Characterization of lesions in radiological images

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images, the method comprising: performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of the lesion from a subject to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from the radiological image of the lesion; and determining correlations between the computed one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics. According to this method, biological ground truth information can be used to identify radiological features indicative of the determined tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion and thus more suitable for characterizing the lesion. Such radiological features can then be used together with corresponding correlations for improved characterization of the lesion in the radiological image.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a method, an apparatus and a computer program for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images. [Background technology]

[0002] Cancer is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide in 2015, with cancer responsible for 8.8 million deaths worldwide. In cancer diagnosis and monitoring, non-invasive radiation imaging, such as X-ray radiography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, computed tomography (CT), and positron emission tomography (PET), are routinely used to evaluate tumor and anatomical tissue characteristics. In addition, radiation imaging may provide useful information for personalized medicine, which is used to adjust treatment techniques based on individual patient characteristics and individual patient tumors.

[0003] Typical cancers exhibit strong phenotypic differences that are visible in radiological images. In the emerging field of radiomics, radiological images are analyzed by applying a number of quantitative image features to objectively and quantitatively describe tumor phenotypes (see, e.g., Aerts HJWL, "Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach," Nature Communications, 5:4006, 2014).

[0004] While radiological images can provide information about the entirety and all lesions in a patient's body, they have the drawback that image features cannot be directly related to the biology of the disease due to lack of spatial resolution and lack of correlation of the measured signal to the biology of the tissue. For this reason, radiomics is based on correlating image features computed by data-driven methods, for example by correlating to treatment response. There is no ground truth information about the meaning of the correlated features, and the results cannot be easily interpreted / extrapolated to other patient cohorts or cancers.

[0005] Pathology images, on the other hand, can provide subcellular resolution and - via immunostaining - direct information about the biology in the tumor. However, images are limited to the location and size of the sample extracted from the patient. Using techniques such as advanced image analysis, machine learning and artificial intelligence, meaningful features of pathology images can be interpreted in terms of diagnostically relevant cellular composition and tissue (sub)type (see, for example, Heindl A. et al., "Mapping spatial heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment: a new era for digital pathology", Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 95, 2015, pp. 377-384). (Digital) pathology can analyze and describe the cellular composition and biomarker expression of tumor tissue, so that (digital) pathology can make knowledge-based links to treatment response. However, because pathology samples are generally not available from all lesions and are only available from biopsies that are not representative of the entire tumor, the correlations observed can be obviously much weaker than they could be. Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0006] It is therefore desirable to provide improved techniques for image-based characterization of cancer.

[0007] It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images that allows for improved characterization of the lesions. It is a further object of the present invention to provide a corresponding apparatus and computer program. [Means for solving the problem]

[0008] According to a first aspect of the invention there is provided a method for use in characterising a lesion in a radiological image comprising the steps of: - performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of the subject's lesion to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; - computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion; - determining a correlation between the calculated radiological signature or signatures and the identified tissue and / or cell characteristics; A method is presented having the following:

[0009] Previous efforts in radiomics have concerned assessing the prognostic value of various quantitative image features derived from radiological images by correlating image features computed by data-driven methods, for example by correlating them with treatment response. However, the biological meaning of these features remains largely unknown with this approach, making it difficult to interpret / extrapolate the results to other patient cohorts or cancers (see, for example, Parmar C., "Radiomic feature clusters and prognostic signatures specific for lung and head & neck cancer", Scientific reports, 5:11044, 2015). By performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of a lesion of a subject to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics, computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from the radiological image of the lesion, and determining a correlation between the computed one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics, the biological ground truth information may be used to identify radiological features indicative of particular tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion and thus more suitable for characterizing the lesion. Such radiological features may then be used together with the corresponding correlations for improved characterization of the lesion in the radiological image.

[0010] Pathology images are generated from thin slices of tissue of lesion samples obtained by biopsy or resection of the lesion with fixation and paraffin embedding. Such slices are typically placed on glass slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), a contrast enhancing stain for visualizing cell and tissue morphology, allowing different cell types to be recognized based on morphological features such as nuclear size and shape. Furthermore, specific stains, such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining, immunofluorescence (IF) staining, or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), can be applied to highlight overexpression of proteins and genes in the tissue, for example using antibodies and hybridization probes, respectively. Pathology images are then acquired by digitally scanning the stained tissue slides. This allows computer-based analysis of the pathology images. Pathology images are typically acquired with a spatial resolution of about 0.25 micrometers, i.e., one square pixel of the digital image corresponds to a 0.25×0.25 micrometer area of ​​the sample placed on the glass slide.

[0011] The computer-based analysis of the pathology image preferably uses techniques such as advanced image analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, such as deep neural networks, to recognize the tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion. Such analysis techniques are known in the art and can be found, for example, in Heindl A. et al., "Mapping spatial heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment: a new era for digital pathology", Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 95, 2015, pp. 377-384. Because the computer-based analysis can highlight specific tissue and / or cellular characteristics without relying on the appearance as a result of a specific staining process, better correlation with one or more radiological features calculated from the radiological image of the lesion, where different aspects of the lesion are highlighted, can be achieved.

