A system and method for multi-angle examination and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners

Abstract

The application provides a system and method for multi-angle examination and evaluation of engineering contractors and employees, which can instantly manage and record multi-aspect data related to the examination of the contractors and employees, determine examination results by using corresponding examination models according to examination requirements, provide data display services and examination result output services matched with instructions in response to the operation of users, identify data attributes and decide storage paths based on received data, decide management action signals based on received instructions, distribute and store multiple data, support real-time data state updating in response to management action instructions, and form prompt instructions according to set rules on data state information. The system can overcome the defects of the prior art, such as complicated data entry, limited application range of evaluation and analysis, and insufficient reliability, form a comprehensive business data examination and management system for engineering contractors and employees, and provide business monitoring and credit repair and update services based on examination data.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] This invention relates to the field of construction project bidding assessment optimization technology, and in particular to a system and method for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners. Background Technology

[0002] In the bidding and tendering process in the petrochemical industry, existing technologies for evaluating the business integrity of contractors and personnel lack a standardized and comprehensive assessment system. Each construction unit independently analyzes and evaluates relevant project contractors and personnel based on its own business needs. On the one hand, the available data for evaluation is limited, the scope of contractors is restricted, and the inconsistent evaluation standards among construction units make it difficult to extend the application of evaluation results beyond their own units. On the other hand, existing contractor evaluation technologies for bidding and tendering transactions largely rely on data collection and input as evaluation indicators, primarily through manual data entry, which is labor-intensive, prone to errors, and lacks autonomy and intelligence.

[0003] The information disclosed in the background section of this invention is intended only to enhance the understanding of the general background of this invention, and should not be construed as an admission or in any way implying that such information constitutes prior art known to those skilled in the art. Summary of the Invention

[0004] To address the aforementioned problems, this invention provides a system for multi-faceted assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and their personnel. This system overcomes the shortcomings of existing technologies, such as cumbersome data entry, limited application scope, and insufficient reliability, forming a comprehensive business data assessment and management system for engineering contractors and their personnel. It enables real-time management and recording of various data related to contractor and personnel assessment; determines assessment results using corresponding assessment models based on assessment needs; provides data display services and assessment result output services in response to user operations; identifies data attributes and determines storage paths based on received data; determines management action signals based on received instructions; performs distributed storage of multiple data sets; supports real-time data status updates in response to management action instructions; generates prompts for data status information according to set rules; and provides business monitoring, credit repair, and update services based on assessment data. Preferably, in one embodiment, the system includes:

[0005] A comprehensive data management system is used to receive and manage and record various data related to the performance evaluation of contractors and employees in real time.

[0006] The intelligent assessment subsystem is connected to the data integrated storage module and is configured to determine the assessment results based on the stored data and the corresponding assessment model according to the assessment requirements.

[0007] The multi-interaction module is used to respond to user operations, generate corresponding instruction inputs, and provide users with instruction matching data display services and assessment result output services.

[0008] The data management system includes an intelligent management module, a data storage module, and a dynamic prompting module.

[0009] The intelligent management module is used to identify data attributes and decide on storage paths based on received data, and to decide on management action signals based on received instructions;

[0010] The data storage module is used for distributed storage of multiple data sets and supports real-time data status updates in response to management action commands; the data storage module includes an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database.

[0011] The dynamic prompt module is used to generate prompt instructions for data status information according to the set rules;

[0012] The intelligent assessment subsystem includes a credit data assessment module, which is configured to obtain credit information of contractors and employees from an associated credit information platform, establish a credit scoring model using statistical and other methods, and determine the credit evaluation results of contractors and employees based on the obtained credit information and the credit scoring model.

[0013] Optionally, in one embodiment, the data management system adaptively manages data received from different sources. The sources of data reception are not limited to document recognition, data entry, and collection from third-party platforms. After receiving the data, the system identifies the object and type of the data, determines whether the data belongs to the contractor or the employee, and distinguishes between attribute data, event information, and credit data before distributing the data for storage.

[0014] Furthermore, in one embodiment, after receiving the data, the data management system also performs the following operations:

[0015] The system iterates through the data of the corresponding type already stored in the data storage module to determine whether the current data content already exists. If the exact same content already exists, it is discarded, and a corresponding prompt instruction is generated through the dynamic prompt module. If the current data content is the same as the data object in the already stored data, and the data content similarity meets the set conditions, a confirmation instruction is generated through the dynamic prompt module to respond to the user's operation decision on whether to update or adjust the data content of the corresponding object.

[0016] In one embodiment, the data storage module includes an attribute database comprising a contractor database and a practitioner database. The data sources for the contractor information database include internal and external data. The internal data includes data on performance records, while the external data is collected based on data from a third-party platform. These data are combined to form a contractor attribute information archive, which is easy to access flexibly.

[0017] The database of practitioners includes internal and external data. Internal data includes job-related data filled in by practitioners, while external data is collected from third-party platforms. Together, they form a practitioner attribute information file, which can be flexibly accessed.

[0018] The database of contractors and practitioners supports interactive search services.

[0019] Optionally, in one embodiment, the contractor database and the practitioner database are respectively set up with an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database; the event information database records descriptions of events and behaviors of contractors or practitioners in the direct operation process of project construction activities.

[0020] Preferably, in one embodiment, scoring rules are pre-assigned to various events in the event information database to form scoring assessment indicators, and these indicators are combined according to certain algorithm rules to form specific objects for scoring and quantitative evaluation. The indicators support retrieval and multi-selection marking through a multi-interaction module, making them convenient and flexible as basic assessment parameters.

[0021] In one optional embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem uses distributed functional modules to realize multi-level evaluation and management, including an attribute data quantification assessment module, an attribute data quantification assessment module for contractors, and an attribute data quantification assessment module for employees, which are set up independently.

[0022] The attribute data quantification assessment module calculates the overall quantitative evaluation result of the contractor or employee based on the acquired contractor attribute data or employee attribute data according to the assessment rules of the assessment model.

[0023] The contractor attribute data includes historical performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information; the employee attribute data includes personal historical job performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information.

[0024] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the contractor's attribute data quantification assessment module includes:

[0025] The performance evaluation unit is configured to obtain a single contract performance evaluation by assessing various events related to safety, quality, and schedule from the contract perspective. Then, weights are set according to factors such as contract amount and project difficulty. Based on the single contract performance evaluation and the corresponding weighted summation, the overall quantitative evaluation of the contractor's contract performance is calculated.

[0026] The basic information evaluation unit conducts a quantitative evaluation based on the contractor's basic corporate information, qualification certifications, personnel information, administrative and judicial supervision, and social responsibility information.

[0027] The market behavior evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluations based on the contractor's bidding situation, project undertaking situation, and bid abandonment situation.

[0028] In a preferred embodiment, the attribute data quantification assessment module for practitioners includes:

[0029] The individual performance evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluations from the contractual perspective, focusing on multiple factors such as safety, quality, and schedule. Then, according to the assessment model, the individual performance evaluations obtained by employees from various contracts are aggregated, weighted, and comprehensively calculated to obtain the overall evaluation result of the employee's individual performance.

[0030] The basic information evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluation based on education, professional title, professional qualification, training experience, and honors information;

[0031] The market behavior evaluation unit is configured to obtain information on professional performance and years of service from the associated Sinopec construction engineering electronic bidding and tendering transaction platform, and conduct corresponding quantitative evaluations based on this information.

[0032] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem includes an event information assessment module, configured to score and assess the event behaviors of the contractor's operational processes, with the contract performance period as the assessment cycle, and to score and assess the direct operational behaviors of the assessed entity; the contract performance period is from the date of issuance of the bid award notice to the date of contract closure;

[0033] In the process of scoring and evaluating the behavior of employees in the work process, a set time period is used as the evaluation period, and the behavior of the evaluated person in the direct work process is scored and evaluated.

[0034] Optionally, in one embodiment, the credit data assessment module is configured to identify records of dishonesty in the credit information. If the credit information includes records of dishonesty, the module determines the level of dishonesty of the assessed object based on the type and time of the record, and identifies the assessed object based on the level of dishonesty, including the red line level of dishonesty. For objects belonging to the red line level of dishonesty, the module locates the assessed object and outputs a confirmation prompt. In response to the instructions of the assessment entity's operator, the module decides whether to conduct subsequent assessments on the assessed object, and the assessment entity may exercise the right of veto.

[0035] Furthermore, in one embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem also includes a classification and supervision module, which is configured to set up a contractor red list based on the assessment results after determining the assessment results of each contractor, mark the contractors in the red list, and implement electronic file management of bidding documents and engineering construction contracts based on this, thereby shortening the qualification review time and approval process for contractors in the red list.

[0036] In a preferred embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem further includes a real-time operation monitoring module, which is configured to, after determining the winning contractor and employees, collect event behavior data of the project work process in real time in conjunction with the information management system corresponding to the petrochemical engineering project, and evaluate and control the work performance of the winning contractor and employees throughout the entire life cycle of the petrochemical engineering project.

