Methods, apparatus, equipment and storage media for confirming supplier information before production commencement.
By constructing a parts and supplier list and combining it with product notification information, the system generates and transmits the information to the SCF system, solving the problem of supplier confirmation for production transition. This achieves automated supplier information display and feedback, improving work efficiency and accuracy.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- DONGFENG AUTOMOBILE COMPANY
- Filing Date
- 2026-03-27
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-02
AI Technical Summary
In the automobile manufacturing process, how to efficiently confirm the supplier's ability and conditions to switch to production and ensure the accurate issuance of production start-up notices is crucial.
By constructing a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before suppliers can switch to production, and combining the structure, item list and drawings in the product notification, the information to be confirmed is generated in the BOM system and transmitted to the SCF system for suppliers to confirm and provide feedback, and finally the production notification is issued.
It enables the automatic generation and transmission of parts supplier confirmation information, improving work efficiency, avoiding human error, and ensuring the scientific nature and timeliness of production notifications.
Smart Images

Figure CN122134048A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This application relates to the field of automobile manufacturing, specifically to a method, apparatus, equipment, and storage medium for confirming information of suppliers involved in production. Background Technology
[0002] The automobile manufacturing process is generally divided into several stages: trial production, preparation, completion, and mass production. The production preparation stage is a crucial condition and instruction for initiating production. The completion stage involves verifying the effectiveness of new product assembly data for production launch and is one of the criteria for determining whether a new product can be mass-produced and transferred to mass production. Before production begins, the most important tasks are confirming supplier inventory conditions and supplier pre-delivery times.
[0003] In practical applications, after receiving the completion notification, before issuing the production commencement notification, it is necessary to confirm whether the supplier's ability and conditions for transitioning to production are met. Therefore, how to verify relevant supplier information has become a pressing issue that needs to be addressed. Summary of the Invention
[0004] This application provides a method, apparatus, equipment, and storage medium for confirming supplier information before production transition, which can automatically generate and transmit parts supplier confirmation information before production transition, efficiently solving the problem of supplier confirmation before production transition.
[0005] In a first aspect, embodiments of this application provide a method for confirming supplier information for production transition, the method comprising: Construct a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before suppliers switch to production, combining the structure, item list and drawings in the product notification, and generate the information to be confirmed in the BOM system; The required confirmation information is transmitted to the SCF system so that the supplier can log in to the SCF system to determine the required confirmation information and transmit the confirmation result to the BOM system. Based on the confirmation results, a determination is made as to whether or not a production commencement notice should be issued. The information to be confirmed includes all parts that need to be confirmed, parts that need to be confirmed at different levels, and parts that need to be confirmed by the supplier.
[0006] In conjunction with the first aspect, in one implementation, for all parts requiring verification, specifically: Virtual parts are identified by the developed identification code and then rejected, leaving only the physical parts. Parts without drawings but with supplier codes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changed to non-drawing changes are not included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changes involving drawing changes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
[0007] In conjunction with the first aspect, in one implementation, for all parts requiring verification, it further includes: For multiple versions of the same sub-item in the same preparation completion notification, all cancelled versions and the highest adopted version will be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation, while intermediate adopted versions will not be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
[0008] In conjunction with the first aspect, in one implementation method, for parts requiring hierarchical confirmation, specifically: Remove the sub-item code from the preparation completion notification and include parts that are not used by vehicles in the preparation or preparation completion status into the scope of parts that need hierarchical confirmation. Include parts that have undergone changes in the project into the scope of parts that require hierarchical confirmation.
[0009] In conjunction with the first aspect, in one implementation method, for parts requiring supplier confirmation, specifically: Parts that have suppliers for themselves and their parent items are classified as parts that require supplier confirmation. Parts that do not have suppliers for themselves but whose parent items have suppliers are classified as parts that require supplier confirmation.
[0010] In conjunction with the first aspect, in one implementation, for parts requiring supplier confirmation, the method further includes: Parts whose parent item is in the trial production or preparation stage are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation. Parts whose item has no supplier but whose parent item has a supplier are included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation.
[0011] In conjunction with the first aspect, in one implementation, for parts requiring supplier confirmation, the method further includes: Parts marked as adopted by a supplier, canceled by a supplier, or whose supplier changes do not involve returning to the original supplier in the adoption / cancellation notice are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation.
