Warehouse Bin Layout to Cut Robot Reach and Raise Storage Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bin-to-person schemes in warehouse storage systems have low storage density and inefficiencies in order fulfillment, particularly in terms of energy consumption and component wear due to excessive telescopic component extension during container retrieval.

Innovation Solution

A container storage system with inventory frames having multiple levels and storage containers arranged along the depth direction of the boards, where the width direction of the containers matches the depth direction, allowing for reduced telescopic component extension and improved stability, enabling higher storage density and reduced energy consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If storage containers are arranged in the conventional direction (length direction of board), then the robot can easily access containers, but the storage density is low and telescopic components must extend excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidtelescopic component extension length
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent rotates the storage container 90 degrees so that containers are arranged along the depth direction of the board instead of the length direction. This dimensional change allows the robot to access containers with minimal telescopic extension, reducing the extension length from what would be required in the conventional arrangement to just the width of the container plus small clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an asymmetric arrangement where the container width direction aligns with the board depth direction, rather than the symmetric conventional arrangement where container length aligns with board length. This asymmetric orientation optimizes both storage density and robot access efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Ease of operation

If telescopic components extend longer to reach containers, then containers can be accessed from any position, but energy consumption increases and component wear accelerates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer accessibilityVSAvoidrobot energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By reorienting containers along the board depth direction, the patent enables the robot to access all containers with minimal telescopic extension regardless of position, dramatically reducing energy consumption while maintaining full accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the spatial parameter of container orientation from conventional (length parallel to board length) to optimized (width parallel to board depth), which reduces the telescopic extension distance and thereby reduces energy consumption and component wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If telescopic components extend longer to reach containers, then all containers are accessible, but component wear increases and service life decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer retrieval capabilityVSAvoidrobot service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reorients container placement along the board depth direction, allowing the robot to retrieve any container with minimal telescopic extension, thereby maintaining full adaptability while significantly reducing mechanical wear and extending service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional container arrangement is used, then the system is simple to implement, but storage density is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem implementation simplicityVSAvoidstorage density
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a simple 90-degree rotation of container orientation relative to the board, changing the arrangement from length-direction to depth-direction alignment. This straightforward dimensional change significantly increases storage density without complicating the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS12540035B2Container storage system, warehousing system and robot
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 BEIJING GEEKPLUS TECH CO LTD
  • US12540035B2 patent drawing
  • US12540035B2 patent drawing
  • US12540035B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a container storage system, a warehousing system, a robot control method, and a robot; the container storage system comprises an inventory area, a control server, a robot, and a plurality of workstations; the control server communicates with the robot wirelessly; an inventory rack is placed in the inventory area; the inventory rack comprises at least one layer of layered panels; the at least one layer of layered panels divides the inventory rack into at least two layers; at least two storage containers are placed on the inventory rack in the direction of the depth of the layered panels, and the direction of width of the storage container on the inventory rack is consistent with the direction of the depth of the layered panels. The system increases the storage density of storage containers in the inventory area, and reduces the energy consumption of the robot picking the storage containers.