Key subject review system and method based on electronic medical record library, electronic equipment and medium

Abstract

The invention provides a key subject review system and method based on an electronic medical record library, electronic equipment and a storage medium, and belongs to the field of medical management. The system comprises a management end tool, a medical institution reports a pre-standard conformance condition and subject details to be declared, uploads an evidence material, and reports the evidence material to a superior auditing unit for auditing and confirming the evidence material; issuing different individual assessment indexes for different subjects; configuring a scoring formula to calculate a subject assessment index score; each subject of the medical institution reports applied subject assessment index data, electronic medical record library data information is introduced, and the data information is audited by experts; and the on-site inspection tool provides a mobile terminal on-site inspection function for data group experts and supports real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results. The objectivity and scientificity of subject review are improved, interference of human factors is reduced, information in the electronic medical record library is fully mined, and the review result can more comprehensively reflect the actual situation of the subject.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention belongs to the technical field of medical management, and specifically relates to a key subject review system, method, electronic equipment and medium based on an electronic medical record library. Background Art

[0002] In the modern medical system, the construction of key disciplines is not only the key to improving the core competitiveness of hospitals and achieving sustainable development, but also an important force to promote the progress of medical and health care. However, the traditional key discipline review method often relies on highly subjective means such as expert review and peer review, and the data collection process is cumbersome and difficult to fully reflect the actual situation of the discipline.

[0003] With the rapid development of information technology, electronic medical record systems have been widely used in medical institutions. This system has not only greatly improved the efficiency and quality of medical services, but also accumulated a large amount of clinical data, providing a richer and more objective basis for subject review. However, there is currently a lack of effective technical means and standardized processes for how to use electronic medical record libraries for key subject reviews.

[0004] Therefore, exploring a key subject review method based on the electronic medical record database is of great significance for improving the objectivity, accuracy and efficiency of the review. Summary of the invention

[0005] The purpose of the embodiments of the present invention is to provide a key subject review system, method, electronic equipment and medium based on an electronic medical record library, so as to improve the objectivity and scientificity of subject review and reduce the interference of human factors; fully mine the information in the electronic medical record library so that the review results can more comprehensively reflect the actual situation of the subject.

[0006] In a first aspect, the present application embodiment provides a key subject review system based on an electronic medical record library, including: Management tools are used by medical institutions to report compliance with pre-standards and the details of the subjects to be reported, and to upload supporting materials and submit them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the supporting materials; and through the management indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, reporting template, and ranking configuration, different personalized assessment indicators are issued for different subjects; the scores of subject assessment indicators are calculated by configuring scoring formulas; medical institutions are supported to fill in basic information, detailed data, and upload supporting materials; each discipline of medical institutions is supported to report the subject assessment indicator data applied for, and support one-click introduction of electronic medical record database data information; data group experts review the data submitted by medical institutions to form review conclusions, and score the indicator data submitted by medical institutions according to pre-configured calculation formulas, and support ranking by subject type; The on-site inspection tool is used to provide data group experts with mobile on-site inspection functions, supporting real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

[0007] Optionally, the scoring formula in the scoring scheme supports the user to configure the indicator score calculation formula through a graphical interface, wherein the configuration function includes the configuration of basic arithmetic operations and logical operations.

[0008] Optionally, the pre-configured calculation formula is represented by the total score of the pre-configured indicator clauses and the corresponding score coefficient formula returned according to different level classifications, and then multiplied by the total score of the indicator clause. Optionally, the on-site inspection tool supports expert group members, expert group leaders and administrators to view the progress of the inspection projects they are responsible for according to their respective permissions, and the expert group leader submits the overall inspection results after confirming that all group members have submitted correct information.

[0009] In a second aspect, the embodiment of the present application further provides a key subject review method based on an electronic medical record library, including: Medical institutions use management tools to report compliance with pre-conditions and the details of the disciplines to be reported, upload supporting materials, and submit them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the reported supporting materials; Control the management tool to manage the indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, reporting template, ranking configuration, and issue different individual assessment indicators for different subjects; and configure the scoring formula through the management tool to calculate the subject assessment indicator score; Experts in the data group review the data submitted by medical institutions and form review conclusions. Management tools are used to calculate scores for the indicator data submitted by each discipline of the medical institution according to pre-configured calculation formulas, and support ranking by discipline type. The on-site inspection tool provides data group experts with a mobile on-site inspection function, which enables real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

[0010] Optionally, the scoring formula supports the user to configure the indicator score calculation formula through a graphical interface, wherein the configuration function includes the configuration of basic arithmetic operations and logical operations.

