Double-task cognition-motion evaluation test method and system based on visual constraint

By displaying markers on a target display device and collecting biomechanical and cognitive data to generate cognitive-motor assessment test results, the problem that traditional tests cannot simulate dynamic cognitive-motor interference effects is solved, and the accuracy and practicality of the assessment are improved.

CN120616448APending Publication Date: 2025-09-12BEIJING SPORT UNIV
View PDF 0 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Application Number
CN202510861194.2
Authority / Receiving Office
CN · China
Patent Type
Applications(China)
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-06-25
Publication Date
2025-09-12

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

Traditional cognitive testing methods cannot simulate the dynamic cognitive-motor interference effects in real sports scenarios and cannot effectively assess athletes' instantaneous decision-making needs during competitions.

Method used

By displaying different original marks on the target display device and collecting biomechanical and cognitive test data when the subject completes the jumping action, the cognitive-motor assessment test results are generated by combining the pointing marks of the target area and the test response time.

Benefits of technology

It achieves the coordination of biomechanical and cognitive testing when completing jumping movements, improves the accuracy and practicality of cognitive-motor integration ability assessment, and meets the assessment needs of athletes in complex scenarios.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure CN120616448A_ABST
    Figure CN120616448A_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of cognition testing, and discloses a double-task cognition-motion evaluation testing method and system based on visual constraint, and the method comprises the steps: controlling a display device to display different original marks in each preset region; when the display device stops displaying in each preset area and receives a jump starting instruction sent by the subject, collecting biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed; the display device is controlled to carry out pointing marking on the target area, and a test mark and test response duration output when the subject carries out a cognitive test on the target area are obtained; and obtaining a cognition test result of the subject according to the test marker corresponding to the target area and the original marker, so as to generate a cognition-motion evaluation test result. According to the method disclosed by the invention, the cooperation of biomechanics and cognitive tests when the jumping action is completed is realized, the evaluation requirement of a subject and the like for instantaneously deciding accompanying movement is met, and the accuracy and the practicability of cognitive-movement integration ability evaluation are improved.
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of cognitive testing, and in particular to a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method and system based on visual constraints. Background Art

[0002] Currently, traditional cognitive testing methods (such as the Stroop test) focus solely on static cognitive abilities when assessing cognitive-motor integration, failing to simulate the dynamic cognitive-motor interference effects of real-world sports. For example, athletes' jumps and landings during competitions require instantaneous decision-making, and existing testing methods are unable to replicate this dual-task environment, resulting in a lack of motor-task coordination in traditional cognitive testing.

[0003] Therefore, it is urgent to provide a technical solution to solve the above problems. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To solve the above technical problems, the present invention provides a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method and system based on visual constraints.

[0005] In a first aspect, the present invention provides a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints, the technical solution of the method is as follows:

[0006] When the subject is given a cognitive-motor assessment test, the target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area;

[0007] When the target display device stops displaying the corresponding test mark in each preset area and receives a jump start instruction from the subject, collecting biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed;

[0008] Controlling the target display device to point to a target area and obtain a test mark and a test response duration output by the subject during a cognitive test on the target area; wherein the target area is any one of all preset areas;

[0009] The cognitive test result of the subject is obtained based on the test mark and the original mark corresponding to the target area, and the cognitive test result, the test response time and the biomechanical test data are determined as the cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

[0010] The beneficial effects of the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention are as follows:

[0011] The method of the present invention can effectively solve the problem that traditional cognitive tests only focus on static cognitive abilities and cannot simulate dynamic cognitive-motor interference effects. It realizes the coordination of biomechanics and cognitive tests when completing jumping movements, meets the assessment needs of athletes and others who need instantaneous decision-making accompanied by movement in complex competition scenarios, and improves the accuracy and practicality of cognitive-motor integration ability assessment.

[0012] Based on the above solution, the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention can be further improved as follows.

[0013] In an optional manner, the step of controlling the target display device to display different original marks in each preset area includes:

[0014] The target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area for a preset time period.

[0015] In an optional manner, all preset areas are distributed in a ring shape, and the original mark corresponding to each preset area is in digital form.

