Wheel Quenching Sequence for Residual Stress Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wheel quenching technologies do not effectively achieve a favorable residual stress distribution, leading to potential distortion and reduced service life.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for quenching a wheel component, where the quenching sequence prioritizes the spokes before the hub portion, resulting in greater tensile residual stresses in the outer rim flange compared to the inner rim flange, and compressive residual stresses in the spokes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional quenching methods are used with simultaneous cooling of all wheel regions, then the quenching process is simple and fast, but the residual stress distribution is unfavorable leading to distortion and reduced service life

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice lifeVSAvoidquenching process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The quenching device segments the wheel into multiple cooling zones (hub region, spoke regions, rim regions) with independently controllable cooling units. Each zone can be cooled at different rates and times, enabling precise control over residual stress distribution throughout the wheel structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The quenching process applies preliminary differential cooling to specific regions before final uniform cooling. The hub and spoke regions are cooled first to establish favorable residual stress patterns, followed by rim cooling, ensuring the wheel achieves optimal stress distribution before completion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If rapid uniform quenching is applied to all wheel regions simultaneously, then the quenching time is short, but the resulting residual stresses cause wheel distortion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequenching speedVSAvoidwheel distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The quenching process uses periodic action by applying cooling in distinct phases: first cooling the hub and spoke regions, then cooling the rim regions. This staged approach allows each region to cool at optimal rates, preventing distortion while maintaining overall process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The cooling system dynamically adjusts cooling rates for different wheel regions based on their specific geometric and material characteristics. The control unit varies cooling intensity and timing for each zone, optimizing both speed and dimensional stability throughout the quenching process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Strength

If the hub region is cooled at the same rate as the rim regions, then the cooling process is uniform and simple, but the hub develops insufficient hardness due to its greater wall thickness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehub hardnessVSAvoiddifferential cooling control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The quenching device applies local quality by providing the hub region with intensified and prolonged cooling compared to rim regions. The cooling units positioned near the hub deliver higher cooling rates to this thick-walled area, ensuring adequate hardness development while rim regions receive appropriate cooling for their thinner geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes cooling parameters (rate, duration, intensity) based on the local geometry of different wheel regions. The hub region receives cooling parameters optimized for thick sections, while rim regions receive parameters suited for thin sections, achieving uniform hardness distribution throughout the wheel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The approach results in low distortion, high strength, and a long service life for the wheel, with a favorable residual stress distribution that enhances mechanical properties.

Implementation Method 1

a method and apparatus for quenching a wheel component, where the quenching sequence prioritizes the spokes before the hub portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuenching: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 2

produce a favorable residual stress distribution is in the component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRapid cooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS12275274B2Quenching a wheel comprising a hub
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 MUBEA PERFORMANCE WHEELS GMBH
  • US12275274B2 patent drawing
  • US12275274B2 patent drawing
  • US12275274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a component in the form of a wheel comprising: a hub portion, a rim portion with an outer rim flange and an inner rim flange, a plurality of circumferentially distributed spokes extending between the hub portion and the rim portion, wherein the spokes and the hub portion are arranged offset with respect to a wheel center plane towards the outer rim flange and have an inner side facing the wheel center plane and an outer side directed away from the wheel center plane, wherein the outer rim flange has greater tensile residual stresses at least in a partial region than at least a partial region of the inner rim flange.