Modified Fc regions to enhance the functional affinity of antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof - Patents.com

Abstract

The present invention relates to the identification of key residues in murine IgG3 antibodies (mAbs) that contribute to intermolecular cooperativity and their transfer to IgG1 antibodies to enhance their functional affinity and direct cell killing.

Description

[Technical field]

[0001] The present invention relates to the identification of key residues in murine IgG3 antibodies (mAbs) that contribute to intermolecular cooperativity and their transfer to IgG1 antibodies to enhance their functional affinity and direct cell killing. [Background technology]

[0002] Mouse (m)IgG3 provides significant protection against bacterial infections and is the only mIgG isotype that forms non-covalent oligomers, which strongly influence the biological activity of IgG3 (Abdelmoula et al. 1989) and increase the functional affinity for polyvalent antigens. The tendency of mIgG3 oligomerization was first identified by Gray et al. (Grey, Hirst, and Cohn 1971), who showed that binding to polyvalent antigens promoted intermolecular interactions of mIgG3, resulting in increased functional affinity for antigens (Greenspan, Monafo, and Davie 1987; Greenspan and Cooper 1993). This feature has been named "intermolecular cooperativity" (Greenspan and Cooper 1993; Greenspan, Dacek, and Cooper 1989; Greenspan and Cooper 1992). This phenomenon was determined to be Fc-dependent, as IgG3 F(ab')2 fragments did not bind antigen cooperatively (Greenspan, Monafo, and Davie 1987). mIgG3 isotypes bind repeat antigens with an intermolecular cooperative nature, resulting in low monovalent affinity that is rescued by avidity-mediated enhanced binding (Greenspan and Cooper 1993, 1992). Noncovalent interactions between adjacent mIgG3Fc regions are believed to support this functional increase in affinity through prolonged target appropriation and reduced dissociation rates (Cooper et al. 1991; Greenspan, Dacek, and Cooper 1989).

[0003] Tumor glycomes are a rich and under-explored source of cancer-specific targets for mAb development due to alterations associated with the transformation process (Pinho and Reis 2015). Glycan structures are present in both protein and glycolipid backbones and can be massively overexpressed in cancers due to altered expression of glycotransferases. Glycans have been shown to be important co-accessory molecules for cancer cell survival, proliferation, metastasis, and immune evasion; cross-linking these antigens can result in direct cell death without the need for immune effector cells or complement (Dalziel et al. 2014; RodrIguez, Schetters, and van Kooyk 2018; Rabu et al. 2012). Indeed, we have generated many glycan-targeting mAbs with promising applications for cancer therapeutics due to their strong differential tumor-to-health tissue binding, high functional affinity, and their ability to cure mice of metastatic colorectal cancer (Chua et al. 2015; Durrant et al. 2006; Noble et al. 2013), many other mAbs are in clinical development as passive or active immunotherapies or have been remodeled into chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (Burris et al. 2010; Labrada et al. 2018; Hege et al. 2017), while the anti-GD2 mAb dinutuximab beta is currently used to treat neuroblastoma (Ladenstein et al. 2018).

[0004] Previously, the present inventors have reported a / c / x , Lewis y and sialyl-di-Lewis adescribed a panel of mAbs targeting cancer glycans with reactivity to mIgG3 (WO 2017 / 033020; WO 2015 / 063500; Chua et al. 2015; Noble et al. 2013). Interestingly, when the glycan-binding mAbs were of mIgG3 isotype, they exhibited direct cytotoxic effects on cancer cells expressing the target at high density, regardless of the presence of complement or immune effector cells, which may initiate antitumor adaptive immune responses and long-term tumor control. This suggested that intermolecular cooperation enabled by the mIgG3 isotype contributed to direct cell killing. This direct cytotoxic potential has also been observed with other anti-glycan mAbs and is usually associated with mAb-induced homotypic cell adhesion, cytoskeletal rearrangements, followed by cell swelling, membrane lesions, and eventual cell death (Loo et al. 2007; Faraj et al. 2017; Roque-Navarro et al. 2008; Chua et al. 2015; Welt et al. 1987). In the majority of cases, cell death is a non-classical form of apoptosis, most similar to oncotic necrosis, possibly involving the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Zheng et al. 2017; Hernandez et al. 2011). Importantly, the concomitant release of inflammatory mediators-damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) as well as immunogenic or inflammatory cell death (ICD) have the potential to recruit innate immune cells to the tumor site where they can further augment mAb-mediated effector functions (Galluzzi et al. 2017). Thus, these anti-glycan mAbs may be important tools to remobilise the full potential of the immune system in an otherwise immunosuppressive environment.

[0005] In human antibody therapeutics, regions that do not contribute to target specificity are usually replaced with their human equivalents to create humanized versions of antibodies that are clinically useful. When we chimerized our own mouse mAbs to IgG1 (e.g., human IgG1, hIgG1), they lost direct cell killing and had reduced functional affinity because intermolecular cooperation does not exist in human IgG. It has previously been suggested that mouse IgG3 antibodies, after binding to their targets, may combine together in a manner that other antibody subclasses do not, stabilizing antibody binding and amplifying clinical efficacy.

[0006] US Patent Publication No. 2011 / 0123440 describes modified antibody Fc regions and their uses. The modified Fc regions have one or more amino acid substitutions. This patent claims some substitutions at many sites, but the examples themselves illustrate that all of the substitutions are different from our invention, and these substitutions do not directly contribute to cell killing.

[0007] US Patent Publication No. 2008 / 0089892 describes polypeptide Fc region variants with amino acid substitutions at positions 251, 256, 268, 280, 332, 378, and 440 to improve ADCC, and compositions comprising these Fc region variants. The only similarity to the modifications outlined in this patent is at position 378, however, the inventors have substituted this with serine rather than aspartic acid, and the inventors show reduced ADCC.

[0008] US Patent Publication No. 2010 / 0184959 describes a method to provide Fc polypeptide variants with two or more amino acid substitutions and altered recognition of Fc ligands (e.g., FcγR or C1q) and / or effector functions (e.g., ADCC). In contrast, our substitutions are associated only with increased cell killing. The 26 and 23 amino acid motifs disclosed in the present invention contain substitutions of V305A, Q342R R344Q, and the 15 amino acid motifs contain only Q342R.

[0009] US Patent Publication No. 2010 / 015133 describes a method for producing a polypeptide by modulating the binding of the polypeptide. They claim to change the charge of the paired amino acids from negative to positive or vice versa in the CH3 constant region of the antibody at positions 356 / 439, 357 / 370, and 399 / 409. In contrast, the present invention described changing amino acid 356 from aspartic acid (D) to glutamic acid (E), which does not change the charge, and amino acid 357 from glutamic acid (E) to glutamine (Q), which changes the negative charge to neutral, and amino acid 370 from lysine (K) to threonine, which changes the negative charge to neutral.

[0010] WO 2018 / 146317 describes polypeptides and antibodies having an Fc region and an antigen-binding region, where the Fc region has Fc-Fc enhancing mutations and C1q binding enhancing mutations, providing the polypeptide or antibody with increased CDC and / or agonistic activity. The Fc region is said to contain (a) substitutions at positions selected from the group consisting of E430, E345, or S440Y, or S440W substitutions, and (b) substitutions at one or more positions selected from the group consisting of G236, S239, S267, H268, S324, K326, I332, E333, and P396 (where the positions correspond to human IgG1). The polypeptide comprises at least one substitution from the group consisting of E430G, E345K, E430S, E430F, E430T, E345Q, E345R, E345Y, S440Y, and S440W. The present invention does not include any of these substitutions.

[0011] International Patent Publication No. 2018 / 083126 describes polypeptides and antibodies that contain variant Fc regions that provide a stable Fc:Fc interaction when the polypeptide or antibody binds to its target antigen on the cell surface, but also have reduced complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and may also have reduced activation of other effector functions resulting from one or more amino acid modifications in the Fc region. The Fc regions are said to contain (i) a first mutation at E430, E345, or S440 (wherein the mutation at S440 is S440Y or S440W) and (ii) a second mutation at K322 or P329. The first mutation is selected from the group consisting of E430G, E345K, E430S, E430F, E430T, E345Q, E345R, E345Y, S440W, and S440Y. The present invention does not include any of these substitutions.

[0012] WO 2014 / 108198 discloses polypeptides, such as antibodies, that contain variant Fc regions with one or more amino acid modifications that result in increased complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). The present invention does not include any of these substitutions.

[0013] WO 2013 / 004842 describes polypeptides and related antibodies that contain variant Fc domains to stabilize Fc:Fc interactions when the polypeptide or antibody binds to its target on the surface of a cell for improved effector functions such as the CDC response. The present invention does not include any of these substitutions. Summary of the Invention

[0014] The present invention provides polypeptides, antibodies, variants and antigen-binding fragments thereof with higher functional affinity compared to their parent polypeptides, antibodies, variants and antigen-binding fragments. The present invention also provides polypeptides, antibodies, variants and antigen-binding fragments thereof with higher cell killing compared to their parent polypeptides, antibodies, variants and antigen-binding fragments. Without being limited by theory, it is believed that such modified polypeptides, antibodies, variants and antigen-binding fragments thereof may allow for more stable binding interactions between the Fc regions of two antibodies, thus providing higher functional affinity of antibody-antigen binding. Furthermore, the present inventors disclose discontinuous regions within the CH2 and CH3 domains of mIgG3 that provide this isotype with increased functional affinity for binding repeating glycan antigens and direct cytotoxicity against high-binding cancer cell lines. Transfer of the involved residues to the IgG1 isotype results in an improved "i" IgG1 with increased anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo.

[0015] By cross-linking the chimeric mAb with anti-human Ig antisera or by varying one key amino acid residue, we showed that direct cell killing is directly related to functional affinity. Furthermore, we recapitulated the functional affinity of our novel murine mAb by introducing intermolecular cooperativity into the chimeric construct. The cooperativity of mIgG3 has not been mapped, and the key amino acids that differ between IgG1 and mIgG3 have not been described previously. Thus, we have not only developed our series of anti-glycolipid mAbs, but have developed a technology that has utility to improve the therapeutic index of all mAbs.

[0016] Chimerisation of mIgG3 mAbs on a human IgG1 scaffold was accompanied by a significant reduction in direct cytotoxicity, leading us to hypothesize that this reduction was the result of reduced intermolecular cooperativity. Therefore, we focused on identifying key residues in mIgG3 that contribute to intermolecular cooperativity and transferring these to IgG1 in order to recapitulate the direct cytotoxic activity observed in mIgG3, resulting in a chimeric IgG1 with superior clinical utility.

[0017] We have generated IgG1 anti-glycan mAbs with increased functional affinity and direct cytotoxic activity through the transfer of selected mIgG3 constant region residues utilizing our panel or previously generated glycan-targeting mAbs. Contributing regions of mIgG3 were identified through the generation of hybrid IgG1 constructs containing mIgG3 CH1, CH2, or CH3 domains. Candidate residues were identified through screening based on increased direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity when introduced into IgG1 (gain-of-function) and / or reduced direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity when replaced in mIgG3 with the respective IgG1 residue (loss-of-function). Preliminary analysis showed that m IgG3 CH 1 We found that the contribution of mIgG3 CH1 to direct cytotoxicity was negligible, since introducing mIgG3 CH1 into IgG1 did not result in a significant increase in cytotoxicity. h IgG1)CH 1 mIgG 3 Introduction of the mIgG3 CH2 and CH3 domains into IgG1 did not result in a significant reduction in killing activity. Next, in a gain-of-function approach, the CH2 and CH3 domains of mIgG3 were separately introduced into IgG1. 3 IgG1 containing the IgG1 showed a significant increase in cytotoxicity. 2Introducing CH2 or CH3 domains of IgG1 into mIgG3 resulted in a small, but not significant, increase in killing activity. As confirmation of the contribution made by both domains, the reverse strategy was followed, whereby the loss of cytotoxic activity was assessed by introducing CH2 or CH3 domains of IgG1 into mIgG3. This scenario IgG1 CH 3 mIgG containing 3 This resulted in a significant reduction in cytotoxicity at 100-fold, confirming previous gain-of-function results. Importantly, this strategy also identified a minor contribution from the mouse CH2, as mIgG3 containing a human CH2 exhibited significantly reduced cytotoxic activity.

[0018] In one aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residues of an Fc region of an immunoglobulin and a binding region, wherein one or more residues of the Fc region have been modified to corresponding residues from a murine IgG3 antibody, and wherein the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof has increased functional affinity compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0019] In some aspects of the invention, modified IgG1 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof are provided, wherein the functional affinity of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 10% higher compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0020] In some embodiments of the invention, the functional affinity of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or at least about 100% higher compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0021] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof has increased direct cell killing compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0022] In some embodiments of the invention, the direct cell killing of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 10% greater compared to the corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0023] In some embodiments of the invention, the direct cell killing of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or at least about 100% greater than a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0024] In a first aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof, in which one or more residues in the CH2 and / or CH3 domain are replaced by corresponding residues in the CH2 and / or CH3 domain of mouse IgG3.

[0025] In a second aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof, wherein the CH2 and / or CH3 domain has been replaced with the CH2 and / or CH3 domain of mouse IgG3.

[0026] Further dissection of the combined CH2-CH3 region via subdomain analysis revealed complete restoration of the direct cytotoxicity of mIgG3 against IgG1 by transferring discontinuous sections including residues 286-306 and 339-378, which contain CH2 and CH3 elements, totalling 26 mIgG3 residues: N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S. These residues are necessary for increased functional affinity through combined action of direct interactions and intermolecular cooperation by conformational residues, where the latter likely provide a permissive framework. Also, the charge distribution pattern, especially in CH2, has been shown to enhance the binding of mIgG3 to negatively charged polyvalent antigens and is distinct from IgG1, so its role cannot be ignored (Klaus and Bereta 2018; Hovenden et al. 2013). Some of these residues involved in our approach are within the large consensus binding sites for many natural binding partners, such as protein A, protein G, rheumatoid factor, and neonatal FcRn (DeLano et al. 2000). However, our residues are not directly involved in FcRn binding (Oganesyan et al. 2014).

[0027] In a third aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having modifications to one or more of the following residues in the Fc region: N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0028] In a fourth aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having one or more of the following modifications to the Fc region: N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0029] In some aspects of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises a modification at one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, twenty, twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-four, twenty-five, or twenty-six residues selected from positions N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at all 26 residues.

[0030] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is selected from the group consisting of N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, , N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, and A378S. In a preferred embodiment of the invention the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises all 26 modifications.

[0031] Many Fc engineering strategies have been described in the literature, often for the effect on mAb effector functions (ADCC and CDC) via modification of FcγR or C1q binding, as well as on mAb half-life via FcRn engagement (Wang, Mathieu, and Brezski 2018; Carter 2006). These descriptions do not describe the amino acid changes that form part of this patent. Furthermore, crystal packing-induced mAb oligomerization via Fc:Fc interactions in many human mAb isotypes (Saphire et al. 2001) formed the basis of a hexameric mAb platform recently described for improved complement activation (WO 2014 / 006217, WO 2018 / 083126, WO 2018 / 146317, Ugurlar et al. 2018; de Jong et al. 2016; Diebolder et al. 2014). Efficient hexamer positioning and C1q binding were dependent on separate mutations (E345K or E430G) distinct from the amino acid changes that form the basis of this patent. Indeed, the ability of type II CD20 mAb 11B8 to induce programmed cell death (i.e., direct cytotoxicity) was not enhanced through these mutations that induced potent CDC properties, suggesting that this position does not contribute to direct cell killing.

