Golf ball

Abstract

To provide a golf ball which is used for a purpose other than competing in predominance in a carry in an excessive manner, by using the same type of a golf ball by a golf player whose head speed HS is fast, and a general golf player.SOLUTION: There is provided a golf ball having a core and a cover. The cover is formed of mainly polyurethane. In a hitting test (head speed of 40 m / s) using a driver with a ball diameter of 43.0 mm or greater, the total sum (t1+t2) of a time (t1) required since the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball until a deformation amount of the golf ball becomes greatest, and a time (t2) since the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes greatest until the driver and golf ball are separated is 650 μsec or smaller.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to a golf ball having two or more layers including at least a core and a cover.

Background Art

[0002] Conventionally, various golf balls have been proposed to increase the flight distance and obtain a good feel. Many of these golf balls are optimized for players with a clubhead speed of around 45 m / sec. However, when a player with a clubhead speed of around 40 m / sec uses such a golf ball, the flight distance and feel are not satisfactory. Also, many golf balls optimized for players with a clubhead speed of around 40 m / sec have problems such as difficulty in stopping on the green during an iron shot or issues during a short game. Originally, golf should be a sport that competes in the skills of players. If the difference in flight distance due to the difference in clubhead speed among golf players becomes too large, it means competing in the difference in power of the players, which is not preferable.

[0003] As designs of golf balls having a two - layer structure or more with a core and a cover, for example, the following Patent Documents 1 to 13 can be cited as technical literature, such as increasing the ball diameter more than usual and adjusting the total dimple volume.

[0004] However, the proposed golf ball has a significant difference in flight distance when struck with a driver (W#1) between golfers with high clubhead speed and those without. When competing with the same ball, it is disadvantageous for players without high clubhead speed or power, and it cannot be considered a golf ball sufficient for competing based on the accuracy of a golfer's shot and approach technique. Also, in order to compete based on the skill of each shot of the golfer without relying on power, it is fair and preferable to increase the spin amount in the short game to enhance controllability rather than increasing the run, which is the difference between the total flight distance and carry during an iron shot, in order to compete based on the golfer's skill. Therefore, while complying with the original golf rules, a fair and appropriate golf ball for each of the above-mentioned players should be developed.

Prior Art Documents

Patent Documents

[0005]

Patent Document 1

Patent Document 2

Patent Document 3

Patent Document 4

Patent Document 5

Patent Document 6

Patent Document 7

Patent Document 8

Patent Document 9

Patent Document 10

Patent Document 11

[0006] The present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and by using the same ball for a person with a high club head speed and a person without it, it does not compete for excessive superiority in flight distance, and by using the same ball for skills in iron shots and short games, it is possible to compete appropriately and fairly. The purpose is to provide a golf ball that can do so. [Means for Solving the Problems]

[0007] As a result of intensive studies to achieve the above object, for a golf ball having a core and a cover, the cover is formed mainly of polyurethane, the ball diameter is designed to be 43.0 mm or more, and in a driving test (club head speed 40 m / s) using a driver, the time (t1) required for the deformation amount of the golf ball to become the largest from the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball, and the golf ball from the state where the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest It has been found that a golf ball in which the total (t1 + t2) of the time (t2) required until it separates from the driver is 650 μsec or less does not cause too much difference in flight distance when a driver (W#1) is hit by a golfer with a high club head speed and a golfer without it, does not increase the run during iron shots, and increases the spin amount in short games and has high controllability. The present invention has been made based on this finding.

[0008] Note that the golfers with a high head speed mentioned above are those with a head speed (HS) of 45 m / s or more, and the golfers with a low head speed are those with a head speed (HS) of less than 45 m / s. The same meaning applies hereinafter in the text.

[0009] Therefore, the present invention provides the following golf ball. 1. A golf ball comprising a core and a cover, wherein the cover is formed mainly of polyurethane, the ball diameter is 43.0 mm or more, Strike a golf ball with a driver under the condition of a head speed of 40 m / s In a hitting test, the total time (t1 + t2) from the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball until the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest and the time (t2) from the state where the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest until the golf ball and the driver are separated is 650 μsec or less. A resin material intermediate layer is formed between the core and the cover, and the surface hardness of the spherical body (intermediate layer coated spherical body) with the core coated by the intermediate layer is 70 or more in Shore D hardness A golf ball characterized by the above. 2. The golf ball according to item 1 above, wherein the ratio (t2 / t1) of the time (t1) to the time (t2) is 1.26 or less. 3. The golf ball according to item 1 or 2 above, wherein the deflection amount (mm) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) applied to the ball is 3.0 mm or less. 4. The diameter of the core is 37.0 mm or more, and in the hardness distribution of the core, when the Shore C hardness at the center of the core is Cc, the Shore C hardness at the midpoint M between the center and the surface of the core is Cm, and the Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm inward from the midpoint M are Cm-2, Cm-4, Cm-6, Cm-8 respectively, and the Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm outward from the center M are Cm+2, Cm+4, Cm+6 respectively, and the Shore C hardness at the surface of the core is Cs, the following areas A to F · Area X: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-6 - Cm-8) · Area A: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-4 - Cm-6) · Area B: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-2 - Cm-4) · Area C: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - Cm-2) · Area D: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+2 - Cm) · Area E: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+4 - Cm+2) · Area F: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+6 - Cm+4) Regarding the following formula (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area A + Area B + Area C) > 0 The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 3 above that satisfies this 5. Regarding Areas A to F and X of the core hardness distribution, the following formula (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area X + Area A + Area B + Area C) > 0 The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 4 above that satisfies this 6. Regarding Areas A to E of the core hardness distribution, the following formula (Area D + Area E) - (Area A + Area B + Area C) ≥ 1 The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 5 above that satisfies this 7. Regarding Areas A to E and X of the core hardness distribution, the following formula (Area D + Area E) - (Area X + Area A + Area B + Area C) > 0 The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 6 above that satisfies this 8. Regarding Areas A to F of the core hardness distribution, core center hardness Cc, and core surface hardness Cs, the following formula 0 < [(Area: D + E + F) - (Area: A + B + C)] / (Cs - Cc) ≤ 1.00 The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 7 above that satisfies this 9. The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 8 above, wherein the value of core surface hardness (Cs) - core center hardness (Cc) is 20 or more 10. From the deflection amount E (mm) of the ball from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf), the value E - B (mm) obtained by subtracting the deflection amount B (mm) of the ball from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is 0.3 to 1.2 mm. The golf ball according to any one of 1 to 9 above

Advantages of the Invention

[0010] According to the golf ball of the present invention, the excessive difference in flight distance due to the high or low head speed (HS) when each player hits a driver (W#1) is reduced, and the run in an iron full shot is reduced, and in a short game, good spin is applied and high controllability is obtained.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0011]

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Modes for Carrying Out the Invention

[0012] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail. The golf ball of the present invention includes a core and a cover. One or a plurality of intermediate layers may be interposed between the core and the cover. For example, in FIG. 1, there is a golf ball G having a three-layer structure having a core 1, an intermediate layer 2 covering the core 1, and a cover 3 covering the intermediate layer. Note that the cover 3 is located in the outermost layer in the layer structure of the golf ball, excluding the coating layer. Usually, a large number of dimples D are formed on the surface of the cover (outermost layer) 3 in order to improve aerodynamic characteristics. Also, a coating layer is usually formed on the surface of the cover 3, but it is not shown in FIG. 1. Hereinafter, each of the above layers will be described in detail.

[0013] As the core material, a rubber material is mainly used. Specifically, a rubber composition can be prepared by using a base rubber as the main component and blending a co-crosslinking agent, an organic peroxide, an inert filler, an organic sulfur compound, etc. with this. As the base rubber, it is preferable to use polybutadiene.

[0014] As the type of polybutadiene, commercially available products can be used. For example, BR01, BR51, BR730 (manufactured by JSR Corporation), etc. can be mentioned. Also, the proportion of polybutadiene in the base rubber is preferably 60% by mass or more, more preferably 80% by mass or more. In addition to the above polybutadiene, other rubber components can be blended with the above base rubber within a range that does not impair the effects of the present invention. Examples of the rubber components other than the above polybutadiene include polybutadiene other than the above polybutadiene, other diene rubbers, such as styrene-butadiene rubber, natural rubber, isoprene rubber, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber, etc.

