An industrial enterprise environmental protection level evaluation method
By establishing an evaluation indicator system and enterprise risk management, the problem of enterprise autonomy in environmental protection rating has been solved, and the objective quantification and dynamic reflection of environmental protection rating have been achieved, supporting enterprise self-assessment and regulatory-assisted rating.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- JIANGSU PROVINCIAL ACAD OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCI
- Filing Date
- 2026-03-02
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-09
AI Technical Summary
The existing methods for evaluating corporate environmental protection levels are mostly determined by the government, which lacks the ability for companies to make their own judgments and makes it impossible to detect problems in the environmental protection process in a timely manner, resulting in a lack of concreteness in environmental protection work.
Establish an evaluation index system, including modules for pollution control at the production source, production equipment management, production personnel management, pollution control during the production process, and pollution control of production emissions. Combined with enterprise operational risk management, score and prioritize the environmental protection level of enterprises.
It enables objective quantification and dynamic reflection of enterprise environmental protection rating, allowing enterprises to independently determine their environmental protection level, identify and improve deficiencies, and is applicable to self-assessment, regulatory-assisted rating, and green production transformation.
Smart Images
Figure CN122175436A_ABST
Abstract
Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to the field of environmental protection technology for enterprises, and in particular to a method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises. Background Technology
[0002] Corporate environmental protection refers to the systematic actions taken by enterprises in their production and operation processes to coordinate the relationship between humans and the environment and to ensure sustainable economic and social development. This is especially true for industrial enterprises, which generate a large amount of pollutants during industrial production processes. For example, concrete production generates a lot of dust and wastewater. If corresponding measures are not taken to treat these pollutants, it will lead to environmental pollution and affect the ecological balance. The environmental protection level of an enterprise is one of the important indicators for judging whether an enterprise is developing healthily. When determining the environmental protection level of an enterprise, it is necessary to evaluate the enterprise's environmental protection level according to the enterprise environmental protection level evaluation method. The importance of the enterprise environmental protection level evaluation method is self-evident.
[0003] However, existing methods for evaluating corporate environmental protection ratings have certain shortcomings:
[0004] First, the existing environmental rating methods for enterprises are mostly determined by the government, which are subject to uncertainty and market regulation. When enterprises are engaged in production and operation, they do not have the corresponding environmental rating methods. Therefore, in daily production and operation activities, they cannot evaluate the environmental rating based on the actual situation of the enterprise's production and operation, cannot promptly identify potential problems in the enterprise's environmental treatment process, cannot easily determine the enterprise's environmental rating level independently, and cannot concretize environmental protection work.
[0005] Therefore, a method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises is proposed, which is aimed at industrial enterprises, especially typical stationary pollution sources such as concrete mixing plants, and can be used for enterprise self-assessment, regulatory-assisted rating, and green production transformation path planning. Summary of the Invention
[0006] The purpose of this application is to provide a method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises, so as to solve the problems mentioned in the background art.
[0007] To achieve the above objectives, this application provides the following technical solution: a method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises, comprising the following steps:
[0008] S1: Determination of evaluation index modules: Based on the relevant nodes and factors that can affect the generation of pollutants during the enterprise's production activities, set up production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module.
[0009] S2: Construction of the evaluation index system framework: Based on the relevant nodes and factors affecting pollutants in the enterprise's production activities, an index framework is constructed to score each link;
[0010] S3: Enterprise Operational Risks and Risk Management: Classify enterprise operational risks according to the specified evaluation indicator modules and conduct risk management;
[0011] S4: Evaluation indicator system score allocation: After the evaluation indicator system is established, the evaluation indicator system accounts for most of the score, and operational risk management accounts for a small part of the score;
[0012] S5: Enterprise Environmental Protection Rating Assessment: The enterprise is scored by combining the evaluation index system with operational risk management, and the enterprise's environmental protection rating is assessed based on the score results.
[0013] S6: Enterprise Pollution Priority Classification: After the environmental protection level of an enterprise is assessed, the priority of the enterprise is classified according to the assessed environmental protection level.