[0016] In an optional manner, the biomechanical test data includes: knee flexion angle value and knee valgus moment value;

[0017] The step of collecting biomechanical test data of the subject when completing a jumping action comprises:

[0018] Using a motion capture device arranged around the subject, collecting the knee joint flexion angle value of the subject; wherein the motion capture device is surrounded by a plurality of cameras;

[0019] A force platform arranged at the jumping landing point of the subject is used to collect the ground reaction force of the subject when the jumping action is completed, and the knee valgus torque value of the subject is obtained by inverse dynamics calculation based on the ground reaction force.

[0020] In an optional manner, the method further includes:

[0021] Obtain cognitive-motor assessment test results obtained by the subject performing cognitive-motor assessment tests multiple times, and determine the average of the multiple cognitive-motor assessment test results as the final cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

[0022] In a second aspect, the present invention provides a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints, the technical solution of the system is as follows:

[0023] It includes: a display control module, a first acquisition module, a second acquisition module and an evaluation test module;

[0024] The display control module is used to: when a cognitive-motor assessment test is performed on a subject, control the target display device to display different original marks in each preset area;

[0025] The first acquisition module is configured to: when the target display device stops displaying the corresponding test mark in each preset area and when receiving a jump start instruction from the subject, acquire biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed;

[0026] The second acquisition module is used to control the target display device to point to a target area and obtain a test mark and a test response time output by the subject when performing a cognitive test on the target area; wherein the target area is any one of all preset areas;

[0027] The evaluation test module is used to obtain the cognitive test results of the subject based on the test marks and original marks corresponding to the target area, and determine the cognitive test results, the test response time and the biomechanical test data as the cognitive-motor evaluation test results of the subject.

[0028] The beneficial effects of the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints of the present invention are as follows:

[0029] The system of the present invention can effectively solve the problem that traditional cognitive tests only focus on static cognitive abilities and cannot simulate dynamic cognitive-motor interference effects. It realizes the coordination of biomechanics and cognitive tests when completing jumping movements, meets the assessment needs of athletes and others who need instantaneous decision-making accompanied by movement in complex competition scenarios, and improves the accuracy and practicality of cognitive-motor integration ability assessment.

[0030] Based on the above solution, the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints of the present invention can be further improved as follows.

[0031] In an optional manner, the display control module is specifically configured to:

[0032] The target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area for a preset time period.

[0033] In an optional manner, all preset areas are distributed in a ring shape, and the original mark corresponding to each preset area is in digital form.

[0034] In a third aspect, the technical solution of an electronic device of the present invention is as follows:

[0035] The system comprises a memory, a processor and a program stored in the memory and running on the processor. When the processor executes the program, the steps of the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention are implemented.

[0036] In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium having the following technical solution:

[0037] The computer-readable storage medium stores instructions. When the computer-readable storage medium reads the instructions, the computer-readable storage medium is caused to execute the steps of the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention.

[0038] The above description is only an overview of the technical solution of the present invention. In order to more clearly understand the technical means of the present invention, it can be implemented in accordance with the contents of the specification. In order to make the above and other purposes, features and advantages of the present invention more obvious and easy to understand, the specific implementation methods of the present invention are specifically listed below. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0039] The accompanying drawings are only used to illustrate the embodiments and are not to be considered as limiting the present invention. In addition, the same reference symbols are used to represent the same components throughout the drawings. In the drawings:

[0040] Figure 1 1 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention;

[0041] Figure 2 Schematic diagram of the structure of an embodiment of a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints of the present invention;

[0042] Figure 3 The figure is a schematic structural diagram of an embodiment of an electronic device of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0043] The exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although exemplary embodiments of the present invention are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present invention can be implemented in various forms and should not be limited to the embodiments set forth herein.

[0044] Figure 1A flow chart of an embodiment of a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints provided by the present invention is shown. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints can be executed by an electronic device such as a terminal device or a server. The terminal device can be any fixed or mobile terminal such as a user equipment (UE), a mobile device, a user terminal, a terminal, a cellular phone, a cordless phone, a personal digital assistant (PDA), a handheld device, a computing device, a vehicle-mounted device, a wearable device, etc. The server can be a single server or a server cluster composed of multiple servers. Any electronic device can implement the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints by calling computer-readable instructions stored in a memory through a processor. As Figure 1 As shown, the following steps are included:

[0045] S1. When a cognitive-motor assessment test is performed on a subject, the target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area.

