Flower arrangement networking degree evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Abstract

This application discloses a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating the degree of interleaved networking. The method includes: acquiring basic cell information, neighbor cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships of each cell within a target area; constructing a cell relationship hypergraph model of the target area based on the basic cell information, neighbor cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships; wherein, in the cell relationship hypergraph model, each cell in the target area is a node, and neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships are hyperedges; determining an interleaved networking degree index of the target area under at least one preset business dimension based on the cell relationship hypergraph model; the interleaved networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension; and determining the evaluation result of the interleaved networking degree of the target area based on the interleaved networking degree index.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This application relates to the field of communications, specifically to a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking. Background Technology

[0002] With the large-scale deployment of 4G and 5G networks, network coverage has extended from urban areas to remote rural villages. However, during the construction of base stations and the filling of network gaps, due to multiple factors such as technological evolution, equipment R&D and procurement cycles, and capital investment, the current network commonly exhibits a phenomenon of interspersed network configurations using equipment from different manufacturers. This interspersed network configuration refers to the existence of neighboring cells or shared coverage relationships between base stations from different equipment manufacturers.

[0003] Inter-vendor network architecture can have a series of negative impacts on the network. These include inconsistent network performance, increased operational complexity, and the inability to effectively achieve load balancing and carrier aggregation between different vendors in such scenarios, thus affecting user experience and the evolution of new technologies.

[0004] Therefore, how to quantitatively assess the impact of cross-vendor network integration on the network has become a pressing technical problem in the field of communications, especially in the field of network optimization. Summary of the Invention

[0005] This application provides a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking, which is used to solve the technical problems existing in the background art.

[0006] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a method for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking, the method comprising:

[0007] Obtain basic information about each cell in the target area, neighboring cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships; the basic information about each cell includes at least the cell identifier, and also includes at least one of the following: the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the load balancing available frequency band combination preset by each manufacturer, or the carrier aggregation available frequency band combination preset by each manufacturer; Based on basic information about the cells, neighboring cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships, a cell relationship hypergraph model is constructed for the target area. In this model, each cell in the target area is a node, and neighboring cell relationships and shared coverage relationships are hyperedges. Based on the cell relationship hypergraph model, the interlacing degree index of the target area under at least one preset business dimension is determined; the interlacing degree index is used to characterize the proportion of the hyperedge between cells of different manufacturers in the hyperedge that meets the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension. Based on the flower arrangement network degree index, the evaluation results of the flower arrangement network degree in the target area are determined.

[0008] In some embodiments, the flower arrangement networking degree index includes a global flower arrangement networking degree index and / or a local flower arrangement networking degree index; Among them, the global interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension; the local interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the target cell within the target area in the hyperedges that the target cell participates in under the corresponding business dimension conditions.

[0009] In some embodiments, the preset service dimension includes the neighboring cell service dimension; Among them, when the interlacing degree index includes the global interlacing degree index, the global interlacing degree index includes the global neighbor cell interlacing degree index. The global neighbor cell interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of second superedges in the first superedge representing the neighbor cell relationship, where the cells at both ends of the first superedge are cells from different manufacturers, to the number of first superedges. When the interleaving degree index includes the local interleaving degree index, the local interleaving degree index includes the target cell interleaving degree index. The target cell interleaving degree index is the ratio of the number of fourth superedges corresponding to the other end node of the third superedge representing the neighbor relationship of the target cell to the number of the target cell that are different manufacturers' cells.

[0010] In some embodiments, the preset business dimension includes the load balancing business dimension; Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes the global load balancing interlacing degree index. The global load balancing interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of sixth superedges with different manufacturers' cell nodes in the fifth superedge, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of fifth superedges. Among them, when the interleaved networking degree index includes the local interleaved networking degree index, the local interleaved networking degree index includes the target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index. The target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index is the ratio of the number of eighth superedges in the superedges representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of seventh superedges.

[0011] In some embodiments, the preset service dimension includes the carrier aggregation service dimension; Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes the global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of tenth superedges with different manufacturers' cell nodes in the ninth superedge, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of ninth superedges. Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the local interlacing network degree index, the local interlacing network degree index includes the target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of cells with different manufacturers from the target cell in the eleventh superedge of the superedge representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of the eleventh superedge.

[0012] In some embodiments, the evaluation result of the degree of floral arrangement networking in a target area is determined based on the floral arrangement networking degree index, including: Obtain the mapping relationship between the flower arrangement network degree index and the flower arrangement network degree; Based on the flower arrangement network degree index and mapping relationship, the evaluation level of the flower arrangement network degree in the target area is determined; The mapping relationship is as follows: when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the first level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the second preset value but not greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the second level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the third preset value but not greater than the second preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the third level; and when the flower arrangement network degree index is not greater than the third preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the fourth level.

[0013] In some embodiments, the method provided by the first aspect further includes: The neighbor relationships and shared coverage relationships of each cell in the target area are verified using preset verification rules; The verification rules include at least one of the following rules: When there is a shared coverage relationship between the first and second cells, check whether there is a neighboring cell relationship between the first and second cells; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring cell relationship between the first and second cells. When there is a neighboring relationship between the third and fourth communities, check whether there is a neighboring relationship between the fourth and third communities; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring relationship between the fourth and third communities. When there is a shared coverage relationship between the fifth and sixth communities, check whether there is a shared coverage relationship between the sixth and fifth communities; if the check result is negative, then complete the shared coverage relationship between the sixth and fifth communities.