[0011] Optionally, the pre-configured calculation formula is represented by the total score of the pre-configured indicator clauses and the corresponding score coefficient formula returned according to different level classifications, and then multiplied by the total score of the indicator clause.

[0012] Optionally, the field inspection tool provides data group experts with a mobile field inspection function to achieve real-time management of field inspection progress and submission of inspection results, including: Expert team members, expert team leaders and administrators can view the progress of the inspection projects they are responsible for according to their respective permissions, and the expert team leader will submit the overall inspection results after confirming that all team members have submitted correct information.

[0013] In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application further provides an electronic device, comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein when the processor executes the program, the steps of the above-mentioned key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library are implemented.

[0014] In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application further provides a storage medium on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the above-mentioned key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library are implemented.

[0015] It can be seen from the above technical solutions that the present invention has the following advantages: The key subject review system, method, electronic equipment and medium based on the electronic medical record library provided in this application improve the objectivity and scientificity of subject review, reduce the interference of human factors, and fully mine the information in the electronic medical record library so that the review results can more comprehensively reflect the actual situation of the subject. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0016] In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solution of the present invention, the accompanying drawings required for use in the description will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the accompanying drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention. For ordinary technicians in this field, other accompanying drawings can be obtained based on these accompanying drawings without paying creative work.

[0017] Figure 1 A schematic diagram of the structure of a key subject review system based on an electronic medical record library provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 2 A flowchart of an implementation method of a key subject review method based on an electronic medical record library provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 3 A detailed flow chart of a key subject review method based on an electronic medical record library provided by an embodiment of the present invention; Figure 4 A schematic diagram of the hardware structure of an electronic device provided by an embodiment of the present invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0018] In the detailed description below, various embodiments of the present disclosure will be described more fully. The present disclosure may have various embodiments, and adjustments and changes may be made therein. However, it should be understood that there is no intention to limit the various embodiments of the present disclosure to the specific embodiments disclosed herein, but rather the present disclosure should be understood to cover all adjustments, equivalents and / or alternatives that fall within the spirit and scope of the various embodiments of the present disclosure.

[0019] Hereinafter, the terms "include" or "may include" that may be used in various embodiments of the present disclosure indicate the presence of the disclosed functions or operations, and do not limit the addition of one or more functions or operations. In addition, as used in various embodiments of the present disclosure, the terms "include", "have" and their cognates are intended only to indicate specific features, numbers, steps, operations, or combinations of the foregoing items, and should not be understood as first excluding the presence of one or more other features, numbers, steps, operations, or combinations of the foregoing items or the possibility of adding one or more features, numbers, steps, operations, or combinations of the foregoing items.

[0020] In various embodiments of the present disclosure, the expression "or" or "at least one of A or / and B" includes any combination or all combinations of the words listed at the same time. For example, the expression "A or B" or "at least one of A or / and B" may include A, may include B, or may include both A and B.

[0021] The following will be combined with the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention to clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, not all of the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by ordinary technicians in this field without creative work are within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0022] See also Figure 1 The figure is a schematic diagram of the structure of a key subject review system based on an electronic medical record library in a specific embodiment, including: Management tools are used by medical institutions to report compliance with pre-standards and the details of the subjects to be reported, and to upload supporting materials and submit them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the supporting materials; and through the management indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, reporting template, and ranking configuration, different personalized assessment indicators are issued for different subjects; the scores of subject assessment indicators are calculated by configuring scoring formulas; medical institutions are supported to fill in basic information, detailed data, and upload supporting materials; each discipline of medical institutions is supported to report the subject assessment indicator data applied for, and support one-click introduction of electronic medical record database data information; data group experts review the data submitted by medical institutions to form review conclusions, and score the indicator data submitted by medical institutions according to pre-configured calculation formulas, and support ranking by subject type; The on-site inspection tool is used to provide data group experts with mobile on-site inspection functions, supporting real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

[0023] The scoring formula in the scoring scheme supports the user to configure the indicator score calculation formula through a graphical interface, wherein the configuration function includes the configuration of basic arithmetic operations and logical operations.