[0046] Among them, the subject refers to a person participating in the cognitive-motor assessment test, who needs to perform jumping movements and respond to visual marking tasks. The cognitive-motor assessment test refers to a test method for synchronously evaluating cognitive ability and motor ability, which is achieved through a dual-task combination of jumping movements (motor tasks) and visual marker recognition (cognitive tasks). The target display device refers to an electronic device for displaying preset area marks, including but not limited to a display screen, a projector or an LED array, which is controlled by a program. The preset area refers to a plurality of fixed position areas pre-set on the target display device for displaying original marks. The original mark refers to the identification symbol initially displayed in the preset area. The identification symbol can be a number, letter, text, etc., and there is no restriction here.

[0047] S2. When the target display device stops displaying the corresponding test mark in each preset area and receives a jump start instruction from the subject, biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed is collected.

[0048] The jump start command refers to an action command issued by the subject by clicking a "jump" button on the touch screen of the target display device or a specific trigger device, which is used to simulate the starting signal of the jump landing action. Biomechanical test data refers to the quantitative motion parameters collected at the completion of the jump action, including but not limited to the knee flexion angle value and knee valgus torque value.

[0049] S3. Control the target display device to point to the target area and obtain the test mark and test response time output by the subject when performing a cognitive test on the target area.

[0050] Among them, the target area is any one of all preset areas. The pointing mark refers to the visual indicator that appears when the target area is selected. By default, it is a red indicator line extending from the center of the display interface of the target display device to the target area. The test mark refers to the cognitive response result output by the subject for the target area, which is generated by clicking the digital button on the touch screen of the target display device or a specific trigger device for comparison with the original mark. The test response time refers to the time interval from the display of the pointing mark in the target area to the output of the test mark by the subject, in milliseconds (ms).

[0051] S4. Obtain a cognitive test result of the subject based on the test mark and the original mark corresponding to the target area, and determine the cognitive test result, the test response time, and the biomechanical test data as a cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

[0052] The cognitive test result refers to the accuracy determination (correct / incorrect) obtained by comparing the test mark and the original mark of the target area. The cognitive-motor assessment test result refers to a comprehensive assessment report generated by integrating the cognitive test results, test response time, and biomechanical test data.

[0053] The technical solution of this embodiment can effectively solve the problem that traditional cognitive tests only focus on static cognitive abilities and cannot simulate dynamic cognitive-motor interference effects. It realizes the coordination of biomechanics and cognitive tests when completing jumping movements, meets the evaluation needs of athletes and others who need instantaneous decision-making accompanied by movement in complex competition scenarios, and improves the accuracy and practicality of cognitive-motor integration ability evaluation.

[0054] In an optional manner, the step of controlling the target display device to display different original marks in each preset area includes:

[0055] The target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area for a preset time period.

[0056] The default display time of the original mark in the preset area is 1 second, which can be adjusted according to actual conditions and is not limited here. Specifically, the display frequency and display duration are controlled synchronously for each preset area.

[0057] In the above optional method, the steps of controlling the display of the original mark are further refined, and the display duration is clarified so that the subjects have enough time to memorize the mark, thereby improving the accuracy and reliability of the cognitive test, providing more accurate cognitive information for subsequent evaluation combined with motion data, and further enhancing the scientific nature of the cognitive-motor integration ability assessment.

[0058] In an optional manner, all preset areas are distributed in a ring shape, and the original mark corresponding to each preset area is in digital form.

[0059] All areas are arranged in a circular pattern with adjacent areas spaced 60 degrees apart. The original markings are in Arabic numerals (e.g., 1-6), with each preset area displaying a unique number.

[0060] In the above optional method, it is further stipulated that the preset areas are distributed in a circular shape and the original markings are in digital form. This layout enables the subjects to focus more evenly in all directions. The digital markings are concise and clear, which facilitates quick recognition and memory, improves test efficiency, optimizes the presentation of cognitive tests, and helps to more accurately evaluate the subjects' cognitive-motor integration ability.

[0061] In an optional manner, the biomechanical test data includes: a knee flexion angle value and a knee valgus torque value; and the step of collecting the biomechanical test data of the subject when completing a jumping action includes:

[0062] The knee joint flexion angle value of the subject is collected by using a motion capture device arranged around the subject.