[0014] Secondly, embodiments of this application provide a device for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking, the device comprising: The acquisition module is used to acquire basic information about each cell in the target area, neighboring cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships. The basic information about each cell includes at least the cell identifier, and also includes at least one of the following: the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the preset load balancing available frequency band combination of each manufacturer, or the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination of each manufacturer. The construction module is used to build a hypergraph model of cell relationships in the target area based on the basic information of the cells, neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships; in the hypergraph model of cell relationships, each cell in the target area is a node, and the neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships are hyperedges; The determination module is used to determine the interlacing degree index of the target area under at least one preset business dimension based on the cell relationship hypergraph model; the interlacing degree index is used to characterize the proportion of the hyperedge between cells of different manufacturers in the hyperedge that meets the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension. The evaluation module is used to determine the evaluation results of the degree of flower arrangement networking in the target area based on the flower arrangement networking index.

[0015] Thirdly, embodiments of this application provide an electronic device, including: a processor and a memory for storing a computer program capable of running on the processor, wherein, when the processor runs the computer program, it performs the method described in any embodiment of the first aspect.

[0016] Fourthly, embodiments of this application provide a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, wherein the computer instructions are used to cause a computer to perform the methods described in any embodiment of the first aspect.

[0017] The interleaved network degree assessment method provided in this application, by introducing the manufacturer attributes of the cell and the available frequency band combination of preset service dimensions, maps the neighbor cell relationship and co-coverage relationship in the physical network of the target area into nodes and hyperedges in the cell relationship hypergraph model. This transforms the complex network topology relationship into a quantifiable mathematical structure, thereby enabling precise calculation of the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers under different service dimensions in the hyperedges that meet the conditions of that service dimension. This overcomes the limitations of related technologies that rely only on a single dimension or specific scenario to qualitatively determine the interference impact of interleaved shared cells. It achieves a comprehensive, quantitative, and interpretable assessment of the degree of interleaved network formation from different manufacturers, providing objective and accurate data support for the planning of new wireless network construction and network optimization decisions.

[0018] It should be understood that the above general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and do not limit this application. Attached Figure Description

[0019] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of this application, the accompanying drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings described below are merely embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on the provided drawings without creative effort, and this application can be applied to other similar scenarios based on the provided drawings.

[0020] Figure 1 A flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking provided in an embodiment of this application; Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the cell relationship hypergraph provided in the embodiments of this application; Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a flower arrangement network evaluation device provided in an embodiment of this application; Figure 4 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of an electronic device provided in an embodiment of this application. Detailed Implementation

[0021] The present application will now be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and not intended to limit it. The described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of this application, and not all of them. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of this application without inventive effort are within the scope of protection of this application.

[0022] It should be noted that the terms "system," "device," "unit," and / or "module" used in this application are methods of distinguishing different components, elements, parts, sections, or assemblies at different levels. However, if other terms can achieve the same purpose, they can be replaced by other expressions.

[0023] Hereinafter, the terms "first," "second," and "third" are used for descriptive purposes only and should not be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly specifying the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first," "second," or "third" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more of that feature.

[0024] Inter-vendor network setups can have a series of negative impacts on the network. For example: First, regarding network performance, network equipment from different manufacturers employs varying technical implementations and optimization strategies. For instance, radio access network (RAN) equipment from different manufacturers may have varying spectrum utilization efficiencies, signal processing capabilities, and interference suppression technologies. Using equipment from different manufacturers within the same 5G network can lead to inconsistent network performance in different areas or at different sites.

[0025] Secondly, regarding the complexity of network maintenance and management, different equipment manufacturers use different management and maintenance platforms, as well as different network optimization and monitoring tools. A complex network architecture can increase the complexity of network maintenance, requiring maintenance personnel to master the technologies and tools of multiple manufacturers. When network problems occur, cross-manufacturer collaboration may be necessary to locate and resolve the issues, increasing the difficulty of troubleshooting.

[0026] Third, in areas involving new technologies, the interleaved networking scenario cannot support load balancing between manufacturers' frequency bands and 2-component carrier aggregation (2CC) / 3-component carrier aggregation (3CC), affecting user experience and 5G evolution (5G-Advanced, 5G-A).

[0027] Therefore, how to quantitatively assess the impact of cross-vendor network integration on the network has become a pressing technical problem in the field of communications, especially in the field of network optimization.

[0028] Based on this, a method for identifying interleaved shared base stations has been proposed. This scheme constructs an intelligent identification model of the impact of interleaved sharing based on three dimensions: the sharing status of neighboring cells around the shared cell, cell distance, and coverage direction. This model enables the determination of high, medium, and low levels of interference impact on interleaved shared cells.

[0029] However, the aforementioned related technologies have at least the following technical defects: First, the application scenarios are limited: This solution is only for the specific scenario of the shared community of electric vehicles, and does not take into account the common phenomenon of cross-construction networking of different equipment manufacturers in the existing network, and lacks universality and applicability. Second, the evaluation dimensions are limited: the solution only builds a model around three dimensions: shared status, distance, and location. It does not introduce the core evaluation elements of cross-vendor interleaved networking in wireless networks, such as neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships. This makes it impossible to fully reflect the actual impact of cross-vendor interleaved networking on network switching, load balancing, and carrier aggregation services. Third, it cannot support advanced service evaluation: the solution can only identify interlaced network relationships between two cells, but cannot identify interlaced network relationships in scenarios where three or more cells share coverage, making it difficult to support accurate evaluation of new technologies such as 3CC carrier aggregation in the 5G-A era.

[0030] To address at least one of the aforementioned technical problems, embodiments of this application provide a method, apparatus, electronic device, and storage medium for evaluating the degree of cross-network integration. By constructing a cell relationship hypergraph model, the complex neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships in the physical network within the target area are transformed into a computable mathematical model, thereby achieving a quantitative evaluation of the degree of cross-network integration among different manufacturers. This overcomes the limitations of related technologies that rely solely on a single dimension or specific scenario to qualitatively determine the interference impact of cross-network shared cells, providing comprehensive, accurate, and interpretable data support for network planning and optimization.

[0031] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking provided in an embodiment of this application.