[0024] Preferably, the pre-configured calculation formula is characterized by the total score of the pre-configured indicator clauses and the corresponding score coefficient formula returned according to different level classifications, and then multiplied by the total score of the indicator clause.

[0025] In some embodiments, the on-site inspection tool supports expert team members, expert team leaders and administrators to view the progress of the inspection projects they are responsible for according to their respective permissions, and the expert team leader submits the overall inspection results after confirming that all team members have submitted correct information.

[0026] See also Figure 2 As shown, it is an implementation flow chart of a key subject review method based on an electronic medical record library provided by an embodiment of the present invention, including the following execution steps: Step 200: The medical institution reports the compliance with the pre-condition standards and the details of the subjects to be reported through the management tool, uploads the supporting materials and submits them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the reported supporting materials.

[0027] For example, the superior review unit may be a provincial or municipal health commission.

[0028] In some implementations, the medical institution shall clarify the specific requirements of the superior audit unit for the compliance with the pre-standards, the discipline details and supporting materials, including format, content, time, etc. Establish or improve the management end tool for reporting relevant information and materials. The tool should have functions such as user identity authentication, data reporting, material upload, and progress query. Fill in the compliance with the pre-standards in the management end tool, including legal practice, public welfare responsibility and integrity, safety management and major events. Ensure that the filled information is true, accurate and complete. According to the actual situation of the medical institution, declare the discipline details to be reviewed in the management end tool, including discipline name, research direction, scientific research results, etc. Ensure that the declared discipline meets the requirements of the superior audit unit. Upload supporting materials related to the compliance with the pre-standards and discipline details, such as scientific research project approval documents, copies of papers, copies of monograph covers, copies of patent certificates, etc. Ensure that the uploaded materials are true, valid and complete. Submit the reported content in the management end tool, and submit it to the superior audit unit after confirmation. After receiving the report, the superior review unit will review and confirm the compliance with the pre-standards, subject details and supporting materials. During the review process, if any non-compliance or problems are found, the superior review unit should communicate with the medical institution in a timely manner and ask it to supplement or modify. After the review is completed, the superior review unit will feedback the review results to the medical institution. If the review is passed, the medical institution can continue to participate in the subsequent review work; if the review is not passed, the medical institution should make rectifications based on the feedback and re-report.

[0029] By clarifying reporting requirements, establishing management tools, and standardizing reporting processes, the automation and standardization of medical institutions' reporting of compliance with pre-standards, subject details, and supporting materials have been achieved. At the same time, by strengthening training, establishing a supervision mechanism, and strengthening communication, the authenticity and accuracy of the reported content are ensured. This will help improve the management efficiency and review pass rate of medical institutions, and lay a solid foundation for subsequent review work.

[0030] Step 201: Control the management end tool to manage the indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, reporting template, ranking configuration, and issue different individual assessment indicators for different subjects; and configure the scoring formula through the management end tool to calculate the subject assessment indicator score.

[0031] The scoring formula supports users to configure the indicator score calculation formula through a graphical interface, wherein the configuration function includes the configuration of basic arithmetic operations and logical operations.

[0032] For example, the indicator framework is the basis for building the entire performance management, which determines which indicators will be included in the assessment scope. The first-level indicators are: teaching quality, scientific research results, discipline development, and social services; the second-level indicators are: rationality of curriculum setting, innovation of teaching methods, satisfaction with teaching quality, and student performance improvement rate. Indicator level: used to distinguish the importance and assessment level of different indicators. In this plan, we divide the indicators into first-level indicators and second-level indicators, where the first-level indicators are macro assessment directions and the second-level indicators are specific assessment contents. Scoring scheme: Satisfaction with teaching quality (secondary indicator): very satisfied: 90-100 points, satisfied: 80-89 points, general: 70-79 points, dissatisfied: 60-69 points, very dissatisfied: 0-59 points. Value scheme: Taking the performance improvement rate as an example, the value range is 0%-100%. The filling template is shown in Table 1 below, and the scoring formula configuration: Comprehensive score of medical disciplines (first-level indicator): Calculation formula: Comprehensive score of medical disciplines = comprehensive score of teaching quality × 0.5 + clinical practice ability score × 0.3 + doctor-patient communication ability score × 0.2.

