Vibration Actuator Contact Surface Structure for Stable Holding Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vibration actuators face challenges in maintaining a high holding force while minimizing performance variations due to manufacturing inconsistencies, particularly in structures with resin impregnated stainless sintered products or resin-filled grooves in metal bodies.

Innovation Solution

A vibration actuator design featuring a contact body with a hard material portion composed of thin plate portions and a resin portion in gaps between them, where the resin is exposed at the contact surface, allowing for controlled resin distribution and reduced manufacturing variations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a stainless sintered product impregnated with resin is used as the contact body, then the holding force is improved, but the manufacturing precision deteriorates due to difficulty in controlling resin distribution

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidresin distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes a sintered product with controlled porosity as the contact body. The porous structure allows resin to be impregnated into the void spaces, creating a composite material that combines the mechanical strength of the sintered metal with the friction properties of the resin. This approach enables the resin to be distributed throughout the contact body in a controlled manner, improving holding force while maintaining manufacturing precision through controlled impregnation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite contact body by combining a sintered metal product with resin material. The sintered product provides structural integrity and mechanical strength, while the resin fills the porous spaces to enhance friction characteristics and holding force. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by integrating two materials with complementary properties, achieving both high holding force and controlled resin distribution through the sintering and impregnation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Force

If resin is provided in grooves of a metal body, then the holding force is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional groove formation steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidcontact body structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the contact body into distinct functional zones: a sintered metal product with controlled porosity and resin-impregnated regions. The segmentation is achieved through the natural porous structure of the sintered material, which creates numerous small void spaces throughout the body rather than requiring large external grooves. This segmented internal structure allows resin to be distributed uniformly throughout the contact body, improving holding force while simplifying the overall geometry and reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a porous sintered metal product as the base structure, eliminating the need for additional groove formation. The porous network provides inherent pathways for resin impregnation, allowing the resin to distribute itself throughout the contact body during the impregnation process. This approach simplifies the contact body structure by using the material's internal porosity rather than adding external geometric features, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining enhanced holding force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

3Force

If the proportion of resin in the contact surface is increased, then the holding force is improved, but the manufacturing difficulty increases due to collapse during molding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding forceVSAvoidmolding stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a sintered metal product with controlled porosity as the foundation, which provides a rigid framework that prevents collapse during molding and resin impregnation. The porous structure allows for high resin content in the final composite without compromising structural integrity during manufacturing, because the sintered metal skeleton maintains shape stability. This approach enables increased resin proportion at the contact surface for higher holding force while avoiding the collapse issues associated with high-resin formulations in conventional molding processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure where a sintered metal product serves as the structural framework and resin is impregnated into the porous spaces. This composite approach allows for high resin content in the final product because the sintered metal provides mechanical support during manufacturing. The two materials work together synergistically: the metal framework prevents collapse during molding and handling, while the resin fills the pores to provide the desired friction and holding characteristics, enabling high resin proportion without manufacturing difficulty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design achieves a vibration actuator with a small variation in performance and a high holding force by stabilizing resin distribution, enhancing frictional stability and reducing wear-related issues.

Implementation Method 1

a vibrating body including an electrical energy-mechanical energy conversion element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical energy-mechanical energy conversion: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a vibrating body including an electrical energy-mechanical energy conversion element and an elastic body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

provides a frictional driving force from the vibrating body to the contact body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20250309792A1Vibration actuator, optical device, and electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.10.02 CANON KK
  • US20250309792A1 patent drawing
  • US20250309792A1 patent drawing
  • US20250309792A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vibration actuator includes a vibrating body including an electrical energy-mechanical energy conversion element and an elastic body and a contact body in contact with a surface of the elastic body via a contact surface, in which vibration of the vibrating body causes relative movement of the vibrating body with respect to the contact body. The contact body includes a hard material portion and a resin portion, the hard material portion and the resin portion are exposed to the contact surface, and the hard material portion includes a plurality of thin plate portions, and the resin portion is present at least in a gap between the thin plate portions.