Vibration-compensated optical system with reaction mass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lithography apparatuses face challenges in minimizing vibrations that cause image distortions and unsharpnesses, particularly in the 10 nm-technology node, due to external and internal forces affecting the positioning of optical elements, which existing solutions struggle to adequately compensate for.

Innovation Solution

A vibration-compensated optical system is designed with an optical element, a carrying element, and an actuator, where a first elastic element couples the optical element to the carrying element, and a reaction mass is supported by a second elastic element, with specific mass and stiffness ratios (m1m2=k1k2) to cancel out supporting forces during actuation, allowing for zero resulting force on the carrying element.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If a reaction mass is supported very softly on the carrying element to minimize transmitted forces, then the forces transmitted to the carrying element are reduced, but the natural frequency of the reaction mass becomes too low to provide effective vibration compensation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transmission to carrying elementVSAvoidnatural frequency of reaction mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the counterweight principle by introducing a reaction mass that generates opposing forces to cancel out the disturbing forces from optical element actuation. The reaction mass is actuated in opposition to the optical element's movement, creating force cancellation that protects the carrying element from vibration while maintaining a sufficiently high natural frequency through optimized mass ratio and stiffness parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

2Force

If the mass of the reaction mass is increased to improve force compensation, then the force cancellation effectiveness increases, but the space required and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce compensation effectivenessVSAvoidspace occupied by reaction mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs parameter optimization by establishing specific relationships between the mass of the optical element, the mass of the reaction mass, and the stiffness of the elastic elements. By tuning these parameters according to the formula m1/m2=k1/k2, the system achieves effective force compensation with a compact reaction mass, avoiding the need for oversized components while maintaining vibration suppression performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If very soft elastic elements are used to support the reaction mass, then force transmission to the carrying element is minimized, but the structural space required increases and manufacturing precision becomes more difficult to maintain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce transmission reductionVSAvoidelastic element fabrication and assembly
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the design approach by optimizing the stiffness parameter k2 of the second elastic element based on the mass ratio and force cancellation requirements. This parameter optimization allows the use of elastic elements with moderate stiffness rather than extremely soft elements, making the system easier to manufacture and assemble while maintaining effective vibration compensation through the coordinated mass-stiffness relationships.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively minimizes the forces transmitted to the carrying element, reducing the need for very soft elastic elements and saving space, while maintaining precise control over the optical element's position, thus enhancing the accuracy of the lithography process.

Implementation Method 1

a first elastic element (218), which couples, in particular directly, the optical element (216) to the carrying element (206)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a second elastic element (222), which couples, in particular directly, the reaction mass (220) to the carrying element (206)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

an actuator (224) for actuating the optical element (216) relative to the carrying element (206), wherein the actuator (224) couples the optical element (216) to the reaction mass (220)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS10095120B2Vibration-compensated optical system, lithography apparatus and method
Publication Date: 2018.10.09 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • US10095120B2 patent drawing
  • US10095120B2 patent drawing
  • US10095120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A vibration-compensated optical system for a lithography apparatus includes an optical element, a carrying element, an actuator for actuating the optical element relative to the carrying element, a first elastic element which directly couples the optical element to the carrying element, a reaction mass, and a second elastic element. The actuator couples the optical element to the reaction mass. The second elastic element directly couples the reaction mass to the carrying element. For a mass (m1) of the optical element, a stiffness (k1) of the first elastic element, a mass (m2) of the reaction mass and a stiffness (k2) of the second elastic element the following holds true:m1m2=k1k2.