Mechanical Wafer Debonding via Adhesive Edge Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current debonding methods for ultra-thin wafers face challenges such as excessive chemical immersion time, low productivity, and environmental concerns, particularly due to limitations in mechanical strength and viscosity during separation, which hinder efficient 3D packaging interconnection.

Innovation Solution

A mechanical debonding method and system that involves measuring the adhesive height, cutting the adhesive at the edge of temporary bonding wafers using a cutting apparatus, removing the carrier wafer, and cleaning the remaining adhesive, utilizing a thickness measurement apparatus, cutting apparatus, controlling apparatus, and removing apparatus to achieve efficient debonding without chemical immersion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If chemical immersion method is used for debonding, then the adhesive can be removed, but the processing time becomes excessive and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive removal effectivenessVSAvoiddebonding processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces chemical immersion methods with a mechanical cutting apparatus that uses a blade to physically cut and separate the adhesive layer between wafers. This mechanical approach eliminates the need for lengthy chemical immersion processes while maintaining effective adhesive removal, thereby significantly improving productivity without sacrificing debonding effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If chemical immersion method is used for debonding, then the adhesive can be removed, but the process becomes non-environmentally friendly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive removal effectivenessVSAvoidenvironmental impact
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes chemical-based adhesive removal with a purely mechanical cutting process. The cutting apparatus physically severs the adhesive bonds without introducing harmful chemicals into the environment, thereby eliminating the environmental pollution associated with chemical immersion methods while maintaining effective adhesive removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If laser treatment is used to decrease adhesive viscosity, then the adhesive can be separated, but the method is limited to glass carrier wafers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive separation capabilityVSAvoidapplicability to different carrier materials
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces laser treatment with a mechanical cutting apparatus that does not rely on optical absorption properties specific to glass. The cutting blade can physically cut through adhesive layers regardless of the carrier wafer material, enabling the method to be applied to silicon, glass, and other material combinations, thereby significantly improving adaptability while maintaining separation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If heat treatment is used for debonding, then the adhesive can be separated, but wafer warping occurs and heating budget must be considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive separation capabilityVSAvoidwafer warping
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal processing with a mechanical cutting method that operates at ambient temperatures. The cutting apparatus physically cuts the adhesive layer without applying heat, thereby eliminating wafer warping and the need to manage heating budgets, while maintaining effective adhesive separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Reliability

If ZoneBOND technology is used for debonding, then the adhesive can be separated, but long pre-brew time is required which reduces productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadhesive separation capabilityVSAvoidpre-brew time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the chemical pre-brew process with immediate mechanical cutting. The cutting apparatus can directly cut through the adhesive layer without requiring any pre-soaking or pre-brew time, thereby eliminating the time loss associated with ZoneBOND technology while maintaining effective adhesive separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9368376B2Mechanical debonding method and system
Publication Date: 2016.06.14 NAT CENT FOR ADVANCED PACKAGING CO LTD
  • US9368376B2 patent drawing
  • US9368376B2 patent drawing
  • US9368376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A mechanical debonding method and system are provided. A mechanical debonding method, used to debond temporary bonding wafers formed by bonding a device wafer and a carrier wafer by an adhesive, includes: obtaining the height position of the adhesive through a thickness measurement apparatus; moving a cutting apparatus to a position between the device wafer and the carrier wafer based on the height position of the adhesive, then removing the adhesive at the edge of the temporary bonding wafers by the cutting apparatus; removing the carrier wafer from the temporary bonding wafers; cleaning the adhesive left on the surface of the device wafer.