A structure-reinforced share

By using a symmetrical mechanical support structure and a cohesive constraint design of reinforcing components, the problem of insufficient structural strength of the hoe was solved, achieving the effect of improving fracture resistance and work efficiency without increasing weight.

CN224343778UActive Publication Date: 2026-06-12雷挺
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Utility models(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
雷挺
Filing Date
2025-07-14
Publication Date
2026-06-12

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Existing hoes lack structural strength when facing complex working environments and are prone to breakage due to stress concentration. Traditional reinforcement methods increase weight but have limited effectiveness.

Method used

A symmetrical mechanical support structure is adopted, and a multi-dimensional synergistic reinforcement system is formed by strengthening the binding constraint design between the components and the hoop, which can reasonably disperse stress and optimize weight distribution.

Benefits of technology

It significantly improves the hoe's resistance to breakage in complex environments, reduces operator fatigue, increases work efficiency, and extends its service life.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN224343778U_ABST
    Figure CN224343778U_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The utility model discloses a structure reinforced type share, including the share board, the share hoop, first reinforcing component and second reinforcing component, the share board has the root and blade department in the opposite position, first reinforcing component and second reinforcing component are respectively located the both sides of root, be equipped with first insertion slot and second insertion slot on the share board, the both ends of share hoop are inserted first insertion slot and second insertion slot respectively, first reinforcing component and second reinforcing component act on the share hoop. Compared with prior art, the utility model can effectively promote the structural strength of share.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This utility model relates to the field of hoe technology, and in particular to a structurally reinforced hoe. Background Technology

[0002] As an indispensable tool in agricultural production, the hoe is widely used in farmland operations such as tilling, weeding, and loosening soil. The rationality and durability of its structural design directly affect work efficiency and user experience. In traditional hoe technology, most existing hoe structures employ relatively conventional designs. In actual use, the hoe frequently withstands external forces such as soil resistance and stone impacts. Especially when facing hard soil or complex working environments, stress concentration areas of the hoe body are prone to breakage due to uneven stress or insufficient strength, severely affecting the tool's lifespan. Currently, some hoes on the market may increase component thickness or use high-strength steel to improve structural strength. However, such methods not only increase the overall weight of the hoe, leading to increased labor intensity for the user, but also have limited effectiveness in improving material strength alone, failing to fundamentally solve the breakage problem caused by structural design flaws.

[0003] With the increasing demands for durability and efficiency in modern agricultural production, the reliability of existing hoe structures under high-intensity operations has become increasingly apparent. How to effectively improve the fracture resistance of hoes under complex stress environments through structural optimization design, without significantly increasing weight and cost, has become a pressing technical problem in this field. Existing technical solutions fail to fully consider the multi-directional stress conditions and stress distribution patterns of hoes in actual use, resulting in insignificant reinforcement effects. Therefore, there is an urgent need to propose a new hoe structure that can specifically enhance the strength of key stress-bearing components and rationally distribute stress to meet actual production needs. Utility Model Content

[0004] The purpose of this invention is to provide a structurally reinforced hoe that can significantly improve the structural strength of the hoe.

[0005] The above-mentioned technical objective of this utility model is achieved through the following technical solution:

[0006] A structurally reinforced hoe includes a hoe plate, a hoe hoop, a first reinforcing member, and a second reinforcing member. The hoe plate has a root portion and a cutting edge in opposite positions. The first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are respectively disposed on both sides of the root portion. The hoe plate is provided with a first insertion groove and a second insertion groove. The two ends of the hoe hoop are respectively inserted into the first insertion groove and the second insertion groove. The first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member act on the hoe hoop.

[0007] In a preferred embodiment, the hoe plate is welded to the hoe hoop, the first reinforcing member, and the second reinforcing member, respectively, and the hoe hoop is welded to the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member, respectively.

[0008] In a preferred embodiment, the hoe plate is provided with a first reinforcing rib and a second reinforcing rib on both sides, the first reinforcing rib and the second reinforcing rib extending from the ends of the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member, respectively, toward the blade of the hoe plate.

[0009] In a preferred embodiment, the hoe plate has a first receiving opening and a second receiving opening on both sides to accommodate the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member, respectively. The first reinforcing member is disposed in the first receiving opening and the second reinforcing member is disposed in the second receiving opening.

[0010] In a preferred embodiment, the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are configured as strips or plates.

[0011] In a preferred embodiment, the first insertion slot and the second insertion slot are configured as openings formed on the hoe plate, the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are disposed along the edge of the hoe plate, and the ends of the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member abut against the hoe hoop.