[0037] Optionally, in one embodiment, the system further includes a credit repair unit, which is associated with the credit data assessment module and configured to receive and verify the credit repair request input by the operator, update the credit information, re-implement the credit evaluation, update the credit evaluation result, and record it.

[0038] Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, the credit repair request also includes a credit commitment, which is a credit commitment information in which the credit subject makes positive rectifications in accordance with the format and specifications stipulated by the social credit management department or the industry competent authority, fulfills its obligations and keeps its promises in future production, operation and life, and voluntarily assumes relevant responsibilities for breach of commitment.

[0039] Based on other aspects of the system described in any one or more of the above embodiments, the present invention also provides a method for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners, which is applied to the system described in any one or more of the above embodiments.

[0040] Compared with the prior art, the present invention has at least the following beneficial effects:

[0041] This invention provides a system and method for multi-faceted assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners. Through a comprehensive data management system, it receives and manages in real-time various data related to the assessment of contractors and practitioners. The comprehensive data management system includes an intelligent management module, a data storage module, and a dynamic prompting module. The intelligent management module identifies data attributes and determines storage paths based on received data, and determines management action signals based on received instructions. The data storage module performs distributed storage of multiple data sets and supports real-time data status updates in response to management action instructions. The dynamic prompting module generates prompts for data status information according to set rules. It comprehensively acquires and distributes assessment-related data for management, including not only entered data but also recorded data and data from external platforms. This effectively controls the scale of manually entered data and allows users to flexibly manage stored data according to their needs, as well as receive timely prompts regarding changes in data status.

[0042] Furthermore, an intelligent assessment subsystem is set up. Based on stored data, the subsystem uses the corresponding assessment model to determine the assessment results according to the assessment requirements. A multi-interaction module responds to user operations, generates corresponding instruction inputs, and provides users with instruction-matched data display services and assessment result output services. Through the intelligent assessment subsystem, contractors and practitioners are comprehensively assessed based on multiple business-related factors, including credit data, attribute data, and event behavior information. This forms a comprehensive business data assessment management system for engineering contractors and practitioners, encompassing business information collection, management, data analysis, assessment, publication, and supervision. The system presents assessment-related business data and comprehensive assessment results in an intuitive and visual format. Attached Figure Description

[0043] The accompanying drawings are provided to further illustrate the invention and form part of the specification. They are used in conjunction with the embodiments of the invention to explain the invention and do not constitute a limitation thereof. In the drawings:

[0044] Figure 1 This is a schematic diagram of the structure of a system for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in an embodiment of the present invention;

[0045] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the overall data acquisition principle of the system for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention;

[0046] Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram illustrating the range of attribute data for contractors in the system for multi-dimensional assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention.

[0047] Figure 4This is a schematic diagram illustrating the attribute data range of practitioners in the system for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention;

[0048] Figure 5 This is a schematic diagram of the overall contract performance assessment process in the system for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention;

[0049] Figure 6 This is a schematic diagram of the overall network architecture of the system for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention;

[0050] Figure 7 This is a schematic diagram of the security infrastructure environment deployment of the system for multi-angle assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in the embodiments of the present invention. Detailed Implementation

[0051] The embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and examples. Those skilled in the art will then fully understand how the present invention uses technical means to solve technical problems and achieve technical effects, and will be able to implement the present invention specifically based on the above-described implementation process. It should be noted that, as long as there is no conflict, the various embodiments and features of the present invention can be combined with each other, and the resulting technical solutions are all within the protection scope of the present invention.

[0052] Although the flowchart describes the operations as sequential processes, many of these operations can be performed in parallel, concurrently, or simultaneously. The order of the operations can be rearranged. A process can be terminated when its operation is completed, but it may also have additional steps not included in the figures. A process can correspond to a method, function, procedure, subroutine, subroutine, etc. Computer devices include user devices and network devices. User devices or clients include, but are not limited to, computers, smartphones, PDAs (Personal Digital Assistants), etc.; network devices include, but are not limited to, a single network server, a server group consisting of multiple network servers, or a cloud based on cloud computing consisting of a large number of computers or network servers. The computer device can operate independently to implement the invention, or it can connect to a network and implement the invention through interaction with other computer devices in the network. The network in which the computer device is located includes, but is not limited to, the Internet, wide area network, metropolitan area network, local area network, VPN network, etc. The terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to limit exemplary embodiments. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the singular forms "a" and "an item" as used herein are also intended to include the plural. It should also be understood that the terms “comprising” and / or “including” as used herein specify the presence of the stated features, integers, steps, operations, units and / or components, without excluding the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, units, components and / or combinations thereof.

[0053] In the bidding and tendering process in the petrochemical industry, the evaluation of contractors and personnel is essential. However, current evaluation techniques lack a standardized and comprehensive assessment system. Each construction unit independently analyzes and evaluates relevant project contractors and personnel based on its own business needs. On the one hand, the available data for evaluation is limited, the scope of contractors is restricted, and the inconsistent evaluation standards among construction units make it difficult to extend the application of evaluation results beyond their own units. On the other hand, existing contractor evaluation techniques for bidding transactions largely rely on data collection and input as evaluation indicators, primarily through manual data entry, which is labor-intensive, prone to errors, and lacks autonomy and intelligence.

[0054] To address the shortcomings of existing technologies, this invention provides a system and method for multi-faceted evaluation of engineering contractors and their personnel. Focusing on the bidding and tendering process and project management, utilizing information technology and guided by intelligent technology, and supported by comprehensive internal and external data, it constructs a comprehensive business integrity data database for contractors and their personnel (including key personnel and evaluation experts). It also establishes a comprehensive business data evaluation management system for the collection, management, data analysis, evaluation, publication, and supervision of business information of engineering contractors and their personnel. The system establishes a contractor evaluation model and indicator system to achieve comprehensive management of contractor "entry, selection, use, evaluation, and exit." Through dual-score quantitative evaluation and violation point evaluation of contractors, it promotes the scientific and comprehensive nature of the evaluation results. The system presents the analysis results, including the distribution of business integrity data collection, records of poor business practices, records of dishonesty, enterprise integrity rating, enterprise comprehensive creditworthiness, and comprehensive evaluation data, in an intuitive and visual format.

[0055] The system using this invention can conduct comprehensive data management and assessment of contractors and employees in petrochemical construction projects. It not only covers the connotation and information sources of contractors and employees, but also achieves quantitative analysis of contractors and employees based on indicator parameters such as assessment cycle, assessment model, assessment indicators, and indicator weights.

[0056] The multi-faceted evaluation system for engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this invention is applicable to petrochemical enterprises of different sizes, including various petrochemical enterprises and institutions, as well as branches (subsidiaries) of the listed company. The system's application subjects can be various entities that implement scoring and quantitative evaluation by recording problem events, including relevant functional departments at headquarters, construction units, subcontractors, and project owners. The evaluation targets refer to those subject to scoring and quantitative evaluation, including contractors and practitioners. Contractors are legal entities or other organizations involved in the general contracting, surveying, design, construction, supervision, and testing of construction projects, including general contractors and subcontractors. Practitioners include various management personnel and operational staff involved in construction activities. In practical applications, based on actual evaluation needs and considering factors such as personnel density and data processing volume, the practitioner targets mainly include personnel who exercise management functions and assume primary management responsibilities in the contractor's project team and bidding experts.

[0057] This system enables the establishment of a credit scoring model based on the credit information of credit subjects, using statistical and other methods to evaluate their creditworthiness and present the results visually in the form of scores. Furthermore, it allows for the implementation of matching management measures based on the credit evaluation of credit subjects. The credit information includes records related to credit generated by individuals or organizations in social and economic activities, as well as various types of information related to evaluating their credit value.

[0058] The structural components, connection methods, and functional principles of the system according to embodiments of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although the logical order of each operation is shown in the description of the system's structural operation, in some cases, the operations shown or described may be performed in a different order than that shown here.

[0059] Example 1

[0060] Figure 1 This diagram illustrates the structure of a system for multi-faceted assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners, as provided in Embodiment 1 of the present invention. (Refer to...) Figure 1 It can be seen that the system includes:

[0061] A comprehensive data management system is used to receive and manage and record various data related to the performance evaluation of contractors and employees in real time.

[0062] The intelligent assessment subsystem is connected to the data integrated storage module and is configured to determine the assessment results based on the stored data and the corresponding assessment model according to the assessment requirements.

[0063] The multi-interaction module is used to respond to user operations, generate corresponding instruction inputs, and provide users with instruction matching data display services and assessment result output services.

[0064] The data integrated management system includes a data intelligence management module, a data storage module, and a dynamic prompting module;

[0065] The intelligent management module is used to identify data attributes and decide on storage paths based on received data, and to decide on management action signals based on received instructions;

[0066] The data storage module is used for distributed storage of multiple data sets and supports real-time data status updates in response to management action commands; the data storage module includes an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database.