[0012] Radiographic images of lesions are acquired using various types of radiological imaging modalities used in clinical practice, each with its own strengths and limitations. Examples include computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in particular multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), positron emission tomography (PET), and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Optionally, contrast agents may be used to highlight, for example, tumors, and to allow visualization of the presence of specific molecules (molecular imaging), or metabolic processes (e.g. FDG) or tissue properties, such as oxygenation or pH (MRI), in specific areas of interest. Typical spatial resolution in CT or PET / CT is around 4 millimeters. MRI resolution can be as small as a millimeter depending on location (where the brain is most controlled).

[0013] The one or more radiomic features may include a large number of different features, including different types such as (i) intensity-based features, (ii) shape-based features, (iii) texture-based features, and (iv) wavelet-based features (see, for example, Aerts HJWL, "Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach", Nature Communications, 5:4006, 2014). These features are typically implemented as image filters, and mathematical definitions of the features may be found in, for example, Haralick, RM et al., "Textural Features for Image Classification", IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, No. 6, 1973, pp. 610-621, and Thibault, G. et al., "Advanced Statistical Matrices for Texture Characterization: Application to Cell Classification", IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2013, pp. 630-637. A detailed description of texture features for radiomics can be found in Depeursinge, A. et al. (Eds.), Biomedical Texture Analysis: Fundamentals, Tools and Challenges, Elsevier, 2017.

[0014] The method comprises: (i) characterizing a lesion in the radiological image based on at least a subset, e.g., one or more, of the one or more computed radiological features and the corresponding determined correlations; and / or (ii) characterizing different areas of the same lesion in the same or different radiological images of the same subject based on at least a subset, e.g., one or more, of the one or more radiological features calculated for different areas of the same lesion and the corresponding determined correlations; and / or (iii) characterizing different lesions in the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or the same lesion in the different radiological images of the subject based on at least a subset, e.g., one or more, of the one or more radiological features calculated for different lesions from the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or for the same lesion from the different radiological images of the subject and the corresponding determined correlations; Preferably, the method further comprises: (a) determining whether the radiological features correlate with the recognized tissue and / or cellular properties, and (b) determining whether the radiological features correlate with the recognized tissue and / or cellular properties, so that knowledge information on how the one or more radiological features correlate with the recognized tissue and / or cellular properties can be used for characterization of one or more lesions for which biological ground truth information from pathology images (including other parts of the same lesion) is not available. Preferably, this further allows generalization of the radiological features to a particular cohort of patients.

[0015] Preferably, the subset of one or more radiomic features in (i), (ii), and / or (iii) is selected based on the strength of the corresponding determined correlations, e.g., the subset is selected to include only those radiomic features that are observed to be strongly or significantly correlated with the recognized tissue and / or cell characteristic, whereas those radiomic features with weak or only minor correlations are not used in the characterization.

[0016] The spatial resolution of the derived pathology image preferably substantially matches the spatial resolution of the radiological image. As mentioned above, radiological images are typically acquired with a spatial resolution of a few millimeters, whereas pathological images have a much higher spatial resolution of 0.25 micrometers. This difference in spatial resolution of the pathological image and the radiological image of the lesion makes it difficult to directly compare the images. By using a derived pathological image that represents the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics at a spatial resolution that substantially matches the spatial resolution of the radiological image, the step of correlating the calculated one or more radiological features with the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics may be simplified.

[0017] Preferably, the method further comprises co-registering the radiological image of the lesion with the derived pathological image. Since the aim is to identify radiological features indicative of tissue and / or cellular properties of the lesion's definition, it is beneficial to determine a spatial correspondence between the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathological image. Thus, recognized tissue and / or cellular properties of the definition in an area of ​​the derived pathological image can be directly used as biological ground truth for the corresponding area in the co-registered radiological image (see below).

[0018] Preferably, the co-registration step is based on automatic feature recognition and / or uses spatial information determined by image-assisted biopsy of the sample. The previous approach has the advantage that it does not depend on the availability of spatial information for the pathology image. However, the previous approach requires the presence of detectable features, e.g. feature points or other detectable structures, common to both the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathology image. This is used, for example, with tissue obtained by tumor resection, since in this case sufficient tissue material with recognizable properties is typically available. On the other hand, the latter approach uses spatial information determined by image-assisted biopsy of the sample. If such information is available, it helps to make the co-registration more robust. For example, if the radiological image is a tomographic image representing a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the subject or a part of the subject, two-dimensional (2D) slices of the tomographic image can be selected in different orientations. If information about the location and orientation of the sample biopsy within the subject is available, this information can be used to robustly select the portion and orientation of the radiological image that matches the derived pathology image (and the pathology image on which the derived pathology image is based).

[0019] It is preferred that the determining step comprises selecting at least one area in the derived pathology image which represents a particular recognised tissue and / or cellular characteristic and analysing the computed one or more radiological features for a corresponding area in the co-registered radiological image.