[0012] Secondly, embodiments of this application provide a device for confirming supplier information for production transition, the device comprising: The module is used to build a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before suppliers start production, combining the structure, item list and drawings in the product notification, and generating the information to be confirmed in the BOM system. The transmission module is used to transmit the information to be confirmed to the SCF system, so that the supplier can log in to the SCF system to determine the information to be confirmed and transmit the confirmation result to the BOM system; The execution module is used to determine whether to issue a production launch notice based on the confirmation results. The information to be confirmed includes all parts that need to be confirmed, parts that need to be confirmed at different levels, and parts that need to be confirmed by the supplier.
[0013] Thirdly, this application provides a device for verifying supplier information for production conversion. The device includes a processor, a memory, and a program for verifying supplier information for production conversion stored in the memory and executable by the processor. When the program for verifying supplier information for production conversion is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the method for verifying supplier information for production conversion described above.
[0014] Fourthly, embodiments of this application provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a program for confirming information on suppliers involved in production transfers. When the program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the method for confirming information on suppliers involved in production transfers described above.
[0015] The beneficial effects of the technical solutions provided in this application include: By thoroughly interpreting the R&D project list and structural drawings, and combining the analysis of the structure and projects, the data is deconstructed and reconstructed. This captures the parts that need to be confirmed by each supplier, the parts that need to be cancelled, and their corresponding suppliers. A precise one-click automated transmission method is constructed, incorporating a large amount of technical logic and key rules for layer-by-layer traceability. This forms a scientific and effective automated system, enabling the formulation of a series of rules for BOM data and data reconstruction. It also enables the automatic generation and transmission of parts supplier confirmation information before production, efficiently solving the problem of supplier confirmation before production. The system automates the display of supplier confirmation information and the transmission of feedback, greatly improving work efficiency. Attached Figure Description
[0016] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the method for confirming supplier information for production conversion in this application. Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the functional modules of the device for confirming supplier information for production conversion in this application. Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of the equipment used to confirm the supplier information for this application's production conversion. Detailed Implementation
[0017] To enable those skilled in the art to better understand the present application, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present application, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments in the present application, all other embodiments obtained by those of ordinary skill in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present application.
[0018] To make the objectives, technical solutions, and advantages of this application clearer, the embodiments of this application will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
[0019] Firstly, this application provides a method for confirming supplier information before production transition. By parsing the content of the product notification and combining a series of functions and logics in the BOM system, the method achieves automatic display and transmission, efficiently solving the problem of supplier confirmation before production transition. It is not only more efficient, but also more scientific and accurate. That is, it realizes the automated display of supplier confirmation information and the automated transmission and feedback, which greatly improves work efficiency, eliminates any human judgment errors, and ensures scientificity and timeliness.
[0020] In one embodiment, reference is made to Figure 1 , Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the method for confirming supplier information for this application's production conversion. Figure 1 As shown, the methods for confirming supplier information for production transition include: S1: Construct a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before suppliers switch to production, combining the structure, item list and drawings in the product notification, and generate the information to be confirmed in the BOM system; S2: Transmit the information to be confirmed to the SCF system so that the supplier can log in to the SCF system to determine the information to be confirmed and transmit the confirmation result to the BOM system; S3: Based on the confirmation results, determine whether to issue a production commencement notice; The information to be confirmed includes all parts that need to be confirmed, parts that need to be confirmed at different levels, and parts that need to be confirmed by the supplier.
[0021] It should be noted that production commencement is a crucial instruction for downstream production planning, parts planning, factory material sourcing, and production. Before the production commencement document is issued, there are important confirmation items, such as adding inventory conditions and pre-delivery time confirmation. A supplier feedback interface is automatically generated in the BOM (Bill of Materials) interface and transmitted from the BOM system to the SCF (Supply Chain Finance) system. Suppliers log in to the SCF system supplier terminal to fill in inventory opinions, inventory quantities, and production commencement opinions online. The data is then transmitted back from the SCF system to the BOM system, which helps process engineers determine whether the production commencement notice should be issued.
