Workflow Management System with Real-Time Stage Dependency Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional workflows do not effectively communicate how changes in one step affect other steps, leading to user frustration and inefficiency as users struggle to manage complex multi-stage workflows.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that manages multi-stage workflows by displaying completion status updates of affected stages via a GUI, allowing users to understand and address changes across stages, including adding or removing stages based on user input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional workflows are used to manage multi-stage processes, then users can complete sequential stages, but users cannot understand the impact of actions in one stage on other stages, leading to time waste and frustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow impact informationVSAvoidtime to complete workflow
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback by monitoring user actions in one stage and automatically updating the completion status of affected stages. When a user completes an action in stage A, the system detects dependencies and automatically marks stage B as incomplete if it is affected, providing continuous information feedback about workflow impact without requiring user investigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of workflow dependencies before user actions are taken. By pre-establishing the relationship map between stages and pre-configuring dependency rules, the system can immediately determine and communicate the impact of any user action on other stages, eliminating the need for users to manually trace through workflow dependencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If users manually track workflow stage dependencies, then they can understand impact on other stages, but the workflow management becomes complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow management easeVSAvoidworkflow tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The workflow management system performs self-service by automatically tracking and updating stage completion statuses based on pre-configured dependency relationships. The system monitors user actions, determines affected stages through automated dependency analysis, and updates the workflow state without requiring user intervention or manual tracking, thereby simplifying user operations while maintaining comprehensive workflow visibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of information

If the system provides detailed visual feedback on all workflow stages, then users understand the impact of their actions, but the graphical user interface becomes cluttered and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkflow status informationVSAvoidGUI complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by providing differentiated visual feedback based on the specific needs of each workflow stage and user context. Rather than uniformly displaying all possible information, the system selectively highlights only the stages that are actually affected by user actions, using visual indicators such as color changes or icons to draw attention to relevant updates while keeping the overall interface clean and uncluttered.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8732568B1Systems and methods for managing workflows
Publication Date: 2014.05.20 COHESITY INC
  • US8732568B1 patent drawing
  • US8732568B1 patent drawing
  • US8732568B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing a multi-stage workflow may include: 1) displaying representations of the plurality of stages of the multi-stage workflow to the user via a graphical user interface, each representation of a workflow stage from the plurality of stages indicating a completion status of the workflow stage; 2) receiving, at a first stage in the multi-stage workflow, input from the user; 3) determining that the input from the user at the first stage affects a second stage in the multi-stage workflow; 4) in response to determining that the input from the user affects the second stage, changing a completion status of the second stage to an updated completion status; and 5) in response to changing the completion status of the second stage, modifying a representation of the second stage such that the representation of the second stage indicates to the user the updated completing status of the second stage.