[0020] This is particularly applicable when the pathology images are based on tissues acquired by tumor resection. For example, if a particular computed radiological feature is observed to provide a strong response in areas of the co-registered radiological images corresponding to areas of the derived pathology images that generally represent a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, the particular computed radiological feature is deemed to exhibit a strong correlation with the particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic. In contrast, if the response of a particular computed radiological feature varies significantly in areas of the co-registered radiological images corresponding to areas of the derived pathology images that represent a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, the particular computed radiological feature is deemed to exhibit only a weak correlation, or even no correlation, with the particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic.

[0021] By doing so, it can be assessed whether the computed one or more radiological features actually indicate a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic of at least one selected area in the derived pathology image.

[0022] It is further preferred that the determining step comprises computing one or more features for at least one area from the derived pathology image and correlating the computed one or more features for at least one area from the derived pathology image and the computed one or more radiological features for the corresponding area in the co-registered radiological image. By doing so, the derived pathology image and the radiological image can be analyzed for similarity and / or similar features, and in this way features in the derived pathology image that show a correspondence to the radiological features in the radiological image can be identified. Such features are for example image filter-based features, and such features are the same as the radiological features used for the analysis of the radiological image. For example, the entropy of the fat distribution in the derived pathology image or the Gaussian of the stromal tissue is calculated and it is determined whether there is a correlation with the corresponding filter in the radiological image. In this context, it is possible to adjust the resolution and / or contrast of the derived radiological image. This provides the freedom to select the resolution and / or contrast of the derived radiological image based on a specific biological basis and to see which filter-based parameters respond and correspond to the output of the radiological features. In other words, this provides two degrees of freedom: (1) biology (which computer-based analysis (detectors) is performed on the raw pathology image); and (2) resolution and contrast (morphological parameters) that can be adjusted to analyze the derived pathology image in a similar manner to radiological images, i.e., by filter-based approaches, for example.

[0023] Alternatively, it is preferred that the determining step comprises calculating one or more features characteristic for the entire sample of the lesion from the derived pathology image and correlating the calculated one or more radiological features and the one or more features calculated from the derived pathology image, where the correlating does not depend on the coregistration of the radiological image of the lesion with the derived pathology image. This is particularly applicable when the pathology image is based on tissue obtained by biopsy of the sample, since in this case only a small amount of tissue material may be available, which is not analyzed for different areas, but the biology of this tissue material is represented, for example, by an average value that is correlated with the radiological features calculated from the radiological image for the region of the lesion where the biopsy was performed. Since no different areas of the lesion are correlated separately in this approach, no actual coregistration is required, but it is only of concern that the correlation is determined between corresponding parts of the lesion.

[0024] Preferably, the recognized tissue and / or cell characteristics include at least one of (i) one or more tissue types, (ii) the distribution of one or more cell types, and (iii) calcification sites. These tissue and / or cell characteristics provide important information about the biology of the lesion that can be used to aid in cancer diagnosis, response prediction, and monitoring. For example, computer-based analysis of the pathology image produces a derived pathology image in which (tumor) epithelial tissue is differentiated from stromal connective tissue, adipose tissue, and background. Or, the derived pathology image only differentiates epithelial tissue from non-epithelial tissue. An alternative type of analysis of the pathology image is to detect specific cell types, such as tumor cells or immune cells, and then represent the density distribution of the specific cell types in the derived pathology image. Furthermore, the distribution is represented for all cells without distinguishing cell types. A further alternative analysis of the pathology image is to detect portions of calcification sites and represent them in the derived pathology image.

[0025] Computer-based staining and analysis of pathology images can be preferably selected and tailored according to the radiological imaging modality, for example, morphological features in MRI correlate with tissue type distribution derived from H&E stained tissue images, whereas FDG-PET metabolic activity correlates with cell density derived from H&E stained tissue images, and immuno-PET images correlate directly with the density of cells stained in immunohistochemistry (IHC) with antibodies targeting the same cell types as the immuno-PET contrast agent.

[0026] The characterization step is preferably performed without pathology images being available for the different lesions. Thus, biological ground truth information from pathology images does not need to be available for all lesions. Alternatively, it is sufficient that correlations of the computed one or more radiomic features to recognized tissue and / or cellular properties have been determined to characterize the different lesions without needing individual pathology information based on correlations.

[0027] It is further preferred that different radiological images are acquired of the subject at different time points when no pathological images are available for the lesion, allowing repeated characterization of the lesion over time, for example to track disease progression or treatment response, without the need to provide a current sample of the lesion for each new characterization.

[0028] More preferably, the characterizing step comprises characterizing a plurality of lesions in one or more radiological images of the subject based on at least a subset of one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations, and determining a characteristic of the cancer of the subject based on the characterization of the plurality of lesions. Many cancers are known to exhibit significant interlesion heterogeneity, which poses significant challenges in designing effective treatment techniques. Such cancers may not be adequately characterized based on characterization of only one lesion. By performing characterization of the plurality of lesions based on at least a subset of one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations, a more accurate picture of the cancer characteristics, e.g., cancer heterogeneity, is obtained. This allows for the generation of more accurate treatment techniques that incorporate heterogeneity knowledge to achieve higher efficacy.

