Methods for detecting cancer using genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation profiles

Abstract

The present disclosure provides methods and systems for diagnosing and predicting cancer status using analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments in a sample obtained from a patient. The present disclosure provides a method for detecting cancer in a subject. The present disclosure also provides a method for determining the overall survival of a subject with cancer. The present disclosure further provides a method for monitoring cancer in a subject. A system for genetic analysis is also provided.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63 / 172,493, filed April 8, 2021. The disclosure of the prior application is considered part of the disclosure of this application and is incorporated by reference into the disclosure of this application.

[0002] FIELD OF THEINVENTION The present invention relates generally to genetic analysis, and more specifically to methods and systems for the analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragments to detect cancer in a subject and / or assess the overall survival of a subject. [Background technology]

[0003] Background information Much of the global human cancer morbidity and mortality is the result of late diagnosis of these diseases, where treatment is less effective. Unfortunately, clinically proven biomarkers that can be used to broadly diagnose and treat patients with early-stage cancers are not widely available.

[0004] Analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) suggests that such approaches may provide new avenues for earlier diagnosis and treatment. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) fragments have been shown to be shorter on average than other cfDNA from non-tumor cells. Previous studies have explored separating fragments into groups of different sizes (e.g., short and long, or sets of mutually exclusive sizes) caused by binding to histone core or linker proteins, and using the counts of these fragments to quantify ctDNA and / or classify individual samples as having the presence / absence of tumor. However, previous studies have lacked the ability to determine the overall survival of patients diagnosed with cancer, as well as providing robust sensitivity and specificity in cancer detection. Summary of the Invention

[0005] The present disclosure provides methods and systems that utilize analysis of cfDNA to detect and predict overall survival of a subject by scoring a cfDNA fragment profile obtained by analysis of cfDNA fragments in a sample obtained from the subject. The scoring methodology provides a measure of the overall survival probability of the subject.

[0006] Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for detecting cancer in a subject, the method comprising: a) determining a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation profile of a sample from a subject, the cfDNA fragmentation profile comprising: Obtaining and isolating cfDNA fragments from a subject; Sequencing the cfDNA fragments to obtain sequenced fragments; Mapping the sequenced fragments against the genome to obtain a window of mapped sequences; Analyzing the mapped sequence windows to determine cfDNA fragment lengths and generate a cfDNA fragmentation profile; a determining step, wherein the determining step is determined by: b) classifying the subject as having or not having cancer by calculating a score based on the cfDNA fragmentation profile, the score indicating the likelihood of the presence of cancer in the subject, thereby detecting and classifying cancer in the subject. In some aspects, the cancer excludes lung cancer. In some aspects, the subject is administered a chemotherapy agent, radiation, immunotherapy, or other therapeutic regimen.

[0007] In some embodiments, calculating the score comprises: i) determining the ratio of short cfDNA fragments to long cfDNA fragments; ii) determining Z-scores for cfDNA fragments by chromosome arm; iii) quantifying cfDNA fragment density using computational mixed model analysis; and iv) using a machine learning model to process the output of i)-iii) to determine a score; and Includes.

[0008] In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of determining overall survival of a subject having cancer, the method comprising: a) determining a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation profile of a sample from a subject; b) calculating a score based on the cfDNA fragmentation profile, wherein calculating the score comprises: i) determining the ratio of short cfDNA fragments to long cfDNA fragments of the sample; ii) determining Z-scores for the cfDNA fragments of the sample by chromosome arm; iii) quantifying cfDNA fragment density using computational mixed model analysis; and iv) using a machine learning model to process the output of i)-iii) to determine a score; and a calculating step comprising: c) determining the likelihood of overall survival of the subject based on the score, thereby determining overall survival of the subject. Includes.

[0009] In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method of treating a subject having cancer, the method comprising: a) detecting cancer in a subject using the methodology of the invention, or determining overall survival of a subject using the methodology of the invention; and b) administering to the subject a cancer treatment, thereby treating the subject. In some aspects, a chemotherapy agent, radiation, immunotherapy, or other therapeutic regimen is administered to the subject.

[0010] In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of monitoring cancer in a subject, the method comprising: a) detecting cancer in a subject using the methodology of the present invention, and / or determining overall survival of a subject using the methodology of the present invention; b) administering to the subject a cancer treatment; and c) determining the overall survival of the subject using the methodology of the present invention after the cancer treatment is administered, thereby monitoring the cancer in the subject. In some aspects, a chemotherapy agent, radiation, immunotherapy or other therapeutic regimen is administered to the subject.

[0011] In another embodiment, the present invention provides a non-transitory computer readable storage medium encoded with a computer program comprising instructions that, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations for performing the method of the present invention.

[0012] In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a computing system including a memory and one or more processors coupled to the memory, the one or more processors configured to perform operations implementing a method of the present invention.