[0014] Preferably, in step S5, when dividing the evaluation index system scores, each evaluation index is scored according to its priority and pollution risk level. The production emission pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production process pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production source pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production equipment management module accounts for 10 points, the production personnel management module accounts for 10 points, and the enterprise's operational risk management accounts for 20 points, for a total of 100 points. When scoring, each index must have a certain score for the score to be valid. If one or more of these indicators have zero points, the score is invalid. If the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module all have high scores, then the enterprise's operational risk management will definitely have a high score. If the enterprise's operational risk management score is low, the score is invalid.
[0015] Preferably, in step S2, when constructing the evaluation index system framework, the environmental protection indicators of enterprises will be graded according to the constructed evaluation index system. The grading is divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D, where A is excellent, B is good, C is qualified, and D is unqualified. Grade A is 90-100 points (excluding 90), Grade B is 80-90 points (excluding 80), Grade C is 60-80 points (excluding 60), and Grade D is 50-60 points (excluding 50). If the score of the evaluation index system is lower than 50 points, the index system grading shall not be carried out.
[0016] Preferably, in step S6, when classifying the pollution priority of enterprises, the priority levels are distinguished by color. The colors used for priority distinction are green, yellow, and red. If the enterprise's environmental protection level is A, the pollution priority is the lowest, which is green. This means that the enterprise can produce normally during heavy pollution weather warnings and emergency control periods, but can only deliver to green sites that meet dust control requirements. If the enterprise's environmental protection level is B or C, the pollution priority is medium, which is yellow. This means that the production and operation site must be rectified within a time limit, and production must be stopped during the control period. Otherwise, it will face more severe penalties. If the enterprise's environmental protection level is D, the pollution priority is the highest, which is red. This means that the enterprise must immediately stop production for rectification and cannot resume production until the rectification is completed. If rectification is hopeless, it will be shut down according to law.
[0017] Preferably, the pollution control module at the production source in step S1 includes dust pollution control during raw material transportation, dust pollution control during raw material unloading, and dust pollution control during raw material stacking. The pollution control module during the production process includes dust pollution control during material transfer, dust pollution control during batching, and dust containment control during the mixing process. The pollution control module for production emissions includes dust collectors and purification equipment to purify the air and wastewater emitted during production. The production personnel management module includes strictly following the operating procedures for production equipment, strictly following the management system for online monitoring and data reporting. The production equipment management module includes strictly following the production equipment maintenance system for equipment maintenance and establishing maintenance records.
[0018] Preferably, when constructing the evaluation index system framework in step S2, the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module are the primary evaluation indicators. Secondary evaluation indicators are set in each primary evaluation indicator, and the sum of the total scores of each group of secondary evaluation indicators is the score of the primary evaluation indicator corresponding to that group of secondary indicators.
[0019] Preferably, in step S3, when discussing the company's operational risks and risk management, operational risks include market risks, technological risks, policy risks, supply chain risks, and financial risks. These risks require risk-weighted management, which includes steps such as risk identification, risk assessment, weight allocation, and calculation of risk-weighted assets. After risk weighting, the corresponding risks are managed in a coordinated manner through risk management to ensure that production and environmental protection are carried out simultaneously.
[0020] Preferably, the pollution control modules at the production source, production process, and production emission control should be strictly implemented in accordance with the prescribed dust prevention measures and pollution treatment methods. The relevant equipment used in the above processes needs to be registered in the production equipment management module. The dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment used are managed in a unified manner with the production equipment. The dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment are maintained and repaired in accordance with the prescribed maintenance measures. In the production personnel management module, production management personnel need to operate the dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment as required. The management and maintenance of the dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment are also included in the evaluation of the production personnel management module.
[0021] Preferably, during the implementation of the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module, corresponding ledgers need to be established to record the above management and control steps. The ledger content should include the model of the equipment involved in each module, maintenance time, management personnel, and operating status.
[0022] This invention offers the following advantages: It establishes an evaluation index system that integrates with enterprise risk management to score enterprises. By combining scores from various modules—production source pollution control, production equipment management, production personnel management, production process pollution control, production emission pollution control, and enterprise risk management—the system details the completion status of environmental protection work in each module. This makes the enterprise's environmental rating more objective and quantifiable, dynamically reflecting the balance between emission risks and governance capabilities. In daily operations, the system allows enterprises to independently assess their environmental protection level. If deficiencies exist in the environmental protection system, improvements can be made based on the self-assessed rating, addressing shortcomings. This system is suitable for enterprise self-assessment, regulatory-assisted rating, and green production transformation path planning. Attached Figure Description
[0023] To more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of this application or the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly introduced below. Obviously, the drawings described below are only some embodiments of this application. For those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained based on these drawings without creative effort.
[0024] Figure 1 This is a flowchart illustrating the steps of the environmental protection rating method for industrial enterprises proposed in this application.
[0025] Figure 2 This is a schematic diagram showing the distribution of evaluation indicators for an environmental protection rating method for industrial enterprises proposed in this application. Detailed Implementation
[0026] The technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Obviously, the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. Based on the embodiments of the present invention, all other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art without creative effort are within the scope of protection of the present invention.
[0027] Please refer to Figures 1-2 This invention provides a method for evaluating the environmental protection rating of industrial enterprises, comprising the following steps:
[0028] S1: Determination of evaluation index modules: Based on the relevant nodes and factors that can affect the generation of pollutants during the enterprise's production activities, set up production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module.
[0029] S2: Construction of the evaluation index system framework: Based on the relevant nodes and factors affecting pollutants in the enterprise's production activities, an index framework is constructed to score each link;
[0030] S3: Enterprise Operational Risks and Risk Management: Classify enterprise operational risks according to the specified evaluation indicator modules and conduct risk management;
[0031] S4: Evaluation indicator system score allocation: After the evaluation indicator system is established, the evaluation indicator system accounts for most of the score, and operational risk management accounts for a small part of the score;
[0032] S5: Enterprise Environmental Protection Rating Assessment: The enterprise is scored by combining the evaluation index system with operational risk management, and the enterprise's environmental protection rating is assessed based on the score results.
[0033] S6: Enterprise Pollution Priority Classification: After the environmental protection level of an enterprise is assessed, the priority of the enterprise is classified according to the assessed environmental protection level.
[0034] In a preferred embodiment of this example, when dividing the evaluation index system scores in step S5, each evaluation index is scored according to its priority and pollution risk level. The production emission pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production process pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production source pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production equipment management module accounts for 10 points, the production personnel management module accounts for 10 points, and the enterprise's operational risk management accounts for 20 points, for a total of 100 points. During scoring, each index must have a certain score for the score to be valid. If one or more of these indicators have zero points, the score is invalid. If the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module all have high scores, then the enterprise's operational risk management will definitely have a high score. If the enterprise's operational risk management score is low, the score is invalid.
[0035] In a preferred embodiment of this example, during the construction of the evaluation index system framework in step S2, the environmental protection indicators of enterprises will be graded according to the constructed evaluation index system. The grading is divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D, with A being excellent, B being good, C being qualified, and D being unqualified. The grade A is 90-100 points (excluding 90), the grade B is 80-90 points (excluding 80), the grade C is 60-80 points (excluding 60), and the grade D is 50-60 points (excluding 50). If the score of the evaluation index system is lower than 50 points, the index system grading shall not be carried out.
[0036] In a preferred embodiment of this example, when classifying the pollution priority of enterprises in step S6, the priority levels are distinguished by color. The colors used for priority distinction are green, yellow, and red. If the enterprise's environmental protection level is A, the pollution priority is the lowest, which is green. This means that the enterprise can produce normally during heavy pollution weather warnings and emergency control periods, but can only deliver to green sites that meet dust control requirements. If the enterprise's environmental protection level is B or C, the pollution priority is medium, which is yellow. This means that the production and operation site must be rectified within a time limit, and production must be suspended during the control period. Otherwise, it will face more severe penalties. If the enterprise's environmental protection level is D, the pollution priority is the highest, which is red. This means that the enterprise must immediately suspend production for rectification and cannot resume production until the rectification is completed. If rectification is hopeless, the enterprise will be shut down according to law.