[0032] like Figure 1 As shown, the method for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking includes the following steps: Step 101: Obtain basic information about each community within the target area, its neighboring relationships, and its shared coverage relationships; In some embodiments, the basic cell information includes at least the cell identifier. Typically, the cell identifier is represented using the Cell Global Identifier (CGI).

[0033] In some embodiments, the basic information of a cell may also include at least one of the following: the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the load balancing available frequency band combination preset by each manufacturer, or the carrier aggregation available frequency band combination preset by each manufacturer.

[0034] In this context, the manufacturer of a cell refers to the supplier that provides the base station equipment for that cell. If different cells belong to the same manufacturer, these cells are called cells from the same manufacturer; conversely, if different cells belong to different manufacturers, these cells are called cells from different manufacturers.

[0035] Load balancing refers to the technology where the network automatically moves users from congested frequency bands (such as 2.6 GHz) to idle frequency bands (such as 700 MHz) to balance the overall network load. Load balancing can only be performed between preset combinations of available load balancing frequency bands. Because different manufacturers have different load balancing strategies, load balancing technology usually cannot be used between cells from different manufacturers. Typically, the available load balancing frequency band combinations specified by different manufacturers may be the same or different. If a manufacturer's preset available load balancing frequency band combination cannot be obtained, the default available load balancing frequency band combination can be used instead.

[0036] Carrier aggregation refers to the technique of combining multiple frequency bands to provide users with wider network bandwidth, thereby improving network speed. Similar to load balancing, carrier aggregation can only be performed between preset combinations of available carrier aggregation frequency bands. Furthermore, because different manufacturers use different carrier aggregation strategies, carrier aggregation technology typically cannot be used between cells from different manufacturers. Generally, the available carrier aggregation frequency band combinations specified by different manufacturers may be the same or different. If a manufacturer's preset available carrier aggregation frequency band combination cannot be obtained, the default combination can be used instead.

[0037] In some embodiments, after obtaining the basic information of the cell, the basic information of the cell can be recorded using the following table: Table 1. Basic Information of the Community

[0038] Table 2. Manufacturer's Preset Load Balancing Available Frequency Band Combinations

[0039] Table 3 shows the default available frequency band combinations for load balancing.

[0040] Table 4. Schematic diagram of carrier aggregation available frequency band combinations preset by the manufacturer.

[0041] Table 5 shows the default carrier aggregation available frequency band combinations.

[0042] In some embodiments, after obtaining the neighbor cell relationships of a cell, the neighbor cell relationships of the cell can be recorded using the following table: Table 6. Schematic diagram of neighboring cell relationships in the community

[0043] In some embodiments, after obtaining the co-coverage relationship of cells, the co-coverage relationship of cells can be recorded using the following table: Table 7. Schematic diagram of the co-coverage relationship of the residential areas.

[0044] Step 102: Based on the basic information of the cell, neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships, construct a cell relationship hypergraph model for the target area; In some embodiments, in the cell relationship hypergraph model, each cell in the target area is a node, and neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships are hyperedges.

[0045] In some embodiments, hypergraph theory can be used to construct a cell relationship hypergraph model for the target area. In this hypergraph, an undirected hyperedge can connect multiple nodes, indicating that there are neighboring or shared coverage relationships between the cells connected by the hyperedge. For example, if three cells share coverage, a hyperedge representing this shared coverage relationship connects the nodes corresponding to these three cells; if two cells are adjacent, a hyperedge representing this neighboring relationship connects the nodes corresponding to these two cells.

[0046] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the cell relationship hypergraph provided in an embodiment of this application. For example... Figure 2 As shown, Figure 2 In the diagram, blue dots represent cells, red edges indicate super-edges representing shared coverage relationships, and green edges indicate super-edges representing neighboring cells.

[0047] In some embodiments, step 102 includes the following steps: First, the basic information of each community obtained in step 101 is deduplicated; specifically, duplicate basic information of each community is removed.

[0048] Secondly, the neighbor relationships of each cell obtained in step 101 are mapped to hyperedges representing neighbor relationships in the hypergraph; specifically, if cell v1 and cell v2 are neighbors, an undirected hyperedge E is constructed. n12 Connect v1 and v2.

[0049] Secondly, the shared coverage relationships of each cell obtained in step 101 are mapped to hyperedges representing these relationships in the hypergraph; specifically, if cell v1 and cell v2 have a shared coverage relationship, an undirected hyperedge Ec is constructed. 12 Connect v1 and v2.

[0050] Understandably, for a shared coverage relationship involving three cells, if the shared coverage relationship of each cell obtained in step 101 is not directly recorded, then it can be inferred based on the shared coverage relationship between two cells. For example, if there are three different cells, cell v3, cell v4, and cell v5, and any two cells (cell v3 and cell v4, cell v4 and cell v5, cell v3 and cell v5) have a shared coverage relationship, then cell v3, cell v4, and cell v5 have a shared coverage relationship, that is, cell v3, cell v4, and cell v5 have a shared coverage relationship. In this case, an undirected superedge Ec is constructed. 345 Connect v3, v4 and v5.

[0051] The hyperedges constructed based on the above steps can represent the hypergraph in matrix form, i.e., the cell relationship hypergraph model of the target region. Rows in the matrix are represented by nodes in the hypergraph (i.e., cells in the target region), and columns are represented by hyperedges in the hypergraph. Define V = {v1, v2, ..., v...} n} represents a set of nodes, E={E1,E2,...,E2} m Let} denote the set of hyperedges. Then, for a hypergraph H=(V,E), its incidence matrix B(H) is a matrix |V|×|E|, where: when v i ∈E j At that time, b ij =1 (meaning that in the incidence matrix B(H), when the node corresponding to the i-th row belongs to the hyperedge corresponding to the j-th column, the element corresponding to the i-th row and j-th column has a value of 1); when v i E j At that time, b ij =0 (meaning that in the incidence matrix B(H), when the node corresponding to the i-th row does not belong to the hyperedge corresponding to the j-th column, the element corresponding to the i-th row and j-th column has a value of 0).

