Double-Sided Processing Machine Working Gap Configuration
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing double-sided processing machines require extensive time and material to configure optimal working gap geometries for plane-parallel processing of flat workpieces, due to production tolerances and varying geometries of components, leading to inefficiencies and a high number of rejects.
Innovation Solution
A method involving a control apparatus that step-by-step or continuously deforms the first working disk between concave and convex shapes, measures the working gap width at multiple radially spaced locations, determines measurement value averages, and specifies a target value for deformation to achieve optimal processing conditions, allowing for partial automation and reduced iterative processing.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If iterative experimental processing is used to determine optimal working gap geometry, then processing precision can be improved, but time consumption and material waste increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing a preliminary measurement of the actual working gap geometry before processing. This initial measurement data is used to calculate optimal deformation values in advance, avoiding the need for iterative experimental adjustments during actual processing. The system determines the required deformation of working disks based on pre-measured gap variations, thereby eliminating time-consuming trial-and-error configuration cycles.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback by continuously measuring the working gap width at multiple locations and using this measurement data to adjust and optimize the deformation values of working disks. The control apparatus receives real-time feedback from measurement devices and automatically calculates the optimal deformation state, creating a closed-loop system that eliminates manual iterative experimentation and significantly reduces configuration time while maintaining high precision.
2Manufacturing precision
If iterative experimental processing is used to determine optimal working gap geometry, then processing precision can be improved, but material waste increases due to rejected workpieces
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by performing a preliminary measurement of the actual working gap geometry before processing. This initial measurement data is used to calculate optimal deformation values in advance, avoiding the need for iterative experimental adjustments during actual processing. The system determines the required deformation of working disks based on pre-measured gap variations, thereby eliminating time-consuming trial-and-error configuration cycles.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback by continuously measuring the working gap width at multiple locations and using this measurement data to adjust and optimize the deformation values of working disks. The control apparatus receives real-time feedback from measurement devices and automatically calculates the optimal deformation state, creating a closed-loop system that eliminates manual iterative experimentation and significantly reduces configuration time while maintaining high precision.
3Adaptability or versatility
If manual configuration methods are used to determine processing parameters, then adaptability to specific machine variations can be achieved, but device complexity and operational difficulty increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies self-service by enabling the processing machine to automatically determine its own optimal configuration parameters. The control apparatus autonomously measures the working gap geometry, calculates the required deformation values, and adjusts the working disks without human intervention. This self-configuring capability eliminates the need for operators to manually adjust parameters for each machine variation, thereby maintaining adaptability while dramatically simplifying operation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment operations with an automated control system that uses measurement data and computational algorithms to determine optimal configuration. The control apparatus substitutes human operators in the configuration process, using electronic measurement and calculation to replace manual trial-and-error adjustment, thereby reducing operational complexity while maintaining machine-specific adaptability.
Data Source
AI summary
A double- or single-sided processing machine and a method for configuring a double- or single-sided processing machine are described. A first working disk and a counter-bearing element are driven rotationally relative to each other. A working gap for processing of flat workpieces is formed between the first working disk and the counter-bearing element. A control apparatus actuates step-by-step or continuous deformation of the first working disk between a concave shape and a convex shape. During the deformation, the working gap width at two or more radially spaced apart locations of the first working disk is measured. The control apparatus determines measurement value averages from the measurement values. The control apparatus determines the minimum of the measurement value averages and, using the determined minimum, specifies a target value for deforming the first working disk as a starting value for the processing of a flat workpiece.