Apparatus, method, and program for supporting requests for review of contract proposals

The method and apparatus use AI models to generate contract summaries and pre-items, addressing discrepancies in contract content understanding between business and legal departments, thereby improving the efficiency and accuracy of contract review processes.

JP7837463B1Active Publication Date: 2026-03-30HUBBLE CO LTD
View PDF 4 Cites 0 Cited by

Patent Information

Authority / Receiving Office
JP · JP
Patent Type
Patents
Current Assignee / Owner
Filing Date
2025-12-30
Publication Date
2026-03-30

AI Technical Summary

Technical Problem

There is a discrepancy between the contract content understood by the business department and the contract draft, leading to additional work for the legal department to clarify the business department's intentions, which is also present in contracts created or agreed upon by one company accepting the terms of another company.

Method used

A method and apparatus that utilize AI models to generate a summary of contract content and pre-items from business department inputs, enabling accurate transmission of desired contract content to the legal department, including instructions for review and workflow determination.

Benefits of technology

Facilitates accurate conveyance of business department desires to the legal department, reducing the need for additional hearings and streamlining the review process by generating summaries and pre-items, thereby enhancing efficiency and clarity in contract review.

✦ Generated by Eureka AI based on patent content.

Smart Images

  • Figure 0007837463000001_ABST
    Figure 0007837463000001_ABST
Patent Text Reader

Abstract

To support requests for contract review, this system enables business units to accurately communicate their desired contract terms to the legal department when making requests. [Solution] First, the device 100 receives a draft contract and related documents from a first terminal 111 used by the business division (S201). The device 100 then requests the generating AI model to generate a summary of the contract content and pre-items that the business division requests the review of (S202). The platform 120, upon receiving the request, generates the summary of the contract content and the pre-items (S203), and transmits them to the device 100 (S204). The device 100 then transmits them to the first terminal 111 (S205). The first terminal 111 transmits a request for review of the draft contract, including the summary accepted by the user or a summary modified by the user (S206). The device 100 notifies the legal department terminal 130 of the review request (S210).
Need to check novelty before this filing date? Find Prior Art

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to an apparatus, a method, and a program for assisting in requesting a review of a contract proposal.

Background Art

[0002] In a company, contract work often proceeds with the joint participation of a business department and a legal department. The business department conducts negotiations with the contract partner from a business perspective and reaches an agreement on the major matters of the contract content. Under such an agreement, one of the contracting parties creates a contract draft, and the other party reviews it. The company that receives the contract draft requests the legal department to review the draft.

Summary of the Invention

Problems to be Solved by the Invention

[0003] However, there are not a few cases where there is a discrepancy between the contract content understood by the business department and the contract content defined in the contract draft. Therefore, the legal department has to spend time hearing from the business department about the contract content desired by the business department. Such hearings also generate additional work for the business department. The same problem arises in the case of a contract (written contract) being created, as well as in the case of a contract (contract) concluded by one company agreeing to the terms of a usage agreement or the like created by the other company.

[0004] The present invention has been made in view of such points, and its problem is to enable the accurate transmission of the contract content desired by the business department in a request from the business department to the legal department in an apparatus, a method, or a program for assisting in requesting a review of a contract proposal (draft contract).

[0005] Although the explanation has been made from the perspective of the company that received the contract draft among the contracting parties, the same problems exist from the perspective of the company that created the contract draft.

Means for Solving the Problems

[0006] To achieve these objectives, a first aspect of the present invention is a method for supporting a request for review of a draft contract, comprising the steps of: receiving the draft contract and related materials from a first business unit terminal used by a business unit; creating instructions based on the draft contract and the materials, which include instructions to generate a summary of the contract content and one or more pre-items to be requested for review from a legal department; making a request to a generating AI model including the instructions; receiving a request for review of the draft contract from the first business unit terminal, which includes the summary generated in response to the request or a revised summary obtained by modifying the summary as a request summary; and notifying a legal department terminal used by the legal department of the request for review.

[0007] Furthermore, a second aspect of the present invention is the method of the first aspect, wherein the instructions include a first instruction for generating one or more pre-items relating to the draft contract, the contract content, or the summary, which includes a first instruction based on the draft contract and the materials, and a second instruction for generating a summary of the contract content, which includes input to the one or more pre-items or a summary of said input, and the step of making the request includes making a first request which includes the first instruction for a first generating AI model, and making a second request which includes the second instruction for a second generating AI model, after the first request.