[0052] Step 103: Based on the cell relationship hypergraph model, determine the degree of interlacing networking of the target area under at least one preset business dimension; In some embodiments, the interleaved networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension.

[0053] Specifically, based on the cell relationship hypergraph model constructed in step 102, the association matrix B(H) of the hypergraph can be used to traverse all hyperedges. According to the hyperedge type (neighbor cell relationship hyperedge or co-coverage relationship hyperedge) and the basic information of the cells corresponding to each node in the hyperedge (such as the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the load balancing available frequency band combination of each manufacturer, or the carrier aggregation available frequency band combination of each manufacturer), the number of hyperedges under different preset service dimensions and the number of hyperedges from different manufacturers can be counted, thereby determining the interlacing networking degree index under the corresponding service dimension.

[0054] In some embodiments, the preset service dimension may include, but is not limited to, at least one of the neighbor cell service dimension, load balancing service dimension, and carrier aggregation service dimension.

[0055] Step 104: Based on the flower arrangement network degree index, determine the evaluation result of the flower arrangement network degree of the target area.

[0056] In some embodiments, after obtaining at least one pre-defined business dimension index for the degree of cross-networking, the evaluation result of the target area in terms of cross-networking can be determined based on the cross-networking degree index. The evaluation result can be used to reflect the severity of cross-networking among different manufacturers in the target area, providing a quantitative basis for subsequent network planning, optimization, and operation and maintenance decisions.

[0057] In some embodiments, the evaluation results may include, but are not limited to, at least one of the following forms: The evaluation results are in numerical form, such as directly outputting the flower arrangement network degree index value calculated in step 103; Evaluation results in the form of grades, such as mapping the degree of flower arrangement networking index to a preset flower arrangement degree grade; Evaluation results in text form, such as generating a text report describing the degree of floral arrangement networking; The evaluation results can be presented in graphical form, such as charts or maps, to visualize the distribution of the floral arrangement network within the target area.

[0058] In some embodiments, when step 103 determines the degree of interweaving network under multiple preset business dimensions, the evaluation results corresponding to each business dimension can be determined separately to form a multi-dimensional interweaving degree evaluation report.

[0059] The interleaved network degree assessment method provided in this application, by introducing the manufacturer attributes of the cell and the available frequency band combination of preset service dimensions, maps the neighbor cell relationship and co-coverage relationship in the physical network of the target area into nodes and hyperedges in the cell relationship hypergraph model. This transforms the complex network topology relationship into a quantifiable mathematical structure, thereby enabling precise calculation of the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers under different service dimensions in the hyperedges that meet the conditions of that service dimension. This overcomes the limitations of related technologies that rely only on a single dimension or specific scenario to qualitatively determine the interference impact of interleaved shared cells. It achieves a comprehensive, quantitative, and interpretable assessment of the degree of interleaved network formation from different manufacturers, providing objective and accurate data support for the planning of new wireless network construction and network optimization decisions.

[0060] In some embodiments, network optimization practices may require a macro-level understanding of the overall interspersed network status of the target area to support global decisions such as frequency refarming and network-wide planning, or a micro-level identification of the interspersed network details of a specific cell and its surroundings to guide precise operations such as site selection for new base stations and replacing idle cells with busy ones.

[0061] Based on this, in order to meet the diverse evaluation needs of different network optimization scenarios, the interlacing network degree index includes a global interlacing network degree index and / or a local interlacing network degree index.

[0062] Among them, the global interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension; the local interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the target cell within the target area in the hyperedges that the target cell participates in under the corresponding business dimension conditions.

[0063] By introducing both global and local interleaved network degree indicators, the interleaved network evaluation system can grasp the proportion of hyperedges between different vendors' cells in a target area under a specific business dimension, providing quantitative basis for global decisions such as frequency refarming and network-wide planning. Simultaneously, it can precisely characterize the proportion of hyperedges between different vendors' cells in a specific target area under a corresponding business dimension, providing fine-grained guidance for precise operations such as new site selection and idle cell replacement. This avoids the one-sidedness of over-focusing on local aspects while ignoring overall trends, and also avoids the limitation of focusing only on the global picture while failing to identify key problem cells. Network optimization personnel can flexibly select or comprehensively refer to different levels of interleaved network degree indicators according to different decision-making scenarios, significantly improving the applicability and accuracy of interleaved network evaluation.

[0064] In some embodiments, as shown in step 103, the preset service dimension includes the neighboring cell service dimension; Among them, when the interlacing degree index includes the global interlacing degree index, the global interlacing degree index includes the global neighbor cell interlacing degree index. The global neighbor cell interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of second superedges in the first superedge representing the neighbor cell relationship, where the cells at both ends of the first superedge are cells from different manufacturers, to the number of first superedges.

[0065] Specifically, for the neighbor cell business dimension, based on the cell relationship hypergraph model, all hyperedges representing neighbor cell relationships (first hyperedges) are traversed. For each hyperedge representing a neighbor cell relationship, the manufacturer information of the cells corresponding to the nodes at both ends of the hyperedge is obtained, and it is determined whether the cells at both ends of the hyperedge are cells from different manufacturers. The total number of all first hyperedges and the number of hyperedges whose two ends are cells from different manufacturers (second hyperedges) are counted. Based on the above statistical results, the global neighbor cell interleaving degree index corresponding to the neighbor cell business dimension can be determined.

[0066] Let A1 be the number of the first hyperedge and B1 be the number of the second hyperedge; then the global neighbor interleaving index I1 = B1 / A1.

[0067] When the interleaving degree index includes the local interleaving degree index, the local interleaving degree index includes the target cell interleaving degree index. The target cell interleaving degree index is the ratio of the number of fourth superedges corresponding to the other end node of the third superedge representing the neighbor relationship of the target cell to the number of the target cell that are different manufacturers' cells.