[0013] In yet another embodiment, the present invention provides a system for genetic analysis and cancer assessment, comprising: (a) a sequencer configured to generate a whole genome sequencing (WGS) dataset for a sample; and (b) a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and / or a computer system of the present invention. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0014] [Figure 1] Schematic diagram illustrating an exemplary DELFI approach using the methodology of the present disclosure in one embodiment of the present invention. Blood is collected from a cohort of healthy individuals and patients with cancer. cfDNA is extracted from the plasma fraction, processed into a sequencing library, interrogated through whole genome sequencing, mapped to the genome, and analyzed to determine the cfDNA fragmentation profile across the genome. A machine learning approach is used to generate a DELFI score and classify individuals as healthy or with cancer. [Diagram 2]

[0023] Figure 1 shows the performance of the cfDNA fragmentation assay for non-invasive detection of cancer. Within 3 months of enrollment, 74 patients were diagnosed with 1 of 16 different solid cancers, while 207 patients were cancer-free. [Diagram 3] 1 is a graph plot showing data generated using the methodology of the present disclosure in one embodiment of the present invention. The graph shows the overall performance of a cfDNA fragmentation assay for cancer detection. [Figure 4] 1 is a graph plot showing data generated using the methodology of the present disclosure in one embodiment of the present invention. The graph shows subject survival correlated with DELFI score. Higher DELFI scores were associated with decreased overall survival, regardless of cancer stage or other clinical characteristics. [Diagram 5] 1 is a series of graph plots showing data curves generated using the methodology of the present disclosure in one embodiment of the present invention. The calculated DELFI scores separate the depicted Kaplan-Meier curves of individuals with cancer (excluding lung cancer) regardless of the cutoff values ​​used to define high scores (>0.5) versus low scores (<0.5). The numbers at the top of each panel indicate the determined cutoff values. [Figure 6] 6 is a graph plot showing data generated using the methodology of the present disclosure in one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 6 shows the results of the Cox proportional hazards model in two settings. In the first setting (left panel of the plot), DELFI score is treated as continuous. In the second setting (right panel of the plot), DELFI score is treated as either high (>0.5) or low (<0.5). In both settings, DELFI score is a strong predictor of survival, even when adjusted for age and stage at blood draw. Note that stage is relative to stage 1. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0015] Detailed Description of the Invention Described herein is a non-invasive method for early detection of cancer and prediction of overall survival of subjects with cancer. cfDNA in blood can provide a non-invasive diagnostic route for patients with cancer. As demonstrated herein, DNA assessment of fragments for early interception (DELFI) was used to assess genome-wide fragmentation patterns of cfDNA of patients with various types of cancer as well as healthy individuals. Assessment of cfDNA involved a scoring methodology. A defined score (also referred to herein as "DELFI score") was determined for the cfDNA fragmentation profile obtained using cfDNA fragments of a given patient sample, which correlated with overall survival. Evaluating cfDNA using the methodology described herein can provide a screening approach for early detection and evaluation of cancer, which can increase the chances of successful treatment of patients with cancer. Evaluating cfDNA can also provide an approach for monitoring cancer, which can increase the chances of successful treatment and improved outcomes of patients with cancer.

[0016] Before the compositions and methods of the present invention are described, it is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the particular methods and systems described, as such methods and systems may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, as the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.

[0017] As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to "the method" includes one or more methods, and / or steps, of the type described herein that will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this disclosure, and so forth.

[0018] Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are described herein.

[0019] The present disclosure provides an innovative method and system for the analysis of cfDNA to detect or otherwise evaluate cancer.As shown in previous studies, on average, individuals without cancer have longer cfDNA fragments (average size of 167.09bp), while individuals with cancer have shorter cfDNA fragments (average size of 164.88bp).The methodology described herein allows for the simultaneous analysis of multiple abnormalities in cfDNA through genome-wide analysis of cfDNA fragmentation patterns.

[0020] Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for detecting cancer in a subject, the method comprising: a) determining a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation profile of a sample from a subject; and b) classifying the subject as having or not having cancer by calculating a score based on the cfDNA fragmentation profile, the score indicating the likelihood of the presence of cancer in the subject, with the proviso that the cancer does not include lung cancer, thereby detecting and classifying cancer in the subject. Includes.

[0021] In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of determining overall survival of a subject having cancer, the method comprising: a) determining a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation profile of a sample from a subject; b) calculating a score based on the cfDNA fragmentation profile, wherein calculating the score comprises: i) determining the ratio of short cfDNA fragments to long cfDNA fragments of the sample; ii) determining Z-scores for the cfDNA fragments of the sample by chromosome arm; iii) quantifying cfDNA fragment density using computational mixed model analysis; and iv) using a machine learning model to process the output of i)-iii) to determine a score; and a calculating step comprising: c) determining the likelihood of overall survival of the subject based on the score, thereby determining overall survival of the subject. Includes.

[0022] In one embodiment, the present invention provides a method of treating a subject having cancer, the method comprising: a) detecting cancer in a subject using the methodology of the invention, or determining overall survival of a subject using the methodology of the invention; and b) administering to the subject a cancer treatment, thereby treating the subject. In some aspects, a chemotherapy agent, radiation, immunotherapy, or other therapeutic regimen is administered to the subject.

