Automatic Welding Instruction Generation From Tracked Tool Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional welding systems lack efficient methods for automatically generating welding instructions, leading to potential errors and resource inefficiencies, especially for less experienced operators.

Innovation Solution

A welding system that tracks the position and orientation of operators and welding tools to automatically generate welding instructions based on welding technique parameters, using sensors and processing circuitry to provide visual, haptic, or audio guidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual welding instruction generation is used, then flexibility and customization are maintained, but time consumption and resource requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction generation efficiencyVSAvoidtime for manual instruction generation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures and records actual welding operations performed by operators, creating digital copies of these operations as instructional content. This eliminates the need for manual instruction creation by automatically documenting real welding processes, thereby significantly improving instruction generation efficiency while reducing time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The welding system automatically generates its own instructional content by monitoring and recording its own operations. The system captures welding parameters, tool positions, and process data, then autonomously converts this data into structured welding instructions, eliminating the need for external manual authoring and reducing resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual welding instruction generation is used, then instruction accuracy can be controlled, but resource inefficiencies and potential errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction accuracyVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor welding operations and automatically adjust instructional content based on actual process data. This closed-loop approach ensures instruction accuracy by validating against real-world performance while improving resource efficiency through automated data utilization rather than manual verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical processes of instruction authoring and verification with automated digital processes. Sensors, processors, and software algorithms substitute for human operators in capturing, analyzing, and generating instructions, thereby reducing resource inefficiencies and minimizing human error while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated welding instruction generation is implemented, then time and resources are saved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstruction generation speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multi-functional components that perform multiple operations simultaneously. For example, sensors capture both welding parameters and positional data, processors analyze multiple data streams concurrently, and the generation module creates various instruction formats from a single data source. This universality improves generation speed while minimizing the number of separate components needed, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If automated tracking and monitoring is added to generate instructions, then instruction quality improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewelding parameter measurement accuracyVSAvoidtracking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges tracking, monitoring, and instruction generation functions into an integrated automated system. Multiple sensors and detection devices are combined to simultaneously capture welding parameters, tool positions, and operational data. This consolidation improves measurement precision through coordinated multi-sensor data collection while reducing device complexity by eliminating the need for separate manual tracking and monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12530984B2Welding systems with automatic welding instruction generation
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US12530984B2 patent drawing
  • US12530984B2 patent drawing
  • US12530984B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some examples, weld monitoring systems may use position tracking systems to track the positions, orientations, and/or movements of an (e.g., expert) operator performing a welding-type operation using a welding-type tool 106. An instruction generation process may then be used to automatically generate welding instructions based on the tracked positions, orientations, and/or movements. The welding instructions may be associated with a particular job, part, and/or welding position, and thereafter used to help guide future operators through similar welding-type operations when the future (e.g., less experienced operator) is working on a similar job/part and/or at a similar welding position.