[0032] Most approved therapeutic mAbs are either humanized or fully human IgG antibodies, with murine or chimeric antibodies carrying a high risk of adverse anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) responses in patients (Schroff et al. 1985; Azinovic et al. 2006; Miotti et al. 1999; D'Arcy and Mannik 2001). Introduction of only 26 mIgG3s at IgG1 is unlikely to induce HAMA responses. However, they may result in MHCII-binding epitopes that have the potential to drive HAMA responses in certain patients. Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) analysis of the hybrid 88 IgG1 containing 26 residues revealed a cluster (cluster 1, residues 294-315) that contained several potential high-scoring epitopes. Reversion of the three mIgG3s in cluster 1 to IgG1 residues at positions 294, 300, and 305 maintained functional affinity and direct cytotoxicity. Importantly, modifications of this 23 aa motif (N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378) when modified to the corresponding mouse IgG3 residues (N286T, K28 The following mutants (8W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S) induced direct cytotoxicity, cell aggregation, pore formation, and eventual cell lysis. Pore formation and eventual cell lysis share similar cell degradation characteristics with necroptosis, but cannot be distinguished from necrosis or secondary necrosis (Vanden Berghe et al. 2010).The resulting outcomes from released DAMPs, either homeostatic or induced as a result of activated stress pathways, depend on the cellular environment and underlying signaling cascades, but collectively have the potential to result in a proinflammatory environment that can further enhance immune effector function and / or result in an adaptive immune response via cross-presentation of released tumor antigens (Yatim, Cullen, and Albert 2017; Galluzzi et al. 2017).

[0033] In a fifth embodiment of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having modifications to one or more of the following residues in the Fc region: N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0034] In a sixth aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having one or more of the following modifications to the Fc region: N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0035] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23 residues selected from positions N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at all 23 residues.

[0036] In some aspects of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, or 23 modifications selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S. In a preferred aspect of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises all 23 modifications.

[0037] This set of 23 modifications is exemplified for the 88 antibody in Figures 9A and 9B.

[0038] Sialyl-di-Lewis, a sialyl-di-Lewis derivative that targets a broad range of tumor tissues, particularly more than 70% of pancreatic tumors, more than 30% of gastrointestinal and colorectal tumors, and more than 20% of ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer tumors, while having a more favorable normal tissue distribution. aFurther validation was shown by introducing 23 selected mIgG3 residues into the 129mAb targeting COLO205. Interestingly, the parental 129mAb produced by the hybridoma is an mIgG1 lacking direct cytotoxicity. Thus, the generation of i129G1 mAb with significantly improved functional affinity via slower dissociation rates compared to 129IgG1, consistent with nanomolar direct cell killing potential on COLO205, suggests that our approach may have broad applicability and may be relevant for immunomodulatory mAbs that rely on avidity action (Wang, Mathieu, and Brezski 2018). The direct cell killing exerted by i129G1 presented itself in a similar manner to i88G1: mAb-induced cell aggregation followed by pore formation and eventual cell lysis. Introduction of 23 mIgG3 residues into i129G1 mAb had mixed effects on effector function; ADCC was significantly reduced, but nanomolar EC 50 The CDC activity of i129G1 was significantly increased while the ADCC activity of i129G1 was maintained. This mirrored the results obtained with i88G1, although i129G1 reduced ADCC more strongly, suggesting that the glyco-targeting nature of 129mAb, targeting glycoproteins and glycolipids whereas 88mAb only targets glycoproteins, also influences ADCC potency. Surprisingly, i129G1 exhibited effective tumor control, with i129G1 exhibiting a significant tumor volume reduction significantly better than 129IgG1, the latter of which did not exhibit significant tumor reduction. This represents an inability of the combined effector functions of 129IgG1 to control tumor growth in this model, further highlighting the value of having direct cytotoxicity.

[0039] To evaluate the individual contribution of each of the 23 selected mG3 residues, a single revertant strategy based on i88G1 (Example 4) was performed. Each of the 23 mG3 residues of i88G1 was reverted to hG1 residues alone, and the resulting constructs were analyzed for direct cell killing, confirming that the 23 above-mentioned residues could be further reduced to 15 residues without significant loss of direct cell killing capacity. Notably, the 6 mIgG3 residues of i88G1 could be reverted to IgG1 residues without significant loss of direct cell killing capacity. This was further illustrated using 129 mAb, where introduction of 15 mIgG3 residues maintained nanomolar direct cell killing in COLO205.

[0040] Immunogenicity may be a major barrier to successful treatment. Anti-drug antibodies may neutralize treatment function, affect pharmacokinetics, and possibly result in severe side effects. T cell epitopes contribute to the risk of immunogenicity and can be relatively accurately evaluated using in silico tools. Immunoinformatic algorithms for identifying T cell epitopes can be applied to evaluate and analyze whether immunotherapy results in undesired immunogenicity. To evaluate the potential immunogenicity of our hybrid SD286 306+339 378 construct, created by the presence of 26 mIgG3 residues, we performed an in silico screening of the SD286 306+339 378 sequence for MHCII-binding epitopes (Immune Epitope Database, IEDB). Class II-restricted T helper cells are more relevant to humoral immune responses, and predicted binding clusters have been shown to be strong indicators of T cell responses (Jawa et al. 2013). Two MHCII-binding clusters containing several high-scoring binding epitopes were identified: cluster 1 (residues 294-315) and cluster 2 (residues 365-393) (Figure 5 / Figure 20). Reversion of three mouse residues, 294 (A to E), 300 (F to Y), and 305 (A to V), to human residues in cluster 1 resulted in a section of human sequence in which the individual was tolerized. Similarly, inversion of two residues, 351 (I to L) and 371 (N to G), in the 339-378 region removed two MHCII-binding cores.

[0041] Reversal of one in silico identified immunogenic cluster led to the leading candidate, the improved “i”88G1, with potent cell killing, pore-forming ability, and robust immune effector functions.

[0042] To demonstrate that the effect of introducing selected residues is not limited to anti-glycan antibodies, trastuzumab (sold specifically under the trade name Herceptin®), which targets the growth factor receptor HER2, was subjected to the transfer of the involved residues. The resulting i-trastuzumab showed improved steady-state cellular binding to cell lines that modestly express HER2, consistent with increased PI uptake. Furthermore, it improved affinity via a slower dissociation rate compared to wild type.

[0043] In a seventh aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having modifications in one or more of the following residues in the Fc region: N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0044] In an eighth aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having one or more of the following modifications to the Fc region: N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0045] This set of 15 modifications is exemplified in antibodies 129 and 88 in Figures 9C and 9D.

[0046] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 residues selected from positions N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, A378. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at all 15 residues.

[0047] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, or 15 modifications selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at all 15 residues.

[0048] In a ninth aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having modifications to one or more of the following residues in the Fc region: Q342, P343, E345, N361, Q362, P374, D376.

[0049] In a tenth aspect of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof having one or more of the following modifications to the Fc region: Q342R, P343A, E345T, N361K, Q362K, P374S, D376A.

[0050] This set of seven modifications is exemplified in antibody 88 in Figure 9F.

[0051] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or 7 residues selected from positions Q342, P343, E345, N361, Q362, P374, D376. In preferred embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises modifications at all seven residues.

[0052] In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises one, two, three, four, five, six or seven modifications selected from Q342R, P343A, E345T, N361K, Q362K, P374S, D376A In preferred embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises all seven modifications.

[0053] In one embodiment of the invention the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises one or more of the sequences disclosed in Figure 15. In one embodiment of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the heavy and light chain sequences disclosed in Figure 15.

[0054] In one embodiment of the invention the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises one or more of the sequences disclosed in Figure 16. In one embodiment of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the heavy and light chain sequences disclosed in Figure 16.

[0055] In one embodiment of the invention the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises one or more of the sequences disclosed in Figure 17. In one embodiment of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the heavy and light chain sequences disclosed in Figure 17.

[0056] In one embodiment of the invention the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises one or more of the sequences disclosed in Figure 19. In one embodiment of the invention there is provided a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the heavy and light chain sequences disclosed in Figure 19.

[0057] In some embodiments of the invention, a "corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof" refers to an unmodified (i.e. wild-type) antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof that comprises native residues with no changes relative to the corresponding mouse IgG3 residues. In some embodiments of the invention, the corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof binds to the same target(s) (e.g. the same epitope) as the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof. In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the corresponding unmodified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprise at least one, at least two, at least three, at least four, at least five, or at least six of the same CDR sequences (i.e. VHCDR1, VHCDR2, VHCDR3, VLCDR1, VLCDR2, VLCDR3). In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the corresponding unmodified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprise the same binding region sequences. In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the corresponding unmodified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprise the same variable region sequences (e.g. the same variable heavy chain sequence and / or the same variable light chain sequence).

[0058] In some embodiments of the present invention, "binding region" refers to the part of an antibody or its antigen-binding fragment that contributes to binding to a target antigen. For example, it may comprise one constant region and one variable region of each of heavy and light chains. In some embodiments of the present invention, binding region may refer to complementarity determining region (CDR) sequences (i.e. VHCDR1, VHCDR2, VHCDR3, VLCDR1, VLCDR2, VLCDR3).

[0059] The structure of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is generally the heavy or light chain sequence of the antibody or a substantial portion thereof. The structure and location of immunoglobulin domains can be determined by referring to http: / / www.imgt.org / .

[0060] Throughout this specification, the numbering of residues refers to the standardized IMGT system for numbering antibody sequences, as disclosed in Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V, Ginestoux C, Jabado-Michaloud J, Folch G, Bellahcene F, et al. IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system. Nucleic acids research. 2009;37:D1006-12. Other suitable numbering systems are known to those skilled in the art. Other suitable numbering systems can be used to identify corresponding residues between modified IgG1 antibodies and their antigen-binding fragments. All numbering systems that allow the identification of corresponding residues are suitable for use in the present invention. The numbering system used herein does not limit the scope of the present invention, but is simply used to identify related residues that may be modified. The term "corresponding residues" is intended to mean residues at structurally or functionally equivalent positions in two or more antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof that are being compared. In some cases, corresponding residues can be identified by sequence alignment. Optionally, corresponding residues can be identified by structural comparison.

[0061] In some embodiments of the invention, an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residues of an immunoglobulin Fc region comprises an Fc region of at least 10 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 20 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 30 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 40 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 50 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 75 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 100 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 200 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 300 amino acid residues, an Fc region of at least 400 amino acid residues, or an Fc region of at least 500 amino acid residues. Preferably, the IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprises the entire immunoglobulin Fc region.

[0062] In some embodiments of the invention, one or more residues of the Fc region are selected from the CH2 domain and / or the CH3 domain. In some embodiments, one or more residues are selected from the CH2 domain. In some embodiments, one or more residues are selected from the CH3 domain.

[0063] In some embodiments of the invention, the functional affinity of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof and the corresponding wild-type IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof can be determined by surface plasmon resonance (e.g., Biacore 3000 / T200, GE Healthcare), for example by injecting increasing concentrations (0.3 nmol / L to 200 nmol / L) of the IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof through a CM5 chip containing a suitable ligand and fitting this data to a suitable binding model using suitable software (e.g., BIAevaluation 4.1). Corresponding experiments using the same conditions can be performed with the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof. In some embodiments of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof shows a higher functional affinity for the corresponding wild-type IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof if the surface plasmon resonance data shows that the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof binds tighter to the CM5 chip coated with the ligand. The ligand includes a control conjugate for glycan-HSA and an anti-glycan antibody.

[0064] The Biacore CM5 chip coated with anti-His antibody contains carboxymethylated dextran covalently bound to a gold surface. Molecules are covalently bound to the sensor surface via amine, thiol, aldehyde, or carboxyl groups. Interactions ranging from small organic molecules such as drug candidates to assemblies of large molecules or whole viruses can be tested. The high binding capacity provides high response, which is suitable for capture assays and interactions involving small molecules. The remarkable surface stability provides accuracy and precision, allowing repeated analysis on the same surface. Other suitable chips are known to those skilled in the art, and surface plasmon resonance protocols can be adapted by standard techniques known in the art.

[0065] In some aspects of the invention, direct cell killing of the modified IgG1 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof and the corresponding wild-type IgG1 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof is achieved by incorporation of propidium iodide (PI), for example by inducing the IgG1 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof into COLO205 or HCT-15 cells (5×10 4 ) for 2 hours at 37°C, followed by addition of 1 μg PI for 30 minutes, resuspending the cells in PBS, processing the cells on a flow cytometer (e.g. Beckman Coulter FC-500 or MACSQuant 10) and analyzing the results with appropriate software (e.g. WinMDI 2.9 or FlowJo v10). Corresponding experiments using the same conditions can be performed with the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof. In some aspects of the invention, the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof provides higher direct cell killing than the corresponding wild-type IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof when PI uptake is higher when cells are incubated with the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof.

[0066] The improvement of the functional properties of the modified IgG1 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof is measured in comparison with the corresponding functional properties of a wild-type IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof that does not contain modified residues in the Fc region. Since the improved functional properties are a relative measure, the exact method used to determine the functional affinity and / or direct cell killing, or any other functional property of the claimed IgG1 antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof, does not affect the relative change in this functional property. Many suitable methods of measuring the functional properties of antibodies and their antigen-binding fragments are known to those skilled in the art. Any suitable method of measuring these functional properties can be used to measure the functional properties of the claimed modified IgG1 antibodies and their antigen-binding fragments thereof, but for a fair comparison, the same method is applied to the corresponding wild-type IgG1 antibodies or their antigen-binding fragments.

[0067] The generation of improved cancer glycan-targeting mAbs with high functional affinity and direct cytotoxicity through the establishment of intermolecular synergistic binding may provide excellent clinical utility. This approach may also be valuable for other mAbs targeting repetitive or dense antigens. Furthermore, the return of the unusual pro-inflammatory cell killing mode observed in many glycan-targeting mIgG3 mAbs to the IgG1 framework has the potential to be used in combination with other immunotherapies.

[0068] The modified IgG1 antibodies of the present invention can be used in methods of diagnosis and treatment of tumors in human or animal subjects. When used for diagnosis, the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments of the present invention can be labeled with a detectable label, for example, a radiolabel such as I or Tc, which can be bound to the modified IgG1 antibodies of the present invention using conventional chemical techniques known in the field of antibody imaging. Labels also include enzyme labels such as horseradish peroxidase. Further labels include chemical moieties such as biotin that can be detected via binding to a specific cognate detectable moiety, for example, labeled avidin. The modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments of the present invention, which have been shown to be effective in killing cancer cells themselves, can be further labeled with functional labels. Functional labels include substances that are designed to be targeted to the site of the cancer to cause its destruction. Such functional labels include toxins such as ricin and enzymes such as bacterial carboxypeptidase or nitroreductase, which can convert a prodrug into an active drug. Furthermore, the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof may be conjugated or otherwise associated with chemotherapeutic or cytotoxic agents, such as maytansines (DM1 and DM4), onides, auristatins, calicheamicins, duocarmycins, doxorubicin 90 131, or radiolabels, such as Y or I. Furthermore, the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention may be administered alone or in combination with other treatments, either simultaneously or sequentially, depending on the condition being treated. Thus, the present invention further provides products comprising the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention and an active agent as a combined formulation for simultaneous, separate, or sequential use in the treatment of tumors. The active agent may include chemotherapeutic or cytotoxic agents, including 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, mitomycin C, oxaliplatin, and tamoxifen, which may act synergistically with the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention.Other active agents may include appropriate doses of pain relieving drugs, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (eg aspirin, paracetamol, ibuprofen, or ketoprofen) or opiates, such as morphine or anti-emetics.