[0029] In a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method of characterising a lesion in a radiological image, the method comprising: - computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion; - characterizing lesions in the radiological images based at least on one or more computed radiological features and corresponding correlations; having The one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations are selected as a subset of the one or more radiological features and corresponding determined correlations calculated as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12 for one or more different lesions of one or more different subjects. A method is presented.

[0030] This aspect foresees that radiological features and corresponding determined correlations are pre-determined from a subject, or from an appropriate cohort of subjects, using the method of any one of claims 1 to 12. These radiological features, e.g., those that have shown significant correlation to biological information from pathology, are then generalized to extract information about biology from radiological images of other subjects.

[0031] In a further aspect of the invention there is provided an apparatus for use in characterising a lesion in a radiological image comprising: - an analysis unit for performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of a lesion of the subject in order to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; - a computing unit for computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion; - a determination unit for determining a correlation between the calculated one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cell properties; An apparatus is presented comprising:

[0032] In a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer program for use in characterising lesions in radiological images, the computer program comprising program code means for causing an apparatus according to claim 14 to carry out the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 12, when the computer program is executed on a computer controlling the apparatus.

[0033] It has to be understood that the method according to claim 1, the apparatus according to claim 14 and the computer program according to claim 15 comprise similar and / or identical preferred embodiments, in particular as defined in the dependent claims.

[0034] It has to be understood that a preferred embodiment of the invention can also be any combination of the dependent claims or the above-mentioned embodiments with the respective independent claim.

[0035] These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0036] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images. [Diagram 2] FIG. 2 shows a schematic and exemplary diagram of a pathology image and a derived pathology image representative of recognized tissue characteristics; [Diagram 3] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a schematic and exemplary diagram of a derived pathology image and the result of conversion into a gray-level image. [Figure 4] FIG. 2 shows a schematic and exemplary transformation result of derived classification of different tissue types of pathology images into an entropy map. [Diagram 5] 1A and 1B illustrate schematic and exemplary embodiments of an apparatus for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images; DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0037] 1 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images. The method presupposes that a pathological image of a sample of the subject's lesion and a radiological image of the lesion have been acquired in a previous step. Alternatively, the step of acquiring these images may be part of the method itself.

[0038] Pathological images are generated as described above using known stains, such as H&E stains, IHC stains, IF stains, or FISH. Radiographic images of the lesions may be acquired using radiological imaging modalities, such as CT, MRI, particularly mpMRI, PET, or SPECT. Optionally, contrast agents may be used that, for example, highlight tumors in specific areas of interest and allow visualization of the presence of specific molecules (molecular imaging), or metabolic processes (e.g. FDG), or tissue properties, such as oxygenation, or pH (MRI).

[0039] In step 101, a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of a subject's lesion is performed to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, and the analysis generates a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics. The contrast and resolution of the derived image may be varied to analyze correlation with a radiological image and / or to optimize sensitivity of correlation with a radiological image. Multiple detectors for different biological characteristics may be combined to generate the derived pathology image.

[0040] The identified tissue and / or cell characteristics include at least one of: (i) one or more tissue types, (ii) the distribution of one or more cell types, and (iii) the site of calcification. These tissue and / or cell characteristics provide important information regarding the biology of the lesion that can be used to aid in cancer diagnosis, response prediction, and monitoring.

[0041] The computer-based analysis of the pathology image preferably uses techniques such as advanced image analysis, machine learning, and artificial intelligence, such as deep neural networks, to recognize the tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion. Such analysis techniques are known in the art and can be found, for example, in Heindl A. et al., "Mapping spatial heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment: a new era for digital pathology," Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 95, 2015, pp. 377-384. Since the computer-based analysis can highlight specific tissue and / or cellular characteristics without relying on the appearance as a result of a specific staining process, better correlation with one or more radiological features calculated from the radiological image of the lesion, where different aspects of the lesion are highlighted, can be achieved.

[0042] To illustrate an example, FIG. 2 shows a schematic and exemplary representation of a pathology image and a derived pathology image representing the recognized tissue characteristics. In this case, a sample of a subject's lesion is obtained by resection of a breast tumor and slices are stained using H&E staining (see FIG. 2(a)). A computer-based analysis is then performed on the pathology image to recognize the tissue characteristics of the lesion (see FIG. 2(b)). In this example, different types of tissue are represented by an incorrect color representation - only shown in gray levels in the figure. For example, the areas indicated by "A", "B", "C" and "D" correspond to different types of tissue, namely tumor epithelial tissue ("D"), stromal connective tissue ("A"), adipose tissue ("B") and acini ("C"). As can be seen from FIG. 2, the different types of tissue are clearly distinguished in the derived pathology image, which makes it easier to determine correlations with one or more computed radiomic features.

[0043] In an alternative not shown in the figures, the derived pathology image may only distinguish epithelial tissue from non-epithelial tissue. A further alternative type of analysis of the pathology image is to detect specific cell types, e.g. tumor cells or immune cells, and thus represent the density distribution of the specific cell types in the derived pathology image. Furthermore, the distribution may be represented for all cells without distinguishing cell types. A further alternative analysis of the pathology image is to detect areas of calcifications and represent the areas of calcifications in the derived pathology image.

