X-Ray Test Sample Identification for Contaminant Inspection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing contaminant monitoring systems in food production lines face issues with test samples being masked by food products, relying on line-of-sight barcode reading, and failing to detect contaminants in food products due to incorrect system operation, with no assurance that only the correct test samples are used.

Innovation Solution

A test apparatus with X-ray-readable identification means, such as a metallic plate with apertures or recesses, securely housed to ensure detection and discrimination by X-rays, allowing for identification and property verification of the contaminant, without relying on line-of-sight reading.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a large number of inspection objects are inspected in a short period, then productivity is improved, but the inspection apparatus becomes congested and inspection quality deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidinspection quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The inspection apparatus is divided into multiple independent inspection units (first inspection unit, second inspection unit, etc.), each capable of inspecting objects separately. This segmentation allows parallel processing of multiple objects simultaneously, increasing throughput while maintaining individual inspection quality through dedicated inspection resources for each unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from sequential inspection (single object at a time) to parallel inspection across multiple spatial dimensions (multiple inspection units operating simultaneously). This dimensional expansion enables the apparatus to handle multiple objects in parallel, resolving the contradiction between throughput and inspection quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple inspection objects are inspected simultaneously, then productivity is improved, but the apparatus structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection throughputVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each inspection unit is designed as a universal module that can inspect various types of objects. The inspection units share common components such as the stage movement mechanism and control system, allowing them to perform multiple functions. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity compared to having dedicated specialized equipment for each inspection type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection units are arranged in a nested or modular configuration where smaller inspection modules can be integrated within a larger framework. The stage can hold multiple inspection units in a compact arrangement, allowing the system to scale flexibility without proportionally increasing spatial footprint or structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Measurement precision

If the inspection apparatus is designed for high precision, then measurement precision is improved, but the inspection speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection qualityVSAvoidinspection speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the inspection function into multiple parallel units, each unit can operate at high precision without compromising overall inspection speed. The segmentation allows each inspection unit to maintain adequate inspection time for high-quality measurement while the collective system achieves high throughput through parallel processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple inspection units enable continuous inspection operation without idle time between inspections. While one unit is inspecting an object, other units can simultaneously inspect different objects, creating continuous useful action that maintains both high precision (through dedicated inspection time) and high speed (through uninterrupted operation).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures accurate detection and verification of test samples, preventing their unnoticed passage through monitoring systems, and ensuring correct operation of contaminant monitoring apparatus by using X-ray scanning to distinguish between contaminant and identification means.

Implementation Method 1

an x-ray tube for irradiating the object with x-rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray generation: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentEP3631426B1Test apparatus for x-ray inspection
Publication Date: 2026.04.29 CHEYNEY DESIGN & DEV
  • EP3631426B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3631426B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A test apparatus (1), for challenging contaminant monitoring apparatus, the test apparatus (1) comprising: contaminant means (3), having a pre-selected property comprising any one or more of the group comprising composition, material, mass, size and/or shape of a contaminant; and identification means (4), for identifying the presence of the contaminant means (3) and/or for identifying the identity of the test apparatus (1); wherein the contaminant means (3) and the identification means (4) are detectable and/or discriminateable by X-rays.