[0015] Examples of the co-crosslinking agent include unsaturated carboxylic acids, metal salts of unsaturated carboxylic acids, etc. Specific examples of the unsaturated carboxylic acid include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid, fumaric acid, etc. In particular, acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are preferably used. The metal salt of the unsaturated carboxylic acid is not particularly limited, but for example, those obtained by neutralizing the above unsaturated carboxylic acid with a desired metal ion can be mentioned. Specific examples include zinc salts and magnesium salts of methacrylic acid, acrylic acid, etc. In particular, zinc acrylate is preferably used.

[0016] The above unsaturated carboxylic acid and / or its metal salt is usually blended in an amount of 20 parts by mass or more, preferably 25 parts by mass or more, more preferably 30 parts by mass or more, and the upper limit is usually 60 parts by mass or less, preferably 50 parts by mass or less, more preferably 40 parts by mass or less, based on 100 parts by mass of the above base rubber. If the blending amount is too large, it may become too hard and have a difficult-to-endure hitting feeling, and if the blending amount is too small, the resilience may decrease.

[0017] As the above-mentioned organic peroxide, commercially available products can be used. For example, Parkmill D (manufactured by NOF Corporation), Perhexa C-40, Perhexa 3M (manufactured by NOF Corporation), Luperco 231XL (manufactured by Atochem), etc. can be preferably used. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more. The compounding amount of the organic peroxide is preferably 0.1 part by mass or more, more preferably 0.3 part by mass or more, still more preferably 0.5 part by mass or more, and as the upper limit, preferably 5 parts by mass or less, more preferably 4 parts by mass or less, still more preferably 3 parts by mass or less, and most preferably 2.5 parts by mass or less, based on 100 parts by mass of the above-mentioned base rubber. If the compounding amount is too large or too small, it may not be possible to obtain suitable hitting feeling, durability and resilience.

[0018] In addition, as compounding agents compounded with the base rubber, inert fillers are included. For example, zinc oxide, barium sulfate, calcium carbonate, etc. can be preferably used. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more. The compounding amount of the inert filler is preferably 1 part by mass or more, more preferably 2 parts by mass or more, and as the upper limit, preferably 20 parts by mass or less, more preferably 15 parts by mass or less, still more preferably 10 parts by mass or less, based on 100 parts by mass of the above-mentioned base rubber. If the compounding amount is too large or too small, it may not be possible to obtain appropriate mass and suitable resilience.

[0019] Furthermore, an antioxidant can be compounded as needed. For example, as commercially available products, Nocrack NS-6, NS-30 (manufactured by Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), Yoshinox 425 (manufactured by Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.), etc. can be mentioned. These may be used alone or in combination of two or more.

[0020] The compounding amount of the anti-aging agent is preferably 0 parts by mass or more, more preferably 0.05 parts by mass or more, particularly preferably 0.1 parts by mass or more, and preferably 3 parts by mass or less, more preferably 2 parts by mass or less, particularly preferably 1 part by mass or less, most preferably 0.5 parts by mass or less, based on 100 parts by mass of the above base rubber. If the compounding amount is too large or too small, suitable resilience and durability may not be obtained.

[0021] In addition, an organic sulfur compound can be compounded into the above core to impart good resilience. The organic sulfur compound is not particularly limited as long as it can improve the resilience of the golf ball. Examples thereof include thiophenols, thionaphthols, halogenated thiophenols, or metal salts thereof. More specifically, pentachlorothiophenol, pentafluorothiophenol, pentabromothiophenol, parachlorothiophenol, zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol, zinc salt of pentafluorothiophenol, zinc salt of pentabromothiophenol, zinc salt of parachlorothiophenol, diphenyl polysulfide with 2 to 4 sulfur atoms, dibenzyl polysulfide, dibenzoyl polysulfide, dibenzothiazoyl polysulfide, dithiobenzoyl polysulfide, etc. are included. In particular, the zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol is preferably used. The compounding amount of the organic sulfur compound is preferably 0 parts by mass or more, more preferably 0.05 parts by mass or more, further preferably 0.1 parts by mass or more, and preferably 5 parts by mass or less, more preferably 3 parts by mass or less, further preferably 2.5 parts by mass or less, based on 100 parts by mass of the above base rubber. If the compounding amount is too large, the improvement effect on resilience (particularly, the impact by W#1) cannot be expected more, and the core may become too soft or the hitting feeling may deteriorate. On the other hand, if the compounding amount is too small, the improvement effect on resilience cannot be expected.

[0022] More specifically, by directly adding water (materials containing water) to the above core material, the decomposition of the organic peroxide during core compounding can be promoted. Also, it is known that the decomposition efficiency of the organic peroxide in the core rubber composition changes with temperature, and the decomposition efficiency increases as the temperature rises above a certain level. If the temperature is too high, the amount of decomposed radicals becomes too large, and the radicals recombine or become inactivated with each other. As a result, the amount of radicals effectively working for crosslinking decreases. Here, when decomposition heat is generated due to the decomposition of the organic peroxide during core vulcanization, the temperature near the core surface is maintained at approximately the same level as the temperature of the vulcanization mold, but near the core center, the decomposition heat of the organic peroxide that has decomposed from the outside accumulates, so it becomes significantly higher than the mold temperature. When water (materials containing water) is directly added to the core, since water has the function of promoting the decomposition of the organic peroxide, the radical reaction as described above can be changed at the core center and the core surface. That is, near the core center, the decomposition of the organic peroxide is further promoted, and the inactivation of radicals is further accelerated, so the amount of effective radicals further decreases. Therefore, a core with a significantly different crosslink density between the core center and the core surface can be obtained, and a core with different dynamic viscoelastic properties at the core center can be obtained.

[0023] There are no particular restrictions on the water added to the above core material, and it may be distilled water or tap water. In particular, it is preferably adopted to use distilled water containing no impurities. The amount of water added is preferably 0.1 part by mass or more, more preferably 0.3 part by mass or more, based on 100 parts by mass of the base rubber. The upper limit is preferably 5 parts by mass or less, more preferably 4 parts by mass or less.

[0024] The above core can be manufactured by vulcanizing and curing a rubber composition containing the above components. For example, it is kneaded using a kneader such as a Banbury mixer or a roll, compression molded or injection molded using a mold for the core, and the molded body is appropriately heated under conditions of a temperature sufficient for an organic peroxide or a co-crosslinking agent to act, at 100 to 200 °C, preferably 140 to 180 °C, for 10 to 40 minutes, whereby the molded body can be cured and manufactured.

[0025] Also, the above core can be formed not only in a single layer but also in multiple layers. As a specific example, a two-layer structure of an inner core and an outer core can be mentioned. When the core is formed into two layers of an inner core and an outer core, as the materials for the inner and outer cores, any of the above-mentioned rubber materials can be used as the main material. Also, the rubber material of the outer core covering the inner core may be of the same type or a different type from the material of the inner core. Specifically, it is the same as described for each component of the rubber material of the above core.

[0026] The diameter of the core is preferably 37.0 mm or more, more preferably 38.0 mm or more, still more preferably 39.0 mm or more, and the upper limit is preferably 41.2 mm or less, more preferably 40.3 mm or less, still more preferably 39.4 mm or less. If the diameter of the core is too small, the amount of spin increases when hitting with a driver (W#1), and there may be a situation where the target flight distance cannot be obtained for a golfer with a slow head speed. On the other hand, if the diameter of the core is too large, the repeated hitting durability may deteriorate or the hitting feeling may become poor.

[0027] With respect to the core, the amount of deflection (mm) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is not particularly limited, but is preferably 2.5 mm or more, more preferably 2.7 mm or more, still more preferably 2.9 mm or more, and as an upper limit value, it is preferably 3.9 mm or less, more preferably 3.7 mm or less, still more preferably 3.5 mm or less. If the amount of deflection of the core is too small, that is, if the core is too hard, the spin of the ball will increase too much, and not only for golfers with a high head speed but also for golfers with a low head speed, the ball may not fly or the feel may become too hard. On the other hand, if the amount of deflection of the core is too large, that is, if the core is too soft, the resilience of the ball will become too low, and not only for golfers with a high head speed but also for golfers with a low head speed, the ball may not fly, the feel may become too soft, or the crack durability during repeated strikes may deteriorate.

[0028] Next, the hardness distribution of the core will be described. The hardness of the core described below means Shore C hardness. This Shore C hardness is the hardness value measured with a Shore C hardness tester conforming to ASTM D2240 standard.