[0044] Referring again to FIG. 1, in step 102, the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathology image are co-registered.

[0045] Since the objective is to identify radiological features indicative of specific tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, it is beneficial to determine spatial correspondence between the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathology image. Thus, specific recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics in areas of the derived pathology image may be directly used as biological ground truth for corresponding areas in the co-registered radiological image (see below). The co-registration step may be based on automatic feature recognition and / or the co-registration step may use spatial information determined by image-assisted biopsy of the sample.

[0046] In step 103, one or more radiological features are computed for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion.

[0047] As discussed above, the one or more radiation features may include a large number of different features including different types such as (i) intensity-based features, (ii) shape-based features, (iii) texture-based features, and (iv) wavelet-based features.

[0048] In step 104, correlations between the computed radiological feature or features and the recognized tissue and / or cell properties are determined.

[0049] In this embodiment, at least one area in the derived pathology image that represents a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic is selected and one or more computed radiological features are analyzed against a corresponding area in the co-registered radiological image.

[0050] For example, if a particular computed radiological feature is observed to generally provide a strong response in areas of the co-registered radiological images corresponding to areas of the derived pathology images that are representative of a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, the particular computed radiological feature is deemed to exhibit a strong correlation with the particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic. In contrast, if the response of a particular computed radiological feature varies significantly in areas of the co-registered radiological images that correspond to areas of the derived pathology images that are representative of a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, the particular computed radiological feature is deemed to exhibit only a weak correlation, or even no correlation, with the particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic.

[0051] By the methods outlined thus far, biological ground truth information can be used to identify radiological features indicative of particular tissue and / or cellular properties of a lesion and thus more suitable for characterizing the lesion. Such radiological features can then be used together with corresponding correlations for improved characterization of lesions in radiological images.

[0052] In optional step 105, (i) a lesion in the radiological image is characterized based at least on a subset of one or more calculated radiological features and the corresponding determined correlations, and / or (ii) different areas of the same lesion in the same or different radiological images of the same subject are characterized based at least on a subset of one or more radiological features calculated for different areas of the same lesion and the corresponding determined correlations, and / or (iii) different lesions in the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or the same lesion in different radiological images of the subject are characterized based at least on a subset of one or more radiological features calculated for different lesions from the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or for the same lesion from different radiological images of the subject and the corresponding correlations.

[0053] By doing so, knowledge information on how one or more radiological features correlate with recognized tissue and / or cellular properties can be used for characterization of one and / or two lesions where biological ground truth information from pathology images is not available. Advantageously, this further enables generalization of the radiological features to a particular cohort of patients.

[0054] In this embodiment, a subset of one or more radiological features is selected based on the strength of the corresponding determined correlations, in particular, the subset is selected to include only those radiological features that are observed to have a strong or significant correlation with the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, whereas those radiological features with a weak or only minor correlation are not used in the characterization.

[0055] It is noted that the characterization step is preferably performed without pathology images being available for the different lesions. Therefore, biological ground truth information from pathology images does not need to be available for all lesions. Alternatively, it is sufficient that the correlation of the computed one or more radiomic features to the recognized tissue and / or cellular properties has been determined in order to characterize the different lesions without needing individual pathology information based on the correlation.

[0056] Similarly, different radiological images of the subject are preferably acquired at different times when pathology images are not available for the lesion.

[0057] In this embodiment, the characterizing step includes characterizing a plurality of lesions in one or more radiological images of the subject based on at least a subset of the one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations, and determining a characteristic of the cancer of the subject based on the characterization of the plurality of lesions. In so doing, a more accurate picture of the characteristics of the cancer, e.g., the heterogeneity of the cancer, is obtained. This allows for the generation of more accurate treatment techniques that incorporate knowledge of the heterogeneity to achieve higher efficacy.

[0058] The method outlined above for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images is considered to be a "position-based" method because it includes a step 102 of co-registering a radiological image of the lesion with a derived pathology image, and because it uses position information in step 104 of determining correlations between the computed one or more radiological features and recognized tissue and / or cell properties.

[0059] In a variation of the "co-location based" method, the determining step comprises computing one or more features for at least one area from the derived pathology image and correlating the computed one or more features for at least one area from the derived pathology image with the computed one or more radiological features for the corresponding area in the radiological image co-registered from the derived pathology image. By doing so, the derived pathology image and the radiological image can be analyzed for similarity and / or similar features, and in this manner features in the derived pathology image can be identified that show a correspondence to the radiological features in the radiological image. Such features can be, for example, image filter-based features, and such features are the same as the radiological features used for the analysis of the radiological image (see Aerts HJWL, "Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach", Nature Communications, 5:4006, 2014). For example, the entropy of the fat distribution in the derived pathology image or the Gaussian of the stromal tissue is calculated to determine whether there is a correlation with the corresponding filter in the radiological image. In this context, it is possible to adjust the resolution and / or contrast of the derived radiological image. This provides the freedom to select the resolution and / or contrast of the derived radiological image based on a specific biological basis and to see which filter-based parameters respond and correspond to the output of the radiological features. In other words, this provides two degrees of freedom: (1) the biology (which computer-based analysis (detector) is performed on the raw pathological image), and (2) the resolution and contrast (morphological parameters) that can be adjusted to analyze the derived pathological image in a similar manner to the radiological image, i.e., by a filter-based approach for example. This is still considered a "co-location-based" approach.