[0063] Wherein, the motion capture device is composed of a plurality of cameras surrounding it. Specifically, the motion capture device refers to a surround-type acquisition system composed of at least 6 infrared high-speed cameras, which tracks the joint motion trajectory through a number of reflective marking points on the body surface (usually spherical or circular, with the surface covered with highly reflective materials). The motion capture device in this embodiment uses the Qualisys Oqus700+8-lens infrared high-speed motion capture device by default, which can also be adjusted according to actual conditions, and there is no restriction here. The Qualisys Oqus700+ infrared motion capture device transmits and receives infrared light through multiple cameras, combined with triangulation, to reconstruct the motion trajectory of objects or human bodies with reflective marking points in three-dimensional space in real time.

[0064] The knee flexion angle value refers to the quantified data collected by a multi-camera motion capture system surrounding the subject, reflecting the knee flexion angle at the moment of landing. The knee valgus moment value refers to the knee valgus load value calculated through inverse dynamics based on the ground reaction force data collected by the force plate.

[0065] A force platform arranged at the jumping landing point of the subject is used to collect the ground reaction force of the subject when the jumping action is completed, and the knee valgus torque value of the subject is obtained by inverse dynamics calculation based on the ground reaction force.

[0066] The force platform is a force sensing device embedded in the ground at the landing point of a jump, used to collect vertical ground reaction force and shear force data. In this embodiment, the force platform is a Kistler 9287CA 3D force platform by default, but it can be adjusted according to actual conditions and is not limited here.

[0067] The jump landing point refers to the area where the subject's foot contacts the ground after completing the jump, where the force plate is placed. Ground reaction force refers to the force vector data, recorded in real time by the force plate, applied by the subject's foot upon landing. Inverse dynamics is a biomechanical method that uses the Newton-Euler equations to calculate joint torques based on ground reaction force and limb kinematic parameters.

[0068] The step of obtaining the knee valgus torque value of the subject by inverse dynamics calculation based on the ground reaction force includes:

[0069] S10. Establish a lower limb biomechanical model, specifically:

[0070] A three-link rigid body model consisting of the foot, calf (tibia-fibula) and thigh (femur) was constructed, with each link connected in series through the ankle joint and knee joint. The model parameters include: ① Link mass (m 足 、m 小腿 、m 大腿 ) is distributed according to the subjects’ weight and human anatomy proportions; ② segment length (L 足 , L 小腿 , L 大腿 ) Calculate the coordinates of the body surface markers collected by the motion capture device; ③ The center of mass position of the link (C 足 、C 小腿 、C 大腿 ) is determined based on the standard human inertial parameter database.

[0071] S20. Obtain kinematic and dynamic input data, specifically:

[0072] S201, using motion capture equipment (such as 8 infrared high-speed cameras) surrounding the subject, track the coordinates of reflective markers attached to key anatomical sites of the lower limbs in real time; calculate the ankle joint center P 踝 , knee joint center P 膝 , hip joint center P 髋 The three-dimensional coordinates of

[0073] S202. The force platform collects the ground reaction force vector F at the moment the subject lands. GRF =(F x ,F y ,F z ), and synchronously obtain the action point position P COP (pressure center coordinates).

[0074] S30, inverse dynamics recursive calculation, specifically:

[0075] S301. Calculate the knee joint torque by recursively working from the foot to the trunk:

[0076] ①The balance equation of the foot segment is: F 踝 =m 足 ·gF GRF M 踝 =I 足 α 足 -(r COP→踝 ×F GRF )+(r 质心→踝 ×m 足 g); where F 踝 Represents the ankle joint force vector (N), M 踝 represents the ankle joint torque vector (N·m), I 足 represents the moment of inertia of the foot (kg·m 2 ),ɑ 足 represents the foot angular acceleration vector (rad / s 2 ), r COP→踝 The vector (m) representing the pressure center pointing to the ankle joint, r 质心→踝 represents the vector from the foot's center of mass to the ankle joint (m);

[0077] ②The balance equation of the calf segment is: F 膝 =m 小腿 ·gF 踝 M 膝 =I 小腿 α 小腿 -M 踝 +(r 膝→踝 ×(-F 踝 ))+(r 质心→膝 ×m 小腿 g); where r 膝→踝 represents the vector from the knee joint to the ankle joint (m), r 质心→膝 The vector (m) pointing from the center of mass of the lower leg to the knee joint.