[0029] The core center hardness (Cc) is not particularly limited, but can preferably be 56 or more, more preferably 58 or more, still more preferably 60 or more. Also, the upper limit is not particularly limited, but can preferably be 67 or less, more preferably 65 or less, still more preferably 63 or less. If this value is too large, the feel may become hard or the spin may increase in a full shot and the desired flight distance may not be obtained. On the other hand, if the above value is too small, the resilience may decrease and the desired flight distance may not be obtained, or the crack durability during repeated strikes may deteriorate. The above core center hardness (Cc) means the hardness measured at the center of the cross-section obtained by cutting the core in half (so as to pass through the center).

[0030] Although there is no particular limitation, the hardness (Cm-8) at a position 8 mm inward from the position M in the middle between the center and the surface of the above core (hereinafter also referred to as "intermediate position M") is preferably 56 or more, more preferably 58 or more, and still more preferably 60 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited and can preferably be 68 or less, more preferably 66 or less, and still more preferably 64 or less.

[0031] Although there is no particular limitation, the hardness (Cm-6) at a position 6 mm inward from the position M in the middle between the center and the surface of the above core (hereinafter also referred to as "intermediate position M") is preferably 57 or more, more preferably 59 or more, and still more preferably 61 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited and can preferably be 69 or less, more preferably 67 or less, and still more preferably 65 or less.

[0032] Although there is no particular limitation, the hardness (Cm-4) at a position 4 mm inward from the position M in the middle between the center and the surface of the above core (hereinafter also referred to as "intermediate position M") is preferably 59 or more, more preferably 61 or more, and still more preferably 63 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited and can preferably be 70 or less, more preferably 68 or less, and still more preferably 66 or less.

[0033] Although there is no particular limitation, the hardness (Cm-2) at a position 2 mm inward from the intermediate position M of the above core is preferably 60 or more, more preferably 62 or more, and still more preferably 64 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited and can preferably be 71 or less, more preferably 69 or less, and still more preferably 67 or less. If these hardness values deviate, there is a risk of causing the same adverse results as those described for the center hardness (Cc) of the above core.

[0034] The cross-sectional hardness (Cm) at the intermediate position M of the core is not particularly limited, but is preferably 60 or more, more preferably 62 or more, and still more preferably 64 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited, but can be preferably 72 or less, more preferably 70 or less, and still more preferably 68 or less. If these hardness values deviate, there is a risk of causing the same adverse results as described for the core center hardness (Cc).

[0035] The hardness (Cm+2) at a position 2 mm outward from the intermediate position M of the core toward the core surface (hereinafter simply referred to as "outward") is not particularly limited, but can be preferably 63 or more, more preferably 65 or more, and still more preferably 67 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited and can be preferably 77 or less, more preferably 75 or less, and still more preferably 73 or less. If this value is too large, the crack durability upon repeated impact may deteriorate, or the hitting feeling may become too hard. On the other hand, if the above value is too small, the repulsion may become too low, or there may be too much spin during a full shot and the target flying distance cannot be obtained.

[0036] The hardness (Cm+4) at a position 4 mm outward from the intermediate position M of the core is not particularly limited, but can be preferably 69 or more, more preferably 71 or more, and still more preferably 73 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited and can be preferably 82 or less, more preferably 80 or less, and still more preferably 78 or less. If these hardness values deviate, there is a risk of causing the same adverse results as described for the hardness (Cm+2) at a position 2 mm away from the intermediate position M of the core.

[0037] The hardness (Cm+6) at a position 6 mm outward from the intermediate position M of the above core is not particularly limited, but is preferably 73 or more, more preferably 75 or more, and even more preferably 77 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited, and can be preferably 85 or less, more preferably 83 or less, and even more preferably 81 or less. If these hardness values deviate, there may be adverse results similar to those described for the hardness (Cm+2) at a position 2 mm away from the intermediate position M of the above core.

[0038] The surface hardness (Cs) of the above core is not particularly limited, but can be preferably 80 or more, more preferably 82 or more, and even more preferably 84 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited, and can be preferably 91 or less, more preferably 89 or less, and even more preferably 87 or less. If this value is too large, the hitting feeling may become hard, or the spin may increase in a full shot and the target flying distance may not be obtained. Note that the above surface hardness (Cs) means the hardness measured on the surface (spherical surface) of the above core.

[0039] To increase the hardness difference between the inside and outside of the core, the hardness difference between the center and the surface of the core is optimized. That is, the value of core surface hardness (Cs) - core center C hardness (Cc) is preferably 20 or more in Shore C hardness, more preferably 22 or more, and even more preferably 23 or more. Also, the upper limit thereof is not particularly limited, and can be preferably 30 or less, more preferably 28 or less, and even more preferably 25 or less. If the above hardness difference is too small, the low spin effect during driver (W#1) hitting may be insufficient and the flying distance of golfers with low head speed may not be achieved. On the other hand, if the above hardness difference is too large, the initial hitting speed may be low, the flying distance of golfers with low head speed may not be achieved, or the crack durability during repeated hitting may deteriorate.

[0040] In the above core hardness distribution of the present invention, the following areas A to F, X · Area X: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - 6 - Cm - 8) · Area A: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - 4 - Cm - 6) · Area B: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - 2 - Cm - 4) · Area C: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - Cm - 2) · Area D: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm + 2 - Cm) · Area E: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm + 4 - Cm + 2) · Area F: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm + 6 - Cm + 4) Regarding this, it is preferable that the value of (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area A + Area B + Area C) exceeds 0, more preferably 2.0 or more, still more preferably 4.0 or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 20.0 or less, more preferably 16.0 or less, and even more preferably 12.0 or less. If this value is too small, the flight distance may not be achieved even for golfers with a fast clubhead speed but insufficient low spin effect when hitting the driver (W#1). On the other hand, if the above value is large, the initial hitting speed may be low, and the flight distance may not be achieved for golfers with a fast clubhead speed, or the crack durability during repeated hitting may deteriorate.

[0041] Regarding the above Areas A - F and X, the value of (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area X + Area A + Area B + Area C) is not particularly limited, but it is preferably more than 0, more preferably 2.0 or more, and even more preferably 4.0 or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 20.0 or less, more preferably 16.0 or less, and even more preferably 12.0 or less. If it deviates from the above range, there may be the same adverse results as those described for the value of (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area A + Area B + Area C).

[0042] Regarding the above areas A to E, the value of (Area D + Area E) - (Area A + Area B + Area C) is not particularly limited, but is preferably 1.0 or more, more preferably 2.0 or more, and even more preferably 3.0 or more. As the upper limit value, it is preferably 14.0 or less, more preferably 11.0 or less, and even more preferably 8.0 or less. If it deviates from the above range, there is a risk of causing the same adverse results as those described for the value of (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area A + Area B + Area C).

[0043] Regarding the above areas A to E, X, the value of (Area D + Area E) - (Area X + Area A + Area B + Area C) is not particularly limited, but is preferably more than 0, more preferably 1.0 or more, and even more preferably 2.0 or more. As the upper limit value, it is preferably 14.0 or less, more preferably 11.0 or less, and even more preferably 8.0 or less. If it deviates from the above range, there is a risk of causing the same adverse results as those described for the value of (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area A + Area B + Area C).

[0044] Regarding the above areas A to F, the core center hardness Cc and the core surface hardness Cs, the following formula 0 < [(Area: D + E + F) - (Area: A + B + C)] / (Cs - Cc) ≤ 1.00 is preferably satisfied, and more preferably, 0.10 ≤ [(Area D + E + F) - (Area A + B + C)] / (Cs - Cc) ≤ 0.80, and even more preferably, 0.20 ≤ [(Area D + E + F) - (Area A + B + C)] / (Cs - Cc) ≤ 0.60.

[0045] Note that FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram explaining areas A to F, X using the core hardness distribution data of Example 1. Thus, areas A to F, X are the areas of each triangle having the difference in the distance at each specific distance as the base and the difference in the hardness at each position as the height.

[0046] Next, the intermediate layer will be described. The material hardness of the intermediate layer is not particularly limited, but in terms of Shore D hardness, it is preferably 60 or more, more preferably 62 or more, still more preferably 64 or more, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 72 or less, more preferably 70 or less, still more preferably 68 or less. Further, the surface hardness of the sphere coated with the intermediate layer (intermediate layer-coated sphere) is preferably 66 or more, more preferably 68 or more, still more preferably 70 or more in terms of Shore D hardness, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 78 or less, more preferably 76 or less, still more preferably 74 or less. If the material hardness and surface hardness of these intermediate layers are too soft compared to the above ranges, even for a person with a low head speed, the amount of spin during a full shot may increase too much and the flying distance may not be achieved, or the initial velocity of the ball may be low and the flying distance may not be achieved during a full shot. On the other hand, if the material hardness and surface hardness of the intermediate layer are too hard compared to the above ranges, the crack durability due to repeated impacts may deteriorate, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate.