[0022] Furthermore, in one embodiment, for all parts requiring verification, specifically: Virtual parts are identified by the developed identification code and then rejected, leaving only the physical parts. Parts without drawings but with supplier codes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changed to non-drawing changes are not included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changes involving drawing changes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
[0023] Specifically, for the confirmation of all parts, since the project corresponds to a project table in the product notification document, changes to the project are ALL changes in the equipment completion notification. The project scope is as follows: extract the R (R&D) change items from the project table, remove "device drawing" / 40 (basic block) / 48 (all device drawings, data, and technical protocol blocks) / 37 (assembly block, virtual management components), remove those that are canceled and use the same drawing markings (present or empty), remove those with A4 (drawings in the product notification document) which did not have A4 changes this time, and upload all others. The core logic is that virtual parts, after being identified by the R&D identification code, do not participate in data extraction; only physical parts are extracted because physical parts involve supplier processing, and only physical parts involve checking inventory and whether production preparation is complete.
[0024] In the R change, for pure A2 (project) A3 (structure) converted to ALL (all), for purchased parts that do not have A4 (drawings) themselves, such as engine assembly, instrument panel module 53G1A (part number starting field), nylon tube RQ85 (part number starting field), and oil hose YG (part number starting field), if there is a supplier code, it must be uploaded (i.e., included in the scope of all parts that need to be confirmed). In this case, only A2 is used, not A4 (drawings); for parts that have A4 drawings but whose change is not a drawing change, it is converted to ALL and the use of the same version is canceled, and it is not uploaded (i.e., not included in the scope of all parts that need to be confirmed); for any physical parts that have A4 drawing changes (which may also have A2 project / A3 structure changes), only those that are used must be uploaded (e.g., adding a new part that did not exist before, i.e., from zero to one), and those that cancel the use of different versions must be uploaded (e.g., canceling version A and using version B, part upgrade).
[0025] Furthermore, for all parts requiring confirmation, this also includes: for multiple versions of the same sub-item in the same preparation completion notification, all cancelled versions and the highest adopted version will be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation, while intermediate adopted versions will not be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
[0026] Specifically, for multiple versions of the same sub-item in the same preparation completion notification, all cancelled versions and the highest adopted version will be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation, while intermediate adopted versions will not be included. For continuous or multiple changes to a supplier's part, the highest adopted version and all process versions in the cancelled state need to be extracted, because it's considered that the supplier may incur inventory at each design change. However, for adopted parts, it's only necessary to confirm whether production preparation is complete and whether mass production is possible; therefore, only the currently adopted part needs to be known. For cancelled parts, the focus is on inventory, which may be present at each stage.
[0027] Furthermore, in one embodiment, for parts requiring hierarchical confirmation, the specific steps are as follows: Remove the sub-item code from the preparation completion notification and include parts that are not used by vehicles in the preparation or preparation completion status into the scope of parts that need hierarchical confirmation. Include parts that have undergone changes in the project into the scope of parts that require hierarchical confirmation.
[0028] Specifically, for cancelled parts, the backend needs to trace the process layer by layer to find the corresponding vehicle model. It checks if any vehicle model uses the part in either the "prepared" or "prepared-to-complete" state. If not, it means the part is to be cancelled, and this will appear on the supplier transmission interface, requiring the supplier to determine if there is any remaining inventory to confirm. For example, part 1119122-NF4101 is cancelled in the "prepared-to-complete" structure. After a regression query at the manufacturing project level, if no vehicle model uses it in either the "prepared" or "prepared-to-complete" state, it means the part is to be cancelled and will appear on the supplier transmission interface, requiring the supplier to confirm.
[0029] Furthermore, in one embodiment, for parts requiring supplier confirmation, the specific steps are as follows: Parts that have suppliers, both themselves and their parent items, are classified as parts requiring supplier confirmation. Similarly, parts that do not have suppliers but whose parent items do have suppliers are also classified as parts requiring supplier confirmation. For example, for engines, the engine's supplier can be traced through the engine technical agreement.
[0030] Furthermore, for parts requiring supplier confirmation, this also includes: Parts whose parent item is in the trial production or preparation stage are not included in the scope of parts that require supplier confirmation (because the parent item is still in the trial production or preparation stage, which does not meet the requirements for pre-production work confirmation. Before production, the work must be completed and the preparation must be completed). Parts whose item has no supplier but whose parent item has a supplier are included in the scope of parts that require supplier confirmation.