[0037] In a preferred embodiment of this example, the pollution control module at the production source in step S1 includes dust pollution control during raw material transportation, dust pollution control during raw material unloading, and dust pollution control during raw material stacking. The pollution control module during the production process includes dust pollution control during material transfer, dust pollution control during batching, and dust containment control during the mixing process. The pollution control module for production emissions includes dust collectors and purification equipment to purify the air and wastewater emitted during production. The production personnel management module includes strictly following the operating procedures for production equipment, strictly following the management system for online monitoring and data reporting. The production equipment management module includes strictly following the production equipment maintenance system to maintain and repair the equipment and establish maintenance records.
[0038] As a preferred implementation of this embodiment, when constructing the evaluation index system framework in step S2, the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module are the primary evaluation indicators. Secondary evaluation indicators are set in each primary evaluation indicator, and the sum of the total scores of each group of secondary evaluation indicators is the score of the primary evaluation indicator corresponding to that group of secondary indicators.
[0039] As a preferred implementation of this embodiment, when the enterprise manages operational risks in step S3, operational risks include market risks, technological risks, policy risks, supply chain risks, and financial risks. The above risks need to be managed with risk weighting, which includes steps such as risk identification, risk assessment, weight allocation, and calculation of risk-weighted assets. After the risk weighting is completed, the corresponding risks are managed in a coordinated manner through risk management to ensure that production and environmental protection are carried out simultaneously.
[0040] As a preferred embodiment of this example, the pollution control module at the production source, the pollution control module during production, and the pollution control module for production emissions should be strictly implemented in accordance with the prescribed dust prevention measures and pollution treatment methods. The relevant equipment used in the above process needs to be registered in the production equipment management module. The dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment used are managed in a unified manner with the production equipment. The dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment are maintained and repaired in accordance with the prescribed maintenance measures. During the production personnel management module process, production management personnel need to operate the dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment as required. The management and maintenance of the dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment are also included in the evaluation of the production personnel management module.
[0041] As a preferred implementation of this embodiment, during the implementation of the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module, it is necessary to establish corresponding ledgers to record the above management and control steps. The ledger content should include the model of the equipment involved in each module, maintenance time, management personnel, and operating status.
[0042] Working principle of this invention:
[0043] In this invention, an evaluation index system is established to score enterprises in conjunction with enterprise risk management. The scores obtained from various modules—production source pollution control, production equipment management, production personnel management, production process pollution control, production emission pollution control, and enterprise risk management—detail the various aspects of the enterprise's environmental protection work. The system provides a detailed description of the completion rate of environmental protection work in each module, making the enterprise's environmental protection rating more objective and quantifiable. It also dynamically reflects the balance between emission risks and governance capabilities. In daily operations, enterprises can independently determine their environmental protection level. If deficiencies exist in the environmental protection system, improvements can be made based on the self-evaluation rating, addressing shortcomings. This system is suitable for enterprise self-assessment, regulatory-assisted rating, and green production transformation path planning.
[0044] Finally, it should be noted that the above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those skilled in the art can still modify the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments or make equivalent substitutions for some of the technical features. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc., made within the spirit and principles of the present invention should be included within the protection scope of the present invention.
Claims
1. A method for evaluating the environmental protection rating of industrial enterprises, characterized in that, Includes the following steps: S1: Determination of evaluation index modules: Based on the relevant nodes and factors that can affect the generation of pollutants during the enterprise's production activities, set up production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module. S2: Construction of the evaluation index system framework: Based on the relevant nodes and factors affecting pollutants in the enterprise's production activities, an index framework is constructed to score each link; S3: Enterprise Operational Risks and Risk Management: Classify enterprise operational risks according to the specified evaluation indicator modules and conduct risk management; S4: Evaluation indicator system score allocation: After the evaluation indicator system is established, the evaluation indicator system accounts for most of the score, and operational risk management accounts for a small part of the score; S5: Enterprise Environmental Protection Rating Assessment: The enterprise is scored by combining the evaluation index system with operational risk management, and the enterprise's environmental protection rating is assessed based on the score results. S6: Enterprise Pollution Priority Classification: After the environmental protection level of an enterprise is assessed, the priority of the enterprise is classified according to the assessed environmental protection level.
2. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step S5, when dividing the evaluation index system scores, each evaluation index is divided into scores according to its priority and pollution risk level. The production emission pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production process pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production source pollution control module accounts for 20 points, the production equipment management module accounts for 10 points, the production personnel management module accounts for 10 points, and the enterprise's operational risk management accounts for 20 points, for a total of 100 points. When scoring, a score is valid if each indicator has a certain score. If one or more indicators have a score of zero, the score is invalid. If the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module all have high scores, the company's operational risk management will definitely have a high score. If the company's operational risk management score is low, the score is invalid.
3. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step S2, when constructing the evaluation index system framework, the environmental protection indicators of enterprises will be graded according to the constructed evaluation index system. The grading is divided into four levels: A, B, C, and D, where A is excellent, B is good, C is qualified, and D is unqualified. Grade A is 90-100 points (excluding 90), Grade B is 80-90 points (excluding 80), Grade C is 60-80 points (excluding 60), and Grade D is 50-60 points (excluding 50). If the score of the evaluation index system is lower than 50 points, the index system grading shall not be carried out.
4. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 3, characterized in that, In step S6, when classifying the pollution priority of enterprises, the priority level is distinguished by color. The colors used to distinguish the priority are green, yellow and red. If the environmental protection level of an enterprise is A, the pollution priority is the lowest, which is green. That is, it can produce normally during heavy pollution weather warnings and emergency control periods, but can only deliver to green sites that meet the dust control requirements. If a company's environmental protection rating is B or C, its pollution priority is medium, indicated by a yellow color. This means that the production and operation site must be rectified within a specified period and production must be suspended during the control period; otherwise, it will face more severe penalties. If a company's environmental protection rating is D, then its pollution priority is the highest, indicated by a red flag. This means that the company must immediately cease production for rectification and may not resume production until the rectification is completed. If rectification proves hopeless, the company will be shut down in accordance with the law.
5. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 2, characterized in that, The pollution control module at the production source in step S1 includes dust pollution control during raw material transportation, dust pollution control during raw material unloading, and dust pollution control during raw material stacking. The pollution control module during the production process includes dust pollution control during material transfer, dust pollution control during batching, and dust containment control during the mixing process. The pollution control module for production emissions includes dust collectors and purification equipment to purify the air and wastewater emitted during production. The production personnel management module includes strictly following the operating procedures for production equipment, strictly following the management system for online monitoring and data reporting. The production equipment management module includes strictly following the production equipment maintenance system to maintain and repair the equipment and establish maintenance records.
6. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, When constructing the evaluation index system framework in step S2, the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module are the primary evaluation indicators. Secondary evaluation indicators are set in each primary evaluation indicator, and the sum of the total scores of each group of secondary evaluation indicators is the score of the primary evaluation indicator corresponding to that group of secondary indicators.
7. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, In step S3, when discussing the company's operational risks and risk management, operational risks include market risks, technological risks, policy risks, supply chain risks, and financial risks. These risks require risk-weighted management, which includes steps such as risk identification, risk assessment, weight allocation, and calculation of risk-weighted assets. After risk weighting, the corresponding risks are managed in a coordinated manner through risk management to ensure that production and environmental protection are carried out simultaneously.
8. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, The pollution control modules at the production source, production process, and production emission control should be strictly implemented in accordance with the prescribed dust prevention measures and pollution treatment methods. The relevant equipment used in the above processes needs to be registered in the production equipment management module. The dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment used should be managed in a unified manner with the production equipment. The dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment should be maintained and repaired in accordance with the prescribed maintenance measures. In the production personnel management module, production management personnel should operate the dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment as required. The management and maintenance of the dust prevention equipment and emission purification equipment are also included in the evaluation of the production personnel management module.
9. The method for evaluating the environmental protection level of industrial enterprises according to claim 1, characterized in that, During the implementation of the production source pollution control module, production equipment management module, production personnel management module, production process pollution control module, and production emission pollution control module, corresponding ledgers need to be established to record the above management and control steps. The ledger content should include the model of the equipment involved in each module, maintenance time, management personnel, and operating status.