[0008] Furthermore, a third aspect of the present invention is the method of the first or second aspect, wherein the materials include at least one of a proposal, emails, chat history, and company information materials of the contracting party.

[0009] Furthermore, a fourth aspect of the present invention is a method according to any one of the first to third aspects, wherein the one or more prior items include pointing out discrepancies between the contents of the draft contract, the contract content, or the summary and the contents described in the document.

[0010] Furthermore, a fifth aspect of the present invention is a method according to any of the first to fourth aspects, wherein the one or more prior items include a recommendation or request to input at least one of the following: the name of the contracting party, the risks to be confirmed, and the review deadline.

[0011] Furthermore, a sixth aspect of the present invention is a method according to any of the first to fourth aspects, wherein the one or more prior items include a set of items designated by the business division or the company to which the business division belongs, or according to the business division or the company to which the business division belongs.

[0012] Furthermore, a seventh aspect of the present invention is a method according to any of the first to fourth aspects, wherein the one or more prior items include one or more items determined according to the type of contract or contract amount determined based on the draft contract, the contract content, or the summary.

[0013] Furthermore, an eighth aspect of the present invention is the method of the seventh aspect, wherein the contract type is any of a sales contract, a purchase contract, a service contract, a confidentiality agreement, and an amendment memorandum.

[0014] Furthermore, a ninth aspect of the present invention is a method according to any of the first to eighth aspects, further comprising the step of determining the workflow leading to the review by the legal department based on the review request.

[0015] Furthermore, a tenth aspect of the present invention is the method of the ninth aspect, wherein the workflow includes an approval step by one or more approvers.

[0016] Furthermore, an eleventh aspect of the present invention is a method according to the ninth or tenth aspect, further comprising the steps of notifying a second business unit terminal used by a downstream approver of a requester using a first business unit terminal, which is determined according to the workflow, of the review request, before the notification to the legal department terminal, and receiving approval for the notification from the second business unit terminal.

[0017] Furthermore, a twelfth aspect of the present invention is the method of the eleventh aspect, wherein the approver is a superior of the client.

[0018] Furthermore, a thirteenth aspect of the present invention is a method according to the eleventh or twelfth aspect, further comprising the step of receiving input from the second business unit terminal for an approval summary displayed using the notification.

[0019] Furthermore, a fourteenth aspect of the present invention is the method of the thirteenth aspect, wherein the approval summary includes an additional summary for the approver.

[0020] Furthermore, a fifteenth aspect of the present invention is a method according to the thirteenth or fourteenth aspect, wherein the approval summary includes the request summary.

[0021] Furthermore, a sixteenth aspect of the present invention is a method according to any thirteenth to fifteenth aspect, wherein the approval summary includes one or more inputs or summaries thereof from one or more intervening approvers.

[0022] Furthermore, a 17th aspect of the present invention is a method according to any 11th to 16th aspect, further comprising the step of displaying the review status in accordance with the workflow on the second business unit terminal.

[0023] Furthermore, an eighteenth aspect of the present invention is a method according to any of the first to seventeenth aspects, wherein the instruction includes determining which of the multiple files described in the instruction is the draft contract and which are the related materials.

[0024] Moreover, a 19th aspect of the present invention is a program for causing a computer to execute a method for assisting in requesting a review of a contract proposal, the method comprising: receiving, from a first business department terminal used by a business department, the contract proposal and materials related to the contract proposal; creating an instruction for generating a summary of the contract content to be reviewed by the legal department and one or more preliminary items, the instruction being based on the contract proposal and the materials; making a request including the instruction to a generation AI model; receiving, from the first business department terminal, a review request for the contract proposal including, as a summary at the time of request, the summary generated in response to the request or a revised summary obtained by revising the summary; and notifying the legal department terminal used by the legal department of the review request.

[0025] Moreover, a 20th aspect of the present invention is an apparatus for assisting in requesting a review of a contract proposal, configured to receive, from a first business department terminal used by a business department, the contract proposal and materials related to the contract proposal, create an instruction for generating a summary of the contract content to be reviewed by the legal department and one or more preliminary items, the instruction being based on the contract proposal and the materials, make a request including the instruction to a generation AI model, receive, from the first business department terminal, a review request for the contract proposal including, as a summary at the time of request, the summary generated in response to the request or a revised summary obtained by revising the summary, and notify the legal department terminal used by the legal department of the review request.

