WW Domain Mutants Using Dynamics Analysis for Peptide Binding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to understand the relationship between protein sequence-structure and protein binding dynamics, particularly in modulating the binding affinity of WW domains, as evolutionary designed sequences often fail to fold correctly and bind effectively to peptides.

Innovation Solution

A method combining structural and dynamic analysis is employed to identify critical residues and hinge-shift mechanisms in WW domains, using computational tools like Adaptive BP-Dock and DFI analysis to design protein variants that enhance binding affinity by altering flexibility profiles and introducing specific mutations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If evolutionary designed sequences are used to create WW domains, then the protein sequence can be generated, but the proteins fail to fold correctly and bind effectively to peptides

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding affinityVSAvoidfolding correctness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by systematically varying amino acid sequences at specific positions in WW domain designs. By changing sequence parameters and analyzing their effects on folding and binding, the researchers identified critical residues and sequence features that enable both correct folding and high binding affinity, resolving the contradiction between reliable binding and proper folding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback through iterative computational design and experimental validation cycles. Structural and dynamic analysis results feed back into refined protein design, allowing continuous improvement of both folding correctness and binding affinity. The feedback loop enables identification of hinge-shift mechanisms and optimization of flexibility profiles to achieve reliable binding

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If structural analysis alone is used to design protein variants, then the static structure can be optimized, but the binding dynamics and flexibility are not adequately addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural accuracyVSAvoidbinding dynamics
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by incorporating molecular dynamics simulations and flexibility analysis into the protein design process. By analyzing dynamic properties such as hinge movements and conformational changes, the researchers designed variants that maintain structural accuracy while achieving optimal binding dynamics and adaptability to peptide substrates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite analysis by combining multiple computational methods (structural analysis, dynamic simulations, flexibility profiles) to create a comprehensive design approach. This composite methodology integrates static and dynamic properties to produce protein variants with both high structural accuracy and optimal binding dynamics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If computational design methods are used to modify WW domains, then the binding affinity can be enhanced, but the complexity of the design process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebinding affinityVSAvoiddesign process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the WW domain into functional regions and analyzing specific residues independently. By segmenting the design process into modular steps (sequence selection, structural analysis, dynamic characterization), the complexity is managed while achieving enhanced binding affinity through systematic optimization of individual components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20260057959A1Engineering gain-of-function mutants of a WW domain by dynamics analysis
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US20260057959A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057959A1 patent drawing
  • US20260057959A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein are systems and methods for characterizing a protein variant including using a computer system to: access simulated protein structure data of the protein, in which the simulated protein structure data indicates a structure of the protein variant while unbound; simulate binding dynamics data indicating binding between the simulated protein structure data and a biological substrate of interest; quantify biophysical properties of the simulated protein structure data and binding dynamics data to produce structural analysis and dynamic analysis of the protein variant; relate the structural analysis and dynamic analysis to functional behaviors of the protein variant; generate a report based on the functional behaviors, structural analysis, and dynamic analysis of the protein variant.