[0012] In a preferred embodiment, the first insertion slot is the gap space between the first reinforcing member and the hoe plate, the second insertion slot is the gap space between the second reinforcing member and the hoe plate, the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are disposed along the edge of the hoe plate, and the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are attached to the hoe hoop.

[0013] Compared with existing technologies, this utility model forms a multi-dimensional synergistic enhancement technology system through the innovative layout of the hoe plate, hoe hoop and reinforcing components. The non-obviousness of its technical effect is reflected in the in-depth deconstruction and targeted optimization of the essential law of force on the hoe.

[0014] From a structural mechanics perspective, the fracture risk of traditional hoes is concentrated at the root of the hoe blade—this area is both the transmission hub of the handle's force and the reaction center of the cutting resistance of the blade, forming a typical stress concentration zone. In this design, the first and second reinforcing members are respectively set on both sides of the root, constructing a symmetrical mechanical support structure. This layout is not a simple superposition of components, but is based on the force distribution law during hoe operation: when the blade cuts into the soil, the resistance is transmitted to the root through the blade, and the reinforcing members on both sides act as "mechanical anchor points," transforming the unidirectional shear force into a bidirectional balanced support force, greatly reducing the peak bending stress at the root. This active guidance of the force direction breaks through the conventional thinking that reinforcing ribs are only set along a single axis.

[0015] In existing technologies, hoe clamps typically serve only as the insertion carrier between the handle and the hoe plate, their function limited to connection and fixation. This solution, however, designs the hoe clamp's two ends to insert into a first and a second insertion slot, enabling the clamp to not only bear axial tensile force but also form a "cozy constraint" with the reinforcing members on both sides. Specifically, the reinforcing members, through their lateral limiting effect on the hoe clamp, create a three-dimensional constraint space at the insertion interface: when the hoe is subjected to lateral impact (such as colliding with a rock), the hoe clamp is no longer an independent force-bearing unit but forms a rigid whole with the reinforcing members and the hoe plate. The impact force is dispersed to the reinforcing members on both sides through the inclined structure of the insertion slot, avoiding the problem of detachment or breakage caused by stress concentration at the insertion point in traditional structures. This design, which deeply integrates the connecting structure and the reinforcing structure, breaks the traditional perception that "connecting components are only responsible for assembly."

[0016] In terms of performance optimization, the solution achieves a dynamic balance of "heavier root and lighter blade" through the design of the reinforced component's position and mass distribution. Traditional hoes often increase root thickness to enhance strength, leading to a forward shift in the overall center of gravity and increased strain on the user's wrists. In this solution, the reinforcement of the root does not rely on material accumulation. Its symmetrical layout increases the structural strength of the root while the rational distribution of mass shifts the hoe's center of gravity backward, creating a "lighter front, heavier back" weight distribution. When the user swings the hoe, the resistance of the blade cutting into the soil and the inertial force of the root create a natural torque balance, reducing the need for lateral arm exertion, significantly increasing the single digging depth, and significantly reducing operator fatigue.

[0017] From the perspective of the synergistic effect of the technical solution, the cooperation between the strengthening component and the hoop is not isolated: the constraint effect of the strengthening component on the hoop changes the stress section of the insertion groove from the traditional linear contact to surface contact, which significantly reduces the processing accuracy requirements; at the same time, the symmetrical strengthening structure provides more room for subsequent material selection. Under the same strength requirements, lighter alloy materials can be selected without worrying about the risk of fracture due to the decrease in material strength.

[0018] In summary, the technical effectiveness of this solution does not stem from improvements to a single component, but rather from the reconstruction of the force transmission path during hoe operation, the functional integration of the connecting and reinforcing structures, and the precise matching of ergonomic parameters, resulting in a significantly innovative technical solution. Its non-obviousness lies in the fact that, when faced with the problem of traditional hoe breakage, those skilled in the art are usually limited to conventional methods such as material upgrades or localized thickening. They find it difficult to foresee that through the interlocking structural design of the reinforcing components on both sides and the hoe hoop, multiple technical breakthroughs could be achieved without increasing weight, including stress dispersion, connection strengthening, and weight optimization. This systematic innovation provides a completely new technical approach to hoe structural design. Attached Figure Description

[0019] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure in Embodiment 1 of this utility model.

[0020] Figures 2 to 4 This is a schematic diagram of different configurations in Embodiment 2 of this utility model.

[0021] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of component disassembly under one configuration in Embodiment 2.

