Digital X-ray Detector Shock Absorbing Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional digital X-ray detectors are heavy, thick, and rigid, making them less portable and more susceptible to damage from physical impact, which limits their versatility and durability.

Innovation Solution

A digital X-ray detector assembly featuring a support panel with a rear and front shock absorbing structure, a reflected light absorption layer, and a shell assembly that surrounds the detector assembly, providing both mechanical protection and ergonomic improvements through lightweight, composite materials and shock-absorbing designs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional construction with heavy protective structures is used, then reliability is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection of fragile componentsVSAvoiddetector weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by incorporating shock-absorbing structures (foam layers, compliant mounts) between the detector array and the shell assembly. These structures are pre-positioned to absorb impact energy before it reaches the fragile detector components, thereby protecting them without requiring heavy protective enclosures. This resolves the contradiction by providing reliable protection through lightweight cushioning materials rather than massive protective structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining the detector array with shock-absorbing foam layers and compliant mounting structures. This creates a composite assembly where the fragile detector elements are integrated with energy-absorbing materials that protect them during impact. The composite structure provides both the necessary protection and weight reduction, resolving the contradiction between reliability and weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If rigid enclosure is used to protect components, then reliability is improved, but device thickness increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection from physical impactVSAvoiddetector thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces rigid protective enclosures with flexible shock-absorbing structures. The compliant mounts and foam layers act as flexible protective elements that can deform during impact to absorb energy, thereby protecting the detector array without requiring thick rigid walls. This resolves the contradiction by providing protection through flexibility and compliance rather than rigid thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The shock-absorbing structures are pre-positioned between the detector array and the shell assembly to cushion against impact before it reaches the components. This beforehand cushioning allows the use of thinner overall construction while maintaining protection, as the cushioning function is built into the layered structure rather than requiring additional thick protective barriers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If heavy protective structures are added, then reliability is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability against impactVSAvoidportability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flexible shock-absorbing structures that provide protection without the weight penalty of rigid protective enclosures. The compliant mounts and foam layers protect the detector array while keeping the overall device lightweight and easy to handle, thereby maintaining ease of operation while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

By incorporating shock-absorbing structures that are already in place before use, the patent provides durability without adding operational complexity or weight. The beforehand cushioning is integrated into the device structure, allowing portable operation while protecting against impact during transport and use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Manufacturing precision

If rigid attachment of components is used, then manufacturing precision is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent alignmentVSAvoidsusceptibility to damage from impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static rigid attachment to dynamic compliant mounting. The shock-absorbing structures allow the detector array to move slightly relative to the shell assembly during impact, absorbing the shock energy. This dynamic approach maintains manufacturing precision during normal operation while improving reliability during impact events by allowing controlled movement rather than rigid constraint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite mounting system that combines rigid support structures for precision alignment with compliant shock-absorbing materials for impact protection. This composite approach allows the detector array to be precisely positioned during manufacturing while being protected from impact damage through the integrated compliant structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in a lightweight, mechanically stiff, and rugged digital X-ray detector that is easier to handle and maintain, with improved energy absorption capabilities and reduced risk of damage from external impacts, enhancing its portability and usability.

Implementation Method 1

a reflected light absorption layer disposed between the detector array and the support panel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

a rear shock absorbing structure secured to a rear side of the support panel, and a front shock absorbing structure secured to a front side of the detector array

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS8269182B2Digital X-ray detector assembly
Publication Date: 2012.09.18 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US8269182B2 patent drawing
  • US8269182B2 patent drawing
  • US8269182B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a digital X-ray detector is provided with a detector assembly that includes a support panel, a digital detector array with a rear side of the detector array being secured to a front side of the support panel, a backscattered X-ray and reflected light absorption layer disposed between the detector array and the support panel, a rear shock absorbing structure secured to a rear side of the support panel, and a front shock absorbing structure secured to a front side of the detector array. The digital X-ray detector further includes a shell assembly surrounding the detector assembly and secured to the rear shock absorbing structure. In another embodiment, a method is provided for assembling a digital X-ray detector.