[0047] In addition, when the material hardness of the intermediate layer is expressed in terms of Shore C hardness, it is preferably 88 or more, more preferably 89 or more, still more preferably 92 or more, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 98 or less, more preferably 96 or less, still more preferably 94 or less. Further, the surface hardness of the intermediate layer-coated sphere is preferably 92 or more, more preferably 94 or more, still more preferably 96 or more in terms of Shore C hardness, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 100 or less, more preferably 99 or less, still more preferably 98 or less.

[0048] The thickness of the intermediate layer is preferably 0.9 mm or more, more preferably 1.1 mm or more, still more preferably 1.2 mm or more. On the other hand, as the upper limit value of the thickness of the intermediate layer, it is preferably 1.8 mm or less, more preferably 1.6 mm or less, still more preferably 1.4 mm or less. If the intermediate layer is too thin, the crack durability due to repeated impacts may deteriorate, or the spin may increase during an iron full shot and the flying distance may not be achieved. On the other hand, if the intermediate layer is too thick, the initial velocity may be low and even a golfer with a low head speed may not achieve the flying distance, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate.

[0049] For the material of the intermediate layer, it is preferable to adopt an ionomer resin as the main material.

[0050] As the ionomer resin material, it is preferable to blend a high acid content ionomer resin with an unsaturated carboxylic acid content (also referred to as "acid content") of 16% by mass or more into a normal ionomer resin and use it. By this blending, low spin and high resilience during a full shot can be achieved, so that a golfer with a slow clubhead speed can ensure the desired flight distance.

[0051] The content (acid content) of the unsaturated carboxylic acid contained in the high acid content ionomer resin is usually 16% by mass or more, preferably 17% by mass or more, more preferably 18% by mass or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 22% by mass or less, more preferably 21% by mass or less, and even more preferably 20% by mass or less. If this value is too small, the spin may increase during a full shot, and the desired flight distance may not be obtained. Conversely, if the above value is too large, the hitting feeling may become too hard, or the crack durability during repeated hitting may deteriorate.

[0052] Also, the high acid content ionomer resin is preferably 10% by mass or more, more preferably 30% by mass or more, and even more preferably 60% by mass or more based on 100% by mass of the resin material. If the blending amount of the above high acid content ionomer resin is too small, the spin may increase when hitting a driver (W#1), and the flight distance may not be achieved.

[0053] Optional additives can be appropriately blended into the intermediate layer material according to the application. For example, various additives such as pigments, dispersants, anti-aging agents, ultraviolet absorbers, and light stabilizers can be added. When blending these additives, the blending amount is preferably 0.1 part by mass or more, more preferably 0.5 part by mass or more, and the upper limit is preferably 10 parts by mass or less, more preferably 4 parts by mass or less based on 100 parts by mass of the base resin.

[0054] Regarding the intermediate layer material, it is preferable to polish the surface of the intermediate layer in order to enhance the adhesion with polyurethane, which is suitably used for the cover material described later. Further, it is preferable to apply a primer (adhesive) to the surface of the intermediate layer after the polishing treatment, or add an adhesion enhancer to the material.

[0055] The specific gravity of the intermediate layer material is preferably 0.90 or more, more preferably 0.93 or more, still more preferably 0.95 or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 1.08 or less, more preferably 1.05 or less, still more preferably 1.00 or less. If the above specific gravity is too large, it may inhibit low spin during a full shot, and it may not be possible to ensure the target flight distance for a golfer with a slow head speed. On the other hand, if the above specific gravity is too small, for example, in order to take a method such as foaming the resin to provide air bubbles inside, the repeated impact durability may deteriorate, the resilience may decrease, and the flight distance may not be achieved even for a golfer with a slow head speed.

[0056] Next, the cover (outermost layer) will be described. The material hardness of the cover is not particularly limited, but in terms of Shore D hardness, it is preferably 35 or more, more preferably 40 or more, still more preferably 45 or more, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 60 or less, more preferably 55 or less, still more preferably 50 or less. Also, the surface hardness of the sphere (ball surface hardness) obtained by covering the intermediate layer coated sphere with the cover is, in terms of Shore D hardness, preferably 50 or more, more preferably 53 or more, still more preferably 56 or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 70 or less, more preferably 67 or less, still more preferably 64 or less. If the material hardness of these covers and the ball surface hardness are too soft compared to the above ranges, there may be too much spin in an iron full shot, and the flight distance may not be achieved under any hitting conditions. On the other hand, if the material hardness of the above cover and the ball surface hardness are too hard compared to the above ranges, there may be no spin during approach, or the scratch resistance may deteriorate.

[0057] In addition, when the material hardness of the cover is expressed in Shore C hardness, it is preferably 57 or more, more preferably 63 or more, still more preferably 70 or more, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 89 or less, more preferably 83 or less, still more preferably 76 or less. Also, when the surface hardness of the ball is expressed in Shore C hardness, it is preferably 75 or more, more preferably 80 or more, still more preferably 85 or more, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 95 or less, more preferably 92 or less, still more preferably 90 or less.

[0058] The thickness of the cover is preferably 0.3 mm or more, more preferably 0.45 mm or more, still more preferably 0.6 mm or more. On the other hand, as the upper limit value of the thickness of the cover, it is preferably 1.2 mm or less, more preferably 1.15 mm or less, still more preferably 1.0 mm or less. If the above cover is too thick, there may be insufficient repulsion or too much spin during an iron full shot, resulting in no flying distance. On the other hand, if the cover is too thin, the scratch resistance may deteriorate, or there may be insufficient spin during approach and insufficient controllability.

[0059] There is no particular limitation on the total thickness of the intermediate layer and the cover, but it is preferably 1.4 mm or more, more preferably 1.7 mm or more, still more preferably 2.0 mm or more, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 2.8 mm or less, more preferably 2.5 mm or less, still more preferably 2.3 mm or less. If the above total thickness is less than the above range, the crack durability due to repeated impacts may deteriorate, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate. On the other hand, if the above total thickness is greater than the above range, the amount of spin during a full shot increases, and not only for players with a high head speed but also for players with a low head speed, the flying distance may not be achieved.

[0060] As the material of the cover, various thermoplastic resins used for the cover material of golf balls can be added. However, from the viewpoints of controllability and scratch resistance, a urethane resin is used as the main material. That is, in the golf ball of the present invention, a cover made of urethane resin is required in order to reduce the run in an iron shot and stop on the green, and to enhance the controllability in a short game. In particular, from the viewpoint of mass productivity of ball products, it is preferable to use a material mainly composed of thermoplastic polyurethane, and more preferably, it can be formed by a resin composition mainly composed of (I) thermoplastic polyurethane and (II) polyisocyanate compound.

[0061] It is recommended that the total mass of the above (I) component and (II) component be 60% or more, more preferably 70% or more, based on the total amount of the resin composition of the cover. The above (I) component and (II) component will be described in detail below.

[0062] Regarding the above (I) thermoplastic polyurethane, the structure of the thermoplastic polyurethane includes a soft segment composed of a high molecular polyol (polymeric glycol) which is a long-chain polyol, and a hard segment composed of a chain extender and a polyisocyanate compound. Here, as the long-chain polyol used as a raw material, any of those conventionally used in the technology related to thermoplastic polyurethane can be used and is not particularly limited. For example, polyester polyol, polyether polyol, polycarbonate polyol, polyester polycarbonate polyol, polyolefin-based polyol, conjugated diene polymerization-based polyol, castor oil-based polyol, silicone-based polyol, vinyl polymerization-based polyol, etc. can be mentioned. These long-chain polyols may be used alone or in combination of two or more. Among these, polyether polyol is preferable in that a thermoplastic polyurethane having a high resilience modulus and excellent low-temperature characteristics can be synthesized.

[0063] As the chain extender, those used in the technology related to conventional thermoplastic polyurethanes can be preferably used. For example, it is preferably a low molecular compound having a molecular weight of 400 or less and having two or more active hydrogen atoms capable of reacting with isocyanate groups in the molecule. Examples of the chain extender include 1,4-butylene glycol, 1,2-ethylene glycol, 1,3-butanediol, 1,6-hexanediol, 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-propanediol, etc., but are not limited thereto. Among these, as the chain extender, aliphatic diols having 2 to 12 carbon atoms are preferable, and 1,4-butylene glycol is more preferable.