[0023] In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of monitoring cancer in a subject, the method comprising: a) detecting cancer in a subject using the methodology of the present invention, or determining overall survival of a subject using the methodology of the present invention; b) administering to the subject a cancer treatment; and c) determining the overall survival of the subject using the methodology of the present invention after the cancer treatment is administered, thereby monitoring the cancer in the subject. Includes.

[0024] The methodology described herein utilizes cfDNA fragmentation profile. As used herein, the term "fragmentation profile", in some embodiments, determining the cfDNA fragmentation profile in a mammal can be used to identify the mammal as having cancer. For example, the cfDNA fragments obtained from a mammal (e.g., from a sample obtained from a mammal) can be subjected to low-coverage whole genome sequencing, and the sequenced fragments can be mapped (e.g., in non-overlapping windows) to the genome and evaluated to determine the cfDNA fragmentation profile. The cfDNA fragmentation profile of a mammal with cancer is more heterogeneous (e.g., in fragment length) than the cfDNA fragmentation profile of a healthy mammal (e.g., a mammal without cancer).

[0025] The cfDNA fragmentation profile may include one or more cfDNA fragmentation patterns. The cfDNA fragmentation pattern may include any suitable cfDNA fragmentation pattern. Examples of cfDNA fragmentation patterns include, but are not limited to, fragment size density, median fragment size, fragment size distribution, ratio of small cfDNA fragments to large cfDNA fragments, and cfDNA fragment coverage. In some embodiments, the cfDNA fragmentation profile may be a genome-wide cfDNA profile (e.g., a genome-wide cfDNA profile in a genome-spanning window). In some embodiments, the cfDNA fragmentation profile may be a target region profile. The target region may be any suitable portion of the genome (e.g., a chromosomal region). Examples of chromosomal regions for which a cfDNA fragmentation profile may be determined as described herein include, but are not limited to, portions of chromosomes (e.g., portions of 2q, 4p, 5p, 6q, 7p, 8q, 9q, 10q, 11q, 12q, and / or 14q) and chromosomal arms (e.g., chromosomal arms of 8q, 13q, 11q, and / or 3p). In some cases, a cfDNA fragmentation profile may include two or more target region profiles.

[0026] In various embodiments, the cfDNA obtained from the sample is isolated, and fragments of a certain size range are used in the analysis.In some embodiments, the analyzing excludes fragment sizes less than about 10, 50, 100 or 105bp, and fragment sizes greater than about 220, 250, 300, 350bp or more.In some embodiments, the analyzing excludes fragment sizes less than 105bp and fragment sizes greater than 170bp.In some embodiments, the analyzing excludes fragment sizes less than about 230, 240, 250, 260bp, and fragment sizes greater than about 420, 430, 440, 450bp or more.In some embodiments, the analyzing excludes fragment sizes less than 260bp and fragment sizes greater than 440bp.

[0027] In some embodiments, the cfDNA fragmentation profile may be determined by processing a sample from a subject containing cfDNA fragments into a sequencing library, subjecting the sequencing library to low-coverage whole-genome sequencing to obtain sequenced fragments, mapping the sequenced fragments to the genome to obtain mapped sequence windows, and analyzing the mapped sequence windows to determine cfDNA fragment lengths.

[0028] In some aspects, the cfDNA fragment profile can be determined by obtaining and isolating cfDNA fragments from a subject, sequencing the cfDNA fragments to obtain sequenced fragments, mapping the sequenced fragments to the genome to obtain mapped sequence windows, and analyzing the mapped sequence windows to determine cfDNA fragment lengths and generate a cfDNA fragment profile.

[0029] The methodology of the present invention is based on low-coverage whole-genome sequencing and analysis of isolated cfDNA. In one aspect, the data used to develop the methodology of the present invention is based on shallow whole-genome sequence data (1-2x coverage).

[0030] In some embodiments, the mapped sequences are analyzed in non-overlapping windows covering the genome. Conceptually, the windows can range in size from thousands to millions of bases, resulting in hundreds to thousands of windows in the genome. 5Mb windows were used to assess cfDNA fragmentation patterns because they provide more than 20,000 reads per window even at a limited amount of 1-2x genome coverage. Within each window, the coverage and size distribution of cfDNA fragments were examined. In some embodiments, genome-wide patterns from an individual can be compared to a reference population to determine whether the patterns are likely to be healthy or cancer-derived.

[0031] In certain embodiments, the mapped sequences include tens to thousands of genomic windows, e.g., 10, 50, 100 to 1,000, 5,000, 10,000 or more windows. Such windows may be non-overlapping or overlapping and may include about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 million base pairs.

[0032] In various embodiments, cfDNA fragmentation profile is determined within each window.Accordingly, the present invention provides a method for determining the cfDNA fragmentation profile in a subject (e.g., in a sample obtained from the subject).