[0067] The dynamic prompt module is used to generate prompt instructions for data status information according to the set rules;

[0068] The intelligent assessment subsystem includes a credit data assessment module, which is configured to obtain credit information of contractors and employees from an associated credit information platform, establish a credit scoring model using statistical and other methods, and determine the credit evaluation results of contractors and employees based on the obtained credit information and the credit scoring model.

[0069] The system for evaluating engineering contractors and practitioners from multiple perspectives, as described in this invention, can reasonably clarify the connotation and status of evaluation for contractors and practitioners in petrochemical construction projects. Before project commencement, it conducts a comprehensive evaluation of relevant contractors and practitioners based on comprehensive information sources, information content, evaluation models, evaluation indicators, indicator weights, and demand evaluation cycles. This provides reliable data support for project bidding and implementation in petrochemical engineering, forming a systematic, scientific, and refined evaluation system. It leverages the decisive role of the market in resource allocation, enhances the predictability and efficiency of economic and social activities, and improves the quality of contractors within China Petrochemical Corporation.

[0070] The data management system adaptively manages data received from different sources, including but not limited to file recognition, data entry, and collection from third-party platforms.

[0071] Upon receiving data, the system identifies the object and type of the data, determining whether it belongs to the contractor or the employee, and further classifying it as attribute data, event information, or credit data. It then iterates through the corresponding data already stored in the data storage module to determine if the current data content already exists. If identical content already exists, it is discarded, and a corresponding prompt is generated via the dynamic prompt module. If the current data content matches a data object in the already stored data, and the data content similarity meets the set conditions, a confirmation instruction is generated via the dynamic prompt module to respond to the user's operational decisions regarding whether to update or adjust the data content of the corresponding object.

[0072] The instructions generated by the dynamic prompt module are transmitted to the multi-interaction module, which outputs the user's interaction intention.

[0073] The data storage module includes an attribute database comprising a contractor database and a workforce database. The contractor information database draws from both internal and external data. Internal data includes existing performance records, while external data is collected from third-party platforms. This comprehensive approach forms a contractor attribute information archive, facilitating flexible access. The overall data storage warehouse is formed based on various data sources and types of data collection, possessing massive data source compatibility and rich data processing components, such as… Figure 2 As shown.

[0074] In practical applications, by combining data entry with platform records, timely, comprehensive, complete and standardized collection of assessment-related information of contractors and practitioners is achieved, and data files of contractor companies and practitioners are established, including basic information, market behavior information, contract performance information, ranking information, evaluation level information, credit data and other contents.

[0075] The database of practitioners contains data from both internal and external sources. Internal data includes performance-related data submitted by practitioners, while external data is collected from third-party platforms. Together, these data form a profile of practitioners' attribute information, which can be accessed flexibly.

[0076] The contractor database and the practitioner database are respectively set up with attribute database, event information database and credit database.

[0077] Contract performance information needs to be analyzed based on contract data. The format of contract data is quite special. When entering contract data, if it is a non-framework agreement and a non-joint venture contract, or a framework agreement with a single assessment and a non-joint venture contract, the process is: construction unit edits -> contractor edits -> construction unit confirms; if it is a non-framework agreement and a joint venture contract, the process is: construction unit edits -> lead contractor allocates the contract -> contractor completes the contract -> construction unit confirms; if it is a framework agreement procurement with multiple assessments, the process is: construction unit edits -> end.

[0078] Enter basic contract information, including project information, bid section information, contract information, and contractor information. Submit the process to the contractor, who will then complete and enter information such as project management personnel and event management personnel. Finally, submit the information to the construction unit for confirmation and approval.

[0079] In an optional embodiment, the contractor's attribute data includes basic information, reward and punishment information, and contract performance information, such as... Figure 3 As shown, the contractor's basic information includes basic contractor information (including contractor name, organization code, registered region, contractor category, contractor business scope, business license, etc.), qualifications, personnel information, contractor performance, contract performance statistics, contractor awards, contractor files, and annual inspection information. The reward and punishment information records the contractor's past awards, negative records, and administrative and legal penalties. This mainly includes the case name, case effective and expiration dates, and case type. The data comes from Sinopec's internal and external reward and punishment information and is automatically aggregated to form the contractor reward and punishment file. Currently, data entry is primarily done by construction units; in the long term, it will be integrated with internal systems (safety, environmental protection, and quality supervision systems) and external systems to achieve system interconnection.

[0080] The contract performance information is obtained from the contractor's performance information for the contract through methods such as interface acquisition and manual entry, including the performance period, performance content, performance documents, etc.; at the same time, third-party evaluation information for the contractor is also obtained.

[0081] To reduce the pressure of input data, the system provided by this invention pre-establishes an event information database, which records descriptions of direct operational events involving contractors or employees during the construction of a project; and includes a matching retrieval and processing module; in practical applications, the contractor event information database and the employee event information database are set up independently.

[0082] It should be noted that the behavioral event information in the event information database refers to events and behaviors in the direct operational process, which is different from the market behavior data contained in the attribute data. Behavioral event information can reflect the event record factors of contractors or practitioners in each stage of project market activities, and reflect the operational reliability of the assessed object in detail from the perspective of event behavior in the activity stage.

[0083] In the event information database, a single event description record includes the event description content, the assessment target to which the event belongs, and search tags; wherein, the assessment target to which the event belongs is whether the assessment target to which the event applies is a contractor or an employee, and the search tags can be set with corresponding keywords or terms as needed.

[0084] When configuring event data, you can enter the event name, event type, event level, score, and event value. The event type is taken from the basic event type data, and the event level is taken from the code item 'event level'.

[0085] The event number uses a combination code with a length of 6 digits. The first digit is the code of the applicable object, the second digit is the code of the event type, the fourth digit is the code of the indicator level, and the last 4 digits are automatically generated by the system, with the value ranging from 0001 to 9999.

[0086] Based on this, when operators need to score (grade) one or more event behaviors of a contractor or employee according to the assessment model, they only need to retrieve or select the corresponding event selection mark from the associated event information database. There is no need for tedious and repetitive typing. Moreover, the selection mark supports multiple selections and multiple selections, which is flexible, convenient and highly practical.

[0087] In practical applications, if new event descriptions need to be assessed, the event information database can be updated simply by inputting the new event descriptions. When inputting new event descriptions, the input information includes the event description content, the assessment target of the event, and search tags.

[0088] All data in the data management system supports user retrieval services, and outputs matching data content in response to retrieval commands from the multi-interaction module.

[0089] The databases for industry practitioners and contractors are set up independently, but the information on practitioners includes their relationship with contractor business. The data comes from the transaction platform's personnel database, the performance evaluation of transaction entities based on a single evaluation, and data collection from external credit platforms. It mainly includes basic information about practitioners, their reward and punishment information, and their personnel files, such as... Figure 4 As shown. In practical applications, based on different types of practitioners, they can be divided into registered personnel, safety production management personnel, technical personnel, and professional personnel. The basic information of practitioners mainly includes the name of the practitioner's employer, certificate number, professional qualification, performance information, and contract information.

[0090] Information on practitioners is divided into internal and external data. Internal data is evaluated by the trading entity on a case-by-case basis and mainly includes practitioners' ID numbers, reward / punishment types, project numbers, project names, bid section numbers, bid section names, supervisory departments, reasons for penalties, basis for penalties, penalty results, publication dates, and restricted behaviors. External data is collected from the information systems of industry regulatory authorities and the National Credit Information Sharing Platform.

[0091] The information on the evaluation experts comes from the personnel information database of the trading platform and the performance evaluation of the bidding organization based on a single evaluation. It mainly includes basic expert information, expert reward and punishment information, and expert files.

[0092] Based on the above settings, the data management system of this invention provides query functions for the business integrity data of contractors, practitioners, and bidding experts, including honor rolls, penalty notices, contractor warnings, and practitioner credit information disclosure. It also provides online query functions for the credit information of various contractors, including surveying units, design units, construction units, supervision units, bidding agencies, cost consulting units, construction drawing review agencies, and suppliers, including basic information, qualification information, project performance, good behavior records, and bad behavior records.

[0093] The query function supports simple fuzzy searches based on existing databases. By setting a few fields as query conditions and others as query output fields, the system automatically generates a query page. More complex queries can also be defined to meet specific needs, with query conditions using either AND or OR operations. Defined queries can be saved as backup query templates for application systems to integrate.

[0094] The contractor information archive establishes matching file information for each contractor and generates relevant indexes for easy file retrieval. It stores process data and assessment results throughout the supplier evaluation and assessment process in a structured format, while unstructured data can be viewed online. Electronic documents from the entire assessment process can be downloaded, viewed, printed, and archived by contractor. Contractor file storage data supports online viewing; unstructured data supports batch download, individual download, and printing functions.

