Autonomous Window Robot Drive Layout With Vacuum Hazard Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous planar surface cleaning robots are not cost-effective, lightweight, or easy to use for household purposes, and lack a feedback control mechanism to safely navigate and avoid dangerous conditions while cleaning vertical surfaces.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a driving mechanism with independently controllable transmission components and a vacuum system that uses negative air pressure for attachment to surfaces, along with a feedback control mechanism to maintain suction and avoid hazards by adjusting direction based on vacuum pressure changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional window cleaning methods are used, then cleaning can be performed, but it is troublesome and dangerous for high buildings

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidconvenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning robot is equipped with autonomous navigation capabilities, sensors, and control systems that enable it to clean windows independently without human intervention. The robot can autonomously move across the window surface, detect edges and hazards, adjust its position, and complete cleaning tasks without requiring operators to manually handle dangerous high-building window cleaning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If autonomous cleaning robots are used for high buildings, then safety is improved, but cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The autonomous cleaning robot is divided into functional modules including a cleaning mechanism module, navigation module, control module, and power supply module. Each module performs a specific function and can be independently optimized or replaced. This modular architecture reduces overall system complexity by allowing separate development and testing of individual components while maintaining safe autonomous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If autonomous cleaning robots are used for high buildings, then safety is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The cleaning robot is designed with multi-functional capabilities that allow it to perform various window cleaning tasks using a single integrated platform. The robot can adapt to different window sizes and configurations, perform both cleaning and hazard detection functions, and serve multiple building types. This universality reduces manufacturing costs by eliminating the need for multiple specialized devices for different cleaning scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If feedback control mechanism is added, then safety and hazard avoidance are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard avoidance capabilityVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot incorporates sensors that continuously monitor vacuum pressure, edge proximity, and surface conditions, feeding this information back to the control system. When hazards or dangerous conditions are detected through vacuum pressure changes or sensor inputs, the control system automatically adjusts the robot's direction and movement to avoid these conditions. This feedback mechanism enables safe autonomous operation while maintaining manageable control complexity through automated decision-making algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables a lightweight, cost-effective, and user-friendly autonomous cleaning robot that can safely navigate and clean vertical surfaces like windows, maintaining suction and avoiding dangerous situations effectively.

Implementation Method 1

autonomous cleaning robots that suction to vertical planar surfaces such as a window pane using negative air pressure, e.g., vacuum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative air pressure: Vacuum

Data Source

PatentUS10258215B2Autonomous planar surface cleaning robot
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 ECOVACS ROBOTICS INC
  • US10258215B2 patent drawing
  • US10258215B2 patent drawing
  • US10258215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving mechanism for an autonomous planar surface cleaning robot is disclosed. The driving mechanism includes a first transmission component and a second transmission component spaced apart in parallel relationship relative to the first transmission component. Each of the first and second transmission components defines first and second ends and first and second sides, wherein the first sides face each other and the second sides face away from each other in a direction transverse from the direction of motion and the first and second ends are oppositely spaced along the direction of motion. Each of the first and second transmission components are independently controllable by a control unit of the autonomous planar surface cleaning robot.