[0069] Without wishing to be bound by theory, the property of the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention to synergistically cooperate with effective agents to enhance tumor killing may not be due to an immune effector mechanism, but rather may be a direct result of the binding of the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof to cell surface receptors. The modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention are usually administered in the form of a pharmaceutical composition, which may contain at least one component in addition to the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof.

[0070] In addition to the active ingredient, the pharmaceutical composition may contain pharma- ceutically acceptable excipients, diluents, carriers, buffers, stabilizers, or other substances well known to those skilled in the art. Such substances should be non-toxic and should not interfere with the effect of the active ingredient. The precise nature of the carrier or other substances will vary according to the route of administration, which may be oral or by injection, for example, intravenous injection. The preferred route of administration is intravenous.

[0071] Injection is assumed to be the main route for therapeutic administration of the composition, although delivery via catheter or other surgical tubes is also used.Some suitable administration routes include intravenous, subcutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intramuscular administration.Liquid formulations can be utilized after reconstitution from powder formulations.

[0072] For intravenous injection or injection at the affected site, the active ingredient is in the form of a parenterally acceptable aqueous solution that is pyrogen-free and has appropriate pH, isotonicity, and stability.Those skilled in the art can prepare appropriate solutions using isotonic vehicles such as sodium chloride injection, Ringer's solution, lactated Ringer's solution, etc.Preservatives, stabilizers, buffers, antioxidants, and / or other additives may be included as necessary.

[0073] Pharmaceutical compositions for oral administration may be in tablet, capsule, powder, or liquid form. Tablets may contain a solid carrier such as gelatin or an adjuvant. Liquid pharmaceutical compositions generally contain a liquid carrier such as water, petroleum, animal or vegetable oils, mineral oil, or synthetic oil. Physiological saline, dextrose, or other sugar solution or glycols such as ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, or polyethylene glycol may be included. When the formulation is liquid, it may be, for example, a physiological salt solution with a non-phosphate buffer of pH 6.8-7.6, or a lyophilized powder.

[0074] The composition may also be administered via microspheres, liposomes, other microparticulate delivery systems, or sustained release formulations that are placed in certain tissues, including blood.Suitable examples of sustained release carriers include semipermeable polymer matrices in the form of shared articles, such as suppositories or microcapsules.Implantable or microencapsulated sustained release matrices include polylactide (U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919; European Patent Publication No. 0058481), copolymers of L-glutamic acid and gamma-ethyl-L-glutamate

[43] , poly(2-hydroxyethyl-methacrylate). Liposomes containing polypeptides are prepared by well-known methods: (Eppstein et al. 1985; Hwang, Luk, and Beaumier 1980); EP 0052522; EP 0036676; EP 0088046; EP 0143949; EP 0142541; JP-A-83-11808; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,485,045 and 4,544,545. Usually, the liposomes are small (about 200-800 angstroms) unilamellar type, in which the lipid content is greater than about 30 mol% cholesterol, with the ratio selected being adjusted to the optimum ratio for leakage of the polypeptide. The composition can be administered in a localized manner to the tumor site or other desired site, or can be delivered in a tumor or other cell-targeted manner.

[0075] The composition is preferably administered to an individual in a "therapeutically effective amount", which is an amount sufficient to show benefit to the individual. The actual amount administered, and the rate and time course of administration, will vary depending on the nature and severity of what is being treated. Prescription of treatment, such as determining dosage, is within the responsibility of general practitioners and other medical doctors, and will usually take into account the disorder being treated, the individual patient's condition, the site of delivery, the method of administration, and other factors known to medical doctors. The compositions of the present invention are particularly relevant for the treatment of existing tumors, particularly cancer, and for preventing the recurrence of the condition after initial treatment or surgery. Examples of the techniques and protocols mentioned above can be found in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences 16 edition Oslo,A (ed) 1980.

[0076] The optimal dosage can be determined by the physician based on a number of parameters, including, for example, age, sex, weight, the severity of the condition being treated, the active ingredient being administered, and the route of administration. Generally, a serum concentration of polypeptides and antibodies that allows for receptor saturation is desired. Concentrations above about 1 nM (1nM) are usually sufficient. For example, 100 mg / m 2 A dose of antibody provides a serum concentration of about 20 nM for about 8 days. As a rough guideline, antibody doses range from 10 to 300 mg / mL. 2 Equivalent doses of antibody fragments may be used at more frequent intervals to maintain serum levels above the concentration that would allow saturation of the glycans.

[0077] The dosage of the composition will vary depending on the properties of the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof, such as their binding activity and in vivo plasma half-life, the concentration of the polypeptide in the formulation, the route, site and rate of administration, the clinical tolerance of the patient involved, the pathology afflicting the patient, etc., and is within the skill of the physician. For example, a dose of 3000 g of antibody per administration per patient is preferred, although doses may range from about 10 μg to 6 mg per administration. During a series of inoculations, different volumes are utilized; the physician may administer an initial inoculation followed by a boost with a smaller dose of antibody.

[0078] The modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the present invention may be produced in whole or in part by chemical synthesis. The modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof may be readily prepared by well-established standard liquid-phase or preferably solid-phase peptide synthesis methods (general descriptions of which are widely available (see, for example, JM Stewart and JD Young, (1984)

[46] , in M. Bodanzsky and A. Bodanzsky, (1984))); or they may be prepared in solution, by liquid-phase methods, or any combination of solid-phase, liquid-phase, and solution chemical techniques, for example by first completing each peptide moiety, then introducing residue X by reaction of the respective carbonate or sulfonic acid or reactive derivative thereof, after removing any protecting groups present if necessary and if desired.

[0079] Another convenient way to produce the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof according to the invention is to express the nucleic acids encoding them by using the nucleic acids in an expression system. The invention further provides isolated nucleic acids encoding the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof according to the invention. Nucleic acids include DNA and RNA. One skilled in the art can determine substitutions, deletions, and / or additions to the nucleic acids that further provide the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof according to the invention.

[0080] The invention also provides constructs in the form of plasmids, vectors, transcription or expression cassettes comprising at least one of the nucleic acids described above. The invention also provides recombinant host cells comprising one or more of the constructs described above. As described above, the nucleic acids encoding the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention form an aspect of the invention, as do methods for producing the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof, comprising expression from the encoding nucleic acids therefor. Expression may be conveniently achieved by culturing recombinant host cells comprising the nucleic acids under suitable conditions. Once produced by expression, the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof may be isolated and / or purified using any suitable technique and then used as appropriate. Systems for cloning and expression of polypeptides in a variety of different host cells are well known. Suitable host cells include bacteria, mammalian cells, yeast, and baculovirus systems. Mammalian cell lines available in the art for expression of heterologous polypeptides include Chinese hamster ovary cells, HeLa cells, baby hamster kidney cells, NSO mouse melanoma cells, and many others. A common and preferred bacterial host is Escherichia coli. Expression of antibodies and antibody fragments in prokaryotic cells such as E. coli is well established in the art. For a review, see, e.g., (Pluckthun 1991). Expression in eukaryotic cells in culture is also available to those skilled in the art as an option for producing modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof. For recent reviews, see, e.g., (Reff 1993; Trill, Shatzman, and Ganguly 1995).

[0081] A suitable vector can be selected or constructed, including suitable control sequences, including promoter sequences, transcription termination sequences, polyadenylation sequences, enhancer sequences, marker genes, and other sequences as appropriate. The vector can be a plasmid, a virus, such as a phage or a phagemid, as appropriate. For further details, see, for example, (Sambrook, Fritsch, and Maniatis 1989); many known techniques and protocols for manipulating nucleic acids, for example, in constructing nucleic acids, mutagenesis, sequencing, introducing DNA into cells, and regulating gene expression, and analyzing proteins, are detailed in Ausubel et al., 1992 (Ausubel et al. 1992).

[0082] Thus, a further aspect of the invention provides a host cell comprising a nucleic acid as disclosed herein. A further aspect provides a method comprising introducing such a nucleic acid into a host cell. The introduction may use any available technique. In eukaryotic cells, suitable techniques may include calcium phosphate transfection, DEAE-dextran, electroporation, liposome-mediated transfection, and transduction using retroviruses or other viruses, such as vaccinia virus or, in insect cells, baculovirus. In bacterial cells, suitable techniques may include calcium chloride transformation, electroporation, and transfection involving bacteriophage. After introduction, for example, culturing the host cell under conditions for gene expression may result or allow expression from the nucleic acid. In one embodiment, the nucleic acid of the invention is integrated into the genome (e.g., chromosome) of the host cell. Integration may be facilitated by inclusion of sequences that facilitate recombination with the genome, by standard techniques. The invention also provides a method comprising using the above-described constructs in an expression system for expressing the above-described modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof.

[0083] The fragment crystallizable region (Fc region) is the tail region of an antibody that interacts with cell surface receptors called Fc receptors and with several proteins of the complement system. This portion allows the antibody to activate the immune system. In the IgG antibody isotype, the Fc region is composed of two identical protein fragments, derived from the second and third constant domains of the antibody's two heavy chains. The IgG Fc region contains a highly conserved N-glycosylation site.

[0084] The Fc (fragment, crystallizable) of IgG consists of a paired set of antibody HC domains, each with a CH2 fused to a CH3, forming a structure of approximately 50 kDa. The name "fragment, crystallizable" (Fc) comes from the fact that after papain digestion of serum-derived myeloma IgG fractions, the only fragments that could be crystallized were the paired CH2-CH3 fragments.

[0085] In the Fc, the two CH3 domains are tightly bound to each other, whereas the two CH2 domains have no direct protein-protein contacts with each other. Oligosaccharides are attached to asparagine-297 (N297) in each of the two CH2 domains, filling part of the space between the two CH2s. In some crystal structures, hydrogen bonds are observed between the two hydrocarbon chains, both directly and via water molecule bridges. Although antibodies appear to be highly segmented molecules, it has been shown that the structure of the Fc can affect the binding of FAbs to antigens of interest, and similarly, the content of the variable chains in FAbs can affect the binding of Fc to various receptors. Recent circular dichroism studies have confirmed significant structural coupling between the FAb arms of IgG and the Fc. Thus, IgG molecules are highly complex molecules in which different domains interact significantly, even over long distances.

[0086] A bivalent / multivalent antibody contains a binding domain that interacts with an epitope, and a synthetic bivalent / multivalent ligand contains a pharmacophore that interacts with a target site. The term "functional affinity" can also be used to describe the apparent increased affinity associated with bivalency / multivalency. This term is synonymous with "avidity."

[0087] Avidity represents the integrated strength of multiple affinities of individual non-covalent interactions, such as between a protein receptor and its ligand, and may also be referred to as "functional affinity". Thus, avidity is clearly different from intrinsic affinity, which describes the strength of a single interaction. However, since individual binding events increase the likelihood that other interactions will occur (i.e., increase the local concentration of each binding partner near the binding site), avidity should not be considered simply as the sum of the component affinities, but as the combined effect of all affinities involved in a biomolecular interaction. The usefulness of the distinction between "intrinsic affinity" and "functional affinity" arises from the different emphases involved in each term. The former is most useful when the structural relationship between the antibody combining site and the complementary region of the ligand is under investigation, or when the dynamic mechanism of the specific interaction is under investigation. On the other hand, the latter is particularly useful when a quantitative measurement of affinity enhancement is performed, as is the case in the present invention.

[0088] "Functional affinity" and "intrinsic affinity" refer to formally identical, reversible processes as follows:

number

[0089] Fragments of antibodies and antigen-binding molecules The antigen-binding molecule of the present invention can be a fragment of an antibody, specifically an antigen-binding fragment of an antibody.Antigen-binding fragments contain one or more antigen-binding regions.Fragments of whole antibodies have been shown to be capable of performing the function of antigen binding. Examples of binding fragments include (i) a Fab fragment consisting of the VL, VH, CL, and CH1 domains; (ii) an Fd fragment consisting of the VH and CH1 domains; (iii) an Fv fragment consisting of the VL and VH domains of a single antibody; (iv) a dAb fragment consisting of the VH domain (Ward, ES et al., Nature 341:544-546(1989)); (v) an isolated CDR region; (vi) an F(ab')2 fragment, which is a bivalent fragment containing two linked Fab fragments; (vii) a single chain Fv molecule (scFv) in which the VH and VL domains are linked by a peptide linker which connects the two domains to form an antigen binding site (Bird et al., Science 242:423-426 (1988); Huston et al., PNAS USA 85:5879-5883). (1988)); (viii) bispecific single chain Fv dimers (WO 92 / 09965), and (ix) "diabodies" (multivalent or multispecific fragments constructed by genetic fusion) (WO 94 / 13804; P. Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 6444-6448 (1993)). Typically, the fragment is a Fab, F(ab')2 or Fv fragment, or a scFv molecule.

[0090] Diabodies are multimers of polypeptides in which each polypeptide contains a first domain comprising the binding region of an immunoglobulin light chain and a second domain comprising the binding region of an immunoglobulin heavy chain, and the two domains are linked (e.g., by a peptide linker) but cannot bind to each other to form an antigen-binding site: the antigen-binding site is formed by the binding of the first domain of one polypeptide in the multimer to the second domain of another polypeptide in the multimer (WO 94 / 13804).

[0091] If bispecific antibodies are used, they may be conventional bispecific antibodies and may be produced in a variety of ways (Hollinger & Winter, Current Opinion Biotechnol. 4:446-449 (1993)), for example prepared chemically or from hybrid hybridomas, or may be any of the bispecific antibody fragments described below. It may be preferable to use scFv dimers or diabodies rather than whole antibodies. Diabodies and scFvs can be constructed without an Fc region, using only the variable domains, which may reduce the effects of anti-idiotypic reactions. Other forms of bispecific antibodies include the single chain "Janusins" described in Traunecker et al., EMBO Journal 10:3655-3659 (1991).

[0092] Bispecific antibodies are antibodies that can simultaneously bind to two target molecules, such as two antigens or two epitopes. Bispecific antibodies can also be called dual-binding antibodies. Examples of bispecific antibody formats include, but are not limited to, (mAb)2, Fcab, F(mAb')2, quadroma, scFv (single-chain variable fragment), bsDb (bispecific diabody), scBsDb (single-chain bispecific diabody), BiTE (bispecific T cell-inducing antibody), DART (dual affinity re-targeting antibodies), charge pair, tandem antibody, tandem scFv-Fc, Fab-scFv-Fc, Fab-scFv, minibody, zybody, DNL-F(ab)3 (dock-and-lock trivalent Fabs), bssdAb (bispecific single domain antibody), and knobs-in-holes.

[0093] Bispecific diabodies may also be useful because, as opposed to bispecific whole antibodies, they can be easily constructed and expressed in E. coli. Diabodies (and many other polypeptides, e.g., antibody fragments) of appropriate binding specificity can be easily selected from libraries using phage display (WO 94 / 13804). If one arm of the diabody remains constant, e.g., with specificity for antigen X, a library can be made in which the other arm is varied and antibodies of appropriate specificity can be selected.