[0078] S40: Extracting the knee valgus moment value, specifically:

[0079] Knee valgus moment value M 外翻 Defined as the knee joint torque vector M 膝 The component in the coronal plane, the knee valgus moment value M 外翻 The expression is: M 外翻 =M 膝 ·n 冠状面 ; where n 冠状面It represents the normal vector of the coronal plane (perpendicular to the sagittal and transverse planes of the human body) in Newton meters (N·m). A positive value indicates a load in the direction of knee valgus (tendency of the knee joint to open medially).

[0080] In the above optional methods, the specific content and collection methods of biomechanical test data are further clarified. Using a motion capture device composed of a camera surround and a force platform at the landing point of the jump, the knee flexion angle value and the knee valgus torque value are accurately collected through inverse dynamics calculation, providing detailed data for evaluating the subject's movement status, making the cognitive-motor assessment more comprehensive and in-depth, and facilitating the subsequent analysis of sports injury risks.

[0081] In an optional manner, the method further includes:

[0082] Obtain cognitive-motor assessment test results obtained by the subject performing cognitive-motor assessment tests multiple times, and determine the average of the multiple cognitive-motor assessment test results as the final cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

[0083] Among them, the final cognitive-motor assessment test result refers to the arithmetic mean of multiple test results, which is a comprehensive assessment data used to eliminate random errors in single tests.

[0084] In the above optional method, the final result is determined by further obtaining multiple test results of the subjects and taking the average value, which reduces the accidental error of a single test, improves the stability and credibility of the cognitive-motor assessment test results, makes the assessment more reflective of the subjects' true cognitive-motor integration ability level, and enhances the practicality and accuracy of the method.

[0085] It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the relevant information of the subject (personal information, multiple cognitive-motor assessment test results, and final cognitive-motor assessment test results) can also be integrated and stored in encrypted form.

[0086] In an optional manner, the method further includes:

[0087] The subject's current assessment results are generated based on the subject's final cognitive-motor assessment test results and combined with the ACL injury risk assessment model.

[0088] The final cognitive-motor assessment test results include: ① Cognitive Accuracy (A): The percentage of correct responses across multiple tests; ② Average Response Time (RT): The arithmetic mean of response times across multiple tests (unit: milliseconds); ③ Mean Knee Flexion Angle (KFA): The average knee flexion angle at landing (unit: degrees); and ④ Mean Knee Valgus Torque (KVM): The average knee valgus load (unit: Newton-meters). Current assessment results include, but are not limited to, risk level.

[0089] Specifically, the steps of generating the subject's current assessment result based on the subject's final cognitive-motor assessment test result and the ACL injury risk assessment model include:

[0090] Step 1: Based on the ACL injury risk assessment model and combined with cognitive accuracy, a three-level risk assessment rule is used to generate a risk level: ① When A ≥ 85%, the risk level is determined to be low risk; ② When 75% ≤ A < 85%, the risk level is determined to be medium risk; ③ When A < 75%, the risk level is determined to be high risk.

[0091] Step 2: Adjust the risk level based on the mean knee flexion angle and the mean knee valgus moment: ① If The risk level will be increased by one level; if The risk level will be increased by one level; KFA ref The reference value of knee flexion angle (default 45°), KVM ref The reference value of knee valgus torque (default 30N·m).

[0092] Step 3: Generate a current assessment result including a risk level to generate a personalized training plan based on the current assessment result.

[0093] In the above optional method, the current assessment result is further generated based on the subject's final cognitive-motor assessment test results and combined with the ACL injury risk assessment model. This can accurately assess the subject's cognitive and motor integration ability, effectively identify the ACL injury risk level, provide a scientific basis for the formulation of personalized training programs, meet the assessment needs of athletes and others for instantaneous decision-making and movement coordination in complex scenarios, and improve the practicality and pertinence of cognitive-motor assessment.