[0095] Furthermore, the intelligent assessment subsystem provided in this embodiment can objectively analyze and evaluate multiple contractors and personnel involved in bidding from multiple aspects, including attribute data, event information, and credit data. Specifically, the intelligent assessment subsystem employs distributed functional modules to achieve multi-level basic evaluation, and then performs comprehensive calculations to obtain a comprehensive evaluation result. In application, the intelligent assessment subsystem uses a scoring system to manage the scoring of contractors' and subcontractors' direct operational behaviors. Through quantitative assessment, it meets the needs of designing a quantitative assessment model and developing an information system for contractors throughout the entire lifecycle of construction projects, satisfying the quantitative assessment requirements for different types of contractors and key management personnel, such as general contractors, designers, construction workers, supervisors, and testers, in engineering construction projects and major overhaul projects.

[0096] In an optional embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem includes an attribute data quantification assessment module, an event information scoring assessment model, and a credit data assessment module; the intelligent assessment subsystem independently sets up attribute data quantification assessment module, event information scoring assessment module, and credit data assessment module applicable to contractors and employees, respectively.

[0097] The attribute data quantification assessment module obtains historical performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information of contractors through an information system, and personal historical performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information of employees. Based on the obtained information, it summarizes and calculates the overall quantitative evaluation of the contractor or employee according to the assessment rules of the assessment model. This facilitates the application of the evaluation results to engineering construction supervision and management, engineering procurement activities, and strategic contractor cultivation. In an optional embodiment, the quantitative evaluation of contractors, key management personnel's contract performance (personal performance), basic information, and market behavior, as well as the overall quantitative evaluation, all adopt a percentage system. Specifically, when conducting an overall quantitative evaluation of contractors, the attribute data quantification assessment module includes a performance evaluation unit, a basic information evaluation unit, and a market behavior evaluation unit.

[0098] The performance evaluation unit conducts quantitative assessments based on aspects such as safety, quality, schedule, comprehensive management, and overall evaluation. From the contract perspective, it assesses various events such as safety, quality, and schedule, and conducts quantitative evaluations on a percentage basis to obtain individual contract performance evaluations. Then, it sets weights based on factors such as contract amount and project difficulty, and calculates the overall quantitative evaluation of the contractor's contract performance based on the individual contract performance evaluations and corresponding weighted summaries.

[0099] The basic information evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluations based on the contractor's basic corporate information, qualification certifications, personnel information, administrative and judicial supervision, social responsibility information, and other relevant information.

[0100] The market behavior evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluations based on factors such as the contractor's bidding activities, project acceptance, and bid withdrawal. This information is collected from the associated petrochemical construction engineering electronic bidding and tendering transaction platform.

[0101] Furthermore, the intelligent assessment subsystem weights the scores from the contractor's contract performance evaluation, basic information evaluation, and market behavior evaluation to arrive at the contractor's overall evaluation score.

[0102] When conducting an overall quantitative evaluation of practitioners, the attribute data quantitative assessment module includes an individual performance evaluation unit, a basic information evaluation unit, and a market behavior evaluation unit. The individual performance evaluation unit is configured to quantitatively assess multiple factors related to practitioners' safety, quality, progress, comprehensive management, and overall evaluation. Based on various events such as safety, quality, and progress, a quantitative evaluation is conducted from a contractual perspective using a 100-point scale. Then, according to requirements, matching weights are set based on business type, event factor type, and score values. Following the assessment model, the individual performance evaluations obtained from each contract by the practitioner are aggregated, weighted, and comprehensively calculated to obtain the practitioner's overall performance evaluation score.

[0103] The basic information evaluation unit is mainly configured to conduct quantitative evaluation based on information such as education, professional title, professional qualification, training experience, and honors.

[0104] The market behavior evaluation unit is configured to obtain information such as professional performance and years of service from the associated Sinopec construction engineering electronic bidding and tendering transaction platform, and conduct corresponding quantitative evaluations based on this information.

[0105] Furthermore, the intelligent assessment subsystem calculates the overall quantitative assessment score of the employee by weighting the scores of the employee's personal performance evaluation, basic information evaluation, and market behavior evaluation according to the assessment model corresponding to the employee.

[0106] The contractor quantitative intelligent assessment subsystem adopts a hierarchical modeling approach. The assessment model's calculation process is as follows: a) The comprehensive evaluation score is weighted and aggregated based on the basic information score, market behavior score, and contract performance score. b) The basic information score, market behavior score, and contract performance score are calculated using a linear summation method. Furthermore, based on the project investment type, each contractor's market behavior evaluation and contract performance evaluation have three evaluation results: Category I, Category II, and Category III projects, meeting the needs of different scenarios.

[0107] Calculate the overall evaluation score using the following formula:

[0108]

[0109] Among them, F Z This represents the comprehensive evaluation score of the attribute data, with a value range of (0-100), F. B This represents the basic information score, with a value range of (0-100), F C F represents market behavior score, with a value range of (0-100). N This represents the contract performance score, with a value range of (0-100). Indicates weight, which can be set. The assessment results are updated daily during a set time period, such as 0:00-04:00 daily, and the data collected is from the information of day T-1.

[0110] In the above embodiments, each lower-level evaluation score participating in the calculation is calculated based on the evaluation scores of the corresponding multiple indicators:

[0111] For example, the basic information evaluation score is calculated based on the scores of multiple basic information indicators, as shown in the following formula:

[0112] F B =∑F Bi

[0113] Among them, F B This represents the basic information score, usually 0 ≤ F. B ≤100, F Bi Let be the score of the i-th basic information indicator. The market behavior evaluation score is calculated based on the scores of multiple market behavior indicators, as follows:

[0114] F C =∑F Ci

[0115] In the formula, F C This represents the market behavior score, typically 0 ≤ F. C ≤100, F Ci Let be the score of the i-th market behavior indicator.

[0116] The contract performance evaluation score is divided into different project types, and the contract performance evaluation scores for different project types are calculated and recorded independently; for example, for a contractor's newly added performance contract; the overall contract performance assessment process is as follows: Figure 5 As shown, newly added assessment-related data and documents can be flexibly reviewed according to needs, and contractors have the right to raise objections to contract records and assessment matters; after the contractor enters the objection description, the event record is submitted for review, and an objection application is submitted within 24 hours. If the review is approved, the event record will not take effect and no points will be deducted.

[0117] Specifically, the performance evaluation score of a contract for a certain type of investment project is calculated based on the performance evaluation scores of different contracts for that type of project, for example, using the following formula:

[0118]

[0119] Where: fi represents the assessment score of the i-th contract in a certain type of project, and the calculation formula is as follows:

[0120]

[0121] In the formula, Pi represents the amount of the i-th contract of a certain type, fL represents the quality management assessment score, fL = 100 - FL; fD represents the schedule management assessment score, fD = 100 - FD; fH1 represents the comprehensive management assessment score, fH1 = 100 - FH1; fH2 represents the comprehensive evaluation assessment score, fH2 = 100 - FH2; δ represents the weight of each assessment; in practical applications, δ1 = 0.3, δ2 = 0.25, δ3 = 0.15, δ4 = 0.15, δ5 = 0.15 can be set.

[0122] In the contractor assessment algorithm of this invention, the calculation indicators cover the evaluation of basic enterprise information, market behavior, and contract performance, which can comprehensively and scientifically reflect the assessment of Sinopec project contractors. In terms of determining the detailed standards, the assessment model sets indicators and industry standard values ​​that reflect industry characteristics, based on the actual characteristics of project contractors, so that the assessment indicators are both uniform and targeted.

[0123] The basic information quantitative evaluation criteria for contractors are shown in Table 1 below:

[0124] Table 1. Examples of Quantitative Evaluation Standards for Basic Contractor Information

[0125]

[0126]

[0127] The quantitative evaluation criteria for contractors' market behavior are shown in Table 2 below:

[0128] Table 2. Examples of Quantitative Evaluation Standards for Contractor Market Behavior

[0129]

[0130]

[0131] The contractor's contract performance quantitative evaluation criteria are shown in Table 3 below:

[0132] Table 3. Examples of Contractor Contract Performance Quantitative Evaluation Standards

[0133]

[0134] The intelligent assessment subsystem of this invention adopts a hierarchical modeling approach to establish the assessment calculation model.

[0135] The comprehensive evaluation score is calculated by weighting the basic information score, market behavior score, and individual performance score.

[0136] The basic information score, market behavior score, and personal performance score are calculated in a linear summation form.

[0137] In an optional embodiment, the overall evaluation score of the practitioner is calculated using the following formula:

[0138]

[0139] Where: Fr represents the comprehensive evaluation score of practitioners, with a value range of (0-100), F Br This represents the basic information score of employees, with a value range of (0-100), F Cr This represents the market behavior score of practitioners, with a value range of (0-100), F Nr This represents the performance score of employees or individuals, with a value range of (0-100). This represents the weight, which can be set in practical applications.