[0033] Table 1: Filling template

[0034] By building a complete, flexible and customizable performance management system, we can meet the needs of medical institutions for personalized assessment of different disciplines. At the same time, through the configuration of scoring formulas, we can easily calculate the assessment index scores of each discipline, providing a basis for subsequent rankings and rewards.

[0035] Step 202: Data group experts review the data submitted by the medical institutions to form a review conclusion, and use management tools to calculate scores for the indicator data submitted by each discipline of the medical institution according to a pre-configured calculation formula, supporting ranking by discipline type.

[0036] The pre-configured calculation formula is characterized by the total score of the pre-configured indicator clauses and the corresponding score coefficient formula returned according to different level classifications, and then multiplied by the total score of the indicator clause.

[0037] Step 203: The mobile terminal on-site inspection function provided by the on-site inspection tool to the data group experts enables real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

[0038] Specifically, when executing step 203, the expert group members, the expert group leader and the administrator can view the progress of the inspection project they are responsible for according to their respective permissions, and the expert group leader submits the overall inspection results after confirming that all team members have submitted the results correctly.

[0039] In one embodiment, Figure 3The present invention provides a detailed flow chart of a key subject review method based on an electronic medical record library according to an embodiment of the present invention. This embodiment is further optimized and expanded on the basis of the above embodiments.

[0040] Medical institutions report the compliance with the pre-standards and the details of the subjects to be applied for, and submit them after uploading supporting materials. The provincial and municipal health and health commissions will review and confirm them. After the review, different evaluation indicators will be issued for different subjects, and accounts will be created for the applied subjects. Medical institutions will fill in the hospital-level content. Each discipline of the medical institution will report the data of the subject assessment indicators applied for. It supports one-click introduction of electronic medical record database data information. Medical institutions will review the data filled in by the subject, and report it to the municipal health and health commission for review after approval. After passing, it will be reported to the data group experts for review to form an evaluation conclusion. The indicator data submitted by each discipline of the medical institution will be scored according to the pre-configured calculation formula, and support ranking by subject type. The results of the subjects that have not been shortlisted will be notified by the municipal health and health commissions and medical institutions. On-site experts will be assigned to the shortlisted subjects. Members of the expert group, expert group leaders, and administrators can view the progress of the inspection projects they are responsible for according to their permissions. After the group leader confirms that all members have submitted correct information, the overall inspection results can be submitted.

[0041] It should be understood that the order of execution of the steps in the above embodiment does not necessarily mean the order of execution. The execution order of each process should be determined by its function and internal logic, and should not constitute any limitation on the implementation process of the embodiment of the present invention.

[0042] Figure 4 It is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of an electronic device for implementing various embodiments of the present invention.

[0043] The key subject review system based on the electronic medical record library provided in the embodiment of the present application can be applied to electronic devices. It can be understood by those skilled in the art that the electronic device structure involved in the embodiment of the present invention does not constitute a limitation on the electronic device, and the electronic device may include more or less components than shown, or combine certain components, or arrange different components. In an embodiment of the present invention, the electronic device includes but is not limited to a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a workbench, a personal digital assistant, a server, a blade server, a mainframe computer, and other suitable computers. The electronic device can also represent various forms of mobile devices, such as personal digital processing, cellular phones, smart phones, wearable devices and other similar computing devices. The components shown herein, their connections and relationships, and their functions are merely examples, and are not intended to limit the implementation of the embodiments of the present application described and / or required herein.

[0044] The electronic device may include a processor, an external memory interface, an internal memory, a universal serial bus (USB) interface, a charging management module, a power management module, a battery, a wireless communication module, an audio module, a speaker, a microphone, a sensor module, buttons, a camera, a display, and a SIM card interface, etc.

[0045] It is to be understood that the structure illustrated in the embodiments of the present application does not constitute a specific limitation on the electronic device. In other embodiments of the present application, the electronic device may include more or fewer components than shown in the figure, or combine certain components, or split certain components, or arrange the components differently. The components shown in the figure may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination of software and hardware.

[0046] The processor may include one or more processing units, for example, the processor may include a central processing unit (CPU), an application processor (AP), a modem processor, a graphics processing unit (GPU), an image signal processor (ISP), a controller, a memory, a video codec, a digital signal processor (DSP), a baseband processor, and / or a neural-network processing unit (NPU), etc. Among them, different processing units may be independent devices or integrated into one or more processors.