[0068] Similarly, let A be the number of third hyperedges. 1’ The number of fourth superedges is B. 1’ Then the global neighboring area interleaving index I 1’ =B 1’ / A 1’ .

[0069] In some embodiments, as shown in step 103, the preset business dimension includes the load balancing business dimension. Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes the global load balancing interlacing degree index. The global load balancing interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of sixth superedges with different manufacturers' cell nodes in the fifth superedge, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of fifth superedges. Specifically, for the load balancing service dimension, based on the cell relationship hypergraph model, all hyperedges representing shared coverage relationships are traversed. For each shared coverage hyperedge, the frequency band information of the cells corresponding to each node within the hyperedge is first obtained, and it is determined whether the frequency band combination of the cells within the hyperedge conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination. If it conforms, the manufacturer information of the cells corresponding to each node within the hyperedge is further obtained to determine whether there are cells from different manufacturers within the hyperedge. The total number of all shared coverage hyperedges that conform to the load balancing available frequency band combination (the fifth hyperedge) and the number of shared coverage hyperedges containing cells from different manufacturers (the sixth hyperedge) are counted. Based on the above statistical results, the global load balancing interleaving degree index corresponding to the load balancing service dimension can be determined.

[0070] Let A2 be the number of the fifth hyperedge and B2 be the number of the sixth hyperedge; then the global load balancing interleaving index I2 = B2 / A2.

[0071] Among them, when the interleaved networking degree index includes the local interleaved networking degree index, the local interleaved networking degree index includes the target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index. The target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index is the ratio of the number of eighth superedges in the superedges representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of seventh superedges.

[0072] Similarly, let A be the number of seventh hyperedges. 2’ The number of eighth superedges is B. 2’ The target cell load balancing interleaving index I 2’ =B 2’ / A 2’ .

[0073] In some embodiments, as shown in step 103, the preset service dimension includes the carrier aggregation service dimension; Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes the global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of tenth superedges with different manufacturers' cell nodes in the ninth superedge, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of ninth superedges. Specifically, for the carrier aggregation service dimension, based on the cell relationship hypergraph model, all hyperedges representing co-coverage relationships are traversed. For each co-coverage relationship hyperedge, the frequency band information of the cells corresponding to each node within the hyperedge is first obtained, and it is determined whether the frequency band combination of each cell within the hyperedge conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination (including 2CC and / or 3CC carrier aggregation combination). If it conforms, the manufacturer information of the cells corresponding to each node within the hyperedge is further obtained to determine whether there are cells from different manufacturers within the hyperedge. The total number of all co-coverage relationship hyperedges that conform to the carrier aggregation available frequency band combination (ninth hyperedge) and the number of co-coverage relationship hyperedges containing cells from different manufacturers (tenth hyperedge) are counted. Based on the above statistical results, the global carrier aggregation interleaving index corresponding to the carrier aggregation service dimension can be determined.

[0074] Define the number of ninth hyperedges as A3 and the number of tenth hyperedges as B3; then the global load balancing interleaving index I3 = B3 / A3.

[0075] Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the local interlacing network degree index, the local interlacing network degree index includes the target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of cells with different manufacturers from the target cell in the eleventh superedge of the superedge representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of the eleventh superedge.

[0076] Similarly, let A be the number of the eleventh hyperedge. 3’ The number of the twelfth superedge is B. 3’ The target cell load balancing interleaving index I 3’=B 3’ / A 3’ .

[0077] It is understandable that since carrier aggregation can be divided into 2CC and 3CC, the global load balancing interleaving index and the target cell load balancing interleaving index can also be divided into two dimensions: 2CC and 3CC. This will not be elaborated here.

[0078] In some embodiments, step 104 includes the following steps: Obtain the mapping relationship between the flower arrangement network degree index and the flower arrangement network degree; Based on the flower arrangement network degree index and mapping relationship, the evaluation level of the flower arrangement network degree in the target area is determined; The mapping relationship is as follows: when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the first level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the second preset value but not greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the second level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the third preset value but not greater than the second preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the third level; and when the flower arrangement network degree index is not greater than the third preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the fourth level.

[0079] In some embodiments, the mapping relationship may be represented using a table or function that represents the mapping relationship.

[0080] In some embodiments, the first preset value, the second preset value, and the third preset value decrease sequentially. Preferably, the first preset value is 0.8, the second preset value is 0.4, and the third preset value is 0.2. It is understood that other first preset values, second preset values, and third preset values ​​may also be used as needed, and this disclosure does not limit them.

[0081] For new base station construction scenarios, under similar conditions or factors, the construction of base stations can be carried out by manufacturers with lower local interleaving network levels, based on the level of local interleaving network coverage. For scenarios involving demolishing idle areas to make up for busy ones, under similar conditions or factors, the demolition can be carried out on communities with higher levels of local interspersed networking based on the level of local interspersed networking. For frequency refarming scenarios, under similar conditions or factors, optimization can be achieved by selecting some cells for swapping, replacing, or dismantling, based on the global interleaving network level and the local interleaving network level.

[0082] In some embodiments, after step 101 or before step 102, the flower arrangement network degree evaluation method provided in this application embodiment further includes the following steps: The neighbor relationships and shared coverage relationships of each cell in the target area are verified using preset verification rules; The verification rules include at least one of the following rules: When there is a shared coverage relationship between the first and second cells, check whether there is a neighboring cell relationship between the first and second cells; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring cell relationship between the first and second cells. Specifically, if two residential communities share coverage, they must also be neighboring communities. However, if two communities are neighboring communities, they do not necessarily share coverage. Therefore, it is necessary to verify whether the data on shared coverage between communities is fully included in the data on neighboring communities.

[0083] When there is a neighboring relationship between the third and fourth communities, check whether there is a neighboring relationship between the fourth and third communities; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring relationship between the fourth and third communities. Specifically, the neighboring relationships between communities are symmetrical. That is, if the third community is a neighbor of the fourth community, then the fourth community is also a neighbor of the third community. The two communities must be either neighbors or non-neighbors to each other. There is no one-way neighboring scenario.