[0060] In another embodiment of the method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images, the correlation may be determined using a purely "feature-based" approach, i.e. the step 102 of co-registration of the radiological image of the lesion with the derived pathological image may be omitted. In particular, the determining step comprises computing one or more features characteristic for the entire sample of the lesion from the derived pathological image and correlating the computed radiological feature or features with the one or more features computed from the derived pathological image, the correlating not being dependent on co-registration of the radiological image of the lesion with the derived pathological image. As mentioned above, this is particularly applicable when the pathological image is based on tissue obtained by biopsy of the sample, since in this case only a small amount of tissue material may be available, which is not analysed for different areas, but the biology of this tissue material is represented, for example, by an average value correlating with the radiological feature computed from the radiological image for the region of the lesion where the biopsy was performed. Since different areas of the lesion are not correlated separately in this approach, actual co-registration is not required, but only that correlation is determined between corresponding parts of the lesion. The feature or features computed from the derived pathology image may be a subset of those also used in radiomics, e.g., as described in Aerts HJWL, "Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach", Nature Communications, 5:4006, 2014.

[0061] In both the variants of the "co-location-based" method and the "feature-based" approach, it is necessary to generate a gray-level image from the derived pathology image.

[0062] To illustrate the example, FIG. 3 shows a schematic and exemplary representation of a derived pathology image and the result of conversion to a gray-level image. In this case, a sample of a subject's lesion is obtained by resection of a breast tumor, and a computer-based analysis of the pathology image of an H&E stained slice is performed to determine a density map of lymphocytes. This density map is superimposed on the pathology image to generate a derived pathology image (see FIG. 3(a)). In this example, the different densities of lymphocytes are represented by a wrong color representation - only shown in gray levels in the figure. For example, the areas indicated by "E1", "E2", "E3", and "E4" correspond to areas containing accumulations of lymphocytes that tend to be located around the lesion. The result of conversion of the derived pathology image to a gray-level image is then shown in FIG. 3(b). This representation can be generated in a straightforward manner by assigning gray values ​​to the binned scaled density ranges.

[0063] FIG. 4 shows the results of the conversion of the derived pathology images of different tissue type classifications into entropy maps in a schematic and exemplary manner. In this case, FIG. 4(a) shows the raw H&E stained pathology images, FIG. 4(c) shows the derived pathology images representing different types of tissues, namely tumor epithelial tissue, stromal connective tissue, adipose tissue, and background, and FIG. 4(e) shows the derived pathology images representing different types of tissues, epithelial tissue vs. non-epithelial tissue, each represented as a gray level image. Then, FIG. 4(b), FIG. 4(d), and FIG. 4(f) respectively show the results of the conversion into entropy maps. As can be seen from the figures, the entropy maps of the derived pathology images provide much more meaningful and useful information than the entropy maps of the raw H&E stained pathology images.

[0064] The computer-based analysis used on the pathology images can highlight certain features independent of their appearance as a result of a particular staining process, and in this way can correlate better with features derived from radiology, which highlight very different features. The computer-based analysis used on the pathology images can be selected and tailored depending on the radiological modality. By analyzing the most strongly correlated features between the derived pathology images and the radiological images, they can be prioritized and preferably used in the analysis and interpretation of radiological images from other lesions, for example to reach a conclusion for the patient related to the characteristics of the cancer associated with heterogeneity.

[0065] 5 shows, in a schematic and exemplary manner, an embodiment of an apparatus for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images, which may be configured to perform a method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images as outlined above.

[0066] In this embodiment the apparatus comprises an analysis unit 10 for performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of a lesion of the subject for recognizing tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics. The apparatus further comprises a co-registration unit 20 for co-registering the radiological image of the lesion with the derived pathology image. Furthermore the apparatus comprises a computation unit 30 for computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from the radiological image of the lesion and a determination unit 40 for determining a correlation between the computed one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics. Further, the apparatus optionally comprises a characterization unit 50 for (i) characterizing a lesion in a radiological image based on at least a subset of the one or more calculated radiological features and the corresponding determined correlations, and / or (ii) characterizing different areas of the same lesion in the same or different radiological images of the same subject based on at least a subset of the one or more radiological features calculated for different areas of the same lesion and the corresponding determined correlations, and / or (iii) characterizing different lesions in the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or the same lesion in different radiological images of the subject based on at least a subset of the one or more radiological features calculated for different lesions from the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or based on the corresponding determined correlations.

[0067] Other variations to the disclosed implementations can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims.