[0094] In some embodiments of the present invention, it may be desirable to generate multispecific (e.g., bispecific) anti-target antibodies that have binding specificities for at least two different epitopes of the same or different molecules. Exemplary bispecific antibodies may bind to two different epitopes of a target molecule. Alternatively, a target-specific antibody arm may be combined with an arm that binds to a cell surface molecule, such as a T cell receptor molecule (e.g., CD3). Exemplary bispecific antibodies of the present invention may bind to antigens derived from T cell receptor molecules (e.g., CD3) as well as any other target.

[0095] The modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention may be antibodies or antibody fragments, Fab, (Fab')2, scFv, Fv, dAb, Fd, or diabodies. The antibodies may be polyclonal antibodies. The antibodies may be monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). The modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention may be humanized, chimeric, or veneered antibodies, or may be non-human antibodies of any species. In a preferred embodiment, the modified IgG1 antibodies and antigen-binding fragments thereof of the invention are human or humanized.

[0096] Murine or chimeric antibodies carry a high risk of adverse anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) reactions in patients (Schroff et al. 1985; Azinovic et al. 2006; Miotti et al. 1999; D'Arcy and Mannik 2001). Therefore, most approved therapeutic mAbs are humanized or fully human IgG antibodies.

[0097] variant The present invention also extends to variants of any of the peptide sequences disclosed herein. As used herein, the term "variant" refers to proteins that have similar amino acid sequences and / or retain the same function. For example, the term "variant" encompasses proteins or polypeptides that include one or more amino acid additions, deletions, substitutions, etc. Examples of variants of the present invention are proteins that include peptides as defined below, except that one or more amino acids are replaced with one or more other amino acids. Amino acid substitutions can be made, for example, to reduce or eliminate a trend in the amino acid sequence. Alternatively, amino acid substitutions can be made to improve antigen affinity or to humanize or deimmunise the antibody, as required. Provided herein are affinity matured, humanised and deimmunised variants of the described antibodies, as well as variants that include amino acid substitutions to reduce or eliminate any trend in the antibody sequence.

[0098] As noted above, in some embodiments, all substitutions may occur only in the framework regions. In such embodiments, the original CDR sequences are retained, but variations may occur in one or more framework regions.

[0099] A variant antigen-binding molecule having one or more amino acid substitutions may retain the functional activity (e.g., EC50, IC50, IC90, Kd, ​​functional affinity, and / or direct cell killing) of the antigen-binding molecule from which the variant antigen-binding molecule is derived. The variant antigen-binding molecules of the present invention may be used and formulated in the same manner as described for the antigen-binding molecule from which they are derived.

[0100] replacement Those skilled in the art recognize that various amino acids have similar properties, and one or more such amino acids of a substance can often be substituted with one or more other such amino acids without eliminating a desired activity of the substance.

[0101] Thus, the amino acids glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, and isoleucine can often be substituted for each other (with amino acids having aliphatic side chains). Of these possible substitutions, glycine and alanine are preferably used to replace each other (because they have relatively short side chains), and valine, leucine, and isoleucine are preferably used to replace each other (because they have large aliphatic side chains that are hydrophobic). Other amino acids that can often be substituted for each other include phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan (amino acids having aromatic side chains); lysine, arginine, and histidine (amino acids having basic side chains); aspartic acid and glutamic acid (amino acids having acidic side chains); asparagine and glutamine (amino acids having amide side chains); and cysteine ​​and methionine (amino acids having sulfur-containing side chains).

[0102] Substitutions of this nature are often referred to as "conservative" or "semi-conservative" amino acid substitutions.

[0103] Using three-letter and one-letter notations, naturally occurring amino acids can be referred to as follows: glycine (G or Gly), alanine (A or Ala), valine (V or Val), leucine (L or Leu), isoleucine (I or Ile), proline (P or Pro), phenylalanine (F or Phe), tyrosine (Y or Tyr), tryptophan (W or Trp), lysine (K or Lys), arginine (R or Arg), histidine (H or His), aspartic acid (D or Asp), glutamic acid (E or Glu), asparagine (N or Asn), glutamine (Q or Gln), cysteine ​​(C or Cys), methionine (M or Met), serine (S or Ser), and threonine (T or Thr). When the residue can be aspartic acid or asparagine, the symbols Asx or B can be used. Where the residue may be glutamic acid or glutamine, the symbols Glx or Z may be used. Unless the context dictates otherwise, a reference to aspartic acid includes aspartate and a reference to glutamic acid includes glutamate.

[0104] In addition, amino acids may be deleted or inserted into the amino acid sequence of the fusion protein shown below. Thus, for example, amino acids that do not substantially affect the activity of the polypeptide, or at least do not eliminate said activity, may be deleted. Such deletions may be advantageous, since the total length and molecular weight of the polypeptide may be reduced while still retaining activity. This allows the amount of polypeptide required for a particular purpose to be reduced, for example, the dosage level may be reduced.

[0105] In some embodiments, the following amino acids may be exchanged for one another with conservative amino acid substitutions: [Table 1]

[0106] Thus, reference to "conservative" amino acid substitution refers to an amino acid substitution in which one or more amino acids in an antibody sequence (e.g., CDR or VH or VL sequence) are replaced with another amino acid of the same class as described above. Conservative amino acid substitutions may be preferred in CDR regions to minimize adverse effects on antibody function. However, conservative amino acid substitutions may also occur in framework regions.

[0107] Amino acid changes compared to the sequences provided below may be made using any suitable technique, for example by using site-directed mutagenesis or solid-state synthesis.

[0108] It should be understood that amino acid substitutions or insertions within the scope of the present invention may be made using naturally occurring or non-naturally occurring amino acids, although naturally occurring amino acids may be preferred. Whether natural or synthetic amino acids are used, it may be preferred that only L-amino acids are present.

[0109] Trend Manufacturing Therapeutic proteins such as antibodies are heterogeneous and complex in nature with chemical modifications and post-translational modifications (PTMs). Modifications can be caused by many factors such as the host cell system, the process used in production or conditions during storage or production. Modifications can relate to the chemical stability or accumulation potential of the molecule itself, which thus affects the inherent physical stability of the antibody. The amino acid motifs or residues in a given antibody sequence that may naturally undergo modification during production or storage are called liability. Thus, mutations can be made to the antibody sequence to present a liability to reduce the antibody's susceptibility to modification and degradation.

[0110] Such modifications as a result of predispositions in antibody sequences may include glycosylation, deamidation, oxidation, and C- or N-terminal variations. Such modifications may occur during manufacturing. Certain residues and structural or sequence motifs are prone to have certain modifications. Examples of predispositions to such modifications include N-linked glycosylation of Asn, O-linked glycosylation of Ser / Thr, deamidation of Asn, isomerization / fragmentation of Asp, glycosylation of Lys, oxidation of Met / Trp, free thiol groups, pyro-glutamate, and C-terminal Lys.

[0111] Those skilled in the art will recognize that computer tools can be used to predict and identify structural and sequence trends that may potentially lead to modifications.Changes can be made to the manufacturing process to minimize the occurrence of modifications.Protein engineering can also be considered to reduce this risk.For example, selective mutation of these trends can help identify and reduce the risk of modifications that compromise the stability of the antibody.

[0112] Aspartic acid residues (Asp) may undergo naturally occurring modifications. Asp-containing motifs, such as Asp-Gly sequences, may undergo naturally occurring isomerization to form isoaspartic acid. The formation of isoaspartic acid may weaken or completely abolish antibody binding. This is even more important when the Asp residue appears in the CDR of an antibody.

[0113] Thus, the aspartic acid residue (Asp) can be substituted with any naturally occurring amino acid to reduce the propensity for this modification. Optionally, the aspartic acid residue (Asp) can be substituted with alanine (Ala), glutamine (Gln), or glutamic acid (Glu) to reduce the propensity for this modification. Production / formulation optimization to reduce isomerization can also be investigated. Alternatively, the Asp-Gly motif can be modified by substituting the glycine residue with another naturally occurring amino acid to inhibit deamidation, rather than substituting the Asp residue.

[0114] Methionine residues (Met) may undergo naturally occurring modifications. The presence of methionine (Met) in CDRs may raise the question of whether methionine will be oxidized, especially when exposed to solvent, which will prevent binding. Thus, methionine residues can be substituted with any other naturally occurring amino acid to reduce the tendency to this modification. Methionine residues can be preferably substituted with Ala or Leu. Optimization of production / formulation to reduce oxidation can also be studied.

[0115] The preferred aspects of each embodiment of the invention are as for each other embodiment mutatis mutandis.The prior art documents described herein are incorporated to the fullest extent permitted by law.

[0116] The following detailed description is provided by way of example and is not intended to limit the invention to only the particular embodiments described, and may be best understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. [Brief description of the drawings]

[0117] [Figure 1] Significantly reduced direct cytotoxicity of 88IgG1 compared to 88mIgG3 and parental hybridoma mAbs, with maintained cancer cell binding. A. Comparable HCT15 and COLO205 cell binding assay results by 88IgG1, 88mIgG3, and FG88 (hybridoma mAbs); B. Significantly reduced direct cytotoxicity (PI uptake) on HCT15 by 88IgG1 compared to parental 88mIgG3 and FG88; Significantly reduced growth inhibition on COLO205 (C) and HCT15 (D) by 88IgG1 compared to parental 88mIgG3 and FG88. Significance estimated from 2-way ANOVA with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Diagram 2]Direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity improvement is contributed by mIgG3 CH3 and, to a lesser extent, CH2. Constant domain shuffling suggests no significant contribution by CH1 to direct cytotoxicity (PI uptake, HCT15, panel A; growth inhibition on COLO205, panel B). In contrast, CH3 (1m3 and 3h3) contributes significantly to direct cytotoxicity, where a small contribution by mCH2 is only evident in the loss-of-function approach (3h2) (PI uptake, HCT15, panel C; growth inhibition, COLO205, panel D). A significant functional affinity increase and off-rate decrease by 1m3; here by 3h2 and even more clearly by 3h3, confirms the contribution of the large CH3 and the small CH2 (panels E, F). Significance compared to each parental construct was estimated from two-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity) or one-way ANOVA (functional affinity, off-rates) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Diagram 3]SD286-397, encompassing the CH2:CH3 junction, underlies the improvement of mIgG3 direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity. Subdivision of the CH2CH3 subdomains identifies two non-contributing regions: SD232-294 and SD390-447, and two regions that contribute significantly to direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity: SD286-345 (CH2) and SD339-397 (CH3). Significant increase in PI uptake by both constructs and the combination (SD286-397) compared to 88IgG1 in HCT15 (panel A) and COLO205 (panel B). Significant increase in growth inhibition by both constructs and the combination compared to 88IgG1 in COLO205 (panel C) and HCT15 (panel D). Significant increase in functional affinity (SPR) resulting mainly from a decrease in off-rate by the two above-mentioned constructs (panels E and F, respectively). Significant reduction in CDC activity (HCT15) by SD339-397 compared to 88IgG1 (Panel G); maintenance of ADCC activity (COLO205) by the above constructs (Panel H). Significance for each parental construct was estimated from two-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity) or one-way ANOVA (functional affinity, off-rates, effector function) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Figure 4]The discontinuous region of 286-306 combined with 339-378 provides direct cytotoxicity and enhanced functional affinity while maintaining immune effector function. Significantly increased PI uptake (panel A) and increased growth inhibition (panel B) by SD339-378 compared to 88IgG1 in HCT15. Significantly decreased PI uptake by SD307-345 compared to SD286-345 suggests a contribution from SD286-306 (panel C). Significantly increased growth inhibition in HCT15 (panel D) and COLO205 (panel E) and significantly increased PI uptake in COLO205 (panel F) by the combination of SD286-306+339-378 compared to 88IgG1. Significantly increased functional affinity (SPR) by SD286-306+339-378 compared to 88IgG1 (panel G). Maintenance of CDC activity in HCT15 (Panel H) and ADCC activity in COLO205 (Panel I) by SD286-306+339-378 compared to 88IgG1. Significance compared to each parental construct was estimated from two-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity) or one-way ANOVA (functional affinity and effector function) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Diagram 5] MHCII-binding clusters containing several high-scoring binding epitopes: cluster 1 consists of residues 294-315, and cluster 2 consists of residues 365-393. [Figure 6] i88G1, with direct cytotoxicity and high functional affinity while maintaining immune effector functions, exhibits pore-forming ability. Significantly increased growth inhibition by i88G1 compared to 88IgG1 in HCT15 (Panel A) and COLO205 (Panel B). Significantly increased functional affinity (SPR) by i88G1 compared to 88IgG1 (Panel C). Slightly but significantly reduced ADCC by i88G1 compared to 88IgG1 in COLO205 (Panel D) and significantly increased CDC activity by i88G1 compared to 88IgG1 in HCT15 (Panel E). Evidence of cell dissociation, aggregation, and pore-forming ability by i88G1 in HCT15 (Panel F). [Figure 7] i129G1, with direct cytotoxicity and high functional affinity while maintaining immune effector functions, exhibits pore-forming ability and tumor control in vivo. Significantly increased growth inhibition (Panel A) and PI uptake (Panel B) by i129G1 in COLO205 compared to 129IgG1. Significantly increased functional affinity (SPR) by i129G1 compared to 129IgG1 (Panel C). i129G1 maintains some ADCC activity in COLO205, but is significantly reduced compared to h129IgG1 (Panel D). CDC activity by i129G1 in COLO205 is significantly increased compared to 129IgG1 (Panel E). Evidence of cell dissociation, aggregation, and pore-forming ability by i129G1 in COLO205 (Panel F). Significant in vivo tumor control by i129G1 compared to vehicle control and 129IgG1 in the COLO205 xenograft model (Balb / c mice) (Panel G). No significant effect on mean body weight over the course of the mouse study (Panel H). Significance compared to each parental construct was estimated from two-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity, and in vivo tumor control) or one-way ANOVA (functional affinity and effector function) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Figure 8] i27G1 exhibits significantly improved direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity compared to 27IgG1 while maintaining immune effector functions. Significantly increased growth inhibition in MCF7 (panel A) and AGS (panel B) by i27G1 compared to 27IgG1. Significantly increased functional affinity (SPR) by i27G1 compared to 27IgG1 (panel C). i27G1 maintains comparable ADCC activity (panel D) and CDC activity (panel E) in MCF7. Significance compared to parental constructs was estimated from 2-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity) or 1-way ANOVA (functional affinity) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Figure 9]Analysis of single revertants reveals that a minimum of 15 residues are required to maintain direct cell killing. Direct cytotoxicity of 23 single i88G1 revertants in COLO205 (panel A) and HCT15 (panel B). Normalized cell killing (to i88G1) indicates the need for an increased number of mG3 residues (15 residues) to maintain direct cytotoxicity in HCT15 compared to COLO205 (7 residues). Improved constructs with 15 mG3 residues (i88G1v2, panels C and E and i129G1v2, panel D) maintain comparable direct cytotoxicity in COLO205 and HCT15 compared to the parental constructs, i88G1 and i129G1, which have 23 mG3 residues, respectively. [Figure 10] Binding of FG27.10 and FG27.18 to ST16, HUVEC and PBMC. Negative controls for this assay were NSO supernatant for ST16 and HUVEC or cells alone for PBMC, and positive controls were anti-sialyl-diLewisa mAb, 505 / 4, or W6 / 32, which recognize HLA. [Figure 11] Binding of FG27.10 and FG27.18 to glycolipid extracts from colonic intestinal cell line (C170), ovarian cell lines (OVCAR-3, OVCAR-4, OVCA433, OAW28, OAW42), and gastric cell lines (ST16, MKN45, AGS). Glycolipids extracted from a range of cancer cell lines were plated on ELISA plates. Cells and glycolipids were then incubated with supernatants of FG27.10 or FG27.18. Binding to glycolipids was probed with anti-IgG-HRP / TMB. [Figure 12]Figure 12A. PI uptake in ST16 cells mediated by IgG3 mAb FG27.10, but not IgG1 variant FG27.18, induced robust PI uptake even at 4°C. Figure 12B: PI uptake mediated by FG27.10 and FG27.18 in a panel of tumor cell lines (AGS, Colo201, C170, C170HM2, MCF7, OVCA4, LoVo, MKN45, 791T, and Skov3). Figure 12C: PI uptake mediated by FG27.10, FG27.18, CH27 IgG2, CH27 IgG1 in C170 cells. [Figure 13] Binding of FG27.10, FG27.18, ch27IgG1 and humanized variant hLewAC to a panel of cell lines: Figure 13A, HCT15; Figure 13B, AGS; Figure 13C, OVCAR3; Figure 13D, H322, and Figure 13E, MCF7, and SPR analysis of FG27.10 (Figure 13F) and FG27.18 (Figure 13G). [Figure 14] i27G1 exhibits significantly improved direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity compared to 27IgG1 while maintaining immune effector functions. Significantly increased growth inhibition in MCF7 (panel i) and AGS (panel ii) by i27G1 compared to 27IgG1. Significantly increased functional affinity (SPR) by i27G1 compared to 27IgG1 (panel iii). i27G1 maintains comparable ADCC activity (panel iv) and CDC activity (panel v) in MCF7. Significance compared to parental constructs was estimated from 2-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity) or 1-way ANOVA (functional affinity) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Figure 15] Sequences of 88 antibodies for DNA and protein antibodies including "improved" versions 1-3. [Figure 16] 129 antibody sequences for DNA and protein antibodies, including "improved" versions 1-3. [Figure 17] Sequences of 27 antibodies, including DNA and protein antibodies, including the "improved" version 1. [Figure 18]iTrastuzumab (iTv1 and iTv2) exhibit improved functional affinity compared to wild-type trastuzumab (WT) in a ligand density-dependent manner (Biacore T200 analysis, Panel A). Summary of cellular binding of trastuzumab constructs on a range of high (SKBR3, BT474) and low-medium binding cell lines (MDA-MB231 and SKOV3) (Panel B). Significantly improved direct cytotoxicity in MDA-MB231 compared to wild-type trastuzumab (iTv2) (Panel C). Higher PI uptake by BT474 cells (reflecting membrane damage) by iTv1 and iTv2 (highest concentration) compared to wild-type trastuzumab (Panel D). Improved solid-phase Her2 binding by directly labeled iTv2 compared to wild-type trastuzumab (Panel E). Significance compared to the parental construct was estimated from a two-way ANOVA (direct cytotoxicity) with Dunnett's correction for multiple comparisons. [Figure 19] Sequence of the protein antibody trastuzumab antibody, including "improved" versions 1 and 2. [Figure 20] IEDB screening for MHC class II binding epitopes. Top, sequence alignment (ClustalW) of hIgG1 and mIgG3 sequences containing SD 286-306+339-378. Combined subdomains 286-306 and 339-378 are boxed; clusters 1 and 2 identified by IEDB analysis are represented by arrows. Bottom, IEDB analysis table with MHCII binding epitopes, DR alleles, and scores in the middle column. The right hand column lists residue changes that restore immunogenicity (mIgG3->hIgG1 underlined). DI, deimmunized construct. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0118] In describing embodiments of the present invention, the terminology is not intended to be limited to the specific terms selected hereby, but rather it is to be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents that operate in a similar manner to accomplish a similar purpose.