[0084] When there is a shared coverage relationship between the fifth and sixth communities, check whether there is a shared coverage relationship between the sixth and fifth communities; if the check result is negative, then complete the shared coverage relationship between the sixth and fifth communities.

[0085] Similar to the neighboring cell relationships between communities, the co-coverage relationship between communities is symmetrical. That is, if the fifth community is a co-coverage community of the sixth community, then the sixth community is also a co-coverage community of the fifth community. The two communities must be co-coverage communities or non-co-coverage communities of each other. There is no one-way co-coverage community scenario.

[0086] To implement the flower arrangement network degree evaluation method provided in the embodiments of this application, the embodiments of this application also provide a flower arrangement network degree evaluation device. For example... Figure 3 As shown, Figure 3 A schematic diagram of a flower arrangement network assessment device provided in an embodiment of this application. The flower arrangement network assessment device includes: The acquisition module 301 is used to acquire the basic information of each cell in the target area, the neighboring cell relationship and the co-coverage relationship; the basic information of the cell includes at least the cell identifier, and also includes at least one of the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the preset load balancing available frequency band combination of each manufacturer or the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination of each manufacturer; Module 302 is used to construct a hypergraph model of cell relationships in the target area based on basic cell information, neighbor cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships. In the hypergraph model of cell relationships, each cell in the target area is a node, and neighbor cell relationships and shared coverage relationships are hyperedges. The determination module 303 is used to determine the interlacing degree index of the target area under at least one preset business dimension based on the cell relationship hypergraph model; the interlacing degree index is used to characterize the proportion of the hyperedge between cells of different manufacturers in the hyperedge that meets the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension. Evaluation module 304 is used to determine the evaluation results of the degree of flower arrangement networking in the target area based on the flower arrangement networking degree index.

[0087] In some embodiments, the flower arrangement networking degree index includes a global flower arrangement networking degree index and / or a local flower arrangement networking degree index; Among them, the global interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the business dimension conditions under the corresponding business dimension; the local interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the target cell within the target area in the hyperedges that the target cell participates in under the corresponding business dimension conditions.

[0088] In some embodiments, the preset service dimension includes the neighboring cell service dimension; Among them, when the interlacing degree index includes the global interlacing degree index, the global interlacing degree index includes the global neighbor cell interlacing degree index. The global neighbor cell interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of second superedges in the first superedge representing the neighbor cell relationship, where the cells at both ends of the first superedge are cells from different manufacturers, to the number of first superedges. When the interleaving degree index includes the local interleaving degree index, the local interleaving degree index includes the target cell interleaving degree index. The target cell interleaving degree index is the ratio of the number of fourth superedges corresponding to the other end node of the third superedge representing the neighbor relationship of the target cell to the number of the target cell that are different manufacturers' cells.

[0089] In some embodiments, the preset business dimension includes the load balancing business dimension; Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes the global load balancing interlacing degree index. The global load balancing interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of sixth superedges with different manufacturers' cell nodes in the fifth superedge, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of fifth superedges. Among them, when the interleaved networking degree index includes the local interleaved networking degree index, the local interleaved networking degree index includes the target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index. The target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index is the ratio of the number of eighth superedges in the superedges representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of seventh superedges.

[0090] In some embodiments, the preset service dimension includes the carrier aggregation service dimension; Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes the global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of tenth superedges with different manufacturers' cell nodes in the ninth superedge, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of ninth superedges. Among them, when the interlacing network degree index includes the local interlacing network degree index, the local interlacing network degree index includes the target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of cells with different manufacturers from the target cell in the eleventh superedge of the superedge representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of the eleventh superedge.

[0091] In some embodiments, the evaluation module 304 is specifically used for: Obtain the mapping relationship between the flower arrangement network degree index and the flower arrangement network degree; Based on the flower arrangement network degree index and mapping relationship, the evaluation level of the flower arrangement network degree in the target area is determined; The mapping relationship is as follows: when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the first level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the second preset value but not greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the second level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than the third preset value but not greater than the second preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the third level; and when the flower arrangement network degree index is not greater than the third preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the fourth level.

[0092] In some embodiments, the flower arrangement network degree evaluation device provided in this application further includes a verification module, which is used for: The neighbor relationships and shared coverage relationships of each cell in the target area are verified using preset verification rules; The verification rules include at least one of the following rules: When there is a shared coverage relationship between the first and second cells, check whether there is a neighboring cell relationship between the first and second cells; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring cell relationship between the first and second cells. When there is a neighboring relationship between the third and fourth communities, check whether there is a neighboring relationship between the fourth and third communities; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring relationship between the fourth and third communities. When there is a shared coverage relationship between the fifth and sixth communities, check whether there is a shared coverage relationship between the sixth and fifth communities; if the check result is negative, then complete the shared coverage relationship between the sixth and fifth communities.

[0093] The above embodiments of this application describe the apparatus provided in the embodiments of this application. To implement the functions of the methods provided in the above embodiments of this application, the flower arrangement network degree evaluation apparatus may include hardware structures and software modules, implementing the above functions in the form of hardware structures, software modules, or a combination of hardware structures and software modules. One of the above functions may be executed in the form of hardware structures, software modules, or a combination of hardware structures and software modules.

[0094] Figure 4 This is a block diagram illustrating an electronic device 400 for implementing the above-described method for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking, according to an exemplary embodiment. For example, the electronic device 400 may be a computer, a personal digital assistant, etc.

[0095] Reference Figure 4 The electronic device 400 may include a communication interface 401, capable of interacting with other devices; a processor 402, connected to the communication interface 401 to interact with other devices, used to execute the methods provided by one or more of the above-described technical solutions when running a computer program; and a memory 403, on which the computer program is stored. Specifically, the specific processing operations of the processor 402 can refer to the flower arrangement network degree evaluation method described in the above embodiments of this disclosure.