[0047] The processor can be the nerve center and command center of the electronic device. The controller can generate an operation control signal according to the instruction operation code and timing signal to complete the control of fetching and executing instructions.

[0048] A memory may also be provided in the processor for storing instructions and data. In some embodiments, the memory in the processor is a cache memory. The memory may store instructions or data that the processor has just used or is cyclically used. If the processor needs to use the instruction or data again, it may be directly called from the memory. This avoids repeated access, reduces the waiting time of the processor, and thus improves system efficiency.

[0049] The external memory interface can be used to connect an external memory card, such as a MicroSD card, to expand the storage capacity of the electronic device. The external memory card communicates with the processor through the external memory interface to implement data storage functions. For example, files such as music and videos can be saved in the external memory card.

[0050] The internal memory can be used to store computer executable program codes, which include instructions. The processor executes various functional applications and data processing of the electronic device by running the instructions stored in the internal memory. The internal memory may include a program storage area and a data storage area. The internal memory may include a high-speed random access memory and may also include a non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk storage device, a flash memory device, a universal flash storage (UFS), etc.

[0051] The wireless communication function of an electronic device can be realized through an antenna, a wireless communication module, a modem processor, and a baseband processor.

[0052] The wireless communication module can provide wireless communication solutions for electronic devices, including wireless local area networks (WLAN) (such as wireless fidelity (Wi-Fi) networks), Bluetooth (BT), global navigation satellite system (GNSS), frequency modulation (FM), near field communication (NFC), infrared technology (IR), etc.

[0053] Electronic devices can implement audio functions, etc. through audio modules, speakers, receivers, microphones, headphone jacks, and application processors.

[0054] Electronic devices can achieve shooting functions through ISP, camera, video codec, GPU, display and application processor.

[0055] Electronic devices can achieve display functions through GPU, display screen and application processor.

[0056] The GPU is a microprocessor for image processing that connects the display screen and the application processor. The GPU is used to perform mathematical and geometric calculations for graphics rendering. The processor may include one or more GPUs that execute program instructions to generate or change display information.

[0057] The display screen is used to display images, videos, etc. The display screen includes a display panel.

[0058] The above-mentioned electronic equipment realizes the management-end tool of the subject name of the key subject review system based on the electronic medical record library of this application, which is used for medical institutions to report the compliance with the pre-standards and the details of the subjects to be reported, and submit the supporting materials to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the supporting materials after uploading them; and through the management indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, filling template, and ranking configuration, different personalized assessment indicators are issued for different disciplines; the scores of subject assessment indicators are calculated by configuring the scoring formula; medical institutions are supported to fill in basic information, detailed data and upload supporting materials; and each discipline of medical institutions is supported to review the subject assessment indicator data applied for. It supports one-click introduction of electronic medical record database data information; data group experts review the data submitted by medical institutions to form review conclusions, and score the indicator data submitted by medical institutions according to pre-configured calculation formulas, and support score ranking by subject type; on-site inspection tools are used to provide data group experts with mobile on-site inspection functions, support real-time management of on-site inspection progress and technical solutions for submission of inspection results, thereby improving the objectivity and scientific nature of subject reviews and reducing interference from human factors; fully tap the information in the electronic medical record database to make the review results more comprehensively reflect the actual situation of the subject.

[0059] The storage medium provided in the present application stores a program product that can implement a key subject review system based on an electronic medical record library.

[0060] The key subject review system based on the electronic medical record library includes: management tools, which are used for medical institutions to report the compliance with the pre-standards and the details of the subjects to be reported, and upload supporting materials and then submit them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the supporting materials; and through the management indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, filling template, and ranking configuration, different individual assessment indicators are issued for different subjects; the scores of subject assessment indicators are calculated by configuring the scoring formula; medical institutions are supported to fill in basic information, detailed data and upload supporting materials; each discipline of the medical institution is supported to report the subject assessment indicator data applied for, and supports one-click introduction of electronic medical record library data information; data group experts review the data submitted by the medical institution to form an evaluation conclusion, and score the indicator data submitted by the medical institution according to the pre-configured calculation formula, and support ranking by subject type; on-site inspection tools are used to provide data group experts with mobile on-site inspection functions, support real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

[0061] In some possible implementations, the subject name of the present disclosure, key subject review system based on electronic medical record library and the system can be implemented in the form of a program product, which includes program code. When the program product is run on a terminal device, the program code is used to enable the terminal device to execute the steps of various exemplary implementations of the present disclosure described in the above "Exemplary Method" section of this specification.