[0119] The term "immunoglobulin" or Ig refers to a class of structurally related glycoproteins consisting of two pairs of polypeptide chains, one pair of low molecular weight chains called light (L) chains and one pair of heavy (H) chains, all four potentially linked together by disulfide bonds. The structure of immunoglobulins is well characterized. See, for example, Fundamental Immunology Ch. 7 (Paul, W., ed., 2 nd ed. Raven Press, NY (1989).

[0120] method Materials, cells, and antibodies All cancer cell lines: COLO205, HCT15 (C170, C170HM2), AGS, COLO201, ST16, MCF7, OVCAR3, H322, OVCA4, LoVo, MKN45, 791T, BT474, MDA-MB231, SKBR3, SKOV3, and 791T, as well as the mouse melanoma NS0 cell line, were purchased from ATCC (Virginia, USA). All cell lines were validated using short tandem repeat profiling. Human serum albumin (HSA)-APD-sialyl-Lewis a and HSA-APD-Lewis a was from IsoSepAB (Sweden). Erb2-His was supplied by Abcam and Stratech. Cell lines were maintained in RPMI1640 medium (Sigma) or DMEM high glucose containing 10% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine (2 mM), and buffered sodium bicarbonate. Parental murine FG88 and FG129 mAbs were generated as previously described (Chua et al. 2015).

[0121] Cloning of modified mAb constructs To generate chimeric IgG1 variants of the mAbs produced by our hybridomas (FG88.2 and FG129), the heavy and light chain variable regions encoding each mAb were introduced into the pDCOrig vector using the restriction enzymes BamHI / BsiWI (light chain position) or HindIII / AfeI (heavy chain position) (Metheringham et al. 2009). Synthetic heavy chain constant regions, including complete mIgG3 constant regions and interchanged mIgG3-IgG1 domains and single residue changes, were designed and ordered from Eurofins MWG (Ebersberg, Germany). Typically, this includes a 1054 bp cassette, spanning from the AfeI restriction site at the JH / CH junction to the 3' end of the XbaI site to the CH stop codon. The synthetic genes were supplied in proprietary Eurofins vectors. After maxiprep (plasmid maxi kit, Qiagen), 15 μg of plasmid DNA was digested with AfeI and XbaI (both NEB) and the insert was gel purified (QIAquick gel extraction kit, Qiagen). The insert was introduced by ligation (T4 DNA ligase, NEB, as recommended by the manufacturer) into the AfeI / XbaI digested vector pOrigHiB (Metheringham et al. 2009). After sequence verification and maxiprep, 15 μg of plasmid DNA was digested with AfeI and AvrII (both NEB) and the insert was gel purified. The insert was then introduced by ligation into the AfeI / AvrII digested vector pDCOrig.

[0122] HEK293 transfection and mAb purification mAb constructs were obtained by transient transfection of Expi293F™ cells using the ExpiFectamine™ 293 Transfection kit (Gibco, LifeTechnologies). Briefly, a suspension of HEK293 cells (100 ml, 2×106 mAbs were transfected with 100 μg of DNA (100 μg / ml) and conditioned medium was harvested 7 days after transfection. Conditioned transfection supernatants were filtered through a 0.22 μm bottle-top filter (Merck Millipore) and sodium azide was added to a final concentration of 0.2 (w / v)%. Antibodies were purified on a Protein G column (HiTrap ProteinG HP, GE Healthcare) using an AKTA FPLC (GE Healthcare). After washing the column with PBS / Tris buffer (PBS containing 50 mM Tris / HCl, pH 7.0), antibodies were eluted with a rapid (2 ml) gradient to 100 mM glycine, pH 12 (supplemented with 0.05 (v / v)% Tween 20) and 2 ml fractions were collected. Fractions containing mAb were pooled, neutralized (using 1 M HCl) and the concentration was determined. All transiently expressed mAb constructs were then analyzed for cell binding in comparison to the parental mAb using flow cytometry as a readout for correct folding of the mAb constructs (data not shown).

[0123] Indirect immunofluorescence and flow cytometry Cancer cells (1×10 5 ) were incubated with primary mAb (33.3 nmol / L or titrated) for 1 h at 4°C, followed by incubation with anti-mouse / anti-human FITC-labeled secondary antibodies for 1 h at 4°C and fixed with 0.4% formaldehyde as previously described (Chua et al. 2015). Stained samples were analyzed on a MACSQuant 10 flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo v10.

[0124] Determination of functional affinity Lewis a - or Sialyl-Lewis aThe kinetic parameters of binding of 88 and 129 mAbs to -APD-HSA were determined by surface plasmon resonance (SPR, Biacore 3000, GE Healthcare). Increasing concentrations of mAbs (0.3 nmol / L to 200 nmol / L) were injected through a CM5 chip and the data were fitted to a heterogeneous ligand binding model using BIAevaluation 4.1. The chip contained four cells, two of which were coated with HSA (in-line reference cells) and the remaining two were coated with low (30-80 response units (RU)) and high (360-390 RU) amounts of each glycan-APD-HSA.

[0125] The kinetic parameters of binding of trastuzumab antibody versus trastuzumab engineered antibody variants to their ligand, HER2, were determined by SPR (Biacore T200, Cytiva (formerly GE Healthcare)). Increasing concentrations of antibody (90.0 nM to 0.37 nM) were injected through a CM5 chip coated with anti-His antibody and captured His-tagged HER2.

[0126] In vitro cytotoxicity The direct cytotoxic effect of the mAbs was analyzed by PI uptake and proliferation inhibition. 4 ) were incubated with mAbs for 2 h at 37°C, followed by addition of 1 μg PI for 30 min. Cells were resuspended in PBS and run on a Beckman Coulter FC-500 or MACSQuant 10 flow cytometer and analyzed with WinMDI 2.9 or FlowJo v10 software, respectively.

[0127] Growth inhibition by the constructs was assessed by using the water-soluble tetrazolium salt WST-8 (CCK8 kit, Sigma-Aldrich) to measure the activity of cellular hydrogenase, which is directly proportional to the number of viable cells. Briefly, after plating cancer cells (1000-2000 cells / 90 μl / well) overnight, constructs were added at different concentrations in a final volume of 10 μl / well and plates were incubated for 72-96 h at 37 °C (5% CO2). WST-8 reagent (10 μl / well) was then added and after an additional 3 h incubation, plates were read at 450 nm (Tecan Infinite F50) and the percentage of inhibition was calculated. EC 50 Values ​​were determined using nonlinear regression (curve fitting) with GraphPad Prism v 8.0 (GraphPad Inc, La Jolla, Calif.).

[0128] Scanning electron microscope HCT-15 or COLO205 cells (1 × 10 5 ) were grown on sterile cover chips for 24 h before addition of mAb (0.2 μmol / L) for 18 h at 37°C. Controls included medium alone and 0.5 (v / v)% hydrogen peroxide (HO) (Sigma). Cells were washed with pre-warmed 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 (SDB) and fixed with 12.5 (v / v)% glutaraldehyde for 24 h. Fixed cells were washed twice with SDB and further post-fixed with 1 (v / v)% osmium tetroxide (pH 7.4) for 45 min. After a final wash with HO, cells were dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol and subjected to critical point drying followed by sputtering with gold and SEM analysis (JSM-840 SEM, JEOL).

[0129] In vivo models The study was conducted by CrownBio UK under a UK Home Office Licence in accordance with NCRI, LASA and FELAS guidelines. Subcutaneous tumours of the COLO 205 human colorectal adenocarcinoma model were grown in age-matched female BALB / c nude mice (Charles River, UK) at 5 × 10 6 Tumors were established by injecting 0.1 ml of serum-free RPMI:Matrigel (1:1) containing viable cells into the left flank of each mouse. On day 6 of the study, mice (n=10) were cultured at 100x the mean tumor volume (approximately 103 mm 3 ±13mm 3 Mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups based on the number of mice treated with mAb (0.1 mg) or vehicle (PBS, 100 μl) administered intravenously (iv) every other week for up to week 5. Body weight and tumor volume were assessed three times weekly, and tumor volume reduction was statistically analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni's post-hoc test (interaction coefficients; GraphPad Prism v 7.4 (GraphPad Inc, La Jolla, CA)).

[0130] Working Example The invention will now be further described with reference to the following examples and the accompanying drawings.

[0131] Example 1.m88G3 exhibits potent glycan binding and direct cytotoxicity in the absence of complement and immune effector cells, both of which are reduced after chimerization to 88IgG1. Previously, it has been shown that hybridoma-produced mIgG3 mAb FG88.2 exerts direct cytotoxic effects on high-binding cancer cell lines such as COLO205 and HCT15 in the absence of complement or effector cells (Chua et al. 2015). This direct cytotoxicity included mAb-induced cell aggregation, growth inhibition, and irregular pore formation via an oncolytic mechanism. We then engineered a chimeric HEK293-expressed IgG1 mAb, 88IgG1, for clinical implementation. 88IgG1 maintained comparable HCT15 and COLO205 cancer cell binding levels compared to hybridoma-produced FG88.2 and HEK293-expressed 88mIgG3 (Figure 1A). The latter mAb was engineered to eliminate expression system-related effects such as differential Fc glycosylation by using mouse hybridomas versus HEK293 cells. Surprisingly, 88IgG1 exhibited significantly lower direct cytotoxicity in COLO205 and HCT15 compared to 88mIgG3 through two functional assays of PI uptake and growth inhibition (Figure 1B-D). 88mIgG3 also showed a modest reduction in direct cytotoxicity compared to hybridoma-produced FG88.2, suggesting that differential glycosylation of the Fc region in the two expression contexts (mouse hybridoma vs. HEK293 cells) may contribute to this effect. This suggests that direct cell killing was associated with dynamic binding of the different isotypes. As a result, the dynamic binding of our isotype-switched mAbs was analyzed using SPR in Lewis and a FG88.2 exhibits rapid apparent on-rates (k on about 10 4 1 / smol / L) and very slow off-rate (k off about 10 -6 1 / s) with strong Lewis a IgG3 produced by HEK293 exhibited faster apparent on-rate (kon Approximately x 10 5 1 / smol / L) and somewhat faster off-rate (k off about 10 -4 1 / s), which may explain its slightly lower cytotoxicity compared to FG88.2. In comparison, 88IgG1 exhibits a rapid apparent on-rate (k on about 10 5 1 / smol / L) but in contrast to the mIgG3 isotype, has a much faster dissociation phase (apparent k off about 10 -2 1 / smol / L), which may be the basis for their reduced cytotoxic activity after cancer cell binding. The mAb binding behavior in the low-density flow cell was 10 -8 Equilibrium dissociation constant (K d ) were nearly equivalent among the three mAbs.