[0096] Of course, in practical applications, the various components in electronic device 400 are coupled together through bus system 404. It can be understood that bus system 404 is used to realize the connection and communication between these components. In addition to a data bus, bus system 404 also includes a power bus, a control bus, and a status signal bus. However, for the sake of clarity, in... Figure 4 The general designated all buses as Bus System 404.

[0097] The memory 403 in this embodiment is used to store various types of data to support the operation of the electronic device 400. Examples of such data include any computer program used to operate on the electronic device 400.

[0098] The methods disclosed in the embodiments of this application can be applied to processor 402, or implemented by processor 402. Processor 402 may be an integrated circuit chip with signal processing capabilities. In implementation, each step of the above method can be completed by the integrated logic circuit of the hardware in processor 402 or by instructions in software form. The processor 402 may be a general-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, etc. Processor 402 can implement or execute the methods, steps, and logic block diagrams disclosed in the embodiments of this application. A general-purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor, etc. The steps of the methods disclosed in the embodiments of this application can be directly manifested as being executed by a hardware decoding processor, or being executed by a combination of hardware and software modules in the decoding processor. The software modules may be located in a storage medium, which is located in memory 403. Processor 402 reads the information in memory 403 and, in conjunction with its hardware, completes the steps of the aforementioned method.

[0099] In an exemplary embodiment, the electronic device 400 may be implemented by one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), DSPs, programmable logic devices (PLDs), complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), general-purpose processors, controllers, microcontrollers (MCUs), microprocessors, or other electronic components to perform the aforementioned method.

[0100] Embodiments of this disclosure also propose a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, wherein the computer instructions are used to cause a computer to execute the flower arrangement network degree evaluation method described in the above embodiments of this disclosure.

[0101] Embodiments of this disclosure also propose a computer program product, including a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements the flower arrangement network degree evaluation method described in the above embodiments of this disclosure.

[0102] Embodiments of this disclosure also propose a chip including one or more interface circuits and one or more processors; the interface circuits are used to receive signals from the memory of an electronic device and send signals to the processors, the signals including computer instructions stored in the memory, which, when executed by the processor, cause the electronic device to perform the flower arrangement network degree evaluation method described in the above embodiments of this disclosure.

[0103] It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," etc., used in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings of this disclosure are used to distinguish similar objects and are not necessarily used to describe a specific order or sequence. It should be understood that such data can be interchanged where appropriate so that the embodiments of this disclosure described herein can be implemented in orders other than those illustrated or described herein. The embodiments described in the following exemplary embodiments do not represent all embodiments consistent with this disclosure. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatuses and methods consistent with some aspects of this disclosure as detailed in the appended claims.

[0104] In the description of this specification, the references to terms such as "one embodiment," "some embodiments," "illustrative embodiment," "example," "specific example," or "some examples," etc., indicate that a specific feature, structure, material, or characteristic described in connection with an embodiment or example is included in at least one embodiment or example of the present invention. In this specification, the illustrative expressions of the above terms do not necessarily refer to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the specific features, structures, materials, or characteristics described may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments or examples.

[0105] Any description of operation or method in the flowchart or otherwise described herein can be understood as representing a module, segment, or portion of code comprising one or more executable instructions for implementing a particular logical function or operation, and the scope of the preferred embodiments of the invention includes additional implementations in which functions may be performed not in the order shown or discussed, including substantially simultaneously or in reverse order depending on the functions involved, as will be understood by those skilled in the art to which embodiments of the invention pertain.

[0106] The logic and / or steps represented in the flowchart or otherwise described herein, for example, can be considered as a sequenced list of executable instructions for implementing logical functions, and can be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device (such as a computer-based system, a system including a processing module, or other system that can fetch and execute instructions from, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device). For the purposes of this specification, "computer-readable medium" can be any means that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit programs for use by, or in conjunction with, an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of computer-readable media include: an electrical connection having one or more wires (control method), a portable computer disk drive (magnetic device), random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable and editable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), fiber optic device, and portable optical disc read-only memory (CDROM). Furthermore, computer-readable media can even be paper or other suitable media on which programs can be printed, because programs can be obtained electronically, for example, by optically scanning the paper or other media, followed by editing, interpreting, or otherwise processing as necessary, and then stored in computer memory.

[0107] It should be understood that various parts of the embodiments of the present invention can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, or a combination thereof. In the above embodiments, multiple steps or methods can be implemented in software or firmware stored in memory and executed by a suitable instruction execution system. For example, if implemented in hardware, as in another embodiment, it can be implemented using any one or a combination of the following techniques known in the art: discrete logic circuits having logic gates for implementing logical functions on data signals, application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) having suitable combinational logic gates, programmable gate arrays (PGAs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), etc.

[0108] Those skilled in the art will understand that all or part of the steps of the methods in the above embodiments can be implemented by instructing related hardware through an operation sequence, and the program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it includes one or a combination of the steps of the method embodiments.

[0109] Furthermore, the functional units in the various embodiments of the present invention can be integrated into a processing module, or each unit can exist physically separately, or two or more units can be integrated into a module. The integrated module can be implemented in hardware or as a software functional module. If the integrated module is implemented as a software functional module and sold or used as an independent product, it can also be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. The storage medium mentioned above can be a read-only memory, a disk, or an optical disk, etc.

