Wafer Edge Inspection via Area Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional substrate inspection methods fail to accurately detect macroscopic abnormalities in the peripheral portion of wafers, particularly during semiconductor device manufacturing, due to difficulties in controlling the peripheral edge area and poor pattern matching, leading to incorrect determination of film formation and coating quality.

Innovation Solution

A substrate inspection method that divides a predetermined area in the peripheral edge image into multiple areas and acquires feature amounts, such as average pixel values or standard deviations, to perform precise determination based on comparison with a reference image, enabling accurate detection of macroscopic abnormalities like large-scale coating failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional substrate inspection methods are used to inspect the peripheral portion of substrates, then the inspection process is simple, but the measurement precision is insufficient to accurately detect macroscopic abnormalities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy of macroscopic abnormalitiesVSAvoidinspection method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection image of the peripheral portion is divided into multiple divided areas, and feature amounts are acquired for each divided area independently. This segmentation enables precise detection of macroscopic abnormalities in specific regions without being affected by other areas, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and device complexity by applying complexity only where needed for accurate detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Manufacturing precision

If the peripheral edge area is controlled loosely to maintain ease of operation, then the operation is simpler, but the manufacturing precision of film formation and coating quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm formation and coating qualityVSAvoidperipheral edge control difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection method applies different analysis approaches to different regions: divided areas for macroscopic abnormality detection and specific positions for microscopic defect detection. This local quality approach enables precise control of manufacturing quality in critical areas while maintaining operational simplicity in less critical areas, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If pattern matching is used for inspection, then the inspection process is straightforward, but the reliability of determination is poor due to incorrect detection of coating unevenness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracy of coating qualityVSAvoidinspection method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection method segments the determination process into two independent stages: first determining macroscopic abnormalities in divided areas, then determining microscopic defects in specific positions. This segmentation eliminates the reliability issues of conventional pattern matching by preventing false detection of coating unevenness as defects, while maintaining reasonable method complexity through systematic organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using pattern matching to directly determine coating quality, the invention inverts the approach by first identifying macroscopic abnormalities and then checking for microscopic defects only in relevant areas. This inversion of the determination logic significantly improves reliability by eliminating false positives from coating unevenness, while the structured two-stage process keeps the method complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for accurate inspection of wafer peripheral edges, preventing false detection of coating unevenness and correctly identifying the formation state of resist films, thereby improving the yield and quality of semiconductor devices.

Implementation Method 1

the camera includes an imaging element to which light from the peripheral area of the front surface of the substrate held by the holding plate is input through a lens together with the reflected light obtained when the light from the end surface of the substrate held on the holding table is reflected from the reflection surface of the mirror member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS11268912B2Substrate inspection method and substrate inspection apparatus
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • US11268912B2 patent drawing
  • US11268912B2 patent drawing
  • US11268912B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A substrate inspection method includes: acquiring a feature amount of each of divided areas in an inspection target peripheral edge image, the inspection target peripheral edge image being an image of a peripheral portion of a target substrate as an inspection target, the divided areas being obtained by dividing a predetermined area in the image of the peripheral portion of the target substrate into a plurality of areas; and performing a predetermined determination concerning inspection of the peripheral portion of the target substrate based on an acquisition result in the acquiring the feature amount.