[0068] In the claims, the word "comprising" does not exclude other elements or steps and the words "a" and "an" do not exclude a plurality.

[0069] One or more steps of the method illustrated in Fig. 1 may be implemented in a computer program product executed in a computer. The computer program product includes a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium on which a control program is recorded (stored), such as a disk, a hard drive, etc. Typical forms of non-transitory computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, a hard disk, a magnetic tape, or any other magnetic storage medium, a CD-ROM, a DVD, or any other optical medium, a RAM, a PROM, an EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, or any other memory chip or cartridge, or any other non-transitory medium that can be read and used by a computer.

[0070] Alternatively, one or more steps of the method may be realized in a transitory medium, e.g., a transmittable carrier wave, in which the control program is embodied as a data signal using a transmission medium, e.g., acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications.

[0071] The exemplary method may be implemented in one or more general purpose computers, special purpose computers, programmed microprocessors or microcontrollers and peripheral integrated circuit elements, ASICs or other integrated circuits, digital signal processors, hardwired electronic or logic circuits, such as discrete element circuits, programmable logic devices, such as PLDs, PLAs, FPGAs, graphical card CPUs (GPUs), or PALs, etc. In general, any device capable of implementing a finite state machine that can result in implementing the flowchart shown in FIG. 1 may be used to implement one or more steps of the method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images as illustrated. As will be appreciated, the steps of the method may be fully implemented by a computer, although in some embodiments one or more of the steps may be implemented at least partially manually.

[0072] The computer program instructions may further be loaded into a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device to cause computer-implemented processing such that the instructions, which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus, provide processing to implement the functions / actions described herein.

[0073] Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the claim.

[0074] The present invention relates to a method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images, the method comprising: performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of the lesion of a subject to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from the radiological image of the lesion; and determining a correlation between the computed one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics. According to this method, biological ground truth information may be used to identify radiological features indicative of specific tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion and thus suitable for characterizing the lesion. Such radiological features may then be used together with the corresponding correlations for improved characterization of the lesion in the radiological images.

[0075] Some construct features are presented in the following numbered paragraphs.

[0076] 1. - performing (101) a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of a lesion of a subject in order to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; - computing (103) one or more radiological features for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion; - determining (104) a correlation between the calculated radiological feature or features and the recognized tissue and / or cell characteristics; 23. A method for use in characterizing a lesion in a radiological image, comprising:

[0077] 2. The method is (i) characterizing a lesion in the radiological image based on at least a subset of the one or more computed radiological features and the corresponding determined correlations; and / or (ii) characterizing different areas of the same lesion in the same or different radiological images of the same subject based on at least a subset of the one or more radiological features computed for different areas of the same lesion and the corresponding determined correlations; and / or (iii) characterizing different lesions in the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or the same lesion in the different radiological images of the subject based at least on the subsets of one or more radiological features computed for different lesions from the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and / or for the same lesion from the different radiological images of the subject and the corresponding determined correlations; 2. The method of paragraph 1, further comprising:

[0078] 3. The method of paragraph 2, wherein in (i), (ii), and / or (iii) a subset of the one or more radiomic features is selected based on the strength of the corresponding determined correlation.

[0079] 4. The method of any one of paragraphs 1 to 3, wherein the spatial resolution of the derived pathology image substantially matches the spatial resolution of the radiology image.

[0080] 5. The method of any one of paragraphs 1 to 4, wherein the method further comprises co-registering the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathology image.

[0081] 6. The method of paragraph 5, wherein the coregistration step is based on automatic feature recognition and / or uses spatial information determined by image-assisted biopsy of the sample.

[0082] 7. The method of paragraph 5 or paragraph 6, wherein the determining step comprises selecting at least one area in the derived pathology image that represents a particular recognized tissue and / or cell characteristic, and analyzing the computed one or more radiological features for a corresponding area in the co-registered radiological image.

[0083] 8. The method of paragraph 1, wherein the determining step includes computing one or more features for at least one area from the derived pathology image, and correlating the one or more features computed for at least one area from the derived pathology image with one or more radiological features computed for corresponding areas in the co-registered radiological image.

[0084] 9. A method according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 4, wherein the determining step comprises calculating one or more features characteristic for the entire sample of the lesion from the derived pathology image, and correlating the calculated one or more radiological features with one or more features calculated from the derived pathology image, wherein the correlating is independent of coregistration of the radiological image of the lesion with the derived pathology image.

[0085] 10. The method of any one of paragraphs 1 to 9, wherein the recognized tissue and / or cell characteristics include at least one of: (i) one or more tissue types; (ii) distribution of one or more cell types; and (iii) sites of calcification.

[0086] 11. A method according to any one of paragraphs 2 to 10, wherein the characterisation step is performed without pathology images being available for the different lesions and / or different radiological images of the subject are acquired at different times when no pathology images are available for the lesions.

[0087] 12. The method of any one of paragraphs 2 to 11, wherein the characterizing step includes characterizing a plurality of lesions in one or more radiological images of the subject based on at least a subset of the one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations, and determining a characteristic of the subject's cancer based on the characterization of the plurality of lesions.