[0140] In the above embodiments, each lower-level evaluation score participating in the calculation is calculated based on the evaluation scores of the corresponding multiple indicators.

[0141] For example, the basic information evaluation score of practitioners is calculated based on the scores of various basic information evaluation indicators, as shown in the following formula:

[0142] F Br =∑F Bri

[0143] Among them, F Br This represents the basic information evaluation score of practitioners, usually 0≤F. Br≤100, FBri represents the score of the i-th quality indicator for practitioners.

[0144] The market behavior evaluation score is calculated by summing the scores of practitioners and their performance evaluation indicators, using the following formula:

[0145] FCr=∑FCri+FCN

[0146] Among them, F Cr This represents the evaluation score of practitioners' market behavior, usually 0 ≤ F. Cr ≤100, F Cri F represents the score of the i-th performance indicator for the employee. CN This indicates the scores for indicators related to the number of employees and years of service.

[0147] The individual performance evaluation score of practitioners is calculated based on the evaluation scores of different contracts within a specific project type, combined with the proportion of the contract amount as a weight. The formula is as follows:

[0148]

[0149] Among them, F Nr This represents the individual performance evaluation score of practitioners, usually 0≤F Nr ≤100, where fri represents the performance evaluation score of an employee participating in the i-th contract of a certain type of project. The calculation formula is as follows:

[0150] f ri =f Qr ×γ1+f Lr ×γ2+f Dr ×γ3+f H 1r ×γ4+f H 2r ×γ5

[0151] Where fQr represents the safety management assessment score, fQr = 100 - FQr, fLr represents the quality management assessment score, fLr = 100 - FLr, fDr represents the schedule management assessment score, fDr = 100 - FDr, fH1r represents the comprehensive management assessment score, fH1r = 100 - FH1r, fH2r represents the comprehensive evaluation assessment score, fH2r = 100 - FH2r, γ represents the weight of each assessment item, and in practical applications, γ1 = 0.3, γ2 = 0.2, γ3 = 0.3, γ4 = 0.1, γ5 = 0.1 can be set, and Pi represents the amount of a certain type of contract.

[0152] The basic information quantitative assessment standards for practitioners are shown in Table 4 below:

[0153] Table 4. Examples of Quantitative Assessment Standards for Basic Information of Practitioners

[0154]

[0155] The quantitative assessment standards for the market behavior of practitioners are shown in Table 5 below:

[0156] Table 5. Examples of Quantitative Assessment Standards for Market Behavior of Practitioners

[0157]

[0158]

[0159] The individual performance evaluation criteria for employees are shown in Table 6 below:

[0160] Table 6. Examples of Quantitative Assessment Standards for Individual Performance of Employees

[0161]

[0162] Based on this, when the intelligent assessment subsystem of the present invention conducts quantitative assessments of practitioners, the calculation indicators cover the evaluation of practitioners' basic information, market behavior, and personal performance, which can comprehensively and scientifically reflect the assessment of practitioners in construction projects.

[0163] The event information scoring and assessment module scores and assesses the behavioral events of contractors and employees directly involved in operations based on event information in the event information database. In practical application, different behavioral events are assigned matching scoring standards, and if there are multiple scoring behavioral events, they are accumulated. In an optional embodiment, contractor scoring and assessment adopts a 100-point system, and employee scoring and assessment adopts a 12-point system. In practical application, the comprehensive evaluation score of the quantitative assessment can be corrected based on the event information scoring and assessment results, or the relevant contractors or employees can be investigated and dealt with according to relevant management methods and standards based on the event information scoring and assessment results.

[0164] In practical applications, scoring rules are assigned to various events in the event information database in advance to form scoring and assessment indicators, and these indicators are combined according to certain algorithm rules to form scoring and quantitative evaluation of specific objects.

[0165] In an optional embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem scores the contractor's work process using the contract performance period as the assessment cycle, and scores the direct work process of the assessed entity; the contract performance period is from the date of issuance of the bid award notice to the date of contract closure.

[0166] In the process of scoring and assessing the behavior of employees in the operational process, a set time period is used as the assessment period, and the behavior of the assessed person in the direct operational process is scored and assessed; preferably, a 12-month assessment period is used.

[0167] In practical application, for employees who participated in Sinopec construction projects at the time this regulation was issued and took effect, the scoring cycle will be calculated from the date this regulation was issued and took effect; for employees who participated in Sinopec construction projects after this regulation was issued and took effect, the scoring cycle will be calculated from the date the employee entered the site; if the date the employee entered the site cannot be accurately recorded, the scoring cycle will be calculated from the date of the first scoring assessment. When an employee completes one scoring cycle, the starting date of the next scoring cycle will also be calculated according to the above logic.

[0168] If an employee changes projects or sites within a scoring cycle, their score will not be cleared and will be accumulated.

[0169] If an employee accumulates 12 points within a scoring cycle, the assessment cycle ends.

[0170] The scoring and assessment of employees is based on the effective time of the event scoring.

[0171] In an optional embodiment, the following assessment calculation model is used to calculate the comprehensive evaluation score of event information based on event scoring:

[0172] F j =∑F Q +∑F L +∑F D +∑F H1 +∑F H2

[0173] Among them, F j F represents the overall score for event information. Q F indicates the scoring of security incidents. L F indicates the scoring of quality incidents. D F represents the scoring of progress events. H 1 indicates the score for comprehensive management events, F H 2 indicates the overall evaluation event score.

[0174] Events are classified into four levels based on their severity: accident level, level one, level two, and level three. Event records are accumulated and scored in real time. In practical applications, the records can be stored in the event information database in association with the event description.

[0175] For example, the contractor accident-level event scoring and penalty list scoring in the event information database is shown in Table 7 below:

[0176] Table 7. List of Scoring and Penalties for Accident-Level Incidents (Scoring)

[0177]

[0178]

[0179] The contractor's score list for Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 incidents is shown in Table 8 below:

[0180] Table 8 Scoring List for Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 Events

[0181]

[0182] The scoring and penalty points for accident-level incidents involving employees are shown in Table 9 below:

[0183] Table 9. List of Scoring and Penalties for Accident-Level Incidents Involving Employees

[0184]

[0185]

[0186] Accordingly, the scoring list for Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 incidents for practitioners is detailed in Table 10 below:

[0187] Table 10: List of Scoring and Penalties for Level 1, 2, and 3 Incidents Involving Practitioners

[0188]

[0189] Furthermore, the credit data assessment module is configured to evaluate the creditworthiness of the credit subject based on the credit information of the credit subject and present it intuitively in the form of a score. This facilitates the correction of the comprehensive evaluation score of the quantitative assessment based on the credit information results, and further enables the implementation of matching management measures based on the credit evaluation of the credit subject.

[0190] Preferably, in one embodiment, a credit data assessment module is set up to obtain credit information of contractors and employees from the associated information system, establish a credit scoring model using statistical and other methods, and determine the credit evaluation results of contractors and employees based on the obtained credit information using the credit scoring model; wherein, the credit information includes credit-related records generated by individuals or organizations in social and economic activities, as well as various types of information related to evaluating their credit value.

[0191] In a preferred embodiment, the level of the assessed object's future repayment ability and willingness to repay is identified by a set symbol based on the credit rating result, and is stored in association with the credit rating result.

[0192] In an optional embodiment, if the credit information includes records of dishonesty, the dishonesty level of the assessed object is determined based on the type and time of the dishonesty record, and the assessed object is identified based on the dishonesty level, including the dishonesty red line level. If the assessed object belongs to the dishonesty red line level, such as being listed in the "National Court's List of Dishonest Judgment Debtors," the "Credit China" blacklist, or the blacklist identified by China Petrochemical Corporation, it is considered to have crossed the bottom line of the assessment of China Petrochemical's project contractors and employees, i.e., the red line. The intelligent assessment subsystem of the system provided in this embodiment of the invention pre-determines whether there is an assessed object belonging to the dishonesty red line level, locates the assessed object and outputs a confirmation prompt, responds to the instructions of the assessment subject's operator, and decides whether to conduct subsequent assessments. If the assessment subject's operator instructs to continue the subsequent assessments, then the assessments in various aspects are carried out according to the subsequent logic.

[0193] In a preferred embodiment, the credit data assessment module includes a credit file for storing the credit information and credit evaluation results of the assessed entity. Separate credit files are set up for contractors and employees. The contractor credit file includes a complete set of credit records formed by organizing, storing, and processing the credit information and credit evaluation results of various contractors in the petrochemical construction project.

[0194] Optionally, in one embodiment, for the assessed object belonging to the credit red line level, its overall quantitative evaluation is output and displayed to the assessment body operator through the multi-interaction module. In response to the operator's instructions, the assessment body decides whether to retain the assessed object's eligibility to participate in the selection, and has the power of veto.