[0110] Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described above, it is understood that the above embodiments are exemplary and should not be construed as limiting the present invention. Those skilled in the art can make changes, modifications, substitutions and variations to the above embodiments within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking, characterized in that, The method includes: Obtain basic cell information, neighbor cell relationships, and shared coverage relationships for each cell within the target area; the basic cell information includes at least the cell identifier, and also includes at least one of the following: the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the load balancing available frequency band combination preset by each manufacturer, or the carrier aggregation available frequency band combination preset by each manufacturer; Based on the basic information of the cells, the neighbor cell relationships, and the shared coverage relationships, a cell relationship hypergraph model for the target area is constructed; wherein, in the cell relationship hypergraph model, each cell in the target area is a node, and the neighbor cell relationships and the shared coverage relationships are hyperedges; Based on the cell relationship hypergraph model, the interlacing degree index of the target area under at least one preset business dimension is determined; the interlacing degree index is used to characterize the proportion of the hyperedge between cells of different manufacturers in the hyperedge that meets the conditions of the business dimension under the corresponding business dimension. Based on the flower arrangement network degree index, the evaluation result of the flower arrangement network degree in the target area is determined.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The flower arrangement networking degree index includes the global flower arrangement networking degree index and / or the local flower arrangement networking degree index; The global interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the conditions of the business dimension under the corresponding business dimension; the local interlacing networking degree index is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells from different manufacturers in which the target cell participates in the target cell in the corresponding business dimension under the corresponding business dimension within the target area.

3. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The preset business dimensions include neighboring cell business dimensions; Wherein, when the flower arrangement network degree index includes a global flower arrangement network degree index, the global flower arrangement network degree index includes a global neighbor cell flower arrangement degree index, and the global neighbor cell flower arrangement degree index is the ratio of the number of second superedges in the first superedge representing the neighbor cell relationship, where the cells corresponding to the nodes at both ends of the first superedge are cells from different manufacturers, to the number of the first superedges. When the interlacing degree index includes a local interlacing degree index, the local interlacing degree index includes a target cell interlacing degree index. The target cell interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of fourth hyperedges (where the target cell is a cell from a different manufacturer) to the number of the third hyperedges in the third hyperedge representing the neighbor relationship corresponding to the target cell.

4. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The preset business dimensions include the load balancing business dimension; Wherein, when the interlacing network degree index includes a global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes a global load balancing interlacing degree index. The global load balancing interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of sixth superedges containing cell nodes from different manufacturers within the fifth superedge in which the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of fifth superedges. Wherein, when the interleaved networking degree index includes a local interleaved networking degree index, the local interleaved networking degree index includes a target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index. The target cell load balancing interleaved networking degree index is the ratio of the number of eighth superedges in the superedges representing the co-coverage relationship corresponding to the target cell, where the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge conforms to the preset load balancing available frequency band combination, to the number of seventh superedges.

5. The method according to claim 2, characterized in that, The preset service dimensions include carrier aggregation service dimensions; Wherein, when the interlacing network degree index includes a global interlacing network degree index, the global interlacing network degree index includes a global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The global carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of tenth superedges containing cell nodes from different manufacturers within the ninth superedge in which the frequency band combination of each node in the superedge represents the co-coverage relationship conforms to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination, to the number of the ninth superedges. Wherein, when the interlacing network degree index includes a local interlacing network degree index, the local interlacing network degree index includes a target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index. The target cell carrier aggregation interlacing degree index is the ratio of the number of cells with frequency band combinations that conform to the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combinations in the eleventh superedge representing the co-coverage relationship of the target cell to the number of cells with cell nodes from different manufacturers in the eleventh superedge.

6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, The evaluation result of determining the degree of floral arrangement networking in the target area based on the floral arrangement networking degree index includes: Obtain the mapping relationship between the flower arrangement network degree index and the flower arrangement network degree; Based on the flower arrangement network degree index and the mapping relationship, the evaluation level of the flower arrangement network degree in the target area is determined; The mapping relationship is as follows: when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than a first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the first level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than a second preset value but not greater than the first preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the second level; when the flower arrangement network degree index is greater than a third preset value but not greater than the second preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the third level; and when the flower arrangement network degree index is not greater than the third preset value, the flower arrangement network degree of the target area is at the fourth level.

7. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, Before constructing the cell relationship hypergraph model of the target area based on the basic cell information, neighbor cell relationships, and co-coverage relationships, the method further includes: The neighbor relationships and shared coverage relationships of each cell in the target area are verified using preset verification rules; The verification rules include at least one of the following rules: When there is a shared coverage relationship between the first cell and the second cell, check whether there is a neighboring cell relationship between the first cell and the second cell; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring cell relationship between the first cell and the second cell. When there is a neighboring relationship between the third and fourth cells, check whether there is a neighboring relationship between the fourth and third cells; if the check result is no, then complete the neighboring relationship between the fourth and third cells. When there is a shared coverage relationship between the fifth cell and the sixth cell, check whether there is a shared coverage relationship between the sixth cell and the fifth cell; if the check result is no, then complete the shared coverage relationship between the sixth cell and the fifth cell.

8. A device for evaluating the degree of flower arrangement networking, characterized in that, The device includes: The acquisition module is used to acquire basic cell information, neighbor cell relationships, and co-coverage relationships of each cell in the target area; the basic cell information includes at least the cell identifier, and also includes at least one of the following: the manufacturer to which the cell belongs, the preset load balancing available frequency band combination of each manufacturer, or the preset carrier aggregation available frequency band combination of each manufacturer; A construction module is used to construct a cell relationship hypergraph model of the target area based on the basic information of the cells, the neighbor cell relationships, and the shared coverage relationships; wherein, in the cell relationship hypergraph model, each cell in the target area is a node, and the neighbor cell relationships and the shared coverage relationships are hyperedges; The determination module is used to determine the degree index of interleaved networking of the target area under at least one preset business dimension based on the cell relationship hypergraph model; the degree index of interleaved networking is used to characterize the proportion of hyperedges between cells of different manufacturers in the hyperedges that meet the conditions of the business dimension under the corresponding business dimension. The evaluation module is used to determine the evaluation result of the degree of flower arrangement networking in the target area based on the flower arrangement networking degree index.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that, include: A processor and a memory for storing a computer program capable of running on the processor, wherein the processor, when running the computer program, performs the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing computer instructions, characterized in that, The computer instructions are used to cause the computer to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

Images