[0094] Figure 2 FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system 200 based on visual constraints provided by the present invention. Figure 2 As shown, the system 200 includes: a display control module 210, a first acquisition module 220, a second acquisition module 230 and an evaluation test module 240;

[0095] The display control module 210 is used to: when a cognitive-motor assessment test is performed on a subject, control the target display device to display different original marks in each preset area;

[0096] The first acquisition module 220 is configured to: when the target display device stops displaying the corresponding test mark in each preset area and when receiving a jump start instruction from the subject, collect biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed;

[0097] The second acquisition module 230 is used to control the target display device to point to a target area and obtain a test mark and a test response time output by the subject when performing a cognitive test on the target area; wherein the target area is any one of all preset areas;

[0098] The evaluation test module 240 is used to obtain the cognitive test results of the subject based on the test marks and original marks corresponding to the target area, and determine the cognitive test results, the test response time and the biomechanical test data as the cognitive-motor evaluation test results of the subject.

[0099] In an optional manner, the display control module 210 is specifically configured to:

[0100] The target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area for a preset time period.

[0101] In an optional manner, all preset areas are distributed in a ring shape, and the original mark corresponding to each preset area is in digital form.

[0102] In an optional manner, the biomechanical test data includes: knee flexion angle value and knee valgus torque value; the first acquisition module 220 is specifically used to:

[0103] Using a motion capture device arranged around the subject, collecting the knee joint flexion angle value of the subject; wherein the motion capture device is surrounded by a plurality of cameras;

[0104] A force platform arranged at the jumping landing point of the subject is used to collect the ground reaction force of the subject when the jumping action is completed, and the knee valgus torque value of the subject is obtained by inverse dynamics calculation based on the ground reaction force.

[0105] In an optional manner, the method further includes: a result generation module; the result generation module is configured to:

[0106] Obtain cognitive-motor assessment test results obtained by the subject performing cognitive-motor assessment tests multiple times, and determine the average of the multiple cognitive-motor assessment test results as the final cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

[0107] It should be noted that the beneficial effects of the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system 200 based on visual constraints provided by the above embodiment are the same as the beneficial effects of the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints, which will not be described in detail here. In addition, when the system provided by the above embodiment realizes its functions, it only uses the division of the above-mentioned functional modules as an example. In actual applications, the above-mentioned functions can be assigned to different functional modules as needed, that is, the system can be divided into different functional modules according to actual conditions to complete all or part of the functions described above. In addition, the system and method embodiments provided by the above embodiment belong to the same concept, and their specific implementation process is detailed in the method embodiment, which will not be described in detail here.

[0108] Among them, the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system 200 based on visual constraints of the present invention can be a computer program (including program code) running in a computer device. For example, the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints of the present invention is an application software that can be used to execute the corresponding steps in the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention.

[0109] In some embodiments, the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system 200 based on visual constraints of the present invention can be implemented in a combination of software and hardware. As an example, the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints of the present invention can be a processor in the form of a hardware decoding processor, which is programmed to execute the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints of the present invention. For example, the processor in the form of a hardware decoding processor can adopt one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), DSPs, programmable logic devices (PLDs), complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) or other electronic components.

[0110] The modules described in the embodiments of the present invention may be implemented in software or hardware, and the name of a module does not necessarily limit the module itself.

[0111] An electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor. When the processor executes the computer program, any one of the above-mentioned dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test methods based on visual constraints is implemented. That is, an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present invention may include but is not limited to: a processor and a memory; the memory is used to store the computer program; the processor is used to execute the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints shown in any embodiment of the present invention by calling the computer program.

[0112] In an alternative embodiment, an electronic device is provided, such as Figure 3 As shown, Figure 3 The electronic device 4000 shown includes: a processor 4001 and a memory 4003. The processor 4001 and the memory 4003 are connected, for example, via a bus 4002. Optionally, the electronic device 4000 may further include a transceiver 4004, which can be used for data exchange between the electronic device and other electronic devices, such as data transmission and / or data reception. It should be noted that in actual applications, the number of transceivers 4004 is not limited to one, and the structure of the electronic device 4000 does not constitute a limitation on the embodiments of the present invention.

[0113] Processor 4001 may be a CPU (Central Processing Unit), a general-purpose processor, a DSP (Digital Signal Processor), an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit), an FPGA (Field Programmable Gate Array), or other programmable logic devices, transistor logic devices, hardware components, or any combination thereof. It may implement or execute the various exemplary logic blocks, modules, and circuits described in conjunction with the present disclosure. Processor 4001 may also be a combination that implements computing functions, such as a combination of one or more microprocessors, a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, and the like.

