An anonymous group threshold aggregation storage certificate method
By generating anonymous partial proof fragments through vehicle-mounted terminals and performing threshold aggregation on servers or edge nodes, the problems of forgery, privacy leakage, and high cost in existing vehicle-to-everything (V2X) signaling proofs are solved. This achieves efficient and flexible anonymous group proofs, improving anti-forgery capabilities and privacy protection.
Patent Information
- Authority / Receiving Office
- CN · China
- Patent Type
- Applications(China)
- Current Assignee / Owner
- 郝彦博
- Filing Date
- 2026-03-16
- Publication Date
- 2026-06-16
AI Technical Summary
Existing trusted spatial signaling proof schemes for vehicle-to-everything (V2X) systems suffer from several drawbacks. Single device location feedback is easily susceptible to simulated positioning, location playback, or single-point forgery and deception. Bilateral mutual verification is insufficient to represent collective facts. Third-party on-site verification is costly and time-consuming. Furthermore, the lack of an anonymous evidence storage mechanism leads to privacy risks. Therefore, it is impossible to form auditable regional signaling aggregation proofs while protecting privacy.
Anonymous local proof fragments are generated by multiple vehicle terminals. The server or edge node performs threshold aggregation without restoring the real identity of the members, generating a regional signaling aggregation proof object, which includes anonymous member tags, window consistency results and local integrity protection results. This avoids directly transmitting personal details back and uses geofencing and time window objects to generate anonymous group co-existence facts.
It improves anti-forgery capabilities, reduces the risk of member identity and precise trajectory leakage, enhances the anti-mass forgery capabilities of group threshold results, improves the flexibility of project deployment, avoids pairwise scoring networks of members and strong on-site confirmation by third parties, and forms an auditable regional-level anonymous group proof.
Smart Images

Figure FT_1 
Figure FT_2 
Figure FT_3
Abstract
Claims
1. A method for distributed spatial signaling anonymity fragment threshold aggregation and evidence preservation, