HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication hybrid data transmission control method

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of power grid communication, and discloses an HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography) and HRF (High Radio Frequency) dual-mode communication hybrid data transmission control method, which comprises the following steps of: 1, initializing hardware parameters of an HPLC module and an HRF module, and configuring a frequency band range of a power line coupler and a radio frequency front end; step 2, dynamically calibrating fractional order model parameters of the dual-mode channel based on frequency band ranges of the HPLC module and the HRF module; and step 3, analyzing the service type of the data packet by using the fractional order model parameters, and calculating the four-dimensional QoS demand weight. According to the technical scheme, the technical scheme of four-dimensional QoS dynamic weight distribution and fractional order HJB equation optimization is adopted, and the technical effect of cooperative control and dynamic optimization of multi-dimensional service quality is achieved. The method solves the problems that a traditional method cannot meet the requirements of real-time performance, reliability, energy efficiency and safety at the same time in a time-varying channel environment, and resource allocation is rigid due to fixed weight.

Description

Technical Field

[0001] The present invention relates to the technical field of power grid communication, and specifically to a hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication. Background Art

[0002] With the increasing requirements for communication reliability in scenarios such as smart grids and industrial Internet of Things, the dual-mode hybrid communication technology based on power line carrier and radio frequency has become an important means to solve high-reliability transmission in complex channel environments. However, there are significant defects in the existing technology in dynamic channel adaptation and quality of service control:

[0003] Most existing dual-mode communication systems adopt a static priority scheduling mechanism with a single QoS index, without considering the influence of service type differences and channel long-term memory effects, resulting in the inability to achieve coordinated guarantee of multi-dimensional quality of service in high-dynamic channels. For example, traditional HPLC / HRF switching strategies are based on fixed thresholds or historical channel statistics. When pulse interference occurs frequently, due to the inability to quickly perceive changes in channel memory characteristics, the switching delay exceeds 10 ms and the misjudgment rate is as high as 15% - 40%. In addition, the static weight allocation mechanism cannot adapt to power grid load fluctuations, resulting in a 37% decrease in energy efficiency utilization in scenarios where the signal-to-noise ratio changes suddenly.

[0004] There are significant differences in QoS requirements between protection services and metering services in smart grids, while the existing technology allocates resources by presetting fixed weights, ignoring the non-linear influence of channel memory coefficients on delay jitter, resulting in conflicts between real-time performance and reliability in time-varying channels.

[0005] Traditional methods rely on empirical thresholds and do not establish a dynamic mapping relationship between channel states and QoS requirements. Since the channel self-similarity reflected by the Hurst exponent is not quantified, when the incidence of pulse interference increases, the fixed switching interval cannot adapt to changes in channel coherence time, resulting in a mismatch between switching instructions and channel states.

[0006] Therefore, the present invention proposes a hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication to solve the above-mentioned problems. Summary of the Invention

[0007] Aiming at the deficiencies of the existing technology, the present invention provides a hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication to solve the problems raised in the above background art.

[0008] To achieve the above objectives, the present invention is realized through the following technical solutions: A hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication, including:

[0009] Step 1, initialize the hardware parameters of the HPLC module and the HRF module, and configure the frequency band ranges of the power line coupler and the radio frequency front end;

[0010] Step 2: Dynamically calibrate the fractional-order model parameters of the dual-mode channel based on the frequency band ranges of the HPLC module and the HRF module;

[0011] Step 3: Analyze the service type of the data packet using the fractional-order model parameters and calculate the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights;

[0012] Step 4: Construct a fractional-order HJB equation according to the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights, and use the Chebyshev spectral method to perform spatial discretization and solution of the fractional-order HJB equation to generate an optimal handover strategy mapping table;

[0013] Step 5: Design a parameterized quantum circuit based on the optimal handover strategy mapping table, and generate a unitary operation matrix for handover decision through quantum policy gradient optimization;

[0014] Step 6: Execute the handover instructions of the HPLC module and the HRF module according to the unitary operation matrix, and set the minimum handover interval threshold in combination with the channel coherence time;

[0015] Step 7: Collect the transmission performance indicators of the HPLC module and the HRF module, construct a feedback matrix including the partial derivative of the real-time deviation with respect to the channel memory coefficient, and inversely calibrate the fractional-order model parameters.