[0114] Bus 4002 may include a path for transmitting information between the above components. Bus 4002 may be a PCI (Peripheral Component Interconnect) bus or an EISA (Extended Industry Standard Architecture) bus. Bus 4002 may be divided into an address bus, a data bus, a control bus, etc. For ease of representation, Figure 3In the figure, only one thick line is used to represent the bus 4002, but this does not mean that there is only one bus or one type of bus.

[0115] The memory 4003 may be a ROM (Read Only Memory) or other types of static storage devices that can store static information and instructions, a RAM (Random Access Memory) or other types of dynamic storage devices that can store information and instructions, or an EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), a CD-ROM (Compact Disc Read Only Memory) or other optical disk storage, optical disk storage (including compact discs, laser discs, optical discs, digital versatile discs, Blu-ray discs, etc.), a magnetic disk storage medium or other magnetic storage device, or any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and can be accessed by a computer, but is not limited to these.

[0116] The memory 4003 is used to store application code (computer program) for executing the solution of the present invention, and is controlled by the processor 4001. The processor 4001 is used to execute the application code stored in the memory 4003 to implement the content shown in the above method embodiment.

[0117] Among them, the electronic device can also be a terminal device, and the terminal device can be any terminal device that can install applications and access web pages through applications, including at least one of a smartphone, tablet computer, laptop computer, desktop computer, smart speaker, smart watch, smart TV, and smart car-mounted device.

[0118] It should be noted that Figure 3 The electronic device shown is only an example and should not limit the functions and scope of use of the embodiments of the present invention.

[0119] A computer-readable storage medium according to an embodiment of the present invention stores a computer program, which, when executed by a processor, implements any of the above-mentioned dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test methods based on visual constraints.

[0120] Alternatively, the computer-readable storage medium may be a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a compact disc (CD-ROM), a magnetic tape, a floppy disk, an optical data storage device, or the like.

[0121] In an exemplary embodiment, a computer program product or computer program is also provided, the computer program product or computer program including computer instructions stored in a computer-readable storage medium. A processor of an electronic device reads the computer instructions from the computer-readable storage medium and executes the computer instructions, causing the electronic device to perform the aforementioned visual constraint-based dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method.

[0122] Computer program code for performing the operations of the present invention may be written in one or more programming languages, or a combination thereof, including object-oriented programming languages ​​such as Java, Smalltalk, C++, and conventional procedural programming languages ​​such as "C" or similar programming languages. The program code may be executed entirely on the user's computer, partially on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partially on the user's computer and partially on a remote computer, or entirely on the remote computer or server. In cases involving a remote computer, the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or may be connected to an external computer (e.g., through the Internet using an Internet service provider).

[0123] It should be understood that the flowcharts and block diagrams in the accompanying drawings illustrate the possible implementation architecture, functions and operations of the methods and computer program products according to various embodiments of the present invention. In this regard, each box in the flowchart or block diagram can represent a module, program segment, or a part of code, and the module, program segment, or a part of code contains one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function. It should also be noted that in some alternative implementations, the functions marked in the box can also occur in a different order than the order marked in the accompanying drawings. For example, two boxes represented in succession can actually be executed substantially in parallel, and they can sometimes be executed in the opposite order, depending on the functions involved. It should also be noted that each box in the block diagram and / or flowchart, and the combination of the boxes in the block diagram and / or flowchart, can be implemented using a dedicated hardware-based system that performs the specified function or operation, or can be implemented using a combination of dedicated hardware and computer instructions.

[0124] The computer-readable storage medium provided in the embodiments of the present invention may be, but is not limited to, an electrical, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, device or component, or any combination thereof. More specific examples of computer-readable storage media may include, but are not limited to: an electrical connection with one or more wires, a portable computer disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination thereof. In the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium may be any tangible medium containing or storing a program that can be used by or in combination with an instruction execution system, device or component.

[0125] The computer-readable storage medium carries one or more programs. When the one or more programs are executed by the electronic device, the electronic device executes the method shown in the above embodiment.