Advantages of the Invention

[0026] According to one aspect of the present invention, by using a contract proposal and related materials from a business department, a summary of the contract content for which the business department requests a review from the legal department is generated, and one or more items that should be pre-checked or considered in the business department are also generated to prompt such checking or consideration, it becomes possible to accurately convey the contract content desired by the business department to the legal department.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0027] [Figure 1]The figure shows a system according to a first embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 2] The figure shows the flow of a method according to the first and second embodiments of the present invention. [Figure 3A] The figure shows an example of a screen for requesting contract review according to the first embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 3B] The figure shows an example of a screen for requesting contract review according to the first embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 4] The figure shows an example of a screen showing the content of a contract review request according to the first embodiment of the present invention. [Figure 5] The figure shows an example of a screen showing the review status according to the second embodiment of the present invention.

Embodiments for Carrying Out the Invention

[0028] Hereinafter, embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the drawings.

[0029] (First Embodiment) FIG. 1 shows a system according to an embodiment of the present invention. The apparatus 100 communicates via an IP network with a first business department terminal 111 and a second business department terminal 112 used by a business department, a legal department terminal 130 used by a legal department, and a platform 120 that provides a generation AI model, and supports a request for review of a contract proposal from the business department to the legal department. In FIG. 1, a generation AI model is provided by the platform 120, but an application for providing a generation AI model may be executed on the apparatus 100. Also, from the perspective of security, the apparatus 100 may communicate with the first business department terminal 111 and the second business department terminal 112 via a closed network using the IP protocol or other protocols. In this case, it is preferable that the platform 120 is also accessible via the closed network, or that a generation AI model is provided on the apparatus 100. The first terminal 111 and the second terminal 112 may be mobile terminals such as smartphones and tablets, for example.

[0030] The device 100 comprises a communication unit 101 such as a communication interface, a processing unit 102 such as a processor or CPU, and a storage unit 103 including a storage device or storage medium such as memory or a hard disk. The device can be configured by executing a program for performing each process or operation in the processing unit 102. The device 100 may include one or more devices, computers, or servers. The program may also include one or more programs and can be recorded on a computer-readable storage medium to form a non-transient program product. The program is stored in the storage unit 103 or in a storage device or storage medium such as a database 104 accessible via an IP network from the device 100, and instructions included in the program can be executed by at least one processor in the processing unit 102. Data described below as being stored in the storage unit 103 may be stored in a storage device or storage medium such as a database 104, and vice versa. The platform 120 can have a similar configuration.

[0031] First, the device 100 receives a draft contract and related documents (hereinafter also referred to as "related documents") from a first terminal 111 used by the business division (S201). The draft contract may be a document in a format such as Word or PDF containing the draft contract. The storage location of such a document may be specified by the first terminal 111, and the device 100 may receive the draft contract by retrieving it from that storage location. The same applies to the related documents. The first terminal 111 may receive input from the client using the first terminal 111 indicating which of the multiple files entered is the draft contract, and may further transmit this input to the device 100.

[0032] Examples of such related documents include, for instance, proposals for contract signing, emails for contract signing, chat history for contract signing, and company information materials of the contracting party. For example, one or more documents to be sent to the device 100 can be specified by dragging and dropping them into the input field 310 shown on screen 300 in Figure 3A. In the example in Figure 3A, it is also possible to enter a comment in the input field 310 and send that comment as a separate document to the device 100.

[0033] After receiving the draft contract and related documents, device 100 requests the generating AI model to generate a summary of the contract content that the business unit will request the legal department to review, and one or more pre-items (S202). These one or more pre-items may be one or more pre-items relating to the received draft contract, the generated contract content, or its summary. More specifically, device 100 creates the instructions to generate a summary of the contract content that the business unit will request the legal department to review, and one or more pre-items, based on the received draft contract and related documents, and makes a request to the generating AI model that includes these instructions. The draft contract and related documents uploaded by the user of the first terminal 111 may be included in the instructions by describing all or part of the text data contained therein in the instructions to the generating AI model, or by describing the storage location of those files in the instructions to the generating AI model.

