a single structure and improving aerodynamics while maintaining airflow control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the air intake function from the wing structure itself and relocates it to the vehicle's front air intake. This separation allows the wing to have a cleaner, more aerodynamic design while still achieving the required airflow control through its internal ducting system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If traditional wing structures with separate components are used, then airflow control is achieved, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairflow controlVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple components (ducts, valves, actuators, and support structures) into an integrated wing assembly. The internal ducts are formed as part of the wing's shell structure, and the valve-actuator assemblies are mounted directly on the support elements, reducing the number of separate parts and simplifying the overall structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The support elements serving the wing also function as mounting structures for the valve and actuator assemblies. The same support structures that hold the wing in place also provide mounting points for the airflow control mechanisms, eliminating the need for separate mounting structures and reducing overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If manual control systems are used for the wing, then simplicity is maintained, but real-time adjustment capability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidreal-time adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic control system where the valve positions are automatically adjusted in real-time based on vehicle operating conditions. The control unit receives input from sensors monitoring vehicle speed, throttle position, and brake status, and dynamically actuates the valve assemblies to optimize airflow and downforce according to current driving conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates a feedback control system where sensors continuously monitor vehicle parameters (speed, throttle position, brake status) and feed this information to the control unit. The control unit processes this feedback and automatically adjusts the valve positions to maintain optimal aerodynamic performance, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to changing conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The wing achieves improved aerodynamics, reduced weight and complexity, and enhanced airflow management, allowing for real-time automatic and manual control of downward thrust, thereby improving vehicle adherence and reducing manufacturing and maintenance challenges.

Implementation Method 1

a wing (1) for vehicles, in particular for sports cars, in particular for Formula 1 competitions, which can generate a downward thrust and increase their adherence to the ground

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic force: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 2

air pass through the slits to reduce the aerodynamic drag of the wing and its downward thrust

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag reduction: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3390210B1Wing for vehicles, process for its control and motor vehicle comprising this wing
Publication Date: 2021.06.23 AUTOMOBILI LAMBORGHINI SPA
  • EP3390210B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3390210B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3390210B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8

AI summary

Wing (1) comprising an upper surface (1a) predominantly concave upwards and a lower surface (1b) predominantly convex downwards, which wing (1) is provided with one or more supports (2, 3) to be fixed to a vehicle, in which the lower surface (1b) of the wing (1) is provided with one or more slits (4, 4', 5, 5') that connect with the outside one or more first ducts (6, 6', 7, 7') arranged in the wing (1), which are in turn connected to at least one second duct (9) arranged in at least one support (2, 3), wherein at least one valve (12) connected to at least one actuator (14, 14') is arranged along the second duct (9) or along a third duct (13, 13'; 16, 16') connected to this second duct (9). The present invention also relates to a process for controlling the operation of the wing and a motor vehicle comprising this wing.