[0062] The storage medium of the present disclosure can adopt any combination of one or more readable media. The readable medium can be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. The readable storage medium can be, for example, but not limited to, a system, device or device of electricity, magnetism, light, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor, or any combination of the above. More specific examples (non-exhaustive list) of readable storage media include: an electrical connection with one or more wires, a portable disk, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), an optical fiber, a portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the above.

[0063] The above description of the disclosed embodiments enables one skilled in the art to implement or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be apparent to one skilled in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be implemented in other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Therefore, the present invention will not be limited to the embodiments shown herein, but rather to the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.

Claims

1. A key subject review system based on electronic medical record database, characterized in that: include: Management tools are used by medical institutions to report compliance with pre-standards and the details of the subjects to be reported, and to upload supporting materials and submit them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the supporting materials; and through the management indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, reporting template, and ranking configuration, different personalized assessment indicators are issued for different subjects; the scores of subject assessment indicators are calculated by configuring scoring formulas; and medical institutions are supported to fill in basic information, detailed data, and upload supporting materials; Support each discipline of medical institutions to report the subject assessment indicator data they applied for, and support one-click introduction of electronic medical record database data information; data group experts review the data submitted by medical institutions to form review conclusions, and score the indicator data submitted by medical institutions according to pre-configured calculation formulas, and support ranking by subject type; The on-site inspection tool is used to provide data group experts with mobile on-site inspection functions, supporting real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

2. The key subject review system based on the electronic medical record database according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The scoring formula in the scoring scheme supports users to configure the indicator score calculation formula through a graphical interface, wherein the configuration function includes the configuration of basic arithmetic operations and logical operations.

3. The key subject review system based on the electronic medical record database according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The pre-configured calculation formula is characterized by the total score of the pre-configured indicator clauses and the corresponding score coefficient formula returned according to different level classifications, and then multiplied by the total score of the indicator clause.

4. The key subject review system based on the electronic medical record database according to claim 1 is characterized in that: The on-site inspection tool supports expert group members, expert group leaders and administrators to view the progress of the inspection projects they are responsible for according to their respective permissions, and the expert group leader submits the overall inspection results after confirming that all group members have submitted correct information.

5. A key subject review method based on an electronic medical record library applied to the key subject review system based on an electronic medical record library as described in any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that: include: Medical institutions use management tools to report compliance with pre-conditions and the details of the disciplines to be reported, upload supporting materials, and submit them to the superior review unit for review and confirmation of the reported supporting materials; Control the management tool to manage the indicator framework, indicator level, scoring scheme, value scheme, reporting template, ranking configuration, and issue different individual assessment indicators for different subjects; and configure the scoring formula through the management tool to calculate the subject assessment indicator score; Experts in the data group review the data submitted by medical institutions and form review conclusions. Management tools are used to calculate scores for the indicator data submitted by each discipline of the medical institution according to pre-configured calculation formulas, and support ranking by discipline type. The on-site inspection tool provides data group experts with a mobile on-site inspection function, which enables real-time management of on-site inspection progress and submission of inspection results.

6. The key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The scoring formula supports users to configure the indicator score calculation formula through a graphical interface, wherein the configuration function includes the configuration of basic arithmetic operations and logical operations.

7. The key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The pre-configured calculation formula is characterized by the total score of the pre-configured indicator clauses and the corresponding score coefficient formula returned according to different level classifications, and then multiplied by the total score of the indicator clause.

8. The key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library according to claim 5 is characterized in that: The field inspection tool provides data group experts with mobile field inspection functions to achieve real-time management of field inspection progress and submission of inspection results, including: Expert team members, expert team leaders and administrators can view the progress of the inspection projects they are responsible for according to their respective permissions, and the expert team leader will submit the overall inspection results after confirming that all team members have submitted correct information.

9. An electronic device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein: When the processor executes the program, the steps of the key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library as described in any one of claims 5 to 8 are implemented.

10. A storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, characterized in that: When the computer program is executed by a processor, the steps of the key subject review method based on the electronic medical record library as described in any one of claims 5 to 8 are implemented.

Images