Vessel Stabilizer Control Using Machine Learning for Resource Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vessel stabilization systems require manual adjustment by operators to select appropriate settings for different stabilizer systems based on sea and weather conditions, leading to inefficiencies in resource usage and crew comfort, especially when multiple systems are involved.

Innovation Solution

A vessel stability controller that learns optimal stabilizer settings through training based on operator inputs, resource usage, and environmental conditions, allowing it to autonomously adjust stabilizer system settings to conserve resources and enhance stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment of stabilizer settings is used, then operators can select appropriate settings based on experience, but resource usage efficiency deteriorates due to lack of optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual adjustment capabilityVSAvoidresource usage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system automatically monitors vessel motion parameters, sea conditions, and stabilizer performance to autonomously adjust stabilizer settings without requiring continuous manual intervention. The system learns from operational data and independently optimizes resource usage while maintaining stabilization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives feedback from motion sensors and environmental sensors about vessel stability and sea conditions, processes this information through machine learning algorithms, and automatically adjusts stabilizer settings in real-time to optimize both performance and resource consumption based on actual conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Stability of the object's composition

If multiple stabilizer systems are operated simultaneously, then vessel stability improves through combined effect, but resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel stabilityVSAvoidresource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates the actual stabilization need based on vessel motion and sea conditions, then activates only the necessary portion of available stabilizer systems. When full stabilization is not required, the system reduces or disables certain stabilizers to conserve resources while maintaining adequate stability through the remaining active systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically adjusts the operation of multiple stabilizer systems based on real-time conditions, transitioning between different combinations of active stabilizers as sea states and vessel response characteristics change, thereby optimizing the balance between stability performance and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If automated machine learning control is implemented, then resource optimization improves through intelligent adjustment, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource optimizationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions including motion sensing, environmental monitoring, machine learning processing, and stabilizer control into a single multi-functional platform. This universal controller handles various stabilizer types and coordination scenarios, reducing the need for separate specialized systems and managing complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Stability of the object's composition

If continuous monitoring and adjustment is performed, then vessel stability is maintained under varying conditions, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevessel stability maintenanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs monitoring and adjustment operations at optimized intervals rather than continuously, using predictive algorithms to determine when stabilization intervention is actually needed based on sea condition patterns and vessel response characteristics. This periodic action maintains stability while reducing unnecessary energy consumption from constant adjustment cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11492084B2Vessel stability control system using machine learning to optimize resource usage
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 BARTLETT MICHAEL HUGHES
  • US11492084B2 patent drawing
  • US11492084B2 patent drawing
  • US11492084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stability controller includes a machine learning engine that outputs stabilizer settings to several on-board stabilizer systems of a vessel based on various inputs. The machine learning engine is first trained based on human selections of stabilizer system settings, and then, once suitably trained, the stability controller can be used to optimize the use and operation of the stabilizer systems as conditions change, based on a quantity or stability quality that the vessel operator desires to optimize.