Wafer Rear Surface Grinding Method for Uniform Thickness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for grinding the rear surface of semiconductor wafers to form recessed portions are inefficient, leading to reduced yield and increased processing time due to difficulties in achieving uniform thickness and maintaining the original device formation area, especially with two-step grinding methods where finishing grinding often misses the outermost circumferential portions.

Innovation Solution

A two-step grinding method using an annular rotary grindstone with a larger grain size for rough grinding followed by a second grindstone with smaller grain size for finishing, ensuring the entire recessed portion is evenly machined, including the inner circumferential lateral surface and bottom surface, to maintain uniform thickness and prevent yield reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If finishing grinding is performed from the beginning with a high-mesh grindstone, then mechanical damage layer is suppressed and transverse rupture strength is maintained, but grinding performance deteriorates and processing time is prolonged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransverse rupture strengthVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The grinding process is divided into two distinct stages: rough grinding using a low-mesh grindstone (#320-#600) to remove material efficiently, followed by finishing grinding using a high-mesh grindstone (#2000 or more) to achieve precise thickness and smooth surface. This segmentation allows each stage to optimize for its specific function, preventing the deterioration of grinding performance while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Rough grinding is performed as a preliminary action before finishing grinding. The low-mesh grindstone pre-processes the wafer by removing the bulk material and forming the initial recessed portion, preparing the surface for the subsequent finishing grinding that ensures high precision and strength without the time penalty of using only high-mesh grindstone throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Force

If the outer circumferential side corner of the grindstone is removed or rounded, then grinding load is reduced, but the inner corner portion is ground in an R-shape and the outermost circumferential portion of the device formation area is not ground to target thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrinding loadVSAvoidthickness uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The grindstone is designed with non-uniform characteristics: the outer circumferential side corner is removed or rounded to reduce grinding load and prevent excessive material removal, while the inner corner portion maintains a sharp edge to ensure precise grinding of the recessed portion inner surface. This local differentiation of grindstone geometry allows simultaneous optimization of load distribution and grinding precision in different areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If a two-step grinding method is used with rough and finishing grinding, then processing time is reduced, but it is difficult to position the finishing grindstone at the inner circumferential lateral surface to conform to the shape and dimensions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidgrindstone positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The grindstone parameters are specifically optimized for the two-step process: the finishing grindstone has a grain size of #2000 or more and an outer diameter equal to or greater than the rough grindstone. These parameter changes enable the finishing grindstone to effectively position and conform to the inner circumferential lateral surface of the recessed portion, achieving precise thickness control despite the complexity of the two-step method.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach streamlines the rear surface grinding process, ensuring the device formation area remains intact and improving productivity by efficiently completing the grinding process without reducing the yield of semiconductor chips.

Implementation Method 1

an area of the rear surface corresponding to the device formation area is ground by an annular rotary type first grindstone or annularly arranged rotary type first grindstones to form a recessed portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 2

a bottom surface of the recessed portion and an inner circumferential lateral surface which constitute an inner surface of the recessed portion are ground by a second grindstone which is an annular rotary type grindstone or annularly arranged rotary type grindstones

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentUS7758402B2Wafer grinding method
Publication Date: 2010.07.20 DISCO CORP
  • US7758402B2 patent drawing
  • US7758402B2 patent drawing
  • US7758402B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A recessed portion is formed in an area, of a rear surface of a wafer, corresponding to a device formation area is formed by a rough grinding wheel of a rough grinding unit and an annular protruding portion is concurrently formed around the recessed portion. The inner circumferential lateral surface of the recessed portion is next ground by a finishing grinding wheel of a finishing grinding unit and the bottom surface is subsequently ground.