[0132] Example 2. Domain analysis of the mIgG3 constant region suggests a major contribution by the mIgG3 CH3 domain and a minor contribution by CH2. In summary, the results show that the high Lewis a This suggested that the functional affinity of -APD-HSA exhibited by FG88 and 88mIgG3 was mainly driven by their slow dissociation, likely resulting from intermolecular cooperativity of this isotype, contributing to their direct cytotoxic effect on high-binding cancer cell lines. Thus, we set out to engineer a mAb that targets IgG1 cancer glycans with direct cytotoxic activity through the transfer of selected mIgG3 constant region residues to 88IgG1. Initially, the contributing regions of mIgG3 were identified through the generation of hybrid 88IgG1 constructs containing mIgG3 CH1, CH2, or CH3 domains. Preliminary analysis demonstrated that the IgG3-APD-HSA functional affinity of -APD-HSA is .... m IgG3 CH 1 This revealed that the contribution of mIgG3 CH1 to the direct cytotoxicity of 88mIgG3 was negligible, since introduction of mIgG3 CH1 (1m1) into 88IgG1 did not result in a significant increase in cytotoxicity (Figures 2A and 2B). IgG1 CH 1 88mIgG 3 Introduction of the mIgG3 CH2 and CH3 domains into 88IgG1 (3h1) similarly did not result in a significant reduction in killing activity (Figures 2A and 2B). Next, in a gain-of-function approach, the mIgG3 CH2 and CH3 domains were separately introduced into 88IgG1. 3 88IgG1(1m3) containing IgG1 exhibited significantly increased PI uptake in HCT15 and significantly increased inhibition of growth of COLO205 cells compared to 88IgG1 (Figures 2C and D). 2 Introducing CH2 or CH3 domains of IgG1 into 88mIgG3 resulted in a non-significant increase in killing activity across both assays (Fig. 2C and D). As confirmation of the contribution made by both domains, the reverse strategy was followed, whereby the loss of cytotoxic activity was assessed by introduction of either the CH2 or CH3 domains of IgG1 into 88mIgG3. This scenario was IgG1 CH 3 Contains 88mG 3 (3h3) resulted in a significant decrease in cytotoxicity, supporting previous gain-of-function results. Importantly, this strategy also identified a minor contribution by the mouse CH2, as 88mIgG3 (3h2) containing a human CH2 exhibited a significant decrease in cytotoxic activity (Figure 2C and D). Next, the dynamic binding behavior of the hybrid constructs was analyzed. Hybrid construct 1m3 displayed a modest but significant functional affinity increase (K d ), whereas 3h3 containing the human CH3 exhibited a significant decrease in functional affinity (K dIgG1, 3h3 and 3h2 exhibited significantly higher off-rates compared to 88mIgG3 (Fig. 2F). Mouse CH2 in construct 1m2 did not result in an increase in functional affinity or a decrease in off-rates, underpinning the non-significant cytotoxicity of this construct compared to 88IgG1 (Fig. 2C and D). Taken together, the results indicate that mouse CH3 has a more prominent contribution to cytotoxicity and dynamic binding, whereas the contribution by mouse CH2 is smaller and observed only in the context of loss of function.

[0133] Example 3. Discontinuous sequences within the CH2-CH3 region of aa286-397 are important for increased killing activity and functional affinity. Because the cytotoxic effect provided by mouse CH3 was not complete, to further narrow down other contributing residues, we designed a hybrid 88mAb construct (in which the CH2 and CH3 domains were further subdivided into two subdomains (SD) with a junction region containing an overlap of 10 residues: CH2: SD232-294 and SD286-345 and CH3: SD339-397 and SD390-447). In COLO205, both SD339-397 and SD286-345 resulted in similar significant increases in cytotoxicity, which were most evident at low concentrations, whereas SD232-294 and SD390-447 alone or in combination (not shown) were not critical for cytotoxicity (Figures 3A and C). However, in HCT15, significant contributions from residues in SD339-397 were greater than those from SD286-345 (Figure 3B and D), suggesting that subtle differences in glycoantigen density and composition may modulate mAb binding and subsequent cytotoxic activity. Specifically, 88IgG1 with combined mIgG3 SD286-345 and SD339-397 (SD286-397) virtually restored all of the cytotoxicity of 88mIgG3 across both assays in both cell lines (Figure 3A-D), eliminating the need to add additional subdomains. Analysis of the functional affinity of the subdomain constructs compared to 88IgG1 revealed a marked improvement in functional affinity with SD286-397, and SD339-397, both of which were consistent with that of 88mIgG3, with a more modest improvement with SD286-345 (Figure 3E). The improvement in functional affinity was due to the apparent off-rates (~10 for SD286-397 and SD339-397) -6 1 / s), where the off-speed of the SD286-345 is a more modest improvement (about 10 -3 1 / s) (Figure 3F). These results lend further weight to the cytotoxicity findings and suggest that engineering mAbs with reduced target off-rates would aid in direct cytotoxicity.

[0134] Although SD339-397, which has 27 mIgG3 residues, reproduced up to 90% of the desirable properties of 88mIgG3, especially slow dissociation and high cytotoxicity, it exhibited significantly lower CDC activity compared to 88IgG1 (Figure 3G), necessitating the use of SD286-397 for further development. In contrast, the ADCC activity of SD339-397 was not reduced compared to 88IgG1 (Figure 3H). SD286-397 fully reproduced the cytotoxicity of 88mIgG3, which further contained 41 mIgG3 residues. As a result, further subdivisions of SD286-345 and SD339-397 were analyzed for cytotoxic activity and functional affinity. This analysis highlighted two regions in SD339-397 and SD286-345, respectively, that contributed to direct cytotoxicity. First, SD339-378, which contains 20 mIgG3-specific residues after introduction of 88IgG1, resulted in a significant return of cytotoxicity to within about 80-90% of the cytotoxicity of mIgG3 across both analyses (Figures 4A and B). This region also resulted in a significant increase in functional affinity compared to 88IgG1, although this improvement was not as clear as with SD339-397 (Figure 4G). Within the same set of constructs, we identified another region to target via a loss-of-function approach. The significant reduction in cytotoxicity by SD307-345 compared to SD286-345 implied an additional contribution by residues 286-306 (Figure 4C). Taken together, the results suggested that a construct containing a combination of residues 286-306 and 339-378, totaling 26 mIgG3-specific residues, could recapitulate, perhaps entirely, the direct cytotoxicity and functional affinity of 88mIgG3. To test this hypothesis, the cytotoxic activity and functional affinity of SD286-306+339-378 were evaluated. SD286-306+339-378 exhibited significantly improved direct cytotoxicity compared to 88IgG1 in both cell lines, consistent with the cytotoxicity of 88mIgG3 (Figure 4D-F). SPR analysis of SD286-306+339-378 revealed a K d (0.3×10 -9The SD286-306+339-378 hybrid IgG1 revealed significantly improved functional affinity compared to 88IgG1 at 100 nmol / L (Figure 4G). Importantly, neither the CDC nor ADCC activity of the SD286-306+339-378 construct was significantly different from that of 88IgG1 (Figures 4H and I). The combination of improved functional affinity with direct cytotoxicity and maintained immune effector function indicates that our SD286-306+339-378 hybrid IgG1 mimics the desirable properties of 88mIgG3.

[0135] Example 4. Reversal of one in silico identified immunogenic cluster leads to an improved lead candidate "i"88G1 with potent cell killing, pore-forming ability, and robust immune effector functions. To evaluate the potential immunogenicity of our hybrid SD286-306+339-378 construct, generated by the presence of 26 mIgG3 residues, we performed an in silico screening of the SD286-306+339-378 sequence for MHCII binding epitopes (Immune Epitope Database, IEDB). Class II restricted T helper cells are more associated with humoral immune responses, and predicted binding clusters have been shown to be strong indicators of T cell responses (Jawa et al. 2013). Two MHCII binding clusters containing several high scoring binding epitopes were identified: cluster 1 (residues 294-315) and cluster 2 (residues 365-393) (Figure 5 / Figure 20). Reversion of three mouse residues, 294 (A to E), 300 (F to Y) and 305 (A to V) to human residues in cluster 1 resulted in a human sequence section in which individuals were tolerated. Similarly, inversion of two residues, 351 (I to L) and 371 (N to G) in the 339-378 region, removed two MHCII-binding cores. Therefore, based on the above in silico screening, we generated two additional SD286-306+339-378-based constructs: cluster 1 (DI1) and 2 (DI2), containing three and two reverted human residues, respectively, and assayed their cytotoxicity. DI1 and DI2 maintained a significant improvement in cytotoxicity compared to 88IgG1, whereas DI2 showed a small but consistent decrease in activity compared to 88mIgG3 (Figures 6A and B). Furthermore, for 88DI1, direct cytotoxicity was not significantly different from that of 88mIgG3, with an apparent off-rate (approximately 10 -4 1 / s) and 0.5×10 -9 K in nmol / L dThis was consistent with a useful functional affinity profile with a 100% affinity to 88mIgG3 (Figure 6C, Table 2). In contrast, DI2 exhibited significantly reduced functional affinity compared to 88mIgG3 (Figure 6C). Based on these findings, we focused on 88DI1, which contains 23 mIgG3 residues, and renamed it improved "i" (improved)88G1, for further analysis of its immune effector functions. 88IgG1 exhibited a subnanomolar EC 50 i88G1 showed potent ADCC activity on COLO205 with IgG1 (Figure 6D), consistent with the potent immune effector function of FG88 (Chua et al. 2015). Similarly, i88G1 showed potent ADCC activity on COLO205 with IgG1 (EC 50 Somewhat reduced but potent subnanomolar EC 50 The CDC activity of i88G1 was modestly improved compared to 88IgG1 (Figure 6E, Table 2).

[0136] Early action of the parent hybridoma-produced FG88 mAb indicated its pore-forming ability, which is speculated to underlie its cytotoxicity (Chua et al. 2015). Thus, we set out to analyze the pore-forming ability of i88G1 in HCT15 using SEM. Incubation of HCT15 with i88G1 or 88mIgG3 resulted in monolayer disruption, cell rounding and clustering, whereas incubation with 88IgG1 did not. At higher magnification, irregular pore formation was evident (Figure 6F), mirroring the original data observed with the hybridoma-produced FG88 mAb (Chua et al. 2015).

[0137] Taken together, the results demonstrate that transferring selected regions from the mIgG3 constant region into the 88IgG1 backbone resulted in hybrid mAbs with direct cell killing capacity, increased functional affinity, and potent immune effector functions.

[0138] Example 5. Transfer of the "iG1" sequence to another non-killing glycan-binding mAb (129 IgG1) results in a cancer-targeting mAb with improved anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo. Recently, the present inventors have developed sialyl-di-Lewis peptides for potential development into cancer immunotherapy. a We have described the generation of a mAb (129mAb) that recognizes IgG1. 129mAb has a more useful tumor vs. normal human tissue distribution compared to the above-mentioned 88mAb, which is mainly due to its very restricted normal tissue reactivity. Hybridoma-produced FG129, murine IgG1mAb, and chimeric 129IgG1 all do not exhibit direct cytotoxicity. This led us to test the hypothesis that the introduction of 23 of the above-selected mIgG3 constant region residues into the Fc region of CH129 would result in "i" 129G1 with direct cytotoxicity and improved functional affinity, and thus superior clinical utility.

[0139] We evaluated the direct cytotoxicity of i129G1 in COLO205, a cancer cell line previously shown to be highly binding to 129 mAb. i129G1 showed an EC 50 IgG1 (Fig. 7A) and significantly improved, but more modest, PI uptake (Fig. 7B). a The functional affinity of i129G1 was analyzed using -APD-HSA coated chips and SPR. The i129G1 mAb exhibited significantly improved functional affinity compared to 129IgG1 (Figure 7C, Table 2), which was approximately 2 log (2.6 × 10 for 129IgG1 and i129G1, respectively). -4 s -1 and 5.5 × 10 -6 s -1) improves the off-rate of i129G1. 129IgG1 previously exerted potent ADCC effector function in COLO205, and we consequently assessed the ADCC and CDC activities of i129G1 in COLO205. Although the ADCC activity of i129G1 was significantly reduced compared to that of 129IgG1, cell lysis was maintained in the nanomolar range (EC of 2.4 × nmol / L and 1.7 × nmol / L for i129G1 and 129IgG1, respectively). 50 ) (Figure 7D, Table 2). However, the CDC activity of i129G1 was significantly increased compared to the parental 129IgG1, where the EC 50 were 8.2×nmol / L and 75×nmol / L, respectively (Fig. 7E, Table 2). Given that i129G1 exhibited direct cytotoxicity and improved functional affinity, we decided to analyze its pore-forming ability in COLO205. Incubation of COLO205 with i129G1 led to the formation of large cell aggregates with an uneven surface and the appearance of irregular pore-like structures (Fig. 7F). Incubation with 129IgG1 at the same concentration also led to some degree of cell aggregation, but fewer and smaller aggregates were observed and there was no evidence of pore-forming ability.

[0140] Due to the direct cytotoxicity and improved functional affinity of i129G1, we turned to analyze the in vivo antitumor activity of i129G1 compared to parental 129IgG1 in the COLO205 xenograft model. i129G1 mAb caused a significant reduction in tumor volume compared to vehicle control that remained significant when compared to 129IgG1 (2-way ANOVA, p<0.0001), confirming the in vitro results (Figure 7G). No effect on mean body weight was observed (Figure 7H).

[0141] The generation of mAbs through the introduction of a selected number of mIgG3 constant region residues with direct cytotoxicity, improved functional affinity, and superior in vivo antitumor activity paves the way for applying our strategy to other cancer-targeting mAbs with clinical utility.

[0142] Example 6. Alternative Lewis sequences of "iG1" Y The shift to a glycan-binding mAb (27IgG1) results in a cancer-targeting mAb with improved direct cell killing capacity in vitro. The present inventors have also demonstrated that monospecific Lewis y The mIgG3 mAb was synthesized using the Lewis y 27mG3 mAb exhibited direct cell killing in AGS and MCF7 cell lines expressing mG3, whereas chimeric 27IgG1 did not (Figure 8A and B). We generated i27G1 by introducing our selected 23 mG3 residues into 27IgG1 and analyzed its direct cell killing ability. In both MCF7 and AGS, i27G1 exhibited significantly improved direct cell killing compared to 27IgG1, which was comparable to 27mG3 mAb (Figure 8A and B). Furthermore, i27G1 exhibited significantly improved functional Lewis y (Figure 8C). Importantly, the effector function, ADCC, and CDC of i27G1 were all comparable to 27IgG1 in MCF7 (Figures 8D and 8E).

[0143] Taken together, the results indicate that transferring selected regions from the mIgG3 constant region into a 27IgG1 backbone resulted in hybrid mAbs with direct cell killing capacity, increased functional affinity, and potent immune effector functions.

[0144] Further refinement of the "iG1" sequence in Example 7.23 suggests that 15 or 7 residues are important for maintaining direct cell killing in a cell type-dependent manner. To evaluate the individual contribution of each of the 23 selected mG3 residues, a single revertant strategy based on i88G1 (Example 4) was performed. Each of the 23 mG3 residues in i88G1 was reverted to the hG1 residue alone, and the resulting constructs were analyzed in COLO205 and HCT15 for direct cell killing compared to parental i88G1 using a cell proliferation assay (CCK-8, Sigma 96992). The percentage killing at a given concentration was normalized to the corresponding percentage killing by i88G1 at the same concentration in the same experiment to correlate cell killing across multiple experiments. Most i88G1 revertant constructs retained good direct cell killing against COLO205 cells (Figure 9A). Residues 342, 343, 345, 361, 362, 374, and 376 (7 in total) had a normalized killing average of less than 1 and were deemed important for direct cell killing in the high binding COLO205 cell line. In contrast, this minimal construct did not express / fold when these seven residues were reverted alone, and therefore this construct was not pursued. Direct cell killing of moderately bound HCT15 proved to be more sensitive to reversion to hG1 residues, where only eight reverted residues (339, 344, 354, 356, 357, 358, 370, 373) maintained i88G1 cell killing to within one standard deviation, thus requiring retention of 15 mG3 residues: N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S (Figure 9B). The latter constructs were generated with both 88 and 129 mAbs, i88G1v2 and i129G1v2, respectively, and their cell killing was analyzed in COLO205 and HCT15. Direct cell killing of COLO205 by i88G1v2 and i129G1v2 was comparable to that observed by i88G1 and i129G1, respectively (Figures 9C and 9D). Direct cell killing of HCT15 by i88G1v2 was also consistent with that observed by i88G1 (Figure 9E).