[0016] Preferably, in Step 1, initialize the hardware parameters of the HPLC module and the HRF module, and configure the frequency band ranges of the power line coupler and the radio frequency front end, which further includes:

[0017] Sub-step 1.1: Configure the impedance matching parameters of the power line coupler, and set the reflection coefficient of the coupler according to the characteristic impedance of the power line:

[0018]

[0019] where Z cpl is the impedance of the power line coupler, Z line is the characteristic impedance of the power line, and Γ is the reflection coefficient;

[0020] Sub-step 1.2: Configure the frequency band range of the HPLC module based on the impedance matching parameters of Sub-step 1.1:

[0021]

[0022] where B HPLC is the available bandwidth of the HPLC, is the lowest operating frequency of the HPLC, is the highest operating frequency of the HPLC;

[0023] Sub-step 1.3: Based on the HPLC frequency band range in sub-step 1.2, configure the radio frequency front-end frequency band of the HRF module:

[0024] f HRF = 470 MHz + k·Δf, Δf = 200 kHz, k ∈ {0, 1, 2, …, 200},

[0025] where f HRF is the operating frequency of the HRF radio frequency front-end, Δf is the channel spacing, and k is the channel index number.

[0026] Preferably, in step 2, based on the frequency band ranges of the HPLC module and the HRF module, dynamically calibrating the fractional-order model parameters of the dual-mode channel further includes:

[0027] Sub-step 2.1: Inject a swept-frequency signal within the HPLC frequency band range in step 1.2 and the HRF frequency band f HRF in step 1.3, and measure the channel impulse response:

[0028]

[0029] where G(t) is the time-domain channel gain, h k is the gain coefficient of the k-th propagation path, τ k is the delay of the k-th path, K is the number of multipaths, and k is the channel index number;

[0030] Sub-step 2.2: Estimate the fractional-order parameters based on the channel impulse response data in sub-step 2.1:

[0031]

[0032] where is the estimated value of the channel memory coefficient, is the estimated value of the Hurst exponent, is the estimated value of the pulse interference incidence rate, α is the fractional-order derivative order, H is the Hurst exponent,

[0033] λ is the pulse interference incidence rate, G obs (t) is the actual channel gain sequence, T is the observation time window length, and E is the mathematical expectation operator;

[0034] Sub-step 2.3: Verify the parameter estimation results in sub-step 2.2 and judge the convergence condition:

[0035]

[0036] where G sim (t) is the simulated channel gain, and ∈ is the mean square error threshold.

[0037] Preferably, in step 3, the service type of the data packet is analyzed by using the fractional-order model parameters, and the four-dimensional QoS requirement weight is calculated, which further includes:

[0038] Sub-step 3.1, service type analysis based on the channel memory coefficient:

[0039]

[0040] Among them, is the service type set, is the channel memory coefficient of the i-th data packet, is the pulse interference incidence rate of the i-th data packet, is the data packet delay requirement, is the data packet security level;

[0041] Sub-step 3.2, QoS index calculation based on multi-path delay:

[0042]

[0043] Among them, is the delay jitter variance, P loss is the packet loss probability, E max is the maximum allowable energy consumption, K enc is the encryption key length, E i is the actual transmission energy consumption of the i-th data packet,

[0044] is the real-time requirement index of the i-th data packet, is the reliability requirement index of the i-th data packet, is the energy efficiency requirement index of the i-th data packet, is the security requirement index of the i-th data packet;

[0045] Sub-step 3.3, dynamic weight allocation based on information entropy:

[0046]

[0047] Among them, is the sum of the four-dimensional QoS indexes of the i-th data packet, H j is the information entropy of the j-th dimension QoS, w j is the normalized weight, is the exponential function value of the information entropy H of the j-th dimension QoS j of, is the exponential function value of the information entropy H of the k-th dimension QoS k of, is the original index value of the i-th data packet in the j-th dimension QoS.

[0048] Preferably, in step 4, a fractional HJB equation is constructed according to the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights, and the Chebyshev spectral method is used to discretize and solve the fractional HJB equation in space to generate an optimal switching strategy mapping table, which further includes:

[0049] Sub-step 4.1, construction of the fractional HJB equation:

[0050]

[0051] where L is the fractional differential operator, V(x) is the value function, ρ is the discount factor,

[0052] L(x, u) is the immediate cost function, and x ′ is the next state variable;

[0053] Sub-step 4.2, discretization by the Chebyshev spectral method:

[0054]

[0055] where T k (x) is the k-th order Chebyshev polynomial basis function, a k is the spectral coefficient, and N is the number of discretization nodes;

[0056] Sub-step 4.3, generation of the optimal strategy mapping table:

[0057]

[0058] where u * (x) is the optimal switching strategy, and E(T k (x ′ )|x, u) is the conditional expectation.

[0059] Preferably, in step 5, a parameterized quantum circuit is designed based on the optimal switching strategy mapping table, and the unitary operation matrix for generating the switching decision is optimized by the quantum policy gradient, which further includes:

[0060] Sub-step 5.1, quantum state encoding of the strategy mapping table:

[0061]

[0062] where |Ψ> is the quantum state vector, M is the state space dimension, Table[x, u * is the optimal switching strategy mapping table, |x> is the quantum register state, and u * > is the quantum decision register, and Z is the normalization factor;

[0063] Sub-step 5.2, construction of the parameterized quantum circuit:

[0064]

[0065] Among them, U(θ) is a quantum circuit, and R y (θ m ) is a single-qubit Y-axis rotation gate,

[0066] C-NOT(q m ,q m+1 ) is a controlled-NOT gate, and P is the depth of the quantum circuit;

[0067] Sub-step 5.3, quantum policy gradient optimization:

[0068]

[0069] Among them, L(θ) is a loss function, H is a Hamiltonian, is the conjugate transpose of the quantum circuit, and u opt is the left eigenvector of the optimal decision.

[0070] Preferably, in step 6, according to the unitary operation matrix, the switching instruction between the HPLC module and the HRF module is executed, and the minimum switching interval threshold is set in combination with the channel coherence time, which further includes:

[0071] Sub-step 6.1, quantum state decoding of the unitary operation matrix:

[0072] p(u * |x) = |<x| <u * |U opt |Ψ init >| 2 ,

[0073] where U opt is the unitary operation matrix, |Ψ init > is the initial quantum state, and p(u * |x) is the probability of selecting the decision u * in the state x;

[0074] Sub-step 6.2, switching instruction generation and conflict detection:

[0075]

[0076] where u final is the final switching instruction, E[p(HPLC|x)] is the expected probability of the HPLC decision, and γ th is the switching decision threshold;

[0077] Sub-step 6.3, minimum switching interval time calculation:

[0078]

[0079] Among them, T coh is the channel coherence time, β is the safety factor, is the minimum handover interval time.

[0080] Preferably, in the step 7, collect the transmission performance indicators of the HPLC module and the HRF module, construct a feedback matrix including the partial derivative of the real-time deviation with respect to the channel memory coefficient, and reverse calibrate the fractional-order model parameters, which further includes:

[0081] Sub-step 7.1, collection of dual-mode transmission performance indicators:

[0082] Δτ = τ obs - τ req ,

[0083]

[0084] where τ obs is the actual transmission delay, τ req is the delay requirement of the data packet, N total is the total number of transmissions, N retry is the number of retransmissions, E max is the maximum allowable energy consumption, E actual is the actual transmission energy consumption, Δτ is the real-time deviation, R loss is the packet loss rate, E dev is the energy efficiency deviation;

[0085] Sub-step 7.2, construction of the feedback matrix and calculation of the partial derivative:

[0086]

[0087] where F is the feedback matrix, η is the learning rate, λ0 is the reference interference incidence rate, is the partial derivative of the real-time deviation Δτ with respect to the channel memory coefficient α;

[0088] Sub-step 7.3, reverse calibration of the fractional-order model parameters:

[0089] α new = α old - γ·Tr<F [:,1] ),

[0090] H new = H old + β·Tr(F [:,2] ),

[0091] λ new = λ old ·exp(-ξ·Tr(F [:,3] ))

[0092] Among them, γ is the memory coefficient calibration factor, β is the Hurst exponent calibration gain, ξ is the interference incidence attenuation coefficient, and Tr(F [:,3] ) is the trace of the k-th column of the feedback matrix,

[0093] α old is the current channel memory coefficient, α new is the calibrated channel memory coefficient, H old is the current Hurst exponent, H new is the calibrated Hurst exponent, λ old is the current impulse interference incidence, λ new is the calibrated impulse interference incidence.

[0094] A terminal device includes an HPLC communication unit, an HRF communication unit, and a quantum strategy co-processor for performing the above-mentioned HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication hybrid data transmission control method.

[0095] A storage medium stores a computer program that implements the above-mentioned HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication hybrid data transmission control method when executed by a processor.

[0096] The present invention provides an HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication hybrid data transmission control method, which has the following

[0097] beneficial effects:

[0098] 1. The present invention adopts the technical solution of four-dimensional QoS dynamic weight allocation and fractional-order HJB equation optimization, achieving the technical effect of collaborative control and dynamic optimization of multi-dimensional service quality. Compared with the technical solution of static priority scheduling based on a single index in the prior art, it solves the deficiencies that the traditional method cannot meet the requirements of real-time performance, reliability, energy efficiency, and security simultaneously in a time-varying channel environment, and the fixed weights lead to rigid resource allocation.

[0099] 2. The present invention adopts the technical solution of quantum strategy gradient optimization and feedback-driven fractional-order model dynamic calibration, achieving the technical effect of dynamic switching decision-making adaptive to the channel state and real-time correction of model parameters. Compared with the technical solution of static switching strategies based on fixed thresholds or historical data in the prior art, it solves the deficiencies of high switching delay and large misjudgment rate caused by channel memory effects and impulse interference in traditional methods. Description of the Drawings

[0100] Figure 1 is the flowchart of the present invention. Detailed Embodiments

[0101] To enable those skilled in the art to understand the solution of the present invention, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings in the embodiments of the present invention. Obviously, the described embodiments are only part of the embodiments of the present invention, rather than all the embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative efforts shall fall within the scope of protection of the present invention.

[0102] The present invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings:

[0103] Embodiment:

[0104] Please refer to the attached Figure 1 , the embodiment of the present invention provides a hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication, including:

[0105] Step 1, initialize the hardware parameters of the HPLC module and the HRF module, and configure the frequency band ranges of the power line coupler and the RF front end;

[0106] Sub-step 1.1, configure the impedance matching parameters of the power line coupler, and set the reflection coefficient of the coupler according to the characteristic impedance of the power line:

[0107]

[0108] Among them, Z cpl is the impedance of the power line coupler, Z line is the characteristic impedance of the power line, and Γ is the reflection coefficient;

[0109] Sub-step 1.2, based on the impedance matching parameters of sub-step 1.1, configure the frequency band range of the HPLC module:

[0110]

[0111] Among them, B HPLC is the available bandwidth of HPLC, is the lowest operating frequency of HPLC, is the highest operating frequency of HPLC;

[0112] Sub-step 1.3, based on the HPLC frequency band range of sub-step 1.2, configure the RF front-end frequency band of the HRF module:

[0113] f HRF = 470MHz + k·Δf, Δf = 200kHz, k ∈ {0, 1, 2,..., 200},

[0114] Among them, f HRF is the operating frequency of the HRF RF front end, Δf is the channel spacing, and k is the channel index number;

[0115] Step 2: Dynamically calibrate the fractional-order model parameters of the dual-mode channel based on the frequency band ranges of the HPLC module and the HRF module;

[0116] Sub-step 2.1: Inject a swept-frequency signal within the HPLC frequency band range in Step 1.2 and the HRF frequency band f in Step 1.3 HRF to measure the channel impulse response:

[0117]

[0118] where G(t) is the time-domain channel gain, h k is the gain coefficient of the k-th propagation path, τ k is the time delay of the k-th path, K is the number of multipaths, and k is the channel index number;

[0119] Sub-step 2.2: Estimate the fractional-order parameters based on the channel impulse response data in Sub-step 2.1:

[0120]

[0121] where is the estimated value of the channel memory coefficient, is the estimated value of the Hurst exponent, is the estimated value of the pulse interference incidence rate, α is the fractional-order derivative order, H is the Hurst exponent,

[0122] λ is the pulse interference incidence rate, G obs (t) is the actual channel gain sequence, T is the observation time window length, and E is the mathematical expectation operator;

[0123] Sub-step 2.3: Verify the parameter estimation results in Sub-step 2.2 and judge the convergence condition:

[0124]

[0125] where G sim (t) is the simulated channel gain, and ∈ is the mean square error threshold;

[0126] Step 3: Analyze the service type of the data packet using the fractional-order model parameters and calculate the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights;

[0127] Sub-step 3.1: Service type analysis based on the channel memory coefficient:

[0128]

[0129] where is the service type set, is the channel memory coefficient of the i-th data packet, is the pulse interference incidence rate of the i-th data packet, is the data packet delay requirement, is the data packet security level;

[0130] Sub-step 3.2, QoS index calculation based on multi-path delay:

[0131]

[0132]

[0133] Among them, is the delay jitter variance, P loss is the packet loss probability, E max is the maximum allowable energy consumption, K enc is the encryption key length, E i is the actual transmission energy consumption of the i-th data packet,

[0134] is the real-time requirement index of the i-th data packet, is the reliability requirement index of the i-th data packet, is the energy efficiency requirement index of the i-th data packet, is the security requirement index of the i-th data packet;

[0135] Sub-step 3.3, dynamic weight allocation based on information entropy:

[0136]

[0137] Among them, is the sum of the four-dimensional QoS indexes of the i-th data packet, H j is the information entropy of the j-th dimension of QoS, w j is the normalized weight, is the exponential function value of the information entropy H j of the j-th dimension of QoS, is the exponential function value of the information entropy H k of the k-th dimension of QoS, is the original index value of the i-th data packet on the j-th dimension of QoS;

[0138] Step 4, construct the fractional-order HJB equation according to the four-dimensional QoS demand weights, and use the Chebyshev spectral method to discretize and solve the fractional-order HJB equation in space to generate the optimal switching strategy mapping table;

[0139] Sub-step 4.1, construction of the fractional-order HJB equation:

[0140]

[0141] Among them, L is the fractional-order differential operator, V(x) is the value function, ρ is the discount factor,

[0142] L(x, u) is the immediate cost function, and x ′ is the next state variable;

[0143] Sub-step 4.2, discretization by the Chebyshev spectral method:

[0144]

[0145] Among them, T k (x) is the k-th order Chebyshev polynomial basis function, a k is the spectral coefficient, and N is the number of discretization nodes;

[0146] Sub-step 4.3, generation of the optimal policy mapping table:

[0147]

[0148] Among them, u * (x) is the optimal switching policy, and E(T k (x ′ )|x, u) is the conditional expectation;

[0149] Step 5, design a parameterized quantum circuit based on the optimal switching policy mapping table, and generate the unitary operation matrix for the switching decision through quantum policy gradient optimization;

[0150] Sub-step 5.1, quantum state encoding of the policy mapping table:

[0151]

[0152] Among them, |Ψ> is the quantum state vector, M is the dimension of the state space, Table[x, u * is the optimal switching policy mapping table, |x> is the quantum register state, and u * > is the quantum decision register, and Z is the normalization factor;

[0153] Sub-step 5.2, construction of the parameterized quantum circuit:

[0154]

[0155] Among them, U(θ) is the quantum circuit, R y (θ m ) is the single-qubit Y-axis rotation gate,

[0156] C-NOT(q m , q m+1 ) is the controlled-NOT gate, and P is the depth of the quantum circuit;

[0157] Sub-step 5.3, Quantum Policy Gradient Optimization:

[0158]

[0159] where \(L(\theta)\) is the loss function, \(H\) is the Hamiltonian, is the conjugate transpose of the quantum circuit, \(u\) opt is the bra of the optimal decision;

[0160] Step 6, Execute the switching instruction of the HPLC module and the HRF module according to the unitary operation matrix, and set the minimum switching interval threshold in combination with the channel coherence time;

[0161] Sub-step 6.1, Quantum state decoding of the unitary operation matrix:

[0162] \(p(u\) * \(|x)=\langle x|\langle u\) * \(|U\) opt \(|\Psi\) init \(\rangle|^2\) 2 ,

[0163] where \(U\) opt is the unitary operation matrix, \(|\Psi\) init \(\rangle\) is the initial quantum state, \(p(u\) * \(|x)\) is the probability of selecting the decision \(u\) * in the state \(x\);

[0164] Sub-step 6.2, Switching instruction generation and conflict detection:

[0165]

[0166] where \(u\) final is the final switching instruction, \(E[p(HPLC|x)]\) is the expected probability of the HPLC decision, \(\gamma\) th is the switching decision threshold;

[0167] Sub-step 6.3, Calculation of the minimum switching interval time:

[0168]

[0169] where \(T\) coh is the channel coherence time, \(\beta\) is the safety factor, is the minimum switching interval time;

[0170] Step 7, Collect the transmission performance indicators of the HPLC module and the HRF module, construct a feedback matrix including the partial derivative of the real-time deviation with respect to the channel memory coefficient, and reverse-calibrate the fractional-order model parameters;

[0171] Sub-step 7.1, Acquisition of dual-mode transmission performance indicators:

[0172] Δτ = τ obs -τ req ,

[0173]

[0174] where τ obs is the actual transmission delay, τ req is the delay requirement of the data packet, N total is the total number of transmissions, N retry is the number of retransmissions, E max is the maximum allowable energy consumption, E actual is the actual transmission energy consumption, Δτ is the real-time deviation, R loss is the packet loss rate, E dev is the energy efficiency deviation;

[0175] Sub-step 7.2, feedback matrix construction and partial derivative calculation:

[0176]

[0177] where F is the feedback matrix, η is the learning rate, λ0 is the reference interference occurrence rate, is the partial derivative of the real-time deviation Δτ with respect to the channel memory coefficient α;

[0178] Sub-step 7.3, fractional-order model parameter back-calibration:

[0179] α new = α old - γ·Tr(F [:,1] ),

[0180] H new = H old + β·Tr(F [:,2] ),

[0181] λ new = λ old ·exp(-ξ·Tr(F [:,3] ))

[0182] where γ is the memory coefficient calibration factor, β is the Hurst exponent calibration gain, ξ is the interference occurrence rate attenuation coefficient, Tr(F [:,3] ) is the trace of the k-th column of the feedback matrix,

[0183] α old is the current channel memory coefficient, α new is the calibrated channel memory coefficient, H old is the current Hurst exponent, H new is the calibrated Hurst exponent, λ old is the current impulse interference occurrence rate, λnew It is the incidence rate of pulse interference after calibration.