[0031] Furthermore, for parts requiring supplier confirmation, this also includes: Parts marked as "adopted supplier," "cancelled supplier," or "supplier change without reverting to the original supplier" in the adoption / cancellation notification are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation. These three categories all relate to changes in the current supplier and only occur at this level.
[0032] This application, through thorough interpretation of the R&D project list and structural drawings, combined with structural and project analysis, deconstructs and reconstructs the data to capture the adopted and cancelled parts that need to be transmitted to various suppliers for confirmation, along with their corresponding suppliers. This process considers various scenarios, such as large assembly parts without drawings, and how to identify the logic for adoption and cancellation in the process of multiple part changes. It precisely constructs a one-click automated transmission method, incorporating a large amount of technical logic and key rules for layered traceability, forming a scientific and effective automated system. This becomes a valuable tool to assist process engineers in implementing production transition. It achieves a series of rule-making and data reconstruction for BOM data, enabling the automatic generation and transmission of part supplier confirmation information before production transition.
[0033] This application innovatively constructs a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before supplier transition to production, generating it automatically with one click. Combining the structure and project tables in the product notification with the drawings, it analyzes the range of parts to be transferred, the level of parts to be transferred, and the supplier matching method, ultimately automatically generating a supplier implementation interface. For parts with multiple design changes, a supplier transfer mechanism is implemented: for adopted parts, the highest version of the part needs to be found; for cancelled parts, all cancelled parts in the process need to be found, based on rules established according to business needs. For adopted parts, the focus is on which part is used and whether production preparation is complete, so the process is not important. Cancelled parts involve potential inventory generated during the design change process, requiring a thorough check.
[0034] Secondly, embodiments of this application also provide a device for confirming supplier information for production conversion.
[0035] In one embodiment, reference is made to Figure 2 , Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram of the functional modules of the device for confirming supplier information for production conversion in this application. Figure 2 As shown, the device for confirming supplier information for production conversion includes: a construction module, a transmission module, and an execution module.
[0036] The construction module is used to build a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before the supplier can start production. It combines the structure, project list and drawings in the product notification and generates the confirmation information in the BOM system. The transmission module is used to transmit the confirmation information to the SCF system so that the supplier can log in to the SCF system to confirm the confirmation information and transmit the confirmation result to the BOM system. The execution module is used to determine whether to issue the production notification based on the confirmation result. The confirmation information includes all parts that need to be confirmed, parts that need to be confirmed at different levels, and parts that need to be confirmed by the supplier.
[0037] In this application, all parts requiring verification are specifically as follows: Virtual parts are identified by the developed identification code and then rejected, leaving only the physical parts. Parts without drawings but with supplier codes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changed to non-drawing changes are not included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changes involving drawing changes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
[0038] This application also includes, for all parts requiring verification: For multiple versions of the same sub-item in the same preparation completion notification, all cancelled versions and the highest adopted version will be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation, while intermediate adopted versions will not be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
[0039] In this application, for parts that require hierarchical confirmation, the specific details are as follows: Remove the sub-item code from the preparation completion notification and include parts that are not used by vehicles in the preparation or preparation completion status into the scope of parts that need hierarchical confirmation. Include parts that have undergone changes in the project into the scope of parts that require hierarchical confirmation.
[0040] In this application, the parts requiring supplier confirmation are specifically as follows: Parts that have suppliers for themselves and their parent items are classified as parts that require supplier confirmation. Parts that do not have suppliers for themselves but whose parent items have suppliers are classified as parts that require supplier confirmation.
[0041] This application also includes, for parts requiring supplier confirmation: Parts whose parent item is in the trial production or preparation stage are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation. Parts whose item has no supplier but whose parent item has a supplier are included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation.
[0042] This application also includes, for parts requiring supplier confirmation: Parts marked as adopted by a supplier, canceled by a supplier, or whose supplier changes do not involve returning to the original supplier in the adoption / cancellation notice are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation.
[0043] Thirdly, this application provides a device for confirming supplier information for production transfer. The device for confirming supplier information for production transfer can be a personal computer (PC), a laptop, a server, or other device with data processing capabilities.
[0044] Reference Figure 3 , Figure 3 This is a schematic diagram of the hardware structure of the device for verifying supplier information for production conversion involved in the embodiments of this application. In this embodiment, the device for verifying supplier information for production conversion may include a processor, a memory, a communication interface, and a communication bus.
[0045] The communication bus can be of any type and is used to interconnect the processor, memory, and communication interface.
[0046] Communication interfaces include input / output (I / O) interfaces, physical interfaces, and logical interfaces used for interconnecting internal devices within the equipment, as well as interfaces used for interconnecting the equipment with other devices (such as other computing devices or user equipment). Physical interfaces can be Ethernet interfaces, fiber optic interfaces, ATM interfaces, etc.; user equipment can be displays, keyboards, etc.
[0047] Memory can be various types of storage media, such as random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), non-volatile RAM (NVRAM), flash memory, optical storage, hard disk, programmable ROM (PROM), erasable PROM (EPROM), electrically erasable PROM (EEPROM), etc.
[0048] The processor can be a general-purpose processor, which can call the implementation program for confirming the information of the supplier involved in production transfer stored in the memory and execute the implementation method for confirming the information of the supplier involved in production transfer provided in the embodiments of this application. For example, the general-purpose processor can be a central processing unit (CPU). The method executed when the implementation program for confirming the information of the supplier involved in production transfer is called can be referred to the various embodiments of the implementation method for confirming the information of the supplier involved in production transfer of this application, and will not be repeated here.
[0049] Those skilled in the art will understand that Figure 3 The hardware structure shown does not constitute a limitation of this application and may include more or fewer components than shown, or combine certain components, or have different component arrangements.
[0050] Fourthly, embodiments of this application also provide a computer-readable storage medium.
[0051] The present application stores a transfer supplier information confirmation implementation program on a computer-readable storage medium, wherein when the transfer supplier information confirmation implementation program is executed by a processor, the steps of the transfer supplier information confirmation implementation method described above are implemented.
[0052] The method implemented when the procedure for confirming the information of suppliers transferred to production is executed can be referred to in the various embodiments of the method for confirming the information of suppliers transferred to production in this application, and will not be repeated here.
[0053] The terms "comprising" and "having," and any variations thereof, in the specification, claims, and accompanying drawings of this application are intended to cover non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, system, product, or apparatus that includes a series of steps or units is not limited to the listed steps or units, but may optionally include steps or units not listed, or may optionally include other steps or units inherent to such process, method, product, or apparatus. The terms "first," "second," and "third," etc., are used to distinguish different objects, etc., and do not indicate a sequence, nor do they limit "first," "second," and "third" to different types.
[0054] In the description of the embodiments of this application, terms such as "exemplary," "for example," or "for instance" are used to indicate examples, illustrations, or explanations. Any embodiment or design described as "exemplary," "for example," or "for instance" in the embodiments of this application should not be construed as being more preferred or advantageous than other embodiments or designs. Specifically, the use of terms such as "exemplary," "for example," or "for instance" is intended to present the relevant concepts in a concrete manner.
[0055] In the description of the embodiments of this application, unless otherwise stated, " / " means "or". For example, A / B can mean A or B. The "and / or" in the text is merely a description of the relationship between related objects, indicating that there can be three relationships. For example, A and / or B can mean: A exists alone, A and B exist simultaneously, and B exists alone. In addition, in the description of the embodiments of this application, "multiple" means two or more.
[0056] In some processes described in the embodiments of this application, multiple operations or steps are included in a specific order. However, it should be understood that these operations or steps may not be executed in the order they appear in the embodiments of this application, or they may be executed in parallel. The sequence number of the operation is only used to distinguish different operations, and the sequence number itself does not represent any execution order. In addition, these processes may include more or fewer operations, and these operations or steps may be executed sequentially or in parallel, and these operations or steps may be combined.
[0057] Through the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that the methods of the above embodiments can be implemented by means of software plus necessary general-purpose hardware platforms. Of course, they can also be implemented by hardware, but in many cases the former is a better implementation method. Based on this understanding, the technical solution of this application, in essence, or the part that contributes to the prior art, can be embodied in the form of a software product. This computer software product is stored in a storage medium (such as ROM / RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk) as described above, and includes several instructions to cause a terminal device to execute the methods described in the various embodiments of this application.
[0058] The above are merely preferred embodiments of this application and do not limit the patent scope of this application. Any equivalent structural or procedural transformations made using the content of this application's specification and drawings, or direct or indirect applications in other related technical fields, are similarly included within the patent protection scope of this application.
Claims
1. A method for confirming supplier information for production conversion, characterized in that, The method for confirming the information of suppliers involved in production conversion includes: Construct a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before suppliers switch to production, combining the structure, item list and drawings in the product notification, and generate the information to be confirmed in the BOM system; The required confirmation information is transmitted to the SCF system so that the supplier can log in to the SCF system to determine the required confirmation information and transmit the confirmation result to the BOM system. Based on the confirmation results, a determination is made as to whether or not a production commencement notice should be issued. The information to be confirmed includes all parts that need to be confirmed, parts that need to be confirmed at different levels, and parts that need to be confirmed by the supplier.
2. The method for confirming supplier information for production conversion as described in claim 1, characterized in that, For all parts requiring confirmation, specifically: Virtual parts are identified by the developed identification code and then rejected, leaving only the physical parts. Parts without drawings but with supplier codes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changed to non-drawing changes are not included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation. Parts with drawings but changes involving drawing changes are included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
3. The method for confirming supplier information for production conversion as described in claim 2, characterized in that, For all parts requiring verification, this also includes: For multiple versions of the same sub-item in the same preparation completion notification, all cancelled versions and the highest adopted version will be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation, while intermediate adopted versions will not be included in the scope of all parts requiring confirmation.
4. The method for confirming supplier information for production conversion as described in claim 1, characterized in that, For parts that require hierarchical confirmation, the specific details are as follows: Remove the sub-item code from the preparation completion notification and include parts that are not used by vehicles in the preparation or preparation completion status into the scope of parts that need hierarchical confirmation. Include parts that have undergone changes in the project into the scope of parts that require hierarchical confirmation.
5. The method for confirming supplier information for production conversion as described in claim 1, characterized in that, For parts requiring supplier confirmation, the specific details are as follows: Parts that have suppliers for themselves and their parent items are classified as parts that require supplier confirmation. Parts that do not have suppliers for themselves but whose parent items have suppliers are classified as parts that require supplier confirmation.
6. The method for confirming supplier information for production conversion as described in claim 5, characterized in that, For parts requiring supplier confirmation, this also includes: Parts whose parent item is in the trial production or preparation stage are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation. Parts whose item has no supplier but whose parent item has a supplier are included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation.
7. The method for confirming supplier information for production conversion as described in claim 5, characterized in that, For parts requiring supplier confirmation, this also includes: Parts marked as adopted by a supplier, canceled by a supplier, or whose supplier changes do not involve returning to the original supplier in the adoption / cancellation notice are not included in the scope of parts requiring supplier confirmation.
8. A device for confirming supplier information for production conversion, characterized in that, The device for confirming supplier information for production conversion includes: The module is used to build a list of parts and suppliers that need to be confirmed before suppliers start production, combining the structure, item list and drawings in the product notification, and generating the information to be confirmed in the BOM system. The transmission module is used to transmit the information to be confirmed to the SCF system, so that the supplier can log in to the SCF system to determine the information to be confirmed and transmit the confirmation result to the BOM system; The execution module is used to determine whether to issue a production launch notice based on the confirmation results. The information to be confirmed includes all parts that need to be confirmed, parts that need to be confirmed at different levels, and parts that need to be confirmed by the supplier.
9. A device for confirming supplier information for production conversion, characterized in that, The device for verifying and implementing supplier information for production conversion includes a processor, a memory, and a program for verifying and implementing supplier information for production conversion stored in the memory and executable by the processor. When the program for verifying and implementing supplier information for production conversion is executed by the processor, it implements the steps of the method for verifying and implementing supplier information for production conversion as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that, The computer-readable storage medium stores a program for confirming information on suppliers who have switched production lines, wherein when the program is executed by a processor, it implements the steps of the method for confirming information on suppliers who have switched production lines as described in any one of claims 1 to 7.