[0145] Collectively, these results suggest that 15 mG3 residues: N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, and A378S, are sufficient to induce direct cell killing in high- and moderate-binding cancer cell lines.

[0146] [Table 2]

[0147] [Table 3]

[0148] Example 8. Generation and initial characterization of FG27 mAb: FG27 was produced by immunization of gastric tumor cells with glycolipids. Analysis of antibody responses to immunization: Antibody titers were initially monitored by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), followed by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analysis using ST16 total and cell membrane lipid extracts, flow cytometry analysis (FACS) using ST16 tumor cells, and Western blot using ST16 total cell, total and cell membrane lipid extracts. Mice deemed to have the best response compared to prebleed serum controls were boosted intravenously (iv) with prefusion ST16 cell membrane lipid extracts.

[0149] Binding of FG27 hybridoma supernatants to a panel of tumor cell lines was analyzed by direct immunofluorescence and FACS analysis. Both FG27.10 and FG27.18 bound to ST16, but not to human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), compared to a positive control anti-HLA mAb, W6 / 32 (eBioscience, CA, USA) and a negative control (Figure 10). Both FG27.10 and FG27.18 were cloned. FG27.10 was subclass IgG3κ and FG27.18 was subclass IgG1κ. To confirm the binding of both mAbs to glycolipids, glycolipids were extracted from a range of cell lines, dried onto ELISA plates, and then incubated with FG27.10 and FG27.18. Binding was seen with both mAbs to glycolipids derived from C170, ST16, and AGS, but not to cell lines that showed no binding to whole cells (MKN-45, OAW28, OVCAR-3, OVCAR-4, and OAW42; Figure 11).

[0150] Example 9. Direct cell killing of parental FG27 mAb Many anti-glycan mAbs have been shown to induce direct cell death in antigen-positive cell lines without the need for effector cells or complement. This could potentially enhance their efficacy in vivo, as tumors may develop mechanisms to evade immune-mediated cell death. This property is primarily associated with glycan-binding mAbs of the mIgG3 isotype, and is therefore lost upon chimerization or humanization.

[0151] To determine whether FG27.10 and FG27.18 have direct cell death-inducing properties, ST16 cells were incubated with FG27.10, FG27.18, and anti-sialyl Lewis aAfter incubation with mAb SC104 for 2 hours at room temperature, cell death was measured by uptake of PI, a DNA intercalating agent that is only taken up by dead cells (Figure 12A). Interestingly, despite having the same variable region, only FG27.10 was able to induce direct cell death, and no PI uptake was observed with FG27.18. Figure 12B shows direct cell killing of a range of antigen-positive (AGS, Colo201, C170, C170HM, MCF-7, OVCAR4) cell lines with the two mAbs showing various amounts of killing. Neither mAb showed killing of antigen-negative cell lines (LoVo, MKN45, 791T, SKOV3).

[0152] Figure 12C shows PI uptake of the colorectal cell line C170 by a range of mAbs. FG27.10 and the positive control antibody SC101 showed strong, titratable killing. FG27.18 showed weak, non-titratable killing. The modified chimeric IgG1, but not the IgG2 variant, showed modest, titratable killing.

[0153] Example 10. Binding test of FG27 The humanized mAb (humanized 27) and the chimeric mAb (CH27) showed similar cell binding patterns upon titration on cancer cell lines (Figure 13A-E). The equilibrium affinity constants were of the same order of magnitude overall, but slightly higher compared to the parental murine antibody (Figure 13F-G), and the maximum binding capacities of humanized 27 and CH27 were greater compared to the values ​​for the murine mAb. This result suggests a successful outcome of the humanization process.

[0154] Example 11. Direct cell killing of humanized FG27 mAb To enhance the direct cell killing of the human IgG1 27 chimera (27IgG1), we transferred selected mIgG3 constant region residues into the IgG1 Fc domain, thereby generating an improved "i27G1" LewisY glycan-binding mAb with improved direct cell killing capacity in vitro.

[0155] FIG. 14 shows the improved direct cell killing, functional affinity, and effector function of i27G1. The mIgG3 27 antibody was synthesized by Lewis y IgG3 expressing MCF7 (Figure 14i) and AGS cell lines (Figure 14ii), whereas chimeric 27IgG1 does not. Our i27G1, which contains selected mIgG3 constant region residues, exhibits similar direct cell killing as 27mG3 mAb and significantly improved direct cell killing compared to 27IgG1 in both MCF7 (Figure 14i) and AGS (Figure 14ii). Furthermore, i27G1 exhibits significantly improved functional Lewis y The i27G1 exhibits similar affinity (Figure 14iii). Importantly, the effector function, ADCC, and CDC of i27G1 were all comparable to 27IgG1 on MCF7 (Figures 14iv and 14v). Collectively, the results demonstrate that transferring selected regions from the mIgG3 constant region onto the 27IgG1 backbone resulted in a hybrid mAb with direct cell killing capacity, increased functional affinity, and potent immune effector function.

[0156] Example 12. Transfer of the "iG1" sequence into a protein-binding mAb (trastuzumab) results in a cancer-targeting mAb with improved functional affinity. To assess whether altering amino acid residues in an antibody targeting a cancer-associated protein resulted in increased functional affinity, the "iG1" residues (23, "v1" and 15, "v2") were altered and the affinity of the resulting "improved" antibody variants determined via SPR analysis. To determine functional affinity, the three trastuzumab antibody constructs were titrated through a HER2-coated chip at three different ligand densities. Multiple kinetic analyses (concentration range 90 nM to 0.37 M) were performed, which showed higher functional affinity by iTv1 and iTv2 compared to WT on both low (20 RU) and high density (200 RU) surfaces (Figure 18A). This improvement was more pronounced on the high density surface, mainly due to a slower off-rate (6.0 × 10 of WT). -7 8.5×10 for iTV1 at 1 / s-8 7.4×10 at 1 / s and iTv2 -8 1 / s). Wild-type trastuzumab (WT) and the "improved" variants (iTv1 and iTv2) expressed in HEK293 showed high binding to the HER2-expressing cell lines SKBR3 and BT474, and low to moderate binding to MDA-MB231 and SKOV3 (Figure 18B). To assess whether the stronger binding by iTv1 and iTv2 results in differential cytotoxicity, growth inhibition in MDA-MB231 and PI uptake in BT474 were explored. iTv2 exhibited significantly improved growth inhibition compared to WT in MDA-MB231 (Figure 18C), where iTv1 and iTv2 showed improved PI uptake in BT474 cells compared to WT, which was most pronounced at the highest concentration tested (Figure 18D). Titration of HRPO-labeled mAbs directly on HER2-coated ELISA plates revealed improved binding by iTv2 compared to WT. Collectively, these results represent improved functional affinity by "iG1" engineered trastuzumab constructs and suggest that our approach may be useful for mAbs targeting proteins in addition to glycan targets. However, the ultimate outcome of our engineering approach depends on the relationship between the complex avidity of the mAbs in combination with the target density.

[0157] Embodiment Specific embodiments of the invention are described below. Various features of the following embodiments may be combined with features of other embodiments, for example structural features such as sequence motifs may be combined with functional features of the claimed antibodies or antigen-binding fragments thereof.

[0158] 1. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residues of an immunoglobulin Fc region and a binding region, wherein one or more residues of the Fc region have been modified to the corresponding residue from a murine IgG3 antibody, and wherein the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof has increased functional affinity compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0159] 2. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 1, wherein the functional affinity of said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 10% higher compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0160] 3. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the functional affinity of said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or at least about 100% higher compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0161] 4. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1-3, wherein said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof has increased direct cell killing compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0162] 5. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of embodiment 4, wherein the direct cell killing of said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 10% higher compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0163] 6. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 1 or 2, wherein the direct cell killing of said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or at least about 100% greater compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

[0164] 7. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more residues in the Fc region are selected from Q342, P343, E345, N361, Q362, P374, D376.

[0165] 8. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more modified residues in the Fc region are selected from Q342R, P343A, E345T, N361K, Q362K, P374S, D376A.

[0166] 9. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more residues in the Fc region are selected from N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0167] 10. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more modified residues in the Fc region are selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0168] 11. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more residues in the Fc region are selected from N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0169] 12. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more modified residues in the Fc region are selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0170] 13. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more residues in the Fc region are selected from N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0171] 14. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein one or more modified residues in the Fc region are selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0172] 15. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein said antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is a human antibody, a humanized antibody, or a chimeric antibody.

[0173] 16. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of the preceding embodiments, wherein the IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is a monospecific antibody, a bispecific antibody, or a multispecific antibody.

[0174] 17. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 16, wherein the IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is a bispecific antibody comprising a first heavy chain and a first antigen-binding region, a second heavy chain and an Fc region with a second antigen-binding region.

[0175] 18. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 16 or 17, wherein the IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is a bispecific antibody that binds to the CD3 antigen.

[0176] 19. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the motif RAXTXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKKXXXXXXXXXXXSXA, where X is any amino acid.

[0177] 20. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the motif TXWXQXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXRAXTXXXXIXXXXXXXSXKKXXXXXXXXNXXSEAXS, where X is any amino acid.

[0178] 21. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the motif TXWXQXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPXXRAQTXXXXXIXXPXEQMSXKKXXXXXXXTXXFSEAXS, where X is any amino acid.

[0179] 22. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the motif TXWXQXXXAXXXXXFXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXPXXRAQTXXXXXIXXPXEQMSXKKXXXXXXXTNXFSEAXS, where X is any amino acid.

[0180] 23. The following list: (i)TXWXQ (ii) RAXTXXXXXI (iii)SXKKXXXXXXXXNXXSEAXS (iv)NXXSEAXS where X is any amino acid. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising any one or more motifs selected from the group consisting of:

[0181] 24. A method for increasing the direct cell killing ability of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residues of an Fc region and a binding region of an immunoglobulin, comprising replacing one or more residues of the CH2 domain and / or CH3 domain of said Fc region with one or more corresponding residues from the CH2 domain and / or CH3 domain of mouse IgG3.

[0182] 25. A method of increasing the direct cell killing ability of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 24, wherein said method comprises modifying one or more residues in the Fc region selected from Q342, P343, E345, N361, Q362, P374, D376.

[0183] 26. The method of embodiment 25, wherein the one or more modified residues are selected from Q342R, P343A, E345T, N361K, Q362K, P374S, D376A.

[0184] 27. A method of increasing the direct cell killing ability of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 24, wherein said method comprises modifying one or more residues in the Fc region selected from N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0185] 28. The method of embodiment 27, wherein the one or more modified residues are selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0186] 29. A method of increasing the direct cell killing ability of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 24, wherein said method comprises modifying one or more residues in the Fc region selected from N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0187] 30. The method of embodiment 29, wherein the one or more modified residues are selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0188] 31. A method of increasing the direct cell killing ability of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to embodiment 24, wherein said method comprises modifying one or more residues in the Fc region selected from N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0189] 32. The method of embodiment 31, wherein the one or more modified residues are selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0190] 33. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1 to 23 and a pharma- ceutically acceptable carrier.

[0191] 34. The pharmaceutical composition according to embodiment 33, further comprising at least one other therapeutic agent.

[0192] 35. A pharmaceutical composition according to embodiment 33 or 34, comprising a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1 to 23 and an immunomodulatory agent.

[0193] 36. A modified IgG1 antibody or an antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1 to 23 or a composition according to any one of embodiments 33 to 35 for use as a medicament.

[0194] 37. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1-23 or a composition according to any one of embodiments 33-35 for use in the treatment of cancer, an autoimmune disease, an inflammatory disease, or an infectious disease.

[0195] 38. A method for treating an individual having a disease, comprising administering to said individual a pharma- ceutical effective amount of a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1-23 or a composition according to any one of embodiments 33-35.

[0196] 39. The method of treating an individual according to embodiment 38, wherein the disease is selected from the group of cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases.

[0197] 40. The method of treating an individual according to any one of embodiments 38-39, further comprising administering to said individual a further therapeutic agent.

[0198] 41. The method of treating an individual according to embodiment 40, wherein the additional therapeutic agent is an immunomodulatory agent.

[0199] 42. A kit comprising the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1 to 23 or the composition according to any one of embodiments 33 to 35, wherein said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof or composition is in one or more containers, such as vials.

[0200] 43. The kit according to embodiment 42, wherein said modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof or composition is for simultaneous, separate or sequential use in therapy.

[0201] 44. Use of a modified IgG1 antibody or an antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of embodiments 1 to 23 or a composition according to any one of embodiments 33 to 35 for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of a disease.

[0202] 45. The use according to embodiment 44, wherein the disease is cancer, an autoimmune disease, an inflammatory disease, or an infectious disease.

[0203] 46. ​​A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residue modifications to the Fc region at residue positions selected from Q342, P343, E345, N361, Q362, P374, D376.

[0204] 47. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more modifications to the Fc region selected from Q342R, P343A, E345T, N361K, Q362K, P374S, D376A.

[0205] 48. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residue modifications to the Fc region at residue positions selected from N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0206] 49. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more modifications to the Fc region selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0207] 50. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residue modifications to the Fc region at residue positions selected from N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0208] 51. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more modifications to the Fc region selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0209] 52. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more residue modifications to the Fc region at residue positions selected from N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

[0210] 53. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more modifications to the Fc region selected from N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

[0211] 54. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising one or more sequences disclosed in Figure 19.

[0212] 55. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising the heavy and light chain sequences disclosed in Figure 19.