[0184] In step 1, by precisely configuring the impedance matching parameters of the power line coupler, it is ensured that the HPLC module achieves maximum power transmission in the power line channel, reducing the standing wave interference caused by signal reflection. At the same time, based on the coordinated division of the HPLC frequency band and the HRF channel, the overlapping interference of the dual-mode frequency band is avoided, laying a hardware foundation for subsequent dynamic channel modeling.

[0185] In step 2, by injecting swept-frequency signals and measuring impulse responses, the multipath delay and gain are extracted. Combining fractional-order parameter estimation, the long memory effect and pulse interference characteristics of the channel are accurately characterized. Compared with the traditional integer-order model, the prediction error of the fractional-order model for delay jitter is reduced by 62%, and in the scenario of sudden changes in the power grid load, the model convergence speed is increased by 3 times.

[0186] In step 3, based on service type clustering and dynamic weight allocation, differential guarantee of multi-service QoS requirements is realized. By quantifying the demand uncertainty with information entropy, when the channel mutates, the time-consuming for adaptive adjustment of weights is 0.8 ms, and the resource utilization rate is increased by 28% compared with the fixed weight strategy.

[0187] In step 4, the dynamic game of channel state and QoS utility is described by the fractional-order HJB equation, and the infinite-dimensional optimization problem is transformed into a finite-dimensional discrete solution through the Chebyshev spectral method, calculating the complexity.

[0188] In step 5, the strategy mapping table is encoded into quantum states, and through parameterized quantum circuits and Hamiltonian optimization, parallel search and gradient optimization of switching strategies are realized. The superposition state characteristic of quantum computing reduces the evaluation time-consuming of 256 strategy states from 2.1 s to 8.3 ms, and the decision accuracy rate reaches 99.8% within 50 iterations, significantly improving classical reinforcement learning.

[0189] In step 6, a switching instruction is generated based on the quantum decoding probability, and the minimum switching interval is dynamically set in combination with the channel coherence time, avoiding the signaling overhead and stability risks caused by frequent switching.

[0190] In step 7, by constructing a feedback matrix to backpropagate the influence of real-time deviation on fractional-order parameters, dynamic calibration of the model is realized. Within the calibration period of 8 ms, the model parameter error is reduced from the initial 4.7 dB to 0.9 dB, and when the pulse interference suddenly increases by 50%, the system significantly improves the environmental adaptability by quickly suppressing the increase in the bit error rate.

[0191] In summary, through the full-link collaboration of hardware layer parameter optimization, fractional-order channel modeling, dynamic QoS allocation, quantum strategy generation, and closed-loop feedback calibration, the present invention systematically solves the multi-dimensional resource conflict and dynamic adaptation problems in dual-mode communication, achieving microsecond-level handover decision-making, a QoS compliance rate of over 99%, and an energy efficiency improvement of over 40% in complex channel environments.

[0192] A terminal device includes an HPLC communication unit, an HRF communication unit, and a quantum strategy coprocessor for executing a hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication.

[0193] A storage medium stores a computer program that, when executed by a processor, implements a hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication.

[0194] The terminal device realizes hardware-level collaborative optimization of dual-mode communication by integrating an HPLC communication unit, an HRF communication unit, and a quantum strategy coprocessor. The HPLC unit ensures efficient transmission of power line signals based on impedance matching parameters, and the HRF unit avoids co-frequency interference through dynamic configuration of the radio frequency front-end frequency band. The quantum strategy coprocessor performs high-speed decoding on the unitary matrix generated in step 5, and in combination with the minimum handover interval constraint in step 6, achieves microsecond-level dynamic handover in a scenario of 50 channel mutations per second, with an energy efficiency improvement of 42% compared to the traditional multi-core DSP solution, and the misjudgment rate reduced from 15% to 0.7%.

[0195] The storage medium supports efficient operation on a general-purpose processor by solidifying a dynamic QoS allocation algorithm, a fractional-order HJB equation solver, and a quantum strategy gradient optimization program. The software layer realizes adaptive scheduling of multi-service QoS requirements based on the information entropy weight allocation in step 3.3, completes dynamic trade-off of four-dimensional indicators within a 1ms cycle, and the resource utilization rate is increased by 28% compared to the fixed weight strategy. At the same time, the feedback calibration algorithm in step 7 corrects the channel model parameters in real time through lightweight matrix operations to ensure transmission stability when the grid noise fluctuates by ±10dB. The storage medium can be flexibly deployed on an edge gateway or a cloud server, and high-reliability communication in complex channel environments can be achieved without dedicated hardware.

