VTOL Autonomous Landing Using 3D Scene Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for autonomously landing vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft require marked landing areas, prior knowledge, or human operators, which is inadequate for increasing VTOL usage in populated areas, necessitating a system for precision landing in unknown, unmarked, or unattended areas.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising sensors (LIDAR, cameras, ultrasonic, etc.) and processing resources to generate 3D models of scenes, identify potential landing areas, and generate maneuvering commands for safe landing, even in unknown environments, avoiding obstacles and considering wind information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing solutions for autonomous landing are used, then landing can be performed in marked areas with prior knowledge, but the system cannot land in unknown, unmarked, or unattended areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding area adaptabilityVSAvoidprior knowledge requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary scanning and mapping of the environment before landing to identify suitable landing areas. Sensors capture data about the surroundings, and the processor identifies potential landing zones in advance, allowing the aircraft to adapt to unknown areas without requiring pre-marked zones or prior knowledge of the specific location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The VTOL aircraft autonomously identifies and selects its own landing area using onboard sensors and processing resources. The system serves itself by independently analyzing environmental data, identifying suitable landing zones, and navigating to them without requiring external marking, prior knowledge databases, or human operator intervention for area selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If human operators are involved in the landing process, then landing safety can be monitored, but automation level is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding safetyVSAvoidautonomous landing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors environmental changes during the landing process using sensors that detect moving objects and update the 3D model in real-time. This feedback loop allows the autonomous system to adapt to dynamic conditions, ensuring safety without human intervention by automatically detecting and responding to changes in the landing environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human operator monitoring with an automated sensor-based detection and decision-making system. The onboard processors and sensors substitute for human senses and judgment, enabling fully autonomous landing while maintaining safety through continuous environmental monitoring and automated obstacle detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If 3D models are generated at high rate, then scene changes can be detected accurately, but processing resources and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescene change detection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system generates 3D models at varying rates depending on the phase of landing and detected environmental conditions. During critical phases or when significant changes are detected, the modeling rate increases to maintain precision. During stable phases, the rate decreases to conserve energy, achieving a balance between detection accuracy and energy consumption by applying partial high-rate modeling only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables autonomous precision landing of VTOL aircraft in unmarked or unattended areas, enhancing safety and automation in populated regions by continuously updating 3D models and adapting to scene changes, ensuring obstacle avoidance and optimal landing site selection.

Implementation Method 1

at least one of the first sensor or the second sensor is one of the following: a Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

obtain, from the first sensor, first readings enabling generating a Three-Dimensional (3D) model of at least part of a scene visible by the first sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

at least one of the first sensor or the second sensor is one of the following: a Light Detection And Ranging (LIDAR), a radar, a structured light sensor, a Time Of Flight (TOF) sensor, a stereoscopic camera, a camera, a Doppler sensor, an ultrasonic sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic detection: Ultrasound

Data Source

PatentUS11922819B2System and method for autonomously landing a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 WONDER ROBOTICS LTD
  • US11922819B2 patent drawing
  • US11922819B2 patent drawing
  • US11922819B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for autonomously landing a Vertical Take-Off and Landing (VTOL) aircraft, comprising: a first sensor; a second sensor; and a processing resource configured to: (a) obtain, from, the first sensor, first readings; (b) generate, at a first rate, based on at least part of the first readings, a 3D model of at least, part of a scene visible by the first sensor; (c) obtain, from the second sensor, a plurality of second readings, enabling identifying changes within the at least part of the scene; (d) analyze at least part of the second readings, at a second rate, to obtain changes information indicative of the changes; (e) identify, using the 3D model and the changes information, potential landing areas for the aircraft; (f) generate commands to maneuver the aircraft towards a selected landing area of the potential landing areas; and (g) repeat steps (a) to (f) until landing the aircraft.