[0213] References Abdelmoula, M., F. Spertini, T. Shibata, Y. Gyotoku, S. Luzuy, PH Lambert, and S. Izui. 1989. 'IgG3 is the major source of cryoglobulins in mice', J Immunol, 143: 526-32. Ausubel, FM, R. Brent, RE Kingston, DD Moore, JG Seidman, JA Smith, and K. Struhl. 1992. Short protocols in molecular biology : a compendium of methods from Current protocols in molecular biology (Brooklyn, NY : Green Pub. Associates : New York, NY : Wiley). Azinovic, I., GL DeNardo, KR Lamborn, G. Mirick, D. Goldstein, BM Bradt, and SJ DeNardo. 2006. 'Survival benefit associated with human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) in patients with B-cell malignancies', Cancer Immunol Immunother, 55: 1451-8. Burris, H. A., 3rd, L. S. Rosen, C. M. Rocha-Lima, J. Marshall, S. Jones, R. B. Cohen, L. A. Kunkel, D. Loo, J. Baughman, S. J. Stewart, and N. Lewis. 2010. ’Phase 1 experience with an anti-glycotope monoclonal antibody, RAV12, in recurrent adenocarcinoma’, Clin Cancer Res, 16: 1673-81. Carter, P. J. 2006. ’Potent antibody therapeutics by design’, Nat Rev Immunol, 6: 343-57. Chua, J. X., M. Vankemmelbeke, R. S. McIntosh, P. A. Clarke, R. Moss, T. Parsons, I. Spendlove, A. M. Zaitoun, S. Madhusudan, and L. G. Durrant. 2015. ’Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting LecLex-Related Glycans with Potent Antitumor Activity’, Clin Cancer Res, 21: 2963-74. Cooper, L. J., J. C. Schimenti, D. D. Glass, and N. S. Greenspan. 1991. ’H chain C domains influence the strength of binding of IgG for streptococcal group A carbohydrate’, J Immunol, 146: 2659-63. D’Arcy, C. A., and M. Mannik. 2001. ’Serum sickness secondary to treatment with the murine-human chimeric antibody IDEC-C2B8 (rituximab)’, Arthritis Rheum, 44: 1717-8. Dalziel, M., M. Crispin, C. N. Scanlan, N. Zitzmann, and R. A. Dwek. 2014. ’Emerging principles for the therapeutic exploitation of glycosylation’, Science, 343: 1235681. de Jong, R. N., F. J. Beurskens, S. Verploegen, K. Strumane, M. D. van Kampen, M. Voorhorst, W. Horstman, P. J. Engelberts, S. C. Oostindie, G. Wang, A. J. Heck, J. Schuurman, and P. W. Parren. 2016. ’A Novel Platform for the Potentiation of Therapeutic Antibodies Based on Antigen-Dependent Formation of IgG Hexamers at the Cell Surface’, PLoS Biol, 14: e1002344. DeLano, W. L., M. H. Ultsch, A. M. de Vos, and J. A. Wells. 2000. ’Convergent solutions to binding at a protein-protein interface’, Science, 287: 1279-83. Diebolder, C. A., F. J. Beurskens, R. N. de Jong, R. I. Koning, K. Strumane, M. A. Lindorfer, M. Voorhorst, D. Ugurlar, S. Rosati, A. J. Heck, J. G. van de Winkel, I. A. Wilson, A. J. Koster, R. P. Taylor, E. O. Saphire, D. R. Burton, J. Schuurman, P. Gros, and P. W. Parren. 2014. ’Complement is activated by IgG hexamers assembled at the cell surface’, Science, 343: 1260-3. Durrant, L. G., S. J. Harding, N. H. Green, L. D. Buckberry, and T. Parsons. 2006. ’A new anticancer glycolipid monoclonal antibody, SC104, which directly induces tumor cell apoptosis’, Cancer Res, 66: 5901-9. Eppstein, D. A., Y. V. Marsh, M. van der Pas, P. L. Felgner, and A. B. Schreiber. 1985. ’Biological activity of liposome-encapsulated murine interferon gamma is mediated by a cell membrane receptor’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 82: 3688-92. Faraj, S., M. Bahri, S. Fougeray, A. El Roz, J. Fleurence, J. Veziers, M. D. Leclair, E. Thebaud, F. Paris, and S. Birkle. 2017. ’Neuroblastoma chemotherapy can be augmented by immunotargeting O-acetyl-GD2 tumor-associated ganglioside’, Oncoimmunology, 7: e1373232. Galluzzi, L., A. Buque, O. Kepp, L. Zitvogel, and G. Kroemer. 2017. ‘Immunogenic cell death in cancer and infectious disease’, Nat Rev Immunol, 17: 97-111. Greenspan, N. S., and L. J. Cooper. 1992. ‘Intermolecular cooperativity: a clue to why mice have IgG3?’, Immunol Today, 13: 164-8. ---. 1993. ‘Cooperative binding by mouse IgG3 antibodies: implications for functional affinity, effector function, and isotype restriction’, Springer Semin Immunopathol, 15: 275-91. Greenspan, N. S., D. A. Dacek, and L. J. Cooper. 1989. ‘Cooperative binding of two antibodies to independent antigens by an Fc-dependent mechanism’, FASEB J, 3: 2203-7. Greenspan, N. S., W. J. Monafo, and J. M. Davie. 1987. ‘Interaction of IgG3 anti-streptococcal group A carbohydrate (GAC) antibody with streptococcal group A vaccine: enhancing and inhibiting effects of anti-GAC, anti-isotypic, and anti-idiotypic antibodies’, J Immunol, 138: 285-92. Grey, H. M., J. W. Hirst, and M. Cohn. 1971. ‘A new mouse immunoglobulin: IgG3’, J Exp Med, 133: 289-304. Hege, K. M., E. K. Bergsland, G. A. Fisher, J. J. Nemunaitis, R. S. Warren, J. G. McArthur, A. A. Lin, J. Schlom, C. H. June, and S. A. Sherwin. 2017. ‘Safety, tumor trafficking and immunogenicity of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells specific for TAG-72 in colorectal cancer’, J Immunother Cancer, 5: 22. Hernandez, A. M., N. Rodriguez, J. E. Gonzalez, E. Reyes, T. Rondon, T. Grinan, A. Macias, S. Alfonso, A. M. Vazquez, and R. Perez. 2011. ‘Anti-NeuGcGM3 antibodies, actively elicited by idiotypic vaccination in nonsmall cell lung cancer patients, induce tumor cell death by an oncosis-like mechanism’, J Immunol, 186: 3735-44. Hovenden, M., M. A. Hubbard, D. P. Aucoin, P. Thorkildson, D. E. Reed, W. H. Welch, C. R. Lyons, J. A. Lovchik, and T. R. Kozel. 2013. ‘IgG subclass and heavy chain domains contribute to binding and protection by mAbs to the poly gamma-D-glutamic acid capsular antigen of Bacillus anthracis’, PLoS Pathog, 9: e1003306. Hwang, K. J., K. F. Luk, and P. L. Beaumier. 1980. ‘Hepatic uptake and degradation of unilamellar sphingomyelin / cholesterol liposomes: a kinetic study’, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 77: 4030-4. Jawa, V., L. P. Cousens, M. Awwad, E. Wakshull, H. Kropshofer, and A. S. De Groot. 2013. ‘T-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics: Preclinical assessment and mitigation’, Clin Immunol, 149: 534-55. Klaus, T., and J. Bereta. 2018. ‘CH2 Domain of Mouse IgG3 Governs Antibody Oligomerization, Increases Functional Affinity to Multivalent Antigens and Enhances Hemagglutination’, Front Immunol, 9: 1096. Labrada, M., D. Dorvignit, G. Hevia, N. Rodriguez-Zhurbenko, A. M. Hernandez, A. M. Vazquez, and L. E. Fernandez. 2018. ‘GM3(Neu5Gc) ganglioside: an evolution fixed neoantigen for cancer immunotherapy’, Semin Oncol, 45: 41-51. Ladenstein, R., U. Potschger, D. Valteau-Couanet, R. Luksch, V. Castel, I. Yaniv, G. Laureys, P. Brock, J. M. Michon, C. Owens, T. Trahair, G. C. F. Chan, E. Ruud, H. Schroeder, M. Beck Popovic, G. Schreier, H. Loibner, P. Ambros, K. Holmes, M. R. Castellani, M. N. Gaze, A. Garaventa, A. D. J. Pearson, and H. N. Lode. 2018. ‘Interleukin 2 with anti-GD2 antibody ch14.18 / CHO (dinutuximab beta) in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1 / SIOPEN): a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial’, Lancet Oncol, 19: 1617-29. Loo, D., N. Pryer, P. Young, T. Liang, S. Coberly, K. L. King, K. Kang, P. Roberts, M. Tsao, X. Xu, B. Potts, and J. P. Mather. 2007. ‘The glycotope-specific RAV12 monoclonal antibody induces oncosis in vitro and has antitumor activity against gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma tumor xenografts in vivo’, Mol Cancer Ther, 6: 856-65. Metheringham, R. L., V. A. Pudney, B. Gunn, M. Towey, I. Spendlove, and L. G. Durrant. 2009. ‘Antibodies designed as effective cancer vaccines’, MAbs, 1: 71-85. Miotti, S., D. R. Negri, O. Valota, M. Calabrese, R. L. Bolhuis, J. W. Gratama, M. I. Colnaghi, and S. Canevari. 1999. ‘Level of anti-mouse-antibody response induced by bi-specific monoclonal antibody OC / TR in ovarian-carcinoma patients is associated with longer survival’, Int J Cancer, 84: 62-8. Noble, P., I. Spendlove, S. Harding, T. Parsons, and L. G. Durrant. 2013. ‘Therapeutic targeting of Lewis(y) and Lewis(b) with a novel monoclonal antibody 692 / 29’, PLoS One, 8: e54892. Oganesyan, V., M. M. Damschroder, K. E. Cook, Q. Li, C. Gao, H. Wu, and W. F. Dall’Acqua. 2014. ‘Structural insights into neonatal Fc receptor-based recycling mechanisms’, J Biol Chem, 289: 7812-24. Pinho, S. S., and C. A. Reis. 2015. ‘Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications’, Nat Rev Cancer, 15: 540-55. Pluckthun, A. 1991. ‘Antibody engineering: advances from the use of Escherichia coli expression systems’, Biotechnology (N Y), 9: 545-51. Rabu, C., R. McIntosh, Z. Jurasova, and L. Durrant. 2012. ‘Glycans as targets for therapeutic antitumor antibodies’, Future Oncol, 8: 943-60. Reff, M. E. 1993. ‘High-level production of recombinant immunoglobulins in mammalian cells’, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 4: 573-6. RodrIguez, E., S. T. T. Schetters, and Y. van Kooyk. 2018. ‘The tumour glyco-code as a novel immune checkpoint for immunotherapy’, Nat Rev Immunol, 18: 204-11. Roque-Navarro, L., K. Chakrabandhu, J. de Leon, S. Rodriguez, C. Toledo, A. Carr, C. M. de Acosta, A. O. Hueber, and R. Perez. 2008. ‘Anti-ganglioside antibody-induced tumor cell death by loss of membrane integrity’, Mol Cancer Ther, 7: 2033-41. Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular Cloning : a laboratory manual (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989.). Saphire, E. O., P. W. Parren, R. Pantophlet, M. B. Zwick, G. M. Morris, P. M. Rudd, R. A. Dwek, R. L. Stanfield, D. R. Burton, and I. A. Wilson. 2001. ‘Crystal structure of a neutralizing human IGG against HIV-1: a template for vaccine design’, Science, 293: 1155-9. Schroff, R. W., K. A. Foon, S. M. Beatty, R. K. Oldham, and A. C. Morgan, Jr. 1985. ‘Human anti-murine immunoglobulin responses in patients receiving monoclonal antibody therapy’, Cancer Res, 45: 879-85. Trill, J. J., A. R. Shatzman, and S. Ganguly. 1995. ‘Production of monoclonal antibodies in COS and CHO cells’, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 6: 553-60. Ugurlar , D. , SC Howes , BJ de Kreuk , RI Koning , RN de Jong , FJ Beurskens , J Schuurman , AJ Koster , TH Sharp , Pwhi Parren , and P Gros . 2018. 'Structures of C1-IgG1 provide insights into how danger pattern recognition activates complement', Science, 359: 794-97. Vanden Berghe, T., N. Vanlangenakker, E. Parthoens, W. Deckers, M. Devos, N. Festjens, CJ Guerin, UT Brunk, W. Declercq, and P. Vandenabeele. 2010. 'Necroptosis, necrosis and secondary necrosis converge on similar cellular disintegration features', Cell Death Differ, 17:922-30. Wang , X. , M. Mathieu , and R. J. Brezski . 2018. 'IgG Fc engineering to modulate antibody effector functions', Protein Cell, 9:63-73. Welt , S. , Carswell EA , Vogel CW , Oettgen HF , and LJ Old . 1987. 'Immune and nonimmune effector functions of IgG3 mouse monoclonal antibody R24 detecting the disialoganglioside GD3 on the surface of melanoma cells', Clin Immunol Immunopathol, 45:214-29. Yatim, N., S. Cullen, and M. L. Albert. 2017. ‘Dying cells actively regulate adaptive immune responses’, Nat Rev Immunol, 17: 262-75. Zheng, J. Y., H. L. Tan, P. T. Matsudaira, and A. Choo. 2017. ‘Excess reactive oxygen species production mediates monoclonal antibody-induced human embryonic stem cell death via oncosis’, Cell Death Differ, 24: 546-58.

Claims

1. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising residues of an immunoglobulin Fc region and a binding region, wherein residues including N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, and A378 of the Fc region have been modified to the corresponding residues from a murine IgG3 antibody, wherein the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof has a higher functional affinity than a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

2. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of claim 1, wherein the functional affinity of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least 10% higher than that of a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

3. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of claim 1 or 2, wherein the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof has increased direct cell killing compared to a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

4. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of claim 3, wherein the direct cell killing of the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof is at least 10% higher than that of a corresponding IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising wild-type Fc region residues.

5. 5. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the modified residues in the Fc region include N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

6. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein residues in the Fc region including N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378 have been modified to corresponding residues derived from a murine IgG3 antibody.

7. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the modified residues include N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

8. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein residues in the Fc region including N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378 have been modified to the corresponding residues derived from a murine IgG3 antibody.

9. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein the modified residues include N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

10. 1. A method of increasing the direct cell killing ability of an IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof comprising residues of an immunoglobulin Fc region and a binding region, the method comprising replacing residues of the CH2 and / or CH3 domains of the Fc region with corresponding residues from the CH2 and / or CH3 domains of mouse IgG3, the replaced residues including N286, K288, K290, Q342, P343, E345, L351, T359, N361, Q362, G371, P374, S375, D376, A378.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the modified residues include N286T, K288W, K290Q, Q342R, P343A, E345T, L351I, T359S, N361K, Q362K, G371N, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

12. The method of claim 10 or 11, wherein the replaced residues include N286, K288, K290, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the modified residues include N286T, K288W, K290Q, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

14. The method of any one of claims 10 to 13, wherein the replaced residues include N286, K288, K290, E294, Y300, V305, A339, Q342, P343, R344, E345, L351, S354, D356, E357, L358, T359, N361, Q362, K370, G371, Y373, P374, S375, D376, A378.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the modified residues include N286T, K288W, K290Q, E294A, Y300F, V305A, A339P, Q342R, P343A, R344Q, E345T, L351I, S354P, D356E, E357Q, L358M, T359S, N361K, Q362K, K370T, G371N, Y373F, P374S, S375E, D376A, A378S.

16. A pharmaceutical composition comprising the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of any one of claims 1 to 9 and a pharma- ceutically acceptable carrier.

17. 17. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 16, further comprising at least one other therapeutic agent.

18. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 17, wherein the other therapeutic agent is an immunomodulator.

19. A modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of claims 1 to 9 or a composition according to claims 16, 17 or 18 for use as a medicament.

20. 19. The modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of any one of claims 1 to 9 or the composition of claims 16, 17, or 18 for use in the treatment of cancer, an autoimmune disease, an inflammatory disease, or an infectious disease.

21. 20. A pharmaceutical composition according to claim 16, 17 or 18 for use in a method of treating an individual having a disease, said method comprising administering to said individual a pharma- ceutical effective amount of the composition according to claim 16, 17 or 18.

22. 22. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 21, wherein the disease is selected from the group of cancer, autoimmune diseases, inflammatory diseases, and infectious diseases.

23. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 21 or 22, wherein the method further comprises a step of administering a further therapeutic agent to the individual.

24. The pharmaceutical composition of claim 23, wherein the further therapeutic agent is an immunomodulator.

25. 19. A kit comprising the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof of any one of claims 1 to 9 or the composition of claim 16, 17, or 18, wherein the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof or composition is in one or more containers, such as a vial.

26. 26. The kit of claim 25, wherein the modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof or composition is for simultaneous, separate or sequential use in therapy.

27. Use of a modified IgG1 antibody or antigen-binding fragment thereof according to any one of claims 1 to 9 or a composition according to claims 16, 17 or 18 for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of a disease.

28. 28. The use according to claim 27, wherein the disease is cancer, an autoimmune disease, an inflammatory disease, or an infectious disease.

Images