Vertical Resistive Switching Array Filament Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for forming vertical arrays of resistive switching devices (RSDs) face challenges in scaling due to high resistivity of vertical electrodes caused by limited deposition area in 3D structures, which affects the tunability of top electrode volume and oxygen vacancy concentration.

Innovation Solution

The approach involves forming a vertical array of RSDs with a horizontal plate serving as the bottom electrode and a conductive pillar as the top electrode, where the metal oxide is fabricated as part of the horizontal electrode, allowing for a full interface and decoupling the metal oxide from the via volume, enabling tuning of various parameters for optimized performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If vertical arrays of RSDs are formed using conventional methods with metal oxide within the via volume, then the structure is simpler to fabricate, but the resistance is high and tunability of top electrode volume is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabrication simplicityVSAvoidresistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the metal oxide from the via volume, placing it within the horizontal electrode rather than the vertical via. This separation allows independent optimization of the conductive pillar (top electrode) volume and the metal oxide region, enabling reduced resistance through improved electrode contact while maintaining fabrication simplicity through standardized processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions the metal oxide from a vertical arrangement within the via to a horizontal arrangement within the electrode plate. This dimensional change allows the conductive pillar to extend fully into the metal oxide, maximizing the interface area and reducing resistance without increasing via complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Volume of stationary object

If the via volume is used for metal oxide, then the structure is compact, but the top electrode volume cannot be tuned independently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevia volume utilizationVSAvoidtunability of top electrode volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the metal oxide from the via volume and placing it in the horizontal electrode, the patent enables independent tuning of the conductive pillar volume within the via while maintaining compact overall structure. The metal oxide region size is determined by horizontal electrode dimensions, while the conductive pillar volume is controlled by via dimensions and fill material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves metal oxide to the horizontal dimension within the electrode plate, freeing the vertical via dimension for independent conductive pillar volume control. This allows tunability of top electrode volume through via geometry and fill material selection without compromising compact structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the metal oxide is decoupled from the via volume and placed in the horizontal electrode, then the resistance is reduced and tunability is improved, but the fabrication process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveresistanceVSAvoidfabrication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the metal oxide formation with the horizontal electrode fabrication process, forming metal oxide regions within the electrode plate in the same processing step or sequence as the electrode itself. This integration minimizes additional fabrication complexity while achieving reduced resistance through improved electrode-metal oxide interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for expanded ranges of RSD parameters, reducing resistance and enabling the formation of larger cell array structures without compromising resistive switching performance, thus addressing the limitations of prior art in scalability and tunability.

Implementation Method 1

A conductive pillar is positioned within the opening and is communicatively coupled to the filament region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentUS10991763B2Vertical array of resistive switching devices having restricted filament regions and tunable top electrode volume
Publication Date: 2021.04.27 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10991763B2 patent drawing
  • US10991763B2 patent drawing
  • US10991763B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the invention are directed to a vertical resistive device. A non-limiting example of the vertical resistive device includes a horizontal plate having a conductive electrode region and a filament region. An opening extends through the filament region and is defined by sidewalls of the filament such that the filament region is positioned outside of the opening. A conductive pillar is positioned within the opening and is communicatively coupled to the filament region.