[0034] In the example shown in Figure 3B, after a user using the first terminal 111 specifies a draft contract and related documents, the generating AI model (hereinafter also referred to as the "first generating AI model") generates one or more pre-items related to the draft contract, the contract content based on the draft contract, or a summary thereof, depending on the selection made by clicking or tapping the icon 331, and these are displayed in the display field 330 as "advice from the AI." Here, "pre-items" refers to items that are desirable to be confirmed or considered in advance before requesting a contract review. The user of the first terminal 111 can enter comments in the input field 310 based on the advice from the AI ​​displayed in the display field 330, and the first terminal 110 can include such comments and other inputs in the related documents sent to the device 100.

[0035] The pre-application items may include pointing out inconsistencies between the content of the contract draft received by the device 100 and the content described in the related documents for the contract draft. Since the intentions of the business division are communicated through proposals, emails, etc., and these intentions are not always reflected in the contract draft, pointing out such inconsistencies and having the business division review them in advance reduces the burden on the legal department to later conduct hearings with the business division to resolve such inconsistencies. The pre-application items may also include inconsistencies between the content of the contract or its summary that the business division requests the legal department to review and the content described in the related documents. The summary may be a summary of the contract draft only, or a summary of both the contract draft and the related documents.

[0036] The pre-entry items may include recommendations or requests to enter the name of the counterparty company, transaction amount, transaction overview, transaction purpose, risks to be confirmed, review deadline, and desired contract signing date. The pre-entry items may also include a set of items designated by or specific to the business unit or the company to which the business unit belongs. This set of items may consist of one or more items determined based on the contract type, contract amount, etc., which are determined based on the draft contract, contract content, or summary thereof. Examples of contract types include sales contracts, purchase contracts, service contracts, confidentiality agreements, and amendment memoranda.

[0037] User input can be performed from an input screen displayed by sending input screen display information to the first terminal 111. The input screen display information can be sent, for example, as an HTML file, read by the web browser of the first terminal 111, and displayed on the display screen of the first terminal 111. If a native application is installed on the first terminal 111, the input screen display information should include the data necessary for that application to display the input screen. Here, "input screen" can take various forms such as a web page, modal window, or popup window when displayed on a web browser, or it can be a screen of a dedicated application when displayed on that application. In any case, any screen that includes an area with input fields for entering necessary information is considered an input screen. Similar techniques can be applied to other screens mentioned in this specification.

[0038] Furthermore, in the example shown in Figure 3B, when the user of the first terminal 111 selects the "Next" button 320, the device 100 requests the generating AI model (hereinafter also referred to as the "second generating AI model") to generate a summary of the contract details that the business unit will request the legal unit to review. Rather than making the request for the creation of one or more pre-items for displaying "AI advice" in advance as described above, both can be generated in a single request, and Figure 2 shows such operation.

[0039] Upon receiving the request, platform 120 generates a summary of the contract details and one or more pre-items (S203) and transmits them to device 100 (S204). Device 100 then transmits the received summary and one or more pre-items to the first terminal 111 (S205). As described above, if the generation of one or more pre-items is performed in advance, and the summary is generated by including comments entered by the user of the first terminal 111 as related materials, it is not necessary to generate one or more pre-items again at this point. The display of the summary and one or more pre-items may be made by notifying the first terminal 111, and the requester using the first terminal 111 can select the notification by tapping or clicking, thereby displaying it on the first terminal 111 via the contract review support service provided by device 100, and the notification may include the summary and one or more pre-items. More generally, the display can be made using a notification.

[0040] In this specification, "AI model" refers to a machine learning model trained to predict output for a given input, and "generative AI model" refers to a large-scale language model (LLM) trained using text data to generate output not included in the input. While LLMs applying a transformer architecture are particularly preferred as generative AI models, it is anticipated that the architecture's name may change with technological advancements. Therefore, in this specification, "transformer architecture" encompasses architectures using one or more features of a transformer architecture or improvements thereof. In this specification, whether "generative AI models" are identical is determined by whether the type of generative AI model specified by the user is identical. For example, in the case of GPT-4, if the value of the variable "model" is identical, they are considered identical generative AI models. If generative AI models used in different processes are not identical, they may be provided on the same platform 120 or on different devices. Furthermore, it goes without saying that requests for generative AI models may include multiple requests, and may include one or more processes performed on the device making the request, other than the requests for the generative AI model.