[0195] Based on this, those listed on the blacklist of serious breaches of trust, including the "Credit China" blacklist, the "National Court's List of Dishonest Judgment Debtors," and the blacklist identified by China Petrochemical Corporation, have the power of veto by the assessment body. On the one hand, the assessment body can clearly understand the information and assessment results of the assessed entities at the credit red line level, and can flexibly decide whether to retain or dismiss such assessed entities.

[0196] In practical applications, contractors and employees are automatically evaluated based on the final revised comprehensive assessment score; in optional embodiments, the evaluation results are ranked according to the type of investment project.

[0197] The system in this invention collects credit information of contractors and employees of Sinopec construction projects, uses big data credit evaluation technology to conduct risk tracking and assessment of the assessment targets, and uses big data credit monitoring as an important basis for bidder qualification review, bid evaluation, bid awarding and contract signing. It can discover potential risk factors from the daily behavior of the assessment subjects, and warn the competent authorities to take investigations, thereby suppressing the occurrence of credit risks and avoiding losses.

[0198] The intelligent assessment subsystem also includes an assessment level determination module, which is configured to classify contractors and employees into assessment levels based on the final comprehensive assessment score. In an optional embodiment, the credit rating levels can be temporarily divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D, with the rankings corresponding to each level as follows:

[0199] Grade A: Top 5% (inclusive), with excellent performance in quality management, safety management, and schedule management;

[0200] Grade B: Ranked in the top 20%-5% (inclusive), with good quality management, safety management, and schedule management;

[0201] Grade C: Ranked in the top 60% - 20% (inclusive), with average performance in quality management, safety management, and schedule management;

[0202] Grade D: Ranked below 60%, with poor quality management, safety management, and schedule management. For contractors and employees already in the system, their evaluation grade is determined according to the scoring results; contractors and employees entering the system for the first time are classified as Grade C.

[0203] In addition, to improve the accuracy of the assessment results, in one embodiment, the grades can be further divided into detailed categories, such as AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C, and D, for fine-grained classification and supervision.

[0204] In a preferred embodiment, after obtaining the final assessment results and classifying them, the assessment results (scores, grades), rankings, and other legally publicizable enterprise information of the enterprises are publicized in the multi-interactive module and the publicity platform associated with the system of this invention, in accordance with the relevant regulations on petrochemical engineering. This aims to ensure fair competition, promote corporate integrity and self-discipline, standardize corporate information disclosure, strengthen corporate credit constraints, maintain transaction security, improve regulatory efficiency, and expand social supervision.

[0205] Based on the assessment results, all contractors and personnel in the database are subject to tiered and categorized management, classifying them into excellent, average, and risk levels. Following the principle of "priority cooperation for excellent level contractors, normal cooperation for average level contractors, and supervision and rectification for risk level contractors," this approach is applied in areas such as bidding, project management, and performance evaluation. This is beneficial for Sinopec Group to establish scientific and refined management methods; it helps to leverage market mechanisms and create a competitive market structure that weeds out the inferior; and it accelerates the formation of a credit market for construction projects, thereby promoting the high-level development of Sinopec's construction project contractors and personnel.

[0206] In addition, the intelligent assessment subsystem also includes a classification and early warning module, which is configured to issue early warnings based on set assessment conditions, handling conditions, and objection situations, and output early warning content including early warning signals and related business integrity data; including information early warnings, such as changes in key credit indicators, such as penalties reaching a set limit, or inconsistencies in key data, the platform will issue early warning reminders to the transaction entity. The objection handling early warning is used to establish a process tracking mechanism, allowing objection applications to be submitted through the objection data processing process, and the data provider to receive and verify the objection issues.

[0207] In practical applications, the evaluation results of contractors for petrochemical construction projects can be published in the form of rankings. Contractors can be classified and graded according to the ranking results. At the same time, efforts to promote integrity can be increased. For red-list suppliers with strong comprehensive strength, leading technology, excellent performance and good social responsibility, tenderers are encouraged to cooperate with the top-ranked contractors.

[0208] As can be seen from the above embodiments, the implementation of the embodiments of the present invention enables comprehensive review and assessment of contractors and practitioners, and can provide a comprehensive and quantitative intuitive evaluation of the situation of multi-source contractors and practitioners, which helps to shorten the time of bidding review, improve efficiency, and save office costs.

[0209] The system of this invention utilizes full-process information management to randomly select evaluation experts for supervision according to supervision needs, and conduct random checks on the bid opening activities according to a certain proportion. The entire process of bid evaluation is supervised, and the published and filed documents are randomly checked according to a certain proportion. All check results are managed electronically.

[0210] This also facilitates the integration, classification, and statistical analysis of performance evaluation data for contractors and employees. Through information retrieval, performance evaluation management, objection management, data visualization, risk warning, and assessment prediction, it enables real-time monitoring and tracking of performance targets. Contractors and employees whose cumulative performance evaluation results reach certain score thresholds can be subject to interviews, training, work stoppages for rectification, and removal from the site.

[0211] Furthermore, the assessment reference data and results of this invention can effectively serve as the basis for evaluating and selecting outstanding contractors and employees in petrochemical construction projects. Enterprises rated as excellent have priority in this evaluation, while enterprises rated as low-risk are disqualified from all awards and recognitions for the year. Personnel listed in the risk level are prohibited from holding positions on enterprise engineering projects.

[0212] Based on the data management and performance analysis technology of this invention, the system meets the needs of statistical analysis of various types of data, realizes the integration and sharing of information resources such as contractor management experience, performance results and rewards and punishments of various enterprises, and establishes a complete Sinopec contractor management, information sharing and big data analysis application platform.

[0213] To further improve efficiency and save office costs, in a preferred embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem also includes a classification and supervision module, which is configured to set up a contractor red list based on the assessment results after determining the assessment results of each contractor. Contractors on the red list are marked, and electronic file management of bidding documents and construction contracts is implemented based on this. For contractors on the red list, the qualification review time and approval process are shortened, and enterprises with excellent ratings can be given priority in bidding for key projects.

[0214] Furthermore, to save on routine inspection and testing costs, the tiered supervision module uses intelligent assessment results as the basis for tiered and categorized supervision, classifying contractors and employees accordingly and implementing differentiated management based on their assessment results. For entities with higher assessment results, the proportion and frequency of inspections can be reasonably reduced as needed, saving on routine inspection and testing costs while minimizing the impact on normal operations. For entities with assessment results meeting general criteria, inspections are conducted at the usual proportion and frequency. For entities with assessment results below the set criteria, the proportion and frequency of inspections are appropriately increased, and strict management and penalties are implemented in accordance with laws and regulations.

[0215] Furthermore, the system manages and applies the attribute data assessment results, event information assessment results, and credit data assessment results for contractors and employees independently. The tiered supervision module then flexibly manages and applies these assessment results as needed. For example, in tiered and categorized supervision, contractors and employees can be categorized based on the comprehensive evaluation results obtained from credit data assessments, with differentiated management based on credit ratings. For entities with good credit, the sampling ratio and frequency can be reasonably reduced to minimize the impact on normal operations; for entities with average credit, sampling can be conducted at the usual ratio and frequency; and for entities that violate laws and regulations and breach trust, the sampling ratio and frequency can be appropriately increased, with strict management and punishment implemented in accordance with laws and regulations.

[0216] The intelligent assessment subsystem also includes a real-time operation monitoring module, which is configured to, after determining the winning contractor and employees, combine the information management system corresponding to the petrochemical engineering project to collect event behavior data of the project work process in real time, and evaluate and manage the work of the winning contractor and employees throughout the entire life cycle of the petrochemical engineering project.

[0217] Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, the system further includes a credit repair unit, which is associated with the credit data assessment module and configured to receive and verify credit repair requests input by operators, update credit information, re-implement credit evaluation, update credit evaluation results, and record them. The credit repair request requiring composite verification includes evidence of the credit subject submitting an application for information repair of dishonest behavior to a national authority, legally authorized organization, or public credit information agency in accordance with prescribed conditions and procedures, and having this application confirmed. This ensures that the credit subject proactively corrects dishonest behavior, actively fulfills legal responsibilities and obligations, and proactively improves its credit status.

[0218] Optionally, in one embodiment, the credit repair request may further include a credit commitment, which is a credit commitment information of the credit subject to actively rectify in accordance with the format and specifications stipulated by the social credit management department or the industry competent authority, to fulfill its obligations and keep its promises in future production, operation and life, and to voluntarily assume relevant responsibilities for breach of commitment.

[0219] The credit data assessment module re-evaluates the credit based on the credit subject's credit repair request. When the new credit evaluation result is different from the original credit evaluation result, the credit commitment in the credit repair request is displayed to the public through the multi-interaction module and the public disclosure system associated with the system of this invention.