[0033] In some embodiments, the cfDNA fragmentation profile can be used to identify changes (e.g., alterations) in cfDNA fragment length. The alterations can be genome-wide alterations or alterations in one or more target regions / locuses. The target region can be any region that contains one or more cancer-specific alterations. In some embodiments, the cfDNA fragmentation profile can be used to identify (e.g., simultaneously identify) about 10 alterations to about 500 alterations (e.g., about 25 to about 500, about 50 to about 500, about 100 to about 500, about 200 to about 500, about 300 to about 500, about 10 to about 400, about 10 to about 300, about 10 to about 200, about 10 to about 100, about 10 to about 50, about 20 to about 400, about 30 to about 300, about 40 to about 200, about 50 to about 100, about 20 to about 100, about 25 to about 75, about 50 to about 250, or about 100 to about 200 alterations).

[0034] In various embodiments, the cfDNA fragmentation profile may include a cfDNA fragment size pattern. The cfDNA fragments may be of any suitable size. For example, in some embodiments, the cfDNA fragments may be about 50 base pairs (bp) to about 400 bp long. As described herein, a subject with cancer may have a cfDNA fragment size pattern that contains a median cfDNA fragment size that is shorter than the median cfDNA fragment size in healthy subjects. A healthy subject (e.g., a subject without cancer) may have a cfDNA fragment size with a median cfDNA fragment size of about 166.6 bp to about 167.2 bp (e.g., about 166.9 bp). In some embodiments, a subject with cancer may have a cfDNA fragment size that is, on average, about 1.28 bp to about 2.49 bp (e.g., about 1.88 bp) shorter than the cfDNA fragment size in healthy subjects. For example, a subject with cancer can have a cfDNA fragment size with a median cfDNA fragment size of about 164.11 bp to about 165.92 bp (e.g., about 165.02 bp).

[0035] In some embodiments, the dinucleosomal cfDNA fragments can be about 230 base pairs (bp) to about 450 bp long. As described herein, subjects with cancer can have a dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size pattern that contains a median dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size that is shorter than the median dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size in healthy subjects. In some embodiments, on average, subjects without cancer have longer cfDNA fragments in the dinucleosomal range (average size of 334.75 bp), while subjects with cancer have shorter dinucleosomal cfDNA fragments (average size of 329.6 bp). Thus, healthy subjects (e.g., subjects without cancer) can have a dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size with a median cfDNA fragment size of about 334.75 bp. In some embodiments, subjects with cancer can have a dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size that is shorter than the dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size in healthy subjects. For example, a subject with cancer can have a dinucleosomal cfDNA fragment size with a median cfDNA fragment size of about 329.6 bp.

[0036] The cfDNA fragmentation profile may include a cfDNA fragment size distribution. As described herein, a subject with cancer may have a more variable cfDNA fragment size distribution than a cfDNA fragment size distribution in a healthy subject. In some embodiments, the size distribution may be within a target region. A healthy subject (e.g., a subject without cancer) may have a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution of about 1 or less than about 1. In some embodiments, a subject with cancer may have a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution that is longer (e.g., 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 bp or more longer, or any number of base pairs between these numbers) than a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution in a healthy subject. In some embodiments, a subject with cancer may have a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution that is shorter (e.g., 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 bp or more shorter, or any number of base pairs between these numbers) than a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution in a healthy subject. In some embodiments, a subject with cancer may have a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution that is about 47bp smaller to about 30bp longer than the target region cfDNA fragment size distribution in a healthy subject. In some embodiments, a subject with cancer may have a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution with a difference in cfDNA fragment length of 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20bp or more on average. For example, a subject with cancer may have a target region cfDNA fragment size distribution with a difference in cfDNA fragment length of about 13bp on average. In some embodiments, the size distribution may be a genome-wide size distribution.

[0037] The cfDNA fragmentation profile may include a ratio of small cfDNA fragments to large cfDNA fragments, and a correlation of the fragment ratio to a reference fragment ratio. As used herein, with respect to the ratio of small cfDNA fragments to large cfDNA fragments, the small cfDNA fragments may be about 100 bp to about 150 bp long. As used herein, with respect to the ratio of small cfDNA fragments to large cfDNA fragments, the large cfDNA fragments may be about 151 bp to 220 bp long. As described herein, a subject with cancer may have a lower (e.g., 2-fold lower, 3-fold lower, 4-fold lower, 5-fold lower, 6-fold lower, 7-fold lower, 8-fold lower, 9-fold lower, 10-fold lower, or more lower) fragment ratio correlation (e.g., a correlation of the cfDNA fragment ratio to a reference DNA fragment ratio, such as a DNA fragment ratio from one or more healthy subjects) than in a healthy subject. A healthy subject (e.g., a subject without cancer) may have a fragment ratio correlation (e.g., a correlation of cfDNA fragment ratios to a reference DNA fragment ratio, such as a DNA fragment ratio from one or more healthy subjects) of about 1 (e.g., about 0.96). In some embodiments, a subject with cancer may have a fragment ratio correlation (e.g., a correlation of cfDNA fragment ratios to a reference DNA fragment ratio, such as a DNA fragment ratio from one or more healthy subjects) that is, on average, about 0.19 to about 0.30 (e.g., about 0.25) lower than the fragment ratio correlation in a healthy subject (e.g., a correlation of cfDNA fragment ratios to a reference DNA fragment ratio, such as a DNA fragment ratio from one or more healthy subjects).