[0022] In the picture

[0023] 1. Hoe hoop; 2. First reinforcing member; 3. Second reinforcing member; 4. Hoe tongue; 5. Hoe plate; 6. First insertion groove; 7. Second insertion groove; 8. Root; 9. Blade; 10. First reinforcing rib; 11. Second reinforcing rib; 12. First receiving opening; 13. Second receiving opening. Detailed Implementation

[0024] The present invention will be further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.

[0025] This specific embodiment is merely an explanation of the present utility model and is not intended to limit the present utility model. After reading this specification, those skilled in the art can make modifications to this embodiment without contributing any inventive step, but as long as they are within the scope of the claims of the present utility model, they are protected by patent law. Example 1

[0026] like Figure 1 As shown, a structurally reinforced hoe includes a hoe plate 5, a hoe hoop 1, a first reinforcing member 2, and a second reinforcing member 3. The hoe plate 5 has a root portion 8 and a blade portion 9 in opposite positions. The first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 are respectively disposed on both sides of the root portion 8. The hoe plate 5 is provided with a first insertion groove 6 and a second insertion groove 7. The two ends of the hoe hoop 1 are respectively inserted into the first insertion groove 6 and the second insertion groove 7. The first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 act on the hoe hoop 1.

[0027] This embodiment of a structurally reinforced hoe forms a multi-dimensional synergistic enhancement technical system through an innovative layout of the hoe plate 5, hoe hoop 1, and reinforcing components. The non-obviousness of its technical effect is reflected in the in-depth deconstruction and targeted optimization of the essential law of force on the hoe.

[0028] From a structural mechanics perspective, the fracture risk of traditional hoes is concentrated at the root 8 of the hoe blade 5—this area is both the transmission hub of the handle's force and the reaction center of the cutting resistance of the blade 9, forming a typical stress concentration zone. In this design, the first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 are respectively set on both sides of the root 8, constructing a symmetrical mechanical support structure. This layout is not a simple superposition of components, but is based on the force distribution law during hoe operation: when the blade 9 of the hoe blade 5 cuts into the soil, the resistance is transmitted to the root 8 through the blade 9, and the reinforcing members on both sides act as "mechanical anchor points," transforming the unidirectional shear force into a bidirectional balanced support force, greatly reducing the peak bending stress at the root 8. This active guidance of the force direction breaks through the conventional thinking that reinforcing ribs are only set along a single axis.

[0029] In existing technologies, the hoe hoop 1 typically serves only as a connector between the handle and the hoe plate 5, its function limited to connection and fixation. This solution, however, designs both ends of the hoe hoop 1 to insert into the first insertion slot 6 and the second insertion slot 7, enabling the hoe hoop 1 to not only bear axial tensile force but also form a "cozy constraint" with the reinforcing members on both sides. Specifically, the reinforcing members, through their lateral limiting effect on the hoe hoop 1, create a three-dimensional constraint space at the insertion interface: when the hoe is subjected to lateral impact (such as colliding with a rock), the hoe hoop 1 is no longer an independent force-bearing unit but forms a rigid whole with the reinforcing members and the hoe plate 5. The impact force is dispersed to the reinforcing members on both sides through the inclined structure of the insertion slots, avoiding the problem of detachment or breakage caused by stress concentration at the insertion point in traditional structures. This design, which deeply integrates the connecting structure and the reinforcing structure, breaks the traditional perception that "connecting components are only responsible for assembly."

[0030] In terms of performance optimization, the solution achieves a dynamic balance of "heavier root 8 and lighter blade 9" through the design of the position and mass distribution of the reinforcing components. Traditional hoes often increase the thickness of the root 8 to improve strength, which usually leads to a forward shift of the overall center of gravity, increasing the burden on the user's wrist. In this solution, the reinforcement of the root 8 by the reinforcing components does not rely on material accumulation. Its symmetrical layout increases the structural strength of the root 8 while the reasonable distribution of mass shifts the center of gravity of the hoe backward, forming a "lighter front and heavier back" weight distribution. When the user swings the hoe, the resistance of the blade 9 cutting into the soil and the inertial force of the root 8 form a natural torque balance, reducing the need for lateral arm force, significantly increasing the single digging depth, and significantly reducing operator fatigue.

[0031] From the perspective of the synergistic effect of the technical solution, the cooperation between the reinforcing component and the hoist 1 is not isolated: the constraint effect of the reinforcing component on the hoist 1 changes the stress section of the insertion groove from the traditional linear contact to the surface contact, which significantly reduces the processing accuracy requirements; at the same time, the symmetrical reinforcing structure provides more space for subsequent material selection. Under the same strength requirements, lighter alloy materials can be selected without worrying about the risk of fracture due to the decrease in material strength.