[0220] Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, the system of the present invention is based on existing data of the management platform, and uses the currently registered contractors as the main body and practitioners (key managers and bidding experts) as the auxiliary body to conduct quantitative assessment, ranking, and rating. During this period, more contractors and practitioners are recruited into the database, and they are guided to improve their information and expand the assessment resources for contractors and practitioners. Through the accumulation and sedimentation of data, the enterprise file information is improved, and contractors and practitioners are evaluated from more dimensions.

[0221] In an optional embodiment, to achieve humanized management and assessment, contractors and employees who have objections to the assessment results can submit an objection application to the petrochemical group's assessment body. The petrochemical group's assessment body will review the data and assessment results of the applicant within 15 working days of accepting the application. If the data is correct, the applicant will be notified by email; if the data is incorrect, the applicant will need to provide relevant supporting documents and input data through the multi-interaction module to correct the application and recalculate the assessment results.

[0222] This invention enables data sharing and information management throughout the entire lifecycle of construction projects. Its integrated application in planning, surveying, design, consulting, construction, installation, and operation and maintenance processes provides a basis for optimizing project plans and making scientific decisions, as well as a reference for researching and formulating company development strategies.

[0223] In the system for multi-dimensional assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention, each module or unit structure can operate independently or in combination according to actual data comprehensive management needs and assessment calculation and application needs, so as to achieve the corresponding technical effects.

[0224] This invention's multi-faceted evaluation system for engineering contractors and their personnel is based on the Petrochemical Smart Cloud Platform. It adopts a "platform + application + service" technical approach, fully utilizing technologies such as microservices, cloud computing, and mobile computing to build contractor management applications, such as... Figure 6 As shown.

[0225] This invention's multi-faceted evaluation system for engineering contractors and practitioners is deployed within the security infrastructure environment of Sinopec Cloud and incorporates Level II cybersecurity standards. Its design primarily focuses on network security, host security, application security, and data security. Figure 7 As shown.

[0226] Example 2

[0227] The above-described embodiments of the present invention have provided a detailed description of the system. Based on other aspects of the system described in any one or more of the above embodiments, the present invention also provides a method for multi-dimensional assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners. This method is applied to the system for multi-dimensional assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners described in any one or more of the above embodiments. Specific embodiments are given below for detailed description.

[0228] Specifically, the method for multi-faceted assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners provided in this embodiment of the invention includes:

[0229] The data management system receives and manages and records various data related to the assessment of contractors and employees in real time.

[0230] The intelligent assessment subsystem uses stored data and corresponding assessment models to determine assessment results based on assessment requirements.

[0231] The multi-interactive module responds to user operations to generate corresponding instruction inputs, and provides users with instruction matching data display services and assessment result output services;

[0232] The process by which the integrated data management system receives and manages in real time various data related to the performance evaluation of contractors and employees includes:

[0233] The intelligent management module is used to identify data attributes and decide on storage paths based on received data, and to decide on management action signals based on received instructions;

[0234] The data storage module is used to distribute multiple data sets and supports real-time data status updates in response to management action commands; the data storage module includes an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database.

[0235] The dynamic prompt module generates prompts for data status information based on the set rules.

[0236] Optionally, in one embodiment, a data integrated management system is used to adaptively manage data received from different sources. The sources of data are not limited to document recognition, data entry, and collection from third-party platforms. After receiving the data, the object and type of the data are identified, it is determined whether the data belongs to the contractor or the employees, and it is further distinguished as attribute data, event information, or credit data, and then distributed storage is performed.

[0237] Furthermore, in one embodiment, after receiving the data, the following operations are performed through the data integration management system:

[0238] The system iterates through the data of the corresponding type already stored in the data storage module to determine whether the current data content already exists. If the exact same content already exists, it is discarded, and a corresponding prompt instruction is generated through the dynamic prompt module. If the current data content is the same as the data object in the already stored data, and the data content similarity meets the set conditions, a confirmation instruction is generated through the dynamic prompt module to respond to the user's operation decision on whether to update or adjust the data content of the corresponding object.

[0239] In one embodiment, the attribute database includes a contractor database and a practitioner database. The data sources of the contractor information database include internal data and external data. The internal data includes data on performance records, and the external data is collected based on data from a third-party platform. The combined data forms a contractor attribute information profile, which is easy to access flexibly.

[0240] The database of practitioners includes internal and external data. Internal data includes job-related data filled in by practitioners, while external data is collected from third-party platforms. Together, they form a practitioner attribute information file, which can be flexibly accessed.

[0241] The database of contractors and practitioners supports interactive search services.

[0242] Optionally, in one embodiment, the contractor database and the practitioner database are respectively set up with an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database; the event information database records descriptions of events and behaviors of contractors or practitioners in the direct operation process of participating in the construction activities of the project.

[0243] Preferably, in one embodiment, scoring rules are pre-assigned to various events in the event information database to form scoring assessment indicators, and these indicators are combined according to certain algorithm rules to form specific objects for scoring and quantitative evaluation. The indicators support retrieval and multi-selection marking through a multi-interaction module, making them convenient and flexible as basic assessment parameters.

[0244] In one optional embodiment, the intelligent assessment subsystem uses distributed functional modules to achieve multi-level evaluation and management. The attribute data quantification assessment module is set up to calculate the overall quantitative evaluation result of the contractor or employee based on the acquired contractor attribute data or employee attribute data according to the assessment rules of the assessment model.

[0245] Utilize contractor attribute data, including historical performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information;

[0246] The attribute data of the practitioners includes personal historical job performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information.

[0247] Furthermore, in one embodiment, a performance evaluation unit is used to obtain a single contract performance evaluation from the contract dimension by assessing various events such as safety, quality, and schedule. Then, weights are set according to factors such as contract amount and engineering difficulty. The overall quantitative evaluation of the contractor's contract performance is determined by weighted summation based on the single contract performance evaluation and the corresponding weights.

[0248] The basic information evaluation unit is used to conduct a quantitative evaluation based on the contractor's basic corporate information, qualification certification, personnel information, administrative and judicial supervision, and social responsibility information.

[0249] The market behavior evaluation unit is used to conduct quantitative evaluation based on the contractor's bidding situation, project undertaking situation, and bid abandonment situation.

[0250] In a preferred embodiment, a personal performance evaluation unit is used to quantitatively evaluate various factors such as safety, quality, and schedule from a contractual perspective. Then, according to the assessment model, the personal performance evaluations obtained by the employee from each contract are aggregated, weighted, and comprehensively calculated to obtain the overall evaluation result of the employee's personal performance.

[0251] The basic information evaluation unit is used to conduct quantitative evaluation based on education, professional title, professional qualification, training experience, and honors information.

[0252] The evaluation unit utilizes the relevant Sinopec construction engineering electronic bidding and tendering transaction platform to obtain information on professional performance and years of service, and conducts corresponding quantitative evaluations based on this information.

[0253] Furthermore, in one embodiment, an event information assessment module is used to score and assess the event behaviors of the contractor's operational processes; the contract performance period is used as the assessment cycle to score and assess the direct operational behaviors of the assessed entity; the contract performance period is from the date of issuance of the bid award notice to the date of contract closure;

[0254] In the process of scoring and evaluating the behavior of employees in the work process, a set time period is used as the evaluation period, and the behavior of the evaluated person in the direct work process is scored and evaluated.

[0255] In one embodiment, a credit data assessment module is also used to obtain credit information of contractors and employees from an associated credit information platform, and a credit scoring model is established using statistical and other methods. Based on the obtained credit information, the credit evaluation results of contractors and employees are determined using the credit scoring model.

[0256] Optionally, in one embodiment, the system identifies records of dishonesty in the credit information. If the credit information includes records of dishonesty, the system determines the level of dishonesty of the assessed object based on the type and time of the record, and identifies the assessed object based on the level of dishonesty, including the red line level of dishonesty. For objects belonging to the red line level of dishonesty, the system locates the assessed object and outputs a confirmation prompt. In response to the instructions of the operator of the assessment body, the system decides whether to conduct subsequent assessments on the assessed object, and the assessment body may exercise the right of veto.

[0257] Furthermore, in one embodiment, after determining the assessment results of each contractor, a classification and supervision module is used to set up a red list of contractors based on the assessment results. Contractors in the red list are marked, and electronic file management of bidding documents and construction contracts is implemented based on this. The qualification review time and approval process are shortened for red list contractors.

[0258] In a preferred embodiment, after the successful bidder and personnel are determined, the real-time operation monitoring module is used in conjunction with the information management system corresponding to the petrochemical engineering project to collect event behavior data of the project's work processes in real time, so as to evaluate and control the work of the successful bidder and personnel throughout the entire life cycle of the petrochemical engineering project.

[0259] Optionally, in one embodiment, a credit repair unit associated with the credit data assessment module is also used to receive and verify the credit repair request input by the operator, update the credit information, re-implement the credit evaluation, update the credit evaluation result, and record it; the credit repair request also includes a credit commitment, which is a credit commitment information of the credit subject to actively rectify in accordance with the format and specifications stipulated by the social credit management department or industry competent department, to fulfill its obligations and keep its promises in future production, operation and life, and to voluntarily assume relevant responsibilities for breach of commitment.