[0038] The methodology of the present invention further comprises calculating a score (for example, DELFI score) based on cfDNA fragmentation profile.In some embodiments, calculating the score comprises: i) determining the ratio of short cfDNA fragments to long cfDNA fragments of the sample; ii) determining the Z-score of the cfDNA fragments of the sample by chromosome arm; iii) quantifying the cfDNA fragment density using a computational mixed model analysis; and iv) using a machine learning model to process the output of i)-iii) to define the score.In various embodiments, the score is utilized to determine the probability of overall survival of the subject.

[0039] In one illustrative example (Example 1), in a multiple cancer cohort, we calculated the ratio of short to long fragments by 5MB bins, Z-score by chromosome arm, and a mixture model of cfDNA fragment size for each individual from low-coverage whole genome sequencing. Using these features as input, we fit a cross-validated gradient boosted machine to each person's cancer status (cancer / no cancer). The output of this model is a score ranging from 0 to 1, with higher numbers indicating a stronger signal of cancer and lower numbers indicating greater similarity to non-cancer. Once complete, only samples with a cancer diagnosis are retained.

[0040] In some embodiments, the output score is analyzed as follows. Using follow-up time (whether the patient is alive or not at the end of follow-up) and the score from the above machine learning model, the association between cfDNA fragmentation and survival is determined. As shown in Figure 5, a strong separation is determined in the Kaplan-Meier curves of high score vs. low score in individuals with cancer. In addition, the independence of this score from other clinical features is evaluated by fitting a Cox proportional hazards model that regresses score, cancer stage, and patient age.

[0041] Referring to Figure 5, as discussed above, the calculated DELFI scores separate the depicted Kaplan-Meier curves of individuals with cancer (excluding lung cancer) regardless of the cutoff values ​​used to define high scores (>0.5) versus low scores (<0.5). The numbers at the top of each panel indicate the determined cutoff values.

[0042] Figure 6 shows the results of the Cox proportional hazards model in two settings. In the first setting (left panel of plot), DELFI score is treated as continuous. In the second setting (right panel of plot), DELFI score is treated as either high (>0.5) or low (<0.5). In both settings, DELFI score is a strong predictor of survival, even when adjusted for age and stage at blood draw. Note that stage is relative to stage 1.

[0043] The described methods and systems of the present invention are useful for detecting, predicting, treating and / or monitoring a cancer condition in a subject. Any suitable subject, such as a mammal, can be evaluated, monitored and / or treated as described herein. Some examples of mammals that can be evaluated, monitored and / or treated as described herein include, but are not limited to, humans, primates such as monkeys, dogs, cats, horses, cows, pigs, sheep, mice and rats. For example, a human who has or is suspected of having cancer can be evaluated using the methods described herein and, optionally, treated with one or more cancer therapies as described herein.

[0044] A subject having or suspected of having any suitable type of cancer can be evaluated and / or treated (e.g., by administering one or more cancer treatments to the subject) using the methods and systems described herein. The cancer can be any stage of cancer. In some aspects, the cancer can be an early stage cancer. In some aspects, the cancer can be an asymptomatic cancer. In some aspects, the cancer can be residual disease and / or recurrence (e.g., after surgical resection and / or after cancer treatment). The cancer can be any type of cancer. Examples of types of cancer that can be evaluated, monitored, and / or treated as described herein include, but are not limited to, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, bile duct cancer, liver cancer, CNS cancer, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer. Additional types of cancer include, but are not limited to, myeloma, multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, lymphocytic leukemia, leukemia, and myeloid leukemia. In some embodiments, the cancer is a solid tumor. In some embodiments, the cancer is a sarcoma, carcinoma, or lymphoma. In some embodiments, the cancer is lung cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, bile duct cancer, liver cancer, CNS cancer, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), uterine cancer, or ovarian cancer. In some embodiments, the cancer is a hematological cancer. In some embodiments, the cancer is a myeloma, multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, lymphocytic leukemia, leukemia, or myeloid leukemia.

[0045] When treating a subject having or suspected of having cancer as described herein, the subject may be administered one or more cancer therapies. The cancer treatment may be any suitable cancer treatment. One or more cancer therapies described herein may be administered to the subject at any suitable frequency (e.g., one or more times over a period ranging from several days to several weeks). Examples of cancer therapies include, but are not limited to, surgical intervention, adjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, cytotoxic therapy, immunotherapy, adoptive T cell therapy (e.g., T cells having chimeric antigen receptors and / or wild-type or modified T cell receptors), targeted therapy such as administration of kinase inhibitors (e.g., kinase inhibitors that target specific genetic lesions, such as translocations or mutations), (e.g., kinase inhibitors, antibodies, bispecific antibodies), signal transduction inhibitors, bispecific antibodies or antibody fragments (e.g., BiTEs), monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, surgery (e.g., surgical resection), or any combination of the above. In some aspects, treating cancer may reduce the severity of the cancer, may reduce the symptoms of the cancer, and / or may reduce the number of cancer cells present in the subject.