[0041] Requests to a generative AI model can be made by executing code containing instructions (prompts) written in natural language, thereby calling the OpenAI API, and the generative AI model generates a response to those prompts. The OpenAI API is an example, and other APIs may be used. More specifically, the code for making the request is stored in the memory of the device on which the code is executed, and the request can be made by the device retrieving this code and executing code containing instructions obtained by setting the required values ​​to the variables contained in the code.

[0042] In this embodiment, all or part of the text data contained in the contract draft and related materials received by the device 100, or a designation thereof, can be set as the value of the variable in the instruction. The instruction may also include classifying which of the multiple files received by the device 100 and described in the instruction above is the contract draft and which are materials related to the contract draft.

[0043] Figure 4 shows an example of a summary of a contract subject to review according to one embodiment of the present invention. Screen 400 displays the generated summary on the first terminal 111, and includes an overview of the contract, as well as a title and date. In the example in Figure 3B, the advice "There is a discrepancy between the project start date (desired for August) and the contract period in the draft contract (October 1, 2025 - September 30, 2026). Please consider whether you would like to request that the start date be brought forward to August" is displayed. If the user of the first terminal 111 enters the comment "Please set the start date to August 1," then the device 100 can generate a summary with August 1 as the start date, as shown in Figure 4. Alternatively, the device 100 may generate a summary without changing October 1 as stipulated in the draft contract, allowing the user of the first terminal 111 to make necessary corrections on screen 400.

[0044] The first terminal 111 transmits to the device 100 a request for review of a draft contract specified by the user, which includes the summary accepted by the user of the first terminal 111 or a summary modified by the user as the request summary (S206). The modifications are, for example, modifications relating to one or more pre-items received by the first terminal 111.

[0045] In response to the review request, device 100 notifies the legal terminal 130 used by the legal department of the review request (S210). The workflow determination based on the received summary by device 100 (S207) and the associated processing will be described later.

[0046] Thus, in this embodiment, using the contract proposal and related materials from the business division, a summary of the contract content that the business division will request the legal division to review is generated, and one or more items that the business division should confirm or consider in advance are also generated to encourage such confirmation or consideration, thereby enabling the legal division to accurately convey the contract content that the business division desires.

[0047] (Second embodiment) In a second embodiment of the present invention, the device 100 can determine a workflow involving a review by the legal department in response to receiving a review request from the first terminal 111 (S207). The workflow may include an approval process from a review request by a business unit to a review by the legal department, and may further include an approval process after the review. Examples of the latter include, for example, approval by the board of directors, approval with a seal, etc.

[0048] The determination can be made based on a summary included in the review request received by the device 100. For example, the summary may include at least one of the following: contract type (sales contract, purchase contract, outsourcing contract, confidentiality agreement, amendment memorandum, etc.), contract amount, business division that made the review request, and the requester. For example, it can determine the workflow corresponding to a contract type being a purchase contract and a contract amount of 10 million yen or more. The determination can be made by storing a correspondence between a set of predetermined conditions and the workflow that satisfies each condition in the storage unit 103 and referring to this correspondence. In addition to being executed using pre-stored logic, it may also be executed using a generated AI model.

[0049] Each workflow includes one or more approver identifiers that identify one or more approvers. The approver identifier is, for example, the ID of the approver on the contract review support service provided by device 100. Examples of approvers include the client's superiors, the department head of the business unit to which the client belongs, and so on.

[0050] The device 100 may generate an additional summary for the approver in the client's subsequent process, in addition to the summary at the time of the request (S208). The additional summary includes one or more items according to the approver's attributes, such as their position. If the subsequent process involves a legal department reviewer, an additional summary may also be generated for that reviewer. The generation of the additional summary can be done using a generation AI model, similar to the summary at the time of the request, but for simplicity, the details are not shown in Figure 2.

[0051] Device 100 notifies the second terminal 112, used by the approver in the next step, of the review request received from the client, according to the determined workflow (S209). Upon receiving approval from the approver using the second terminal 112 and any comments entered as necessary (S210), Device 100 notifies the legal department terminal 130, used by the legal department, of the request for review of the draft contract (S211).