[0064] As the polyisocyanate compound, those used in the technology related to conventional thermoplastic polyurethanes can be preferably used, and there is no particular limitation. Specifically, one or more selected from the group consisting of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, 2,4-(or)2,6-toluene diisocyanate, p-phenylene diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, naphthylene 1,5-diisocyanate, tetramethylxylylene diisocyanate, hydrogenated xylylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, tetramethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, norbornene diisocyanate, trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate, dimer acid diisocyanate can be used. However, depending on the isocyanate species, it may be difficult to control the crosslinking reaction during injection molding. In the present invention, from the viewpoint of the balance between the stability during production and the physical properties exhibited, 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate, which is an aromatic diisocyanate, is most preferable.

[0065] As the specific thermoplastic polyurethane of component (I), commercially available products can also be used. For example, there are Panlex T8295, T8290, T8260 (all manufactured by DIC Covestro Polymer Co., Ltd.), etc.

[0066] Although not an essential component, a thermoplastic elastomer other than the above-mentioned thermoplastic polyurethane can be blended as another component (III) with the above components (I) and (II). By blending this component (III) into the resin composition, various physical properties required for a golf ball cover material, such as further improvement in the fluidity, resilience, and scratch resistance of the resin composition, can be enhanced.

[0067] Regarding the composition ratio of the above components (I), (II), and (III), there are no particular restrictions. However, in order to fully and effectively exhibit the effects of the present invention, it is preferably (I):(II):(III) = 100:2 to 50:0 to 50 by mass ratio, and more preferably (I):(II):(III) = 100:2 to 30:8 to 50 (mass ratio).

[0068] Furthermore, various additives other than the components constituting the above-mentioned thermoplastic polyurethane can be blended into the above resin composition as needed. For example, pigments, dispersants, antioxidants, light stabilizers, ultraviolet absorbers, mold release agents, etc. can be appropriately blended.

[0069] Regarding the manufacturing method of a golf ball formed by laminating the above-mentioned core, intermediate layer, and cover (outermost layer), it can be carried out by a conventional method such as a known injection molding method. For example, an intermediate layer material can be injected with an injection molding die around the core to obtain each coated sphere, and then a multi-piece golf ball can be obtained by injecting the material of the cover, which is the outermost layer. Also, as each coating layer, a golf ball can be produced by wrapping the coated sphere with two pre-formed semi-spherical half cups and performing heat and pressure molding.

[0070] For the golf ball, the amount of deflection (mm) from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is not particularly limited, but is preferably 2.0 mm or more, more preferably 2.2 mm or more, still more preferably 2.4 mm or more. As the upper limit value, it is preferably 3.0 mm or less, more preferably 2.9 mm or less, still more preferably 2.8 mm or less. If the amount of deflection of the golf ball is too small, i.e., too hard, even for a player with a low head speed, the spin may increase too much and the carry distance may not be achieved during a full shot, or the feel may become too hard. On the other hand, if the above-mentioned amount of deflection is too large, i.e., the above-mentioned spherical body is too soft, the crack durability during repeated impacts may deteriorate, or the actual initial velocity may be low and the carry distance may not be achieved especially with a driver (W#1) for a player with a low head speed.

[0071] 〔 Hardness relationship of each layer 〕 The intermediate layer-coated spherical body has a higher surface hardness than the core, and the difference in these surface hardnesses is preferably 1 or more, more preferably 5 or more, still more preferably 10 or more in Shore C hardness, and as the upper limit value, it is preferably 30 or less, more preferably 20 or less, still more preferably 15 or less. If the above value is too small, the carry distance may not be achieved even for a golfer with a low head speed and increased spin during a full shot. If the above value is too large, the crack durability during repeated impacts may deteriorate.

[0072] The intermediate layer-coated sphere has a higher surface hardness than the ball, and the difference in these surface hardnesses is, in terms of Shore C hardness, preferably 1 or more, more preferably 5 or more, still more preferably 9 or more, and the upper limit is preferably 20 or less, more preferably 17 or less, still more preferably 15 or less. When the above value is small, if the small value is due to the material hardness of the intermediate layer, even for a player with a low head speed, the spin may increase during a full shot and the desired flight distance may not be achieved. When the small value is due to the material hardness of the cover, the spin controllability in a shot game may deteriorate, or the scratch resistance may deteriorate. On the other hand, when the above value is large, if the large value is due to the material hardness of the intermediate layer, the crack durability due to repeated impacts may deteriorate, or the hitting feel may become too hard. When the large value is due to the material hardness of the cover, even for a player with a low head speed, the spin may increase during a full shot and the desired flight distance may not be achieved.

[0073] Deflection amount relationship between the core and the ball From the deflection amount E (mm) of the core until a load is applied from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf), the value E - B (mm) obtained by subtracting the deflection amount B (mm) of the ball until a load is applied from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is preferably 0.3 mm or more, more preferably 0.5 mm or more, still more preferably 0.6 mm or more, and the upper limit is preferably 1.2 mm or less, more preferably 1.0 mm or less, still more preferably 0.8 mm or less. If this value is too small, the spin during a full shot may increase and the flight distance may not be achieved even for a golfer with a low head speed. On the other hand, if the above value is too large, the crack durability during repeated impacts may deteriorate, or there may be too much run during an iron shot.

[0074] ​​The ratio of the amount of deflection between the ball and the core, that is, the value of B / E, is preferably 0.70 or more, more preferably 0.73 or more, still more preferably 0.78 or more. As the upper limit value, it is preferably 0.84 or less, more preferably 0.82 or less, still more preferably 0.80 or less. If this value is too small, the cracking durability during repeated hitting may deteriorate, or excessive draw may occur during an iron shot. On the other hand, if the above value is too large, the spin during a full shot increases, and the target flight distance may not be achieved even for a golfer with a slow head speed.

[0075] In the present invention, in a hitting test using a driver (head speed: 40 m / s), the ratio (t2 / t1) of the time (t1) required from the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball until the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest, and the time (t2) required from the state where the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest until the golf ball and the club face of the driver are separated is preferably 1.20 or more.

[0076] Specifically, a metal head driver (W#1), "TourB XD-5" (loft angle: 9.5°) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd., is attached to a golf hitting robot, and a golf ball is hit under the condition of a head speed (HS) of 40 m / s. Regarding the golf ball during hitting, it is photographed using a high-speed video camera (FASTCAM SA-Z manufactured by Photron), the photographed image is analyzed, and the times of the above (t1) and (t2) are obtained. Note that, using the image photographed from directly side of the hitting, the point in time when the diameter of the golf ball in the flight direction from the contact surface between the club face and the golf ball becomes the smallest is defined as the point in time when the deformation amount of the golf ball is the largest.

[0077] Regarding the above-mentioned (t1) time, that is, in the hitting test using a driver (head speed: 40 m / s), the time required from the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball until the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest is preferably 260 μsec or more, more preferably 270 μsec or more, still more preferably 275 μsec or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 300 μsec or less, more preferably 295 μsec or less, still more preferably 285 μsec or less. If the above value is too small, in particular, in an iron full shot, the spin may become too much and the flying distance may not be achieved, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate. On the other hand, if the above value is too large, the initial velocity may become low, and in particular, even under the hitting conditions of the driver (W#1), the flying distance may not be achieved, or there may be too much run during an iron shot.

[0078] Regarding the above-mentioned (t2) time, that is, in the hitting test using a driver (head speed: 40 m / s), the time required from the state where the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest until the golf ball and the driver are separated is preferably 295 μsec or more, more preferably 305 μsec or more, still more preferably 315 μsec or more, and the upper limit value is preferably 365 μsec or less, more preferably 355 sec or less, still more preferably 345 sec or less. If the above value is too small, in particular, in an iron full shot, the spin may become too much and the flying distance may not be achieved, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate. On the other hand, if the above value is too large, the initial velocity may become low, and in particular, even under the hitting conditions of the driver (W#1), the flying distance may not be achieved, or there may be too much run during an iron shot.

[0079] The above ratio (t2 / t1) is preferably 1.00 or more, more preferably 1.05 or more, still more preferably 1.10 or more, and the upper limit is preferably 1.26 or less, more preferably 1.24 or less, still more preferably 1.22 or less. If the value of this ratio is too small, especially in an iron full shot, the spin may become too much and the flying distance may not be achieved, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate. If the above value is too large, the initial velocity may decrease, and especially in the hitting conditions of a driver (W#1), the flying distance may not be achieved, or there may be too much run during an iron shot.

