Silicon Wafer Defect Identification via Sequential Oxidation Haze

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods fail to efficiently and accurately differentiate between defect regions in silicon wafers, particularly O-band, vacancy dominant point defect (VDP), and interstitial dominant point defect (IDP) zones, leading to device failures and reduced wafer strength due to metal contamination and oxygen precipitation differences.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the formation of multiple oxide films on a silicon wafer using dry and wet oxidation processes, followed by etching to create haze patterns for visual identification of defect regions, allowing for scoring and differentiation between VDP and IDP zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If multiple oxide films are formed using dry and wet oxidation processes followed by etching to create haze patterns, then identification accuracy of defect regions is improved, but process complexity and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The identification process is segmented into three distinct oxidation stages (primary, secondary, tertiary oxide formation) with specific temperature ranges, allowing systematic differentiation of defect regions through controlled sequential processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple oxide films are formed in advance before etching, creating a prepared structure that enables subsequent haze pattern formation and defect region identification through a predetermined sequence of actions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If multiple oxide films are formed using dry and wet oxidation processes followed by etching to create haze patterns, then identification accuracy of defect regions is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The oxidation process continues through three sequential stages without interruption, with each stage building upon the previous one to progressively enhance defect region differentiation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

Temperature parameters are systematically changed across three oxidation stages (800-1000°C for primary, 1000-1100°C for secondary, 1100-1200°C for tertiary), enabling distinct oxide film formations that improve identification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If rapid and simple identification method is used, then productivity is improved, but measurement precision of defect regions may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification speedVSAvoiddefect region differentiation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Haze patterns with distinct visual characteristics are formed through the oxidation and etching process, enabling rapid visual identification and differentiation of defect regions without complex measurement equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Solution Approach 2:

The internal defect structure is copied onto the surface as visible haze patterns, allowing direct observation and identification of defect regions through surface examination rather than requiring complex internal analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables rapid and simple identification of defect regions, reducing device failures by accurately distinguishing between O-band, VDP, and IDP zones, thereby improving wafer quality and reducing manufacturing costs without the need for metal contamination devices.

Implementation Method 1

forming a primary oxide film on the sample wafer at a temperature of 800° C. to 1000° C., forming a secondary oxide film on the primary oxide film at a temperature of 1000° C. to 1100° C., forming a tertiary oxide film on the secondary oxide film at a temperature of 1100° C. to 1200° C.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

removing the primary to tertiary oxide films, etching one surface of the sample wafer, from which the primary to tertiary oxide films are removed, to form haze on the one surface of the sample wafer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEtching:

Data Source

PatentUS10634622B2Method of identifying defect regions in wafer
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 SK SILTRON CO LTD
  • US10634622B2 patent drawing
  • US10634622B2 patent drawing
  • US10634622B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of identifying a wafer defect region is disclosed. The method includes preparing a sample wafer, forming a primary oxide film on the sample wafer at a temperature of 800° C. to 1000° C., forming a secondary oxide film on the primary oxide film at a temperature of 1000° C. to 1100° C., forming a tertiary oxide film on the secondary oxide film at a temperature of 1100° C. to 1200° C., removing the primary to tertiary oxide films, etching one surface of the sample wafer from which the primary to tertiary oxide films are removed to form haze on one surface of the sample wafer, and identifying a defect region of the sample wafer based on the haze.