[0052] An approver or reviewer who receives a notification can view the review status in accordance with the determined workflow, as shown in Figure 5. The review status confirmation screen 500 preferably visually displays the progress of the review vertically and may include a message 510 for the approver or reviewer of the next step. Although the requester is not shown in Figure 5, the requester may be shown first. For example, a message 510 for approver "Katsuya Fujii" may include an element 511 for displaying a summary with the words "Summary here," and depending on whether the approver selects this by clicking or tapping, an approval summary for the approver may be displayed on the display screen of the second terminal 112 used by the approver. The approval summary or review summary may be included in the notification and may be displayed based on an action by the approver or reviewer, such as tapping or clicking on the notification. More generally, the approval summary or review summary can be displayed using a notification.

[0053] The approval summary may include the additional summary described above and may also include the request summary. The additional summary means an additionally generated summary and may substitute for the request summary. The approval summary may be generated before notification to the second terminal 112 as described above, but may also be generated in response to the approver requesting the display of the approval summary.

[0054] The message 530 addressed to examiner "Tomoya Sakai" may similarly include an element 531 for displaying a summary that includes the phrase "Summary here." The display of the approval summary or review summary can be displayed at the request of the person requesting it, and is not limited to the selection of the phrase "Summary here." For example, it may be displayed or generated and displayed in response to the requester entering phrases such as "Explain the draft contract" in the input field 540. If there are multiple examiners in the legal department, the review summary can be a summary for each examiner and may include one or more items corresponding to the examiner's position or other attributes.

[0055] The approval summary or review summary may include one or more comments or summaries thereof entered by one or more approvers involved. In the example in Figure 5, approver "Katsuya Fujii" mentions the possibility of subcontracting and makes comment 520 indicating that discussion is possible, and when reviewer "Tomoya Sakai" displays the review summary, the summary may include a description regarding the possibility of subcontracting. In the example in Figure 5, the review process is not complicated for illustrative purposes, but for example, if there are multiple approvers, many comments will be entered, and the approval or review process will proceed more efficiently by providing summaries of the items that subsequent approvers or reviewers should consider.

[0056] In this way, by determining the workflow leading to the legal department's review based on the contract draft review request, it becomes possible to smoothly and accurately convey the contract terms desired by the business division. Furthermore, by generating an approval summary for approvers or a review summary for reviewers, approvers or reviewers in subsequent stages of the request can efficiently recognize the points discussed within the business division. In particular, by including one or more items that the legal department should pay attention to in the review summary, it becomes possible to streamline the review process within the legal department.

[0057] Furthermore, in the embodiments described above, unless the word "only" is used, such as "based only," "depending only," "in the case of only," or "referencing only," it is assumed in this specification that additional information may also be considered. Also, as an example, the statement "if a, then b" does not necessarily mean "always b in the case of a" or "b immediately after a," unless explicitly stated otherwise. In addition, the statement "each a constituting A" does not necessarily mean that A is composed of multiple components, but includes the possibility that the component is singular.

[0058] Furthermore, it should be noted that the embodiments of the present invention described above are included in the disclosure herein, in any way that they are not inconsistent with each other.

[0059] Furthermore, for the sake of clarity, even if there are aspects of operation in some method, program, terminal, device, server, or system (hereinafter referred to as "method, etc.") that differ from the operation described herein, each aspect of the present invention is intended to cover the same operation as any of the operations described herein, and the existence of operation different from the operation described herein does not mean that such method, etc. is outside the scope of each aspect of the present invention.

[0060] The above explanation does not specifically mention cases where the business division makes modifications to the contract draft entered by the client, but it is not necessary for the contract draft and the contract draft reviewed by the legal division to be strictly identical. The device 100 may generate one or more modified contracts in response to the review summary of the contract draft entered by the reviewer or the modified contract draft modified by the approver, for example, using a generation AI model. The contract draft displayed on the legal division terminal 130 in response to the reviewer's operation of the review request notification to the legal division terminal 130 may be a draft that includes the one or more modified contracts or a draft that reflects the one or more modified contracts. [Explanation of Symbols]