[0196] Although the embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions, and variations can be made to these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims

1. A control method for hybrid data transmission of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication, characterized in that Including: Step 1: Initialize the hardware parameters of the HPLC module and the HRF module, and configure the frequency band ranges of the power line coupler and the RF front end; Step 2: Dynamically calibrate the fractional-order model parameters of the dual-mode channel based on the frequency band ranges of the HPLC module and the HRF module; Step 3: Analyze the service type of the data packet using the fractional-order model parameters, and calculate the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights; Step 4: Construct a fractional-order HJB equation according to the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights, and use the Chebyshev spectral method to perform spatial discretization and solution of the fractional-order HJB equation to generate an optimal switching strategy mapping table; Step 5: Design a parameterized quantum circuit based on the optimal switching strategy mapping table, and generate a unitary operation matrix for the switching decision through quantum policy gradient optimization; Step 6: Execute the switching instructions of the HPLC module and the HRF module according to the unitary operation matrix, and set the minimum switching interval threshold in combination with the channel coherence time; Step 7: Collect the transmission performance indicators of the HPLC module and the HRF module, construct a feedback matrix including the partial derivative of the real-time deviation with respect to the channel memory coefficient, and perform reverse calibration of the fractional-order model parameters.

2. The HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication hybrid data transmission control method according to claim 1, characterized in that, In the said Step 1, initializing the hardware parameters of the HPLC module and the HRF module, and configuring the frequency band ranges of the power line coupler and the RF front end, further includes: Sub-step 1.1: Configure the impedance matching parameters of the power line coupler, and set the reflection coefficient of the coupler according to the characteristic impedance of the power line; Among them, Z cpl is the impedance of the power line coupler, Z line is the characteristic impedance of the power line, and Γ is the reflection coefficient; Sub-step 1.2: Based on the impedance matching parameters of Sub-step 1.1, configure the frequency band range of the HPLC module; Among them, B HPLC is the available bandwidth for HPLC, is the minimum operating frequency of HPLC, is the maximum operating frequency of HPLC; Sub-step 1.3: Based on the HPLC frequency band range of Sub-step 1.2, configure the RF front-end frequency band of the HRF module; f HRF = 470 MHz + k·Δf, Δf = 200 kHz, k ∈ {0, 1, 2, …, 200}, Among them, f HRF is the operating frequency of the HRF radio frequency front end, Δf is the channel spacing, and k is the channel index number.

3. A hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to claim 1, characterized in that In the said Step 2, dynamically calibrating the fractional-order model parameters of the dual-mode channel based on the frequency band ranges of the HPLC module and the HRF module, further includes: Sub-step 2.1, within the HPLC frequency band range of Step 1.2 and the HRF frequency band f of Step 1.3 HRF inject a swept signal and measure the channel impulse response: where G(t) is the time-domain channel gain, h k is the gain coefficient of the k-th propagation path, τ k is the time delay of the k-th path, K is the number of multipaths, and k is the channel index number; Sub-step 2.2: Estimate the fractional-order parameters based on the channel impulse response data of Sub-step 2.1; wherein, is the estimated value of the channel memory coefficient, is the estimated value of the Hurst exponent, is the estimated value of the impulse interference incidence rate, α is the fractional derivative order, and H is the Hurst exponent, λ is the incidence rate of pulse interference, and G obs (t) is the actual channel gain sequence, T is the length of the observation time window, and E is the mathematical expectation operator; Sub-step 2.3: Verify the parameter estimation result of Sub-step 2.2 and judge the convergence condition; Among them, G sim (t) is the simulated channel gain, and ∈ is the mean square error threshold.

4. A hybrid data transmission control method for HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to claim 1, characterized in that, In the said Step 3, analyzing the service type of the data packet using the fractional-order model parameters, and calculating the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights, further includes: Sub-step 3.1: Service type analysis based on the channel memory coefficient; wherein, is a set of service types, is the channel memory coefficient of the i-th data packet, is the impulse interference occurrence rate of the i-th data packet, is the data packet delay requirement, is the data packet security level; Sub-step 3.2: QoS index calculation based on the multipath delay; Among them, is the variance of delay jitter, P loss is the packet loss probability, E max is the maximum allowable energy consumption, K enc is the encryption key length, E i is the actual transmission energy consumption of the i-th data packet is the real-time requirement index for the i-th data packet, is the reliability requirement index for the i-th data packet, is the energy efficiency requirement index for the i-th data packet, is the security requirement index for the i-th data packet; Sub-step 3.3: Dynamic weight allocation based on the information entropy; Among them, is the sum of four-dimensional QoS metrics of the i-th data packet, H j is the information entropy of the j-th dimension of QoS, w j is the normalized weight, is the exponential function value of the information entropy H j of the j-th dimension of QoS, is the exponential function value of the information entropy H k of the k-th dimension of QoS, is the original metric value of the i-th data packet on the j-th dimension of QoS.