[0080] Also, regarding the total time of the above (t1) and (t2), it is preferably 550 μsec or more, more preferably 580 μsec or more, still more preferably 600 μsec or more, and the upper limit is preferably 650 μsec or less, more preferably 640 μsec or less, still more preferably 630 μsec or less. If this value is too small, especially in an iron full shot, the spin may become too much and the flying distance may not be achieved, or the hitting feeling may deteriorate. On the other hand, if the above value is too large, the initial velocity may decrease, and especially in the hitting conditions of a driver (W#1), the flying distance may not be achieved, or there may be too much run during an iron shot.

[0081] In the present invention, the ball diameter is 43.0 mm or more, preferably 43.1 mm or more, more preferably 43.2 mm or more. On the other hand, the upper limit of the ball diameter is usually 44.0 mm or less, preferably 43.7 mm or less, more preferably 43.5 mm or less. If this diameter is too small, the difference in flying distance when a person with a high head speed and a person without it hit with a driver (W#1) will become excessively large. On the other hand, if the ball diameter is too large, the flying distance in the driver (W#1) hit by a person with a low head speed will decrease, and the difficulty of golf will increase, tending to be disadvantageous in competition.

[0082] A large number of dimples can be formed on the outer surface of the cover. There are no particular restrictions on the dimples arranged on the cover surface, but preferably there are 250 or more, preferably 300 or more, more preferably 320 or more. As an upper limit, preferably 380 or less, more preferably 350 or less, still more preferably 340 or less can be provided. When the number of dimples exceeds the above range, the trajectory of the ball may become lower and the flying distance may decrease. Conversely, when the number of dimples decreases, the trajectory of the ball may become higher and the flying distance may not increase.

[0083] Regarding the shape of the dimples, one or a combination of two or more such as circular, various polygons, teardrop shape, and other elliptical shapes can be appropriately used. For example, when using circular dimples, the diameter can be about 2.5 mm or more and 6.5 mm or less, and the depth can be 0.08 mm or more and 0.30 mm or less.

[0084] Regarding the dimple occupancy rate of the dimples on the spherical surface of the golf ball, specifically, the total dimple area defined by the plane edges surrounded by the edges of the dimples, which is the ratio (SR value) of the total dimple area to the spherical surface area of the ball assuming no dimples, it is desirable to be 70% or more and 90% or less from the viewpoint of sufficiently exhibiting aerodynamic characteristics. Also, the value (cylindrical volume ratio) V0 obtained by dividing the spatial volume of the dimples under the plane surrounded by the edges of each dimple by the cylindrical volume with the plane as the bottom surface and the maximum depth of the dimple from this bottom surface as the height is preferably 0.35 or more and 0.80 or less from the viewpoint of optimizing the trajectory of the ball. Further, the VR value of the total dimple volume formed downward from the plane surrounded by the edges of the dimples to the spherical volume of the ball assuming no dimples is preferably 0.6% or more and 1.0% or less. If the ranges of the above-described numerical values are deviated from, a trajectory that cannot obtain a good flying distance may result, and a sufficiently satisfactory flying distance may not be achieved.

[0085] A paint layer (coating layer) can be formed on the cover surface. This paint layer can be applied using various paints. As the paint, it is preferable to use a paint composition mainly composed of a urethane paint composed of a polyol and a polyisocyanate because it needs to withstand the severe usage conditions of a golf ball.

[0086] Examples of the polyol component include acrylic polyols and polyester polyols. These polyols include modified forms of polyols, and other polyols can be added to further improve workability.

[0087] It is preferable to use two types of polyester polyols in combination as the polyol component. In this case, if the two types of polyester polyols are used as component (a) and component (b), as the polyester polyol of component (a), a polyester polyol with a cyclic structure introduced into the resin skeleton can be adopted. For example, polycondensation of a polyol having an alicyclic structure such as cyclohexanedimethanol and a polybasic acid, or polycondensation of a polyol having an alicyclic structure and diols or triols and a polybasic acid can be used to obtain a polyester polyol. On the other hand, as the polyester polyol of component (b), a polyester polyol having a multi-branched structure can be adopted. For example, a polyester polyol having a branched structure such as "NIPPOLAN 800" manufactured by Tosoh Corporation can be mentioned.

[0088] On the one hand, there are no particular restrictions on the polyisocyanate, and it is a commonly used polyisocyanate such as aromatic, aliphatic, or alicyclic polyisocyanate. Specifically, examples include tolylene diisocyanate, diphenylmethane diisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate, tetramethylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanate, lysine diisocyanate, isophorone diisocyanate, 1,4-cyclohexylene diisocyanate, naphthalene diisocyanate, trimethylhexamethylene diisocyanate, dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, 1-isocyanato-3,3,5-trimethyl-4-isocyanatomethylcyclohexane, and the like. These can be used alone or in combination.

[0089] Depending on the painting conditions, various organic solvents can be mixed into the paint composition. Examples of such organic solvents include aromatic solvents such as toluene, xylene, and ethylbenzene; ester solvents such as ethyl acetate, butyl acetate, propylene glycol methyl ether acetate, and propylene glycol methyl ether propionate; ketone solvents such as acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, and cyclohexanone; ether solvents such as diethylene glycol dimethyl ether, diethylene glycol diethyl ether, and dipropylene glycol dimethyl ether; alicyclic hydrocarbon solvents such as cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane, and ethylcyclohexane; and petroleum hydrocarbon solvents such as mineral spirit.

[0090] There are no particular restrictions on the thickness of the paint layer composed of the above paint composition, but it is usually 5 to 40 μm, preferably 10 to 20 μm. Here, the thickness of the paint layer means the average thickness of the paint measured at three locations: the center of the dimple and two positions between the center of the dimple and the edge of the dimple.

[0091] In the present invention, it is necessary that the elastic work recovery rate of the paint layer composed of the above paint composition is 60% or more, preferably 80% or more. If the elastic work recovery rate of this paint layer is within the above range, since the paint layer has a high elastic force, it has a high self-healing function and is extremely excellent in abrasion resistance. Further, various performances of a golf ball coated with the above paint composition can be improved. The method for measuring the above elastic work recovery rate is as follows.

[0092] The elastic work recovery rate is a microhardness test method that controls the indentation load on the order of micronewtons (μN) and tracks the indenter depth during indentation with nanometer (nm) accuracy, and is one parameter of the nanoindentation method for evaluating the physical properties of the paint layer. In the conventional method, only the size of the deformation mark (plastic deformation mark) corresponding to the maximum load could be measured, but in the nanoindentation method, by automatically and continuously measuring, the relationship between the indentation load and the indentation depth can be obtained. Therefore, it is considered that there is no individual difference as in the case of visually measuring the deformation mark with an optical microscope in the conventional manner, and the physical properties of the paint layer can be evaluated with high accuracy. Since the paint layer on the ball surface is greatly affected by the impact of a driver or various clubs, and the influence of the paint layer on the physical properties of the golf ball is not small, measuring the paint layer by the microhardness test method and performing it with higher accuracy than before is a very effective evaluation method.

[0093] Further, the hardness of the above paint layer, the Shore M hardness is preferably 40 or more, more preferably 60 or more, and as the upper limit, preferably 95 or less, more preferably 85 or less. Note that this Shore M hardness conforms to ASTM D2240. Also, the hardness of the above paint layer, the Shore C hardness is preferably 40 or more, and as the upper limit, preferably 80 or less. Note that this Shore C hardness conforms to ASTM D2240. If the paint layer is too hard compared to the above hardness range, the paint may become brittle upon repeated impact, and there is a risk that the cover layer cannot be protected. If the paint layer is too soft compared to the above hardness range, the ball surface is likely to be damaged when hitting a hard object, which is not preferable.

[0094] When using the above paint composition, for a golf ball manufactured by a known method, the paint composition of the present invention is adjusted during painting, and a normal painting process is adopted to apply it to the surface, and a paint layer can be formed on the ball surface through a drying process. In this case, as the painting method, a spray painting method, an electrostatic painting method, a dipping method, etc. can be preferably adopted, and there is no particular limitation.

Examples

[0095] Hereinafter, examples and comparative examples will be shown to specifically explain the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the following examples.

[0096] 〔Examples 1 to 3, Comparative Examples 1 to 5〕 Formation of the core After preparing the rubber compositions of each example and comparative example shown in Table 1, a solid core is produced by vulcanization molding at the temperature and for the time shown in the same table.