[0061] 100 devices 101 Communications Department 102 Processing Unit 103 Storage section 104 Databases 111 First Business Unit Terminal 112 Second Business Unit Terminal 120 platforms 130 Legal Department Terminals 300 Input screen 310 Input field 320 "Next" button 330 Display field 331 icons 400 Summary Confirmation Screen 500 Screen showing review status 510 Message to Approvers 511 Summary display elements 520 comments by approvers 530 Message to the judges 531 Summary display elements 540 Input fields

Claims

1. A method for supporting requests for review of contract proposals, The computer receives the draft contract and related materials from a first business unit terminal used by the business unit, The steps include: the computer making a first request to a first generating AI model, which includes a first instruction to generate one or more pre-items relating to the draft contract; The computer transmits to the first business unit terminal input screen display information for inputting the one or more pre-items; The computer provides a second instruction to a second generating AI model for generating a summary of the contract to be submitted to the legal department for review, the second request including inputs to the draft contract, the materials, and the one or more pre-items, or a second instruction based on the gist of such inputs, The computer transmits the summary generated in response to the second request to the first business unit terminal, The steps include receiving a request for review of the draft contract from the first business unit terminal, which includes the summary or a revised summary obtained by modifying the summary as the request summary, The steps include notifying the legal department terminal used by the legal department of the aforementioned review request and Includes.

2. The method according to claim 1, The aforementioned documents include at least one of the following: a proposal, emails, chat history, and company information materials of the contracting party.

3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, The aforementioned one or more pre-registration items include a recommendation or requirement to enter at least one of the following: the name of the contracting party, the risks to be reviewed, and the review deadline.

4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, The one or more of the aforementioned prior items include a set of items designated by the business division or the company to which the business division belongs, or items appropriate to the business division or the company to which the business division belongs.

5. A method according to claim 1 or 2, The process further includes determining the workflow leading to the review by the legal department based on the aforementioned review request.

6. The method according to claim 5, Prior to the notification to the legal department terminal, the further step includes notifying a second business unit terminal used by a later approver of the requester using a first business unit terminal, as determined according to the workflow, of the review request.

7. The method according to claim 6, The process further includes receiving input from the second business unit terminal regarding the approval summary displayed using the notification.

8. A program for causing a computer to execute a method for assisting in the review of a draft contract, wherein the method is The steps include receiving the draft contract and related materials from a first business unit terminal used by the business unit, A step of making a first request to a first generative AI model, which includes a first instruction to generate one or more pre-items relating to the said draft contract, The steps include transmitting input screen display information for inputting the one or more pre-items to the first business unit terminal, A second instruction for generating a summary of contract terms to be submitted to the legal department for review, comprising the step of making a second request to a second generating AI model, which includes inputs to the said draft contract, said materials and the said one or more pre-items, or a second instruction based on the gist of said input, The computer transmits the summary generated in response to the second request to the first business unit terminal, The steps include receiving a request for review of the draft contract from the first business unit terminal, which includes the summary or a revised summary obtained by modifying the summary as the request summary, The steps include notifying the legal department terminal used by the legal department of the aforementioned review request and Includes.

9. A device for supporting requests for review of contract proposals, A first request is made to a first generating AI model, which includes a first instruction to receive the contract draft and related materials from a first business unit terminal used by the business unit, and to generate one or more pre-items relating to the contract draft. The input screen display information for inputting the one or more pre-items is transmitted to the first business unit terminal. A second instruction to generate a summary of the contract to be submitted to the legal department for review, wherein a second request is made to a second generating AI model, which includes inputs to the said draft contract, said materials and the said 1 or more pre-items, or a second instruction based on the gist of said inputs, The summary generated in response to the second request is transmitted to the first business unit terminal. The system is configured to receive a request for review of the draft contract, which includes the summary or a revised summary obtained by modifying the summary, as the request summary, from the first business division terminal, and to notify the legal department terminal used by the legal department of the request for review.

10. A system for supporting requests for review of contract proposals, The apparatus according to claim 9, The first business division terminal capable of communicating with the aforementioned device and It is equipped with.

Citation Information

Patent Citations

  • Contract information processing unit, contract information processing method, and program

    JP2012064055A

  • Legal case management server, legal case management system, and legal case management method

    JP2024004804A

  • Legal affairs consultation visualization system

    JP2025012599A

  • Information processing method and information processing device

    WO2025115798A1