[0046] In some embodiments, the cancer treatment can be a chemotherapeutic agent. Non-limiting examples of chemotherapeutic agents include amsacrine, azacitidine, axathioprine, bevacizumab (or an antigen-binding fragment thereof), bleomycin, busulfan, carboplatin, capecitabine, chlorambucil, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dacarbazine, daunorubicin, docetaxel, doxifluridine, doxorubicin, epirubicin, erlotinib hydrochloride, etoposide, fiudarabine, floxuridine, fludarabine, fluorouracil, gemcitabine, Include hydroxyurea, idarubicin, ifosfamide, irinotecan, lomustine, mechlorethamine, melphalan, mercaptopurine, methotrexate, mitomycin, mitoxantrone, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, pemetrexed, procarbazine, all-trans retinoic acid, streptozocin, tafluposide, temozolomide, teniposide, thioguanine, topotecan, uramustine, valrubicin, vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, vinorelbine, and combinations thereof. Additional examples of anticancer treatments are known in the art. For example, see the guidelines for treatment from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), or the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN).

[0047] When monitoring a subject having or suspected of having cancer as described herein, the monitoring can be before, during, and / or after a course of cancer treatment. The monitoring methods provided herein can be used to determine the effectiveness of one or more cancer treatments and / or to select subjects for increased monitoring.

[0048] In some embodiments, monitoring may include conventional techniques that can monitor one or more cancer treatments (e.g., the effectiveness of one or more cancer treatments). In some embodiments, subjects selected for increased monitoring may be administered diagnostic tests (e.g., any of the diagnostic tests disclosed herein) at an increased frequency compared to subjects not selected for increased monitoring. For example, subjects selected for increased monitoring may be administered diagnostic tests twice daily, daily, biweekly, weekly, bimonthly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annually, or any frequency therein.

[0049] In various embodiments, the DNA is present in a biological sample taken from a subject, and the biological sample used in the methodology of the present invention can be virtually any type of biological sample that contains DNA. The biological sample is typically a fluid, such as whole blood or a portion thereof that contains circulating cfDNA. In embodiments, samples include DNA from tumor or liquid biopsies, including, but not limited to, amniotic fluid, aqueous humor, vitreous fluid, blood, whole blood, fractionated blood, plasma, serum, breast milk, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), cerumen (earwax), chyle, chime, endolymph, perilymph, feces, breath, gastric acid, gastric juice, lymph, mucus (including nasal drip and phlegm), pericardial fluid, peritoneal fluid, pleural fluid, pus, mucosal secretions, saliva, exhaled breath condensate, sebum, semen, sputum, sweat, synovial fluid, tears, vomit, prostatic fluid, nipple aspirate, tears, sweat, cheek swabs, cell lysates, gastrointestinal fluids, biopsy tissue, and urine or other biological fluids. In one aspect, the sample includes DNA from circulating tumor cells.

[0050] As disclosed above, the biological sample may be a blood sample. Blood samples may be obtained using methods known in the art, such as finger prick or venipuncture. Preferably, the blood sample is approximately 0.1-20 ml, or alternatively approximately 1-15 ml, with a blood volume of approximately 10 ml. Smaller volumes may also be used, as may the circulating free DNA in blood. Microsampling and sampling by needle biopsy, catheter, excretion or production of bodily fluids containing DNA are also possible biological sample sources.

[0051] The disclosed methods and systems utilize nucleic acid sequence information and therefore may include any method or sequencing device for performing nucleic acid sequencing, including nucleic acid amplification, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), nanopore sequencing, 454 sequencing, and insertion tag sequencing. In some embodiments, the disclosed methodology or system utilizes systems such as those provided by Illumina, Inc. (including but not limited to HiSeq™ X10, HiSeq™ 1000, HiSeq™ 2000, HiSeq™ 2500, Genome Analyzers™, MiSeq™, NextSeq, NovaSeq 6000 systems), Applied Bioiosystems Life Techenologies (SOLiD™ System, Ion PGM™ Sequencer, Ion Proton™ Sequencer) or Genapsys or BGI MGI, as well as other systems. Nucleic acid analysis can also be performed by systems provided by Oxford Nanopore Technologies (GridiON™, MinION™) or Pacific Biosciences (Pacbio™ RS II or Sequel I or II).

[0052] The present invention, including systems for performing the steps of the disclosed methods, is described in part in terms of functional components and various process steps. Such functional components and process steps may be realized by any number of components, operations, and techniques configured to perform the specified functions and achieve various results. For example, the present invention may employ a variety of biological samples, biomarkers, elements, materials, computers, data sources, storage systems and media, information collection techniques and processes, data processing standards, statistical analyses, regression analyses, and the like, which may perform various functions.

[0053] Accordingly, the present invention further provides a system for detecting, analyzing, and / or assessing cancer, in various embodiments, the system comprising (a) a sequencer configured to generate a low-coverage whole genome sequencing dataset for a sample, and (b) a computer system and / or processor having functionality for performing the methods of the present invention.