[0032] The hoe plate 5 is welded to the hoe hoop 1, the first reinforcing member 2, and the second reinforcing member 3, respectively. The hoe hoop 1 is welded to both the first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3. Welding enables the hoe plate 5, hoe hoop 1, first reinforcing member 2, second reinforcing member 3, and hoe tongue 4 to form a robust integral structure, eliminating assembly gaps between components, effectively preventing stress concentration caused by loosening, and significantly improving the structural stability of the hoe under complex working conditions. Simultaneously, the welding process allows for precise control of the connection position and strength.

[0033] This embodiment of a structurally reinforced hoe also includes a hoe tongue 4, which is welded to the hoe plate 5 and the hoe hoop 1. The hoe tongue 4 is located at the root 8 of the hoe plate 5, corresponding to the connection position between the hoe plate 5 and the hoe hoop 1. The hoe tongue 4, located at the root 8 of the hoe plate 5 and corresponding to the connection position between the hoe plate 5 and the hoe hoop 1, forms a complementary support system with the reinforcing members on both sides and the hoe hoop 1. When the hoe is under stress, the hoe tongue 4 can help disperse the stress from the connection between the hoe hoop 1 and the hoe plate 5, reducing local stress concentration; at the same time, it can fill any gaps between components, enhancing the tightness of the connection, ensuring the hoe remains stable during high-frequency use, and working synergistically with the reinforcing members and the hoe hoop 1 to improve the overall structural strength and durability of the hoe.

[0034] The hoe plate 5 has a first reinforcing rib 10 and a second reinforcing rib 11 on both sides. The first reinforcing rib 10 and the second reinforcing rib 11 originate from the ends of the first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3, respectively, and extend towards the blade 9 of the hoe plate 5. The arrangement of the first reinforcing rib 10 and the second reinforcing rib 11 can disperse and transfer the stress borne by the reinforcing members along the length of the hoe plate 5, avoiding excessive local stress concentration and effectively enhancing the overall bending resistance of the hoe plate 5. At the same time, the reinforcing ribs provide reinforced support to the surface of the hoe plate 5, improving the resistance of the blade 9 to external impacts when the hoe is used for turning soil, weeding, or other operations, reducing the risk of deformation or breakage of the blade 9 due to stress, and significantly extending the service life of the hoe.

[0035] The hoe plate 5 has a first receiving opening 12 and a second receiving opening 13 on both sides to accommodate the first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3, respectively. The first reinforcing member 2 is disposed in the first receiving opening 12, and the second reinforcing member 3 is disposed in the second receiving opening 13. The receiving openings allow the reinforcing members to fit tightly into the hoe plate 5. The flush sides of the two eliminate the sharp edges and protrusions that may be generated by traditional external reinforcing structures, avoiding the resistance to movement caused by scraping soil, grass roots, or stones during digging, and greatly improving the smoothness of the hoe entering the soil.

[0036] Furthermore, the first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 are configured as strips or plates. In this embodiment, they are preferably configured as strips, as the strip structure is lighter and can effectively improve the strength of the hoe while avoiding the impact of excessive weight on operational flexibility; its slender shape conforms to the force direction of the hoe and can transmit stress more accurately along the length of the hoe plate 5, enhancing the bending resistance of key parts; moreover, the strip component occupies less space, and welding with the hoe plate 5 and hoe hoop 1 is more convenient, which helps to improve production efficiency and also reduces frictional resistance when in contact with soil, etc.

[0037] The first insertion slot 6 and the second insertion slot 7 are configured as openings formed on the hoe plate 5. The first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 are arranged along the edge of the hoe plate 5, and the ends of the first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 abut against the hoe hoop 1. The end of the hoe hoop 1 is inserted into the open insertion slot, which, compared with the traditional planar sleeve method, forms an embedded three-dimensional limiting structure, which can effectively resist axial tensile force and lateral torsional force during use, and greatly reduce the risk of loosening or falling off the connection. At the same time, the reinforcing member is arranged along the edge of the hoe plate 5 and abuts against the hoe hoop 1, which is equivalent to forming an additional "fastening ring" at the insertion point, further strengthening the connection strength between the hoe hoop 1 and the hoe plate 5. From the perspective of stress dispersion, the abutting effect of the end of the reinforcing member against the hoe hoop 1 allows the stress to be quickly and evenly transmitted along the contact surface between the reinforcing member, the hoe hoop 1 and the hoe plate 5 when the hoe is subjected to external force, avoiding the breakage problem caused by stress concentration at the insertion point in the traditional structure. This multi-component collaborative connection and reinforcement method breaks through the limitation of relying on only a single connection structure in the existing technology. Example 2

