Motorized Wrist Support for Surgical Tool Constraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robot-assisted tool use systems lack precision and control, especially in small-scale operations, and often fail to effectively constrain tool movements to avoid damaging surrounding tissues during surgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method utilizing motors, a wrist support, and a shaft to couple with tools, which receives position and constraint data to control the tool's movement, allowing for precise finger movements while maintaining the tool within a safe working region, using either active or mechanical constraints to prevent damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If robot-assisted tool use is implemented for precision work, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool positioning precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A wrist support device acts as an intermediary between the user's hand and the tool, providing motorized control and constraint enforcement without requiring complex robotic arms. The wrist support serves as a mediator that translates user intent into precise tool movements while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the user's own hand and wrist as part of the control interface, leveraging natural human dexterity while adding motorized assistance. The back-driveable motors allow the user to directly manipulate the tool with finger movements while the system provides precision control and constraint enforcement automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-affected harmful factors

If active constraints are applied to limit tool region, then object-affected harmful factors are reduced, but ease of operation decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue damage riskVSAvoidtool manipulation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint system is dynamic rather than static, allowing the tool to move freely within the defined safe region and only applying forces when the tool attempts to enter restricted areas. The back-driveable motors provide adaptive resistance that engages only when needed, maintaining ease of operation during normal use while preventing harmful movements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors tool position and actively adjusts motor forces to enforce constraints. Position data from encoders feeds back to the control system, which calculates appropriate constraint forces and applies them through the motors, creating a closed-loop system that prevents tissue damage while maintaining natural operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If back-driveable motors are used for user control, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control capabilityVSAvoidforce control reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical force control mechanisms with electronic control of back-driveable motors. Instead of using intricate mechanical brakes or clutches to control motor behavior, the system uses electronic torque control to achieve reliable force application while maintaining back-driveability for natural user interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables precise and safe robotically assisted tool use at a small scale, allowing for fine control and preventing tool interaction with restricted areas, thereby reducing tissue damage during operations.

Implementation Method 1

The robot can then guide the surgeon, for example by applying active constraints (a 'virtual wall') that limit the region where a tool attached to the robot can be used

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectActive constraints:

Implementation Method 2

Fine and precise finger movements are further facilitated by resting the wrist in a fixed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical support:

Data Source

PatentUS11786335B2Apparatus and method for assisting tool use
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 SIGNATURE ROBOT LTD
  • US11786335B2 patent drawing
  • US11786335B2 patent drawing
  • US11786335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and related methods for assisting tool use includes one or more motors, a wrist support and a shaft coupled to the one or more motors. The shaft includes a coupling to couple to a tool to enable a user resting a hand with the wrist on the wrist support to hold and manipulate the tool with one or more fingers. The apparatus can include a controller configured to: receive position data indicative of a position of an active end of the tool; receive constraint data indicative of one or more regions of space in which the active end should not be positioned; and process the position and constraint data to control the one or more motors to bias the active end out of a region indicated by the constraint data when a position indicated by the position data is within the region indicated by the constraint data.