[0126] The above description is merely a preferred embodiment of the present invention and an illustration of the technical principles employed. Those skilled in the art should understand that the scope of disclosure involved in the present invention is not limited to the technical solutions formed by the specific combination of the above-mentioned technical features, but also includes other technical solutions formed by any combination of the above-mentioned technical features or their equivalents without departing from the above-mentioned disclosed concepts. For example, a technical solution formed by replacing the above-mentioned features with (but not limited to) technical features with similar functions disclosed in the present invention.

[0127] It should be noted that the terms "first," "second," and the like in the specification and claims of this application are used to distinguish similar objects and to define a specific order or precedence. Where appropriate, the order used for similar objects may be interchanged, such that the embodiments of the present application described herein can be implemented in an order other than the order shown or described.

[0128] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be implemented as a system, method, or computer program product. Therefore, the present invention may be implemented in the following forms: entirely in hardware, entirely in software (including firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.), or in a combination of hardware and software, generally referred to herein as a "circuit," "module," or "system." Furthermore, in some embodiments, the present invention may be implemented in the form of a computer program product embodied in one or more computer-readable media containing computer-readable program code.

[0129] Although the embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described above, it will be understood that the above embodiments are illustrative and are not to be construed as limitations on the present invention. A person skilled in the art may change, modify, replace and modify the above embodiments within the scope of the present invention.

Claims

1. A dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints, characterized in that: include: When the subject is given a cognitive-motor assessment test, the target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area; When the target display device stops displaying the corresponding test mark in each preset area and receives a jump start instruction from the subject, collecting biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed; Controlling the target display device to point to a target area and obtain a test mark and a test response duration output by the subject during a cognitive test on the target area; wherein the target area is any one of all preset areas; The cognitive test result of the subject is obtained based on the test mark and the original mark corresponding to the target area, and the cognitive test result, the test response time and the biomechanical test data are determined as the cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

2. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints according to claim 1, characterized in that: The step of controlling the target display device to display different original marks in each preset area includes: The target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area for a preset time period.

3. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints according to claim 2, characterized in that: All preset areas are distributed in a circular shape, and the original mark corresponding to each preset area is in digital form.

4. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints according to claim 1, characterized in that: The biomechanical test data include: knee flexion angle value and knee valgus moment value; The step of collecting biomechanical test data of the subject when completing a jumping action comprises: Using a motion capture device arranged around the subject, collecting the knee joint flexion angle value of the subject; wherein the motion capture device is surrounded by a plurality of cameras; A force platform arranged at the jumping landing point of the subject is used to collect the ground reaction force of the subject when the jumping action is completed, and the knee valgus torque value of the subject is obtained by inverse dynamics calculation based on the ground reaction force.

5. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints according to any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: Also includes: Obtain cognitive-motor assessment test results obtained by the subject performing cognitive-motor assessment tests multiple times, and determine the average of the multiple cognitive-motor assessment test results as the final cognitive-motor assessment test result of the subject.

6. A dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints, characterized in that: include: Display control module, first acquisition module, second acquisition module and evaluation test module; The display control module is used to: when a cognitive-motor assessment test is performed on a subject, control the target display device to display different original marks in each preset area; The first acquisition module is configured to: when the target display device stops displaying the corresponding test mark in each preset area and when receiving a jump start instruction from the subject, acquire biomechanical test data of the subject when the jump action is completed; The second acquisition module is used to control the target display device to point to a target area and obtain a test mark and a test response time output by the subject when performing a cognitive test on the target area; wherein the target area is any one of all preset areas; The evaluation test module is used to obtain the cognitive test results of the subject based on the test marks and original marks corresponding to the target area, and determine the cognitive test results, the test response time and the biomechanical test data as the cognitive-motor evaluation test results of the subject.

7. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints according to claim 6, characterized in that: The display control module is specifically used for: The target display device is controlled to display different original marks in each preset area for a preset time period.

8. The dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test system based on visual constraints according to claim 6 or 7, characterized in that: All preset areas are distributed in a circular shape, and the original mark corresponding to each preset area is in digital form.

9. An electronic device, characterized in that: The electronic device includes a processor, which is coupled to a memory. The memory stores at least one computer program, and the at least one computer program is loaded and executed by the processor so that the electronic device implements the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that The computer-readable storage medium stores at least one computer program, which is loaded and executed by a processor so that the computer-readable storage medium implements the dual-task cognitive-motor assessment test method based on visual constraints as described in any one of claims 1 to 5.