[0260] For the foregoing method embodiments, in order to simplify the description, they are all described as a series of actions. However, those skilled in the art should understand that the present invention is not limited to the described order of actions, because according to the present invention, some steps can be performed in other orders or simultaneously. Furthermore, those skilled in the art should also understand that the embodiments described in the specification are preferred embodiments, and the actions and modules involved are not necessarily essential to the present invention.

[0261] It should be noted that, in other embodiments of the present invention, the method can also combine one or more of the above embodiments to obtain a new method for multi-dimensional assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners, so as to achieve efficient and accurate evaluation of petrochemical engineering bidding contractors and practitioners.

[0262] It should be noted that, based on the methods in any one or more embodiments of the present invention described above, the present invention also provides a storage medium storing program code that can implement the methods described in any one or more embodiments. When the program code is executed by the operating system, it can implement the method for multi-dimensional evaluation of engineering contractors and practitioners as described above.

[0263] It should be understood that the embodiments disclosed herein are not limited to the specific structures, processing steps, or materials disclosed herein, but should be extended to equivalent substitutions of these features as understood by those skilled in the art. It should also be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.

[0264] The phrase "an embodiment" in the specification means that a specific feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. Therefore, the phrase "an embodiment" appearing in various places throughout the specification does not necessarily refer to the same embodiment.

[0265] While the embodiments disclosed in this invention are as described above, the content is merely for the purpose of facilitating understanding of the invention and is not intended to limit the invention. Any person skilled in the art to which this invention pertains may make any modifications and variations in form and detail of the implementation without departing from the spirit and scope disclosed herein; however, the scope of patent protection for this invention shall still be determined by the scope defined in the appended claims.

Claims

1. A system for multi-faceted assessment and evaluation of engineering contractors and their employees, characterized in that, The system includes: A comprehensive data management system is used to receive and manage and record various data related to the performance evaluation of contractors and employees in real time. The intelligent assessment subsystem is connected to the data integrated storage module and is configured to determine the assessment results based on the stored data and the corresponding assessment model according to the assessment requirements. The multi-interaction module is used to respond to user operations, generate corresponding instruction inputs, and provide users with instruction matching data display services and assessment result output services. The data management system includes an intelligent management module, a data storage module, and a dynamic prompting module. The intelligent management module is used to identify data attributes and decide on storage paths based on received data, and to decide on management action signals based on received instructions; The data storage module is used for distributed storage of multiple data sets and supports real-time data status updates in response to management action commands; the data storage module includes an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database. The dynamic prompt module is used to generate prompt instructions for data status information according to the set rules; The intelligent assessment subsystem includes a credit data assessment module, which is configured to obtain credit information of contractors and employees from an associated credit information platform, establish a credit scoring model using statistical and other methods, and determine the credit evaluation results of contractors and employees based on the obtained credit information and the credit scoring model.

2. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The data management system adaptively manages data received from different sources, including but not limited to document recognition, data entry, and collection from third-party platforms. Upon receiving the data, it identifies the object and type of the data, determines whether the data belongs to the contractor or the employee, and distinguishes between attribute data, event information, and credit data before distributing the data for storage.

3. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, After receiving the data, the data management system also performs the following operations: Iterate through the data of the corresponding type already stored in the data storage module to determine whether the current data content already exists. If the exact same content already exists, discard it and generate the corresponding prompt instruction through the dynamic prompt module; if the current data content is the same as the data object in the already stored data, the data content similarity meets the set conditions. The dynamic prompt module generates confirmation instructions to respond to the user's operational decisions regarding whether to update or adjust the data content of the corresponding object.

4. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, In the data storage module, the attribute database includes a contractor database and a practitioner database. The data sources of the contractor information database include internal data and external data. The internal data includes data on existing performance records, and the external data is based on data collection from third-party platforms. Together, they form a contractor attribute information archive, which is easy to be flexibly accessed. The database of practitioners includes internal and external data. Internal data includes job-related data filled in by practitioners, while external data is collected from third-party platforms. Together, they form a practitioner attribute information file, which can be flexibly accessed. The database of contractors and practitioners supports interactive search services.

5. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The contractor database and the employee database are respectively set up with an attribute database, an event information database, and a credit database; the event information database records descriptions of events and behaviors of contractors or employees in the direct operation process of project construction activities.

6. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The system pre-assigns scoring rules to various events in the event information database to form scoring and assessment indicators. These indicators are then combined according to certain algorithm rules to score and quantify specific objects. The system supports retrieval and multi-selection marking through multiple interactive modules, making it convenient to use as a basic parameter for assessment.

7. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The intelligent assessment subsystem adopts distributed functional modules to realize multi-level evaluation and management, including an attribute data quantification assessment module, a contractor attribute data quantification assessment module, and an employee attribute data quantification assessment module, which are set up independently. The attribute data quantification assessment module calculates the overall quantitative evaluation result of the contractor or employee based on the acquired contractor attribute data or employee attribute data according to the assessment rules of the assessment model. The contractor attribute data includes historical performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information; the employee attribute data includes personal historical job performance information, basic information, and historical market behavior information.

8. The system according to claim 7, characterized in that, The contractor's attribute data quantification assessment module includes: The performance evaluation unit is configured to obtain a single contract performance evaluation by assessing various events related to safety, quality, and schedule from the contract perspective. Then, weights are set according to factors such as contract amount and project difficulty. Based on the single contract performance evaluation and the corresponding weighted summation, the overall quantitative evaluation of the contractor's contract performance is calculated. The basic information evaluation unit conducts a quantitative evaluation based on the contractor's basic corporate information, qualification certifications, personnel information, administrative and judicial supervision, and social responsibility information. The market behavior evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluations based on the contractor's bidding situation, project undertaking situation, and bid abandonment situation.

9. The system according to claim 7, characterized in that, The attribute data quantitative assessment module for practitioners includes: The individual performance evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluations from the contractual perspective, focusing on multiple factors such as safety, quality, and schedule. Then, according to the assessment model, the individual performance evaluations obtained by employees from various contracts are aggregated, weighted, and comprehensively calculated to obtain the overall evaluation result of the employee's individual performance. The basic information evaluation unit is configured to conduct quantitative evaluation based on education, professional title, professional qualification, training experience, and honors information; The market behavior evaluation unit is configured to obtain information on professional performance and years of service from the associated Sinopec construction engineering electronic bidding and tendering transaction platform, and conduct corresponding quantitative evaluations based on this information.

10. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The intelligent assessment subsystem includes an event information assessment module, configured to score and assess the event behaviors of contractors in their operational processes, with the contract performance period as the assessment cycle, and to score and assess the direct operational behaviors of the assessed entity; the contract performance period is from the date of issuance of the bid award notice to the date of contract closure; In the process of scoring and evaluating the behavior of employees in the work process, a set time period is used as the evaluation period, and the behavior of the evaluated person in the direct work process is scored and evaluated.

11. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The credit data assessment module is configured to identify records of dishonesty in credit information. If the credit information includes records of dishonesty, the module determines the level of dishonesty of the assessed object based on the type and time of the record, and identifies the assessed object based on the level of dishonesty, including the red line level of dishonesty. For objects belonging to the red line level of dishonesty, the module locates the assessed object and outputs a confirmation prompt, responding to the instructions of the assessment entity's operator, and decides whether to conduct further assessment. The assessment entity has the right to veto.

12. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The intelligent assessment subsystem also includes a classification and supervision module, which is configured to set up a red list of contractors based on the assessment results after determining the assessment results of each contractor. Contractors in the red list are marked, and electronic archive management of bidding documents and construction contracts is implemented based on this. The qualification review time and approval process are shortened for contractors in the red list.

13. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The intelligent assessment subsystem also includes a real-time operation monitoring module, which is configured to, after determining the winning contractor and employees, collect event behavior data of the project work process in real time in conjunction with the information management system corresponding to the petrochemical engineering project, and evaluate and control the work performance of the winning contractor and employees throughout the entire life cycle of the petrochemical engineering project.

14. The system according to claim 1, characterized in that, The system also includes a credit repair unit, which is associated with the credit data assessment module and configured to receive and verify credit repair requests input by operators, update credit information, re-implement credit evaluation, update credit evaluation results, and record them.

15. The system according to claim 11, characterized in that, The credit repair request also includes a credit commitment, which is a credit commitment information in which the credit subject makes positive rectifications in accordance with the format and specifications stipulated by the social credit management department or the industry competent authority, fulfills its obligations and keeps its promises in future production, operation and life, and voluntarily assumes relevant responsibilities for breach of the commitment.

16. A method for evaluating engineering contractors and their employees from multiple perspectives, characterized in that, The method is applied to the system described in any one of claims 1 to 15.

Images