[0038] like Figure 2 to Figure 4As shown, unlike Embodiment 1, the first insertion groove 6 is the gap space between the first reinforcing member 2 and the hoe plate 5, and the second insertion groove 7 is the gap space between the second reinforcing member 3 and the hoe plate 5. The first reinforcing member 2 and the second reinforcing member 3 are arranged along the edge of the hoe plate 5 and are attached to the hoe hoop 1. The hoe hoop 1 is directly and tightly attached to the reinforcing member and is also embedded in the gap formed by the reinforcing member and the hoe plate 5. This design ensures the effective contact area between the hoe hoop 1 and the hoe plate 5, making the connection between the two more stable and better able to withstand the complex and changing external forces during use, significantly reducing the risk of loosening or falling off the connection. In terms of reinforcement effect, the reinforcing member not only serves as a key component in forming the insertion groove but also directly acts as a supporting structure for the hoe hoop 1. When the hoe is subjected to impact force during operation, the reinforcing member can promptly disperse the external force, avoiding excessive stress concentration at the connection between the hoe hoop 1 and the hoe plate 5. Furthermore, the layout of the reinforcing components along the edge of the hoe plate 5 enables a continuous and stable force transmission path when the hoe is subjected to force, effectively enhancing the overall structural strength of the hoe. Compared with traditional structures, this design achieves high efficiency and reliability in structural reinforcement without adding too much material and weight.

[0039] It should be noted that, in this document, relational terms such as "first" and "second" are used only to distinguish one entity or operation from another, and do not necessarily require or imply any such actual relationship or order between these entities or operations. Furthermore, the terms "comprising," "including," or any other variations thereof are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or terminal device that comprises a list of elements includes not only those elements but also other elements not expressly listed, or elements inherent to such a process, method, article, or terminal device. Unless otherwise specified, an element defined by the phrase "comprising..." or "including..." does not exclude the presence of additional elements in the process, method, article, or terminal device that includes said element. Additionally, in this document, "greater than," "less than," "exceeding," etc., are understood to exclude the stated number; "above," "below," "within," etc., are understood to include the stated number.

[0040] The above description of the embodiments is provided to facilitate understanding and use of the present invention by those skilled in the art. It is obvious to those skilled in the art that various modifications can be easily made to the embodiments, and the general principles described herein can be applied to other embodiments without creative effort. Therefore, the present invention is not limited to the above embodiments. Any improvements and modifications made by those skilled in the art based on the disclosure of the present invention without departing from the scope of the present invention should be within the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A structurally reinforced hoe, characterized in that, The hoe includes a hoe plate, a hoe hoop, a first reinforcing member, and a second reinforcing member. The hoe plate has a root and a cutting edge in opposite positions. The first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are respectively located on both sides of the root. The hoe plate is provided with a first insertion groove and a second insertion groove. The two ends of the hoe hoop are respectively inserted into the first insertion groove and the second insertion groove. The first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member act on the hoe hoop.

2. The structurally reinforced hoe according to claim 1, characterized in that, The hoe plate is welded to the hoe hoop, the first reinforcing member, and the second reinforcing member, respectively, and the hoe hoop is welded to the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member, respectively.

3. The structurally reinforced hoe according to claim 1, characterized in that, The hoe blade is provided with a first reinforcing rib and a second reinforcing rib on both sides, and the first reinforcing rib and the second reinforcing rib extend from the ends of the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member, respectively, toward the blade of the hoe blade.

4. The structurally reinforced hoe according to claim 1, characterized in that, The hoe plate has a first receiving opening and a second receiving opening on both sides to accommodate the first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member, respectively. The first reinforcing member is disposed in the first receiving opening and the second reinforcing member is disposed in the second receiving opening.

5. The structurally reinforced hoe according to claim 1, characterized in that, The first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are configured as strips or plates.

6. The structurally reinforced hoe according to claim 1, characterized in that, The first and second insertion slots are configured as openings formed on the hoe plate, the first and second reinforcing members are disposed along the edge of the hoe plate, and the ends of the first and second reinforcing members abut against the hoe hoop.

7. The structurally reinforced hoe according to claim 1, characterized in that, The first insertion slot is the gap space between the first reinforcing member and the hoe plate, and the second insertion slot is the gap space between the second reinforcing member and the hoe plate. The first reinforcing member and the second reinforcing member are arranged along the edge of the hoe plate and are attached to the hoe hoop.