[0054] In some embodiments, the computer system further comprises one or more additional modules. For example, the system may comprise one or more extraction and / or isolation units operable to perform suitable genetic component analysis, e.g., to select cfDNA fragments of a particular size.

[0055] In some aspects, the computer system further includes a visual display device. The visual display device may be operable to display the curve fit line, the reference curve fit line, and / or a comparison of both.

[0056] The method for detection and analysis according to various aspects of the present invention can be implemented in any suitable manner, for example, using a computer program operating on a computer system. As discussed herein, an exemplary system according to various aspects of the present invention can be implemented in conjunction with a computer system, for example, a conventional computer system including a processor and random access memory, for example, a remotely accessible application server, a network server, a personal computer, or a workstation. The computer system also preferably includes additional memory devices or information storage systems, for example, a mass storage system, and a user interface, for example, a conventional monitor, keyboard, and tracking devices. However, the computer system can include any suitable computer system and associated devices and can be configured in any suitable manner. In one embodiment, the computer system includes a stand-alone system. In another embodiment, the computer system is part of a network of computers including a server and a database.

[0057] The software required to receive, process, and analyze the information may be implemented in a single device or may be implemented in multiple devices. The software may be accessible over a network such that the storage and processing of information is performed remotely with respect to the user. The system and its various elements according to various aspects of the present invention provide functions and operations to facilitate detection and / or analysis, such as data collection, processing, analysis, reporting, and / or diagnosis. For example, in this aspect, the computer system executes a computer program that may receive, store, retrieve, analyze, and report information related to the human genome or regions thereof. The computer program may include multiple modules that perform various functions or operations, such as a processing module for processing raw data and generating supplemental data, and an analysis module for analyzing the raw data and supplemental data to generate a disease state model and / or a quantitative assessment of diagnostic information.

[0058] The procedures performed by the system may include any suitable process for facilitating analysis and / or cancer diagnosis. In one embodiment, the system is configured to establish a disease state model and / or determine a disease state in a patient. Determining or identifying a disease state may include generating any useful information regarding the patient's condition that is relevant to the disease, such as making a diagnosis, providing information to aid in the diagnosis, assessing the stage or progression of the disease, identifying conditions that may indicate susceptibility to the disease, identifying whether further testing may be recommended, predicting and / or evaluating the effectiveness of one or more treatment programs, or otherwise evaluating the disease state, likelihood of disease, or other aspects of the patient's health.

[0059] The following examples are provided to further illustrate the advantages and features of the present invention, but are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. Although the examples are illustrative of the features that may be used, other procedures, methodologies, or techniques known to those skilled in the art may alternatively be used. EXAMPLES

[0060] Example 1 Cancer detection using genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation in prospective diagnostic cohorts Genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation patterns have been demonstrated to distinguish between plasma samples from individuals with and without cancer with high sensitivity and specificity.

[0061] In this example, the methodology of the present disclosure was utilized to detect cancer and predict overall patient survival.

[0062] The study objective was to evaluate the cfDNA fragmentation assay as a blood-based screening test to detect multiple different solid tumors and predict overall patient survival by using a computational scoring scheme.

[0063] method Plasma samples: Samples were collected from 281 patients referred to the Diagnostic Outpatient Clinic of the Herlev and Gentofte Hospital (Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark) due to non-organ specific signs and symptoms of cancer.

[0064] cfDNA Fragmentation Approach: The cfDNA fragmentation approach is summarized in Figure 1. cfDNA was extracted from plasma, processed into sequencing libraries, interrogated by low-coverage whole genome sequencing (WGS), mapped to the genome, and analyzed to determine the genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation profile.

[0065] Machine learning was used to generate a DELFI score to classify individuals as healthy or having cancer and to predict overall patient survival.

[0066] result Performance of the cfDNA fragmentation assay for non-invasive detection of cancer: Within 3 months of enrollment, 74 patients were diagnosed with one of 16 different solid cancers, while 207 patients were cancer-free. Additional results are shown in Figure 2. Areas under the curve (AUC) for localized and metastatic cancers and for all stages of colorectal, lung, and all other cancers determined using 10-replicate, 10-fold cross-validation.

[0067] Overall performance of the cfDNA fragmentation assay for cancer detection: Results are summarized in Figure 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) AUC for the analysis of 74 individuals with stages I-IV cancer and 207 non-cancer controls.

[0068] Survival by DELFI score: As shown in Figure 4, higher DELFI scores were associated with decreased overall survival, regardless of cancer stage or other clinical characteristics. Figure 4 shows subject survival correlated with DELFI score. Higher DELFI scores were associated with decreased overall survival, regardless of cancer stage or other clinical characteristics.

[0069] conclusion This study of prospectively enrolled individuals demonstrated the ability of the cfDNA fragmentation assay to discriminate between individuals with and without cancer. The assay demonstrated high performance in a multi-cancer setting using only fragmentation-related information obtained from low-coverage WGS.

[0070] The results suggest that machine learning models can use cfDNA fragmentation profiles to discriminate between cancer and non-cancer despite the presence of common non-malignant conditions (including cardiovascular, autoimmune, or inflammatory diseases).In addition, individuals with higher DELFI scores had a worse prognosis, independent of other characteristics.