[0097]

Table 1

[0098] The details of each component described in Table 1 are as follows. · Polybutadiene A: Manufactured by JSR Corporation, trade name "BR01" · Polybutadiene B: Manufactured by JSR Corporation, trade name "BR730" · Zinc acrylate: "ZN-DA85S" (manufactured by Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.) · Organic peroxide: Dicumyl peroxide, trade name "Perkyl D" (manufactured by NOF Corporation) · Water: Pure water (manufactured by Shoei Yakuhin Kogyo Co., Ltd.) · Antioxidant: 2,2-Methylenebis(4-methyl-6-butylphenol), trade name No Crack NS-6 (manufactured by Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) · Zinc oxide: Trade name "Three Kinds of Zinc Oxide" (manufactured by Sakai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) · Zinc pentachlorothiophenolate: Manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.

[0099] Formation of the intermediate layer and the cover (outermost layer) Next, for each example and comparative example, an intermediate layer is formed by an injection molding method around the core obtained above using the intermediate layer material having the composition shown in Table 2 to produce an intermediate layer-coated sphere. Next, a cover (outermost layer) is formed by an injection molding method around the intermediate layer-coated sphere obtained above using the cover material having the composition shown in the same table to produce a golf ball. At this time, a predetermined number of dimples described below are formed on the cover surface.

[0100] [Table 2]

[0101] The trade names of the materials described in the table are as follows. "Himilan", an ionomer manufactured by Mitsui Dow Chemical Co., Ltd. "AM7318", an ionomer manufactured by Mitsui Dow Chemical Co., Ltd. "Surlyn", an ionomer manufactured by THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY "Nuclel 9-1", an ethylene-methacrylic acid copolymer manufactured by Dupont "Trimethylolpropane" (TMP), manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. "TPU", the trade name "Pandex" of Covestro Polymer GmbH, an ether-type thermoplastic polyurethane

[0102] The dimples of each example and comparative example have an arrangement pattern as shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 5(A) shows a plan view of the dimples, and FIG. 5(B) shows a side view thereof. In each example, the following dimple patterns A to D were used respectively. Each dimple pattern includes eight types of circular dimples numbered 1 to 8 with different diameters and depths. The details are shown in Table 3 below.

[0103] [Table 3]

[0104] Definition of dimple Edge: The highest point in the cross-section passing through the center of the dimple Diameter: The diameter of the plane surrounded by the edge of the dimple Depth: The maximum depth of the dimple from the plane surrounded by the edge of the dimple SR: The ratio of the total dimple area defined by the plane surrounded by the edge of the dimple to the spherical surface area of the ball assuming no dimples Dimple volume: The dimple volume below the plane surrounded by the edge of the dimple Cylinder volume ratio: The ratio of the dimple volume to the volume of a cylinder with the same diameter and depth as the dimple VR: The total dimple volume formed downward from the plane surrounded by the edge of the dimple to the ball volume assuming no dimples

[0105] Formation of the paint layer (coating layer) Next, for each example and comparative example, as a paint composition common to all examples and comparative examples, the paint composition shown in Table 4 below was used, and the above paint was applied to the surface of a large number of formed covers (outermost layer) by an air spray gun to produce a golf ball having a paint layer with a thickness of 15 μm.

[0106] [Table 4]

[0107] [Synthesis Example of Polyester Polyol (A)] Into a reactor equipped with a reflux condenser, a dropping funnel, a gas inlet tube, and a thermometer, 140 parts by mass of trimethylolpropane, 95 parts by mass of ethylene glycol, 157 parts by mass of adipic acid, and 58 parts by mass of 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol were charged, and the temperature was raised to 200 - 240 °C with stirring and heated (reacted) for 5 hours. Thereafter, "Polyester Polyol (A)" with an acid value of 4, a hydroxyl value of 170, and a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 28,000 was obtained. Next, the synthesized polyester polyol (A) was dissolved in butyl acetate to prepare a varnish with a non-volatile content of 70% by mass.

[0108] The coating composition in Table 4 was prepared by mixing 15 parts by mass of "polyester polyol (B)" (saturated aliphatic polyester polyol "NIPPOLAN 800" manufactured by Tosoh Corporation, weight average molecular weight (Mw) 1,000, solid content 100%) and an organic solvent with respect to 23 parts by mass of the above polyester polyol solution, and used as the main agent. This mixture had a non-volatile content of 38.0% by mass.

[0109] Elastic work recovery rate For the measurement of the elastic work recovery rate of the coating, a coating sheet with a thickness of 50 μm is used for measurement. As the measuring device, the ultra-micro hardness tester "ENT-2100" manufactured by Elionix is used, and the measurement conditions are as follows. · Indenter: Berkovich indenter (material: diamond, angle α: 65.03°) · Load F: 0.2 mN · Loading time: 10 seconds · Holding time: 1 second · Unloading time: 10 seconds Based on the indentation work amount Welast (Nm) due to the return deformation of the coating and the mechanical indentation work amount Wtotal (Nm), the elastic work recovery rate is calculated by the following formula. Elastic work recovery rate = Welast / Wtotal × 100 (%)

[0110] Shore C hardness and Shore M hardness For the Shore C hardness and Shore M hardness in Table 4 above, a sheet with a thickness of 2 mm is prepared, and three sheets are stacked and used as test pieces, and measured using a Shore C hardness tester and a Shore M hardness tester conforming to ASTM D2240 standard respectively.

[0111] For each of the obtained golf balls, various physical properties such as the internal hardness at each position of the core, the outer diameter of the core and each coated sphere, the thickness and material hardness of each layer, and the surface hardness of each coated sphere are evaluated by the following method and shown in Table 5 and Table 6.

[0112] Outer diameter of each spherical body of the core and the intermediate layer coated spherical body After adjusting the temperature of the sphere to be measured in a thermostatic bath adjusted to 23.9 ± 1°C for 3 hours or more, measure it in a room at 23.9 ± 2°C. Measure 5 arbitrary surface locations, and use the average value as the measured value for each sphere. Then, obtain the average value with 10 measurement samples.

[0113] Diameter of the ball After adjusting the temperature of the ball to be measured in a thermostatic bath adjusted to 23.9 ± 1°C for 3 hours or more, measure it in a room at 23.9 ± 2°C. Measure 15 arbitrary non-dimpled parts, and use the average value as the measured value for each ball. Then, obtain the average value with 10 measurement samples of balls.

[0114] Deflection amount of the core and the ball Place the core or the target-coated sphere of the ball on a hard board, and measure the deflection amount from the state where an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) is applied until a final load of 1275 N (130 kgf) is applied. The above deflection amount is the measured value after temperature adjustment to 23.9°C. Also, set the pressurization speed of the head that compresses the ball to 10 mm / s.

[0115] Core hardness distribution The surface of the core is spherical. Set the needle of the durometer almost perpendicular to the spherical surface, and measure the surface hardness in Shore C hardness according to ASTM D2240. For the center and predetermined positions of the core, cut the core into a hemispherical shape to make the cross-section flat, and press the needle of the durometer vertically against the center part and the predetermined positions shown in Table 5 for measurement. Indicate the hardness of the center and each position with the value of Shore C hardness. For the hardness measurement, an automatic rubber hardness tester "P2" manufactured by Polymer Instruments Co., Ltd. equipped with a Shore C type durometer is used. Read the maximum value as the hardness value. All measurements are made in an environment at 23 ± 2°C. Note that the values in Table 5 are Shore C hardness values. Also, in the hardness distribution of the core, the Shore C hardness Cc at the center of the core, and the Shore C hardness C at the midpoint M between the center and the surface of the core m, for the Shore C hardness Cm-2, Cm-4, Cm-6, Cm-8 at positions 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm inside from the midpoint M, the Shore C hardness Cm+2, Cm+4, Cm+6 at positions 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm outside from the center M, and the Shore C hardness Cs on the surface of the core, the following areas A to F, X · Area X: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-6 - Cm-8) · Area A: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-4 - Cm-6) · Area B: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-2 - Cm-4) · Area C: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - Cm-2) · Area D: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+2 - Cm) · Area E: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+4 - Cm+2) · Area F: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+6 - Cm+4) were calculated, and the values of the following 9 mathematical formulas were obtained. (1) Area: A + B + C (2) Area: X + A + B + C (3) Area: D + E (4) Area: D + E + F (5) (Area: D + E + F) - (Area: A + B + C) (6) (Area: D + E + F) - (Area: X + A + B + C) (7) (Area: D + E) - (Area: A + B + C) (8) (Area: D + E) - (Area: X + A + B + C) (9) 〔(Area: D + E + F) - (Area: A + B + C)〕 / (Cs - Cc)

[0116] As an explanation of the areas A to F, X of the core hardness distribution, a schematic diagram showing the areas A to F using the core hardness distribution data of Example 1 is shown in FIG. 2. Also, graphs of the core hardness distributions of Examples 1 to 3 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 are shown in FIGS. 3 and 4.