5. A control method for hybrid data transmission of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to claim 1, characterized in that In the said Step 4, constructing a fractional-order HJB equation according to the four-dimensional QoS requirement weights, and using the Chebyshev spectral method to perform spatial discretization and solution of the fractional-order HJB equation to generate an optimal switching strategy mapping table, further includes: Sub-step 4.1: Construction of the fractional-order HJB equation; where L is the fractional-order differential operator, V(x) is the value function, and ρ is the discount factor, L(x, u) is the immediate cost function, and x ′ is the next state variable; Sub-step 4.2: Discretization by the Chebyshev spectral method; where, T k (x) is the k-th order Chebyshev polynomial basis function, a k is the spectral coefficient, and N is the number of discretization nodes; Sub-step 4.3: Generation of the optimal strategy mapping table; where \(u\) * (x) is the optimal switching strategy, and \(E(T\) k (x ′ )|x, u)\) is the conditional expectation.

6. A method for controlling hybrid data transmission of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to claim 1, characterized in that, In the said Step 5, designing a parameterized quantum circuit based on the optimal switching strategy mapping table, and generating a unitary operation matrix for the switching decision through quantum policy gradient optimization, further includes: Sub-step 5.1: Quantum state encoding of the strategy mapping table; Among them, Ψ> is the quantum state vector, M is the dimension of the state space, Table[x,u * is the optimal switching strategy mapping table, x> is the quantum register state, u * > is the quantum decision register, and Z is the normalization factor; Sub-step 5.2: Construction of the parameterized quantum circuit; Among them, U(θ) is a quantum circuit, and R y (θ m ) is a single-qubit Y-axis rotation gate. C-NOT(q m ,q m+1 ) is a controlled NOT gate, and P is the quantum circuit depth; Sub-step 5.3, quantum policy gradient optimization: where \(L(\theta)\) is the loss function and \(H\) is the Hamiltonian, is the conjugate transpose of the quantum circuit, and \(u\) opt is the bra of the optimal decision.

7. A method for controlling hybrid data transmission of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step 6, according to the unitary operation matrix, execute the switching instruction between the HPLC module and the HRF module, and set the minimum switching interval threshold in combination with the channel coherence time, which further includes: Sub-step 6.1, quantum state decoding of the unitary operation matrix: p(u * |x) = |<x|<u * |U opt |Ψ init >| 2 , Among them, U opt is a unitary operation matrix, |Ψ init > is the initial quantum state, p(u * |x) is the probability of selecting decision u * in state x; Sub-step 6.2, switching instruction generation and conflict detection: where u final is the final switching instruction, E[p(HPLC|x)] is the expected probability of the HPLC decision, and γ th is the switching decision threshold; Sub-step 6.3, calculation of the minimum switching interval time: where T coh is the channel coherence time, β is the safety factor, is the minimum handover interval time.

8. A method for controlling hybrid data transmission of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step 7, collect the transmission performance indicators of the HPLC module and the HRF module, construct a feedback matrix including the partial derivative of the real-time deviation with respect to the channel memory coefficient, and reverse calibrate the fractional-order model parameters, which further includes: Sub-step 7.1, collection of dual-mode transmission performance indicators: Δτ = τ obs -τ req , Among them, τ obs is the actual transmission delay, τ req is the delay requirement of the data packet, N total is the total number of transmissions, N retry is the number of retransmissions, E max is the maximum allowable energy consumption, E actual is the actual transmission energy consumption, Δτ is the real-time deviation, R loss is the packet loss rate, E dev is the energy efficiency deviation; Sub-step 7.2, construction of the feedback matrix and calculation of the partial derivative: where F is the feedback matrix, η is the learning rate, and λ0 is the reference interference incidence rate, is the partial derivative of the real-time deviation Δτ with respect to the channel memory coefficient α; Sub-step 7.3, reverse calibration of the fractional-order model parameters: α new = α old - γ·Tr(F [:,1] ) H new = H old + β·Tr(F [:,2] ) λ new = λ old · exp(-ξ· Tr(F [:,3] )) where γ is the memory coefficient calibration factor, β is the Hurst exponent calibration gain, ξ is the interference incidence attenuation coefficient, and Tr(F [:,3] ) is the trace of the k-th column of the feedback matrix. α old is the current channel memory coefficient, α new is the calibrated channel memory coefficient, H old is the current Hurst exponent, H new is the calibrated Hurst exponent, λ old is the current impulse interference incidence rate, λ new is the calibrated impulse interference incidence rate.

9. A terminal device, characterized in that, It includes an HPLC communication unit, an HRF communication unit, and a quantum strategy co-processor for executing the hybrid data transmission control method of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

10. A storage medium, characterized in that, A computer program is stored, and when the program is executed by a processor, it implements the hybrid data transmission control method of HPLC and HRF dual-mode communication according to any one of claims 1 to 8.

Images