[0088] 13. - computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion; - characterizing lesions in the radiological images based at least on one or more computed radiological features and corresponding correlations; having The one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations are selected as a subset of the one or more radiological features and corresponding determined correlations calculated as described in any one of paragraphs 1 to 12 for one or more different lesions of one or more different subjects. A method for characterizing lesions in radiological images.

[0089] 14. - an analysis unit (10) for performing a computer-based analysis of a pathology image of a sample of a lesion of a subject in order to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; - a computing unit (30) for computing one or more radiological features for the lesion from a radiological image of the lesion; - a determination unit (40) for determining a correlation between the calculated radiological feature or features and the recognized tissue and / or cell properties; 16. An apparatus for use in characterizing a lesion in a radiological image, comprising:

[0090] 15. A computer program for use in characterising lesions in radiological images, comprising program code means for causing an apparatus according to paragraph 14 to perform the steps of the method according to any one of paragraphs 1 to 12, when the computer program is executed on a computer controlling the apparatus.

Claims

1. performing a computer-based analysis, including one or more of advanced image analysis, machine learning, or artificial intelligence, of a pathology image of a sample of the subject's lesion to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, the analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; co-registering the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathology image; computing one or more radiological features from the radiological image of the lesion by an image filter including a mathematical definition of the one or more radiological features; selecting at least one area within the derived pathology image that represents a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic and analyzing the computed one or more radiomic features for a corresponding area within the co-registered pathology image; determining a correlation between the computed one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cell properties in the derived pathology image; characterizing the lesion in the radiological image based on at least a subset of the computed one or more radiological features and the corresponding determined correlations; wherein the determining step includes determining whether a particular computed radiological feature provides a strong response in an area of ​​the co-registered radiological image corresponding to an area of ​​the derived pathology image representing a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, and if the particular computed radiological feature provides a strong response, deeming the particular computed radiological feature to exhibit a strong correlation with the particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic. A method for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images.

2. The method further comprising: (i) characterizing the area of ​​the lesion in different radiological images associated with the same subject based on at least a subset of the computed radiological features for the area of ​​the lesion and the determined correlation between the computed radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics in the derived pathology image; and / or (ii) characterizing different lesions in the radiological images associated with the same subject or different subjects based on at least a subset of the one or more radiological features computed for different lesions from the radiological images of the same subject or different subjects and the corresponding determined correlations between the computed one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cellular properties in the derived pathology images; The method of claim 1 further comprising:

3. In (i) and / or (ii), the subset of the one or more radiological features is selected based on the corresponding determined strength of correlation. The method of claim 2.

4. a spatial resolution of the derived pathology image is adjusted to substantially match a spatial resolution of the radiological image.

4. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 3.

5. the step of co-registrating is based on automated feature recognition and / or uses spatial information determined by image-assisted biopsy of the sample.

5. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4.

6. The recognized tissue and / or cell characteristics include at least one of: (i) one or more tissue types; (ii) the distribution of one or more cell types; and (iii) sites of calcification.

6. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5.

7. the characterizing step is performed without pathology images available for the different lesions, and / or the different radiological images of the subject are acquired at different times when pathology images are not available for the lesions. A method according to claim 2 or any one of claims 3 to 6 dependent thereon.

8. the characterizing step comprises characterizing a plurality of lesions in the one or more radiological images of the subject based on at least the subset of the one or more radiological features and corresponding correlations; and determining a characteristic of cancer in the subject based on the characterization of the plurality of lesions. A method according to claim 2 or any one of claims 3 to 7 dependent thereon.

9. an analysis unit for performing a computer-based analysis, including one or more of advanced image analysis, machine learning, or artificial intelligence, of a pathology image of a sample of a lesion of a subject to recognize tissue and / or cellular characteristics of the lesion, said analysis generating a derived pathology image representative of the recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristics; a co-registration unit for co-registering the radiological image of the lesion and the derived pathology image; a computing unit for computing one or more radiological features from the radiological image of the lesion by an image filter comprising a mathematical definition of the one or more radiological features; a determining unit for determining a correlation between the calculated one or more radiological features and the recognized tissue and / or cell properties in the derived pathology image; a characterization unit for characterizing the lesion in the radiological image based on at least a subset of the computed one or more radiological features and the corresponding determined correlation, the analysis unit selecting at least one area within the derived pathology image that represents a particular recognized tissue and / or cell characteristic and analyzing the computed one or more radiomic features for a corresponding area within the co-registered pathology image; the determining unit determines whether a particular computed radiological feature provides a strong response in an area of ​​the co-registered radiological image corresponding to an area of ​​the derived pathology image representing a particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic, and if the particular computed radiological feature provides a strong response, considers the particular computed radiological feature to show a strong correlation with the particular recognized tissue and / or cellular characteristic. An apparatus for use in characterizing lesions in radiological images.

10. 9. A computer program for use in characterising lesions in radiological images, comprising program code means for causing the apparatus to carry out the steps of the method according to any one of claims 1 to 8, when said computer program is executed on a computer controlling an apparatus. Computer program.

Images