[0071] These data support the development of genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation assays for the noninvasive detection of both single and multiple cancers.

[0072] Although the invention has been described with reference to the above examples, it will be understood that modifications and variations are encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is limited only by the scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. 1. A method for detecting cancer in a subject, comprising: a) determining a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation profile of a sample from the subject, the cfDNA fragmentation profile comprising: obtaining and isolating cfDNA fragments from the subject; Sequencing the cfDNA fragments to obtain sequenced fragments; mapping said sequenced fragments to a genome to obtain a window of mapped sequences; analyzing windows of the mapped sequences to determine cfDNA fragment lengths and generate the cfDNA fragmentation profile; a determining step, wherein the determining step is determined by b) classifying the subject as having or not having cancer by calculating a score based on the cfDNA fragmentation profile, the score indicating the likelihood of the presence of cancer in the subject, thereby detecting and classifying cancer in the subject. A method comprising:

2. Calculating the score comprises: i) determining the ratio of short to long cfDNA fragments; ii) determining a Z-score for the cfDNA fragment by chromosome arm; iii) quantifying cfDNA fragment density using computational mixed model analysis; iv) processing the output of i)-iii) using a machine learning model to define said score; The method of claim 1 , comprising:

3. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the classifying step comprises comparing the cfDNA fragmentation profile to a reference cfDNA fragmentation profile, and optionally, the reference cfDNA fragmentation profile is a cfDNA fragmentation profile of a healthy subject.

4. 1. A method for determining overall survival of a subject having cancer, comprising: a) determining a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentation profile of a sample from said subject; b) calculating a score based on the cfDNA fragmentation profile, wherein calculating the score comprises: i) determining the ratio of short to long cfDNA fragments of said sample; ii) determining Z-scores for the cfDNA fragments of the sample by chromosome arm; iii) quantifying cfDNA fragment density using computational mixed model analysis; iv) processing the output of i)-iii) using a machine learning model to define said score; a calculating step comprising: c) determining the likelihood of overall survival of the subject based on said score, thereby determining overall survival of the subject. A method comprising:

5. The method of claim 1 or 4, wherein the score has a range of 0 to 1.

6. The method of claim 5, which cites claim 1, wherein the likelihood of the presence of cancer in the subject increases with increasing score value.

7. The method of claim 6, further comprising, for a subject classified as having cancer, determining the subject's likelihood of overall survival based on the score.

8. 10. The method of claim 1 or 5, wherein the subject's likelihood of overall survival decreases with increasing score value.

9. classifying said score as a high score or a low score; A high score has a value above 0.5 and a low score has a value below 0.5, with a high score indicating decreased overall survival of the subject. The method according to claim 8.

10. The cfDNA fragmentation profile obtaining and isolating cfDNA fragments from the subject; Sequencing the cfDNA fragments to obtain sequenced fragments; mapping said sequenced fragments to a genome to obtain a window of mapped sequences; analyzing windows of the mapped sequences to determine cfDNA fragment lengths and generate the cfDNA fragmentation profile; The method of claim 4, wherein the value is determined by

11. 11. The method of claim 1 or 10, wherein sequencing comprises subjecting the cfDNA fragments to low-coverage whole genome sequencing to obtain the sequenced fragments.

12. 11. The method of claim 1 or 10, wherein isolating the cfDNA fragments comprises excluding fragment sizes less than 105 bp and greater than 170 bp.

13. 11. The method of claim 1 or 10, wherein the windows of mapped sequences comprise tens to thousands of windows, optionally the windows are non-overlapping windows, further optionally, the windows each comprise about 5 million base pairs, and further optionally, a cfDNA fragmentation profile is determined within each window.

14. The cfDNA fragmentation profile (a) comprising a ratio of small to large cfDNA fragments in said mapped sequence window; (b) comprising sequence coverage of small and large cfDNA fragments in a window spanning the genome; (c) across the entire genome; or (d) spanning a subgenomic interval; The method according to claim 1 or 10.

15. The cancer is (a) a solid tumor, optionally (i) a sarcoma, carcinoma, or lymphoma, or (ii) selected from the group consisting of lung cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, bile duct cancer, liver cancer, CNS cancer, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), uterine cancer, and ovarian cancer; or (b) a hematological cancer, optionally selected from the group consisting of myeloma, multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, lymphocytic leukemia, leukemia, and myeloid leukemia; The method according to claim 4.

16. 1. A cancer therapy for use in a method of treating a subject, optionally a human subject, having cancer, the method comprising: a) detecting cancer in said subject using the method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, 5 to 9 and 11 to 15, or determining the overall survival of said subject using the method according to any one of claims 4, 5 and 8 to 15; and b) administering the cancer treatment to the subject, thereby treating the subject. A method comprising:

17. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium encoded with a computer program, comprising: The program is Instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 15. Including, A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium.

18. A computing system comprising a memory and one or more processors coupled to the memory, the one or more processors configured to perform operations to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 15.

Images