[0117] Material hardness of the intermediate layer and the cover The resin material of each layer is formed into a sheet with a thickness of 2 mm and left for two weeks. Then, the Shore D hardness and Shore C hardness are measured in accordance with the ASTM D2240 standard. For the hardness measurement, an automatic rubber hardness tester "P2" manufactured by Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd. is used. Attach the attachments for Shore D hardness and Shore C hardness and measure each hardness. Read the maximum value as the hardness value. All measurements are made in an environment of 23 ± 2°C.

[0118] Surface hardness of each spherical body of the intermediate layer coated spherical body and the ball Press a needle perpendicularly against the surface of each sphere for measurement. Note that the surface hardness of the ball (cover) is the measured value at the land portion where no dimples are formed on the ball surface. The Shore D hardness and Shore C hardness are measured in accordance with the ASTM D2240 standard. For the hardness measurement, an automatic rubber hardness tester "P2" manufactured by Kobunshi Keiki Co., Ltd. is used. Attach the attachments for Shore D hardness and Shore C hardness and measure each hardness. Read the maximum value as the hardness value. All measurements are made in an environment of 23 ± 2°C.

[0119] Deformation time of the ball Attach a driver (W#1) with a metal head, "TourB XD-5" (loft angle 9.5°) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd., to the golf hitting robot and hit a golf ball under the condition of a head speed (HS) of 40 m / s. For the golf ball during the hit, it is photographed using a high-speed video camera (FASTCAM SA-Z manufactured by Photron), the photographed images are analyzed, and two times (in μsec) are obtained: the time (t1) required from the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball until the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest, and the time (t2) required from the state where the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest until the golf ball and the club face of the driver are separated. Note that using the image photographed from directly side of the hit, the point in time when the diameter of the golf ball in the flight direction from the contact surface between the club face and the golf ball becomes the smallest is taken as the point in time when the deformation amount of the golf ball is the largest.

[0120]

Table 5

[0121]

Table 6

[0122] The flight (W#1)(I#6), spin amount at approach, and damage susceptibility of each golf ball are evaluated by the following method. The results are shown in Table 7.

[0123] Jump evaluation (W#1) Attach a driver (W#1) to a golf hitting robot, measure the total flight distances P and Q when hitting at a head speed (HS) of 47 m / s and a head speed (HS) of 42 m / s respectively, obtain the difference (P - Q) of these total flight distances, and judge according to the following criteria. The club used is the "TourB XD-5 Driver" (loft angle 9.5°) manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. 〔Judgment Criteria〕 The difference in total flight distance is 38.5 m or less... ○ The difference in total flight distance is 38.6 m or more... ×

[0124] Jump evaluation (I#6) Attach a 6-iron (I#6) to a golf hitting robot, measure the carry and total when hitting at a head speed (HS) of 42 m / s, calculate the run from these distances, and judge according to the following criteria. The club used is the "TourB X-CB I#6" manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. 〔Judgment Criteria〕 The run (total - carry) is 10.4 m or less... ○ The run (total - carry) is 10.5 m or more... ×

[0125] Evaluation of the spin amount at approach It is judged by the amount of spin when a sand wedge is attached to a golf hitting robot and the ball is hit at a head speed (HS) of 16 m / s. The amount of spin was measured by an initial condition measuring device for the ball immediately after hitting in the same manner. As the sand wedge, "TourB XW-1 SW" manufactured by Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. is used. 〔Judgment Criteria〕 When the amount of spin is 4000 rpm or more ··· ○ When the amount of spin is less than 4000 rpm ··· ×

[0126] Damageability A PS wedge with a corner groove was attached to the golf hitting robot, the ball was hit at a head speed (HS) of 40 m / s, and the evaluation was made according to the following criteria. 〔Judgment Criteria〕 The difficulty of getting scratched is equal to or greater than that of Example 1 ··· ○ Scratches are more prominent than in Example 1 ··· ×

[0127]

Table 7

[0128] As shown in the results of Table 7, the golf balls of Comparative Examples 1 to 5 are inferior to the product of the present invention (Example) in the following points. Comparative Example 1 has a ball diameter smaller than 43.0 mm. As a result, the total difference (P-Q) between head speeds (HS) of 47 m / s and 42 m / s becomes large. Comparative Example 2 has a ball diameter smaller than 43.0 mm. As a result, the total difference (P-Q) between head speeds (HS) of 47 m / s and 42 m / s becomes large, and the run during hitting with an iron (I#6) increases. Comparative Example 3 has a ball diameter smaller than 43.0 mm and the total of ball deformation times t1 and t2 (t1 + t2) is larger than 650 μsec. As a result, the run during hitting with an iron (I#6) increases. In Comparative Example 4, the ball diameter is smaller than 43.0 mm, and the sum (t1 + t2) of the ball deformation times t1 and t2 is greater than 650 μsec. As a result, the number of runs during hitting with an iron (I#6) increases. In Comparative Example 5, the cover is formed mainly of an ionomer resin. As a result, the ball surface is easily damaged.

Claims

1. A golf ball comprising a core and a cover, wherein the cover is formed mainly of polyurethane, the ball diameter is 43.0 mm or more, and in a hitting test in which the golf ball is hit with a driver under the condition of a head speed of 40 m / s, the time (t1) required from the start of contact between the driver and the golf ball until the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest, and the golf ball from the state where the deformation amount of the golf ball becomes the largest until the golf ball and the driver are separated The total (t1 + t2) of the time (t2) required is 650 μsec or less, and an intermediate layer made of a resin material is formed between the core and the cover, and the surface hardness of the spherical body (intermediate layer-coated spherical body) obtained by coating the core with the intermediate layer is 70 or more in Shore D hardness. A golf ball characterized by that.

2. The golf ball according to claim 1, wherein the ratio (t2 / t1) of the time (t1) to the time (t2) is 1.26 or less.

3. The golf ball according to claim 1 or 2, wherein the deflection amount (mm) until a load of an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) to a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is applied to the ball is 3.0 mm or less.

4. The diameter of the core is 37.0 mm or more, and in the hardness distribution of the core, the Shore C hardness at the center of the core is Cc, the Shore C hardness at the midpoint M between the center and the surface of the core is C m , when the Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm inward from the midpoint M are Cm-2, Cm-4, Cm-6, Cm-8 respectively, and the Shore C hardnesses at positions 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm outward from the center M are Cm+2, Cm+4, Cm+6 respectively, and the Shore C hardness at the surface of the core is Cs, the following areas A to F ・ Area X: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-6 - Cm-8) ・ Area A: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-4 - Cm-6) ・ Area B: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm-2 - Cm-4) ・ Area C: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm - Cm-2) ・ Area D: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+2 - Cm) ・ Area E: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+4 - Cm+2) ・ Area F: 1 / 2 × 2 × (Cm+6 - Cm+4) Regarding, the following formula (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area A + Area B + Area C) > 0 The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 3, which satisfies.

5. Regarding the areas A to F and X of the core hardness distribution, the following formula (Area D + Area E + Area F) - (Area X + Area A + Area B + Area C) > 0 The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 4, which satisfies.

6. Regarding the areas A to E of the core hardness distribution, the following formula (Area D + Area E) - (Area A + Area B + Area C) ≥ 1 The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 5, which satisfies.

7. Regarding the areas A to E and X of the core hardness distribution, the following formula (Area D + Area E) - (Area X + Area A + Area B + Area C) > 0 The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 6, which satisfies.

8. Regarding the areas A to F of the core hardness distribution, the core center hardness Cc, and the core surface hardness Cs, the following formula 0 < [(area: D + E + F) - (area: A + B + C)] / (Cs - Cc) ≤ 1.00 The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 7 that satisfies the above formula.

9. The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the value of the core surface hardness (Cs) - the core center hardness (Cc) is 20 or more.

10. From the deflection amount E (mm) of the core until a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is applied from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf), the value E - B (mm) obtained by subtracting the deflection amount B (mm) of the ball until a final load of 1,275 N (130 kgf) is applied from an initial load of 98 N (10 kgf) is 0.3 to 1.2 mm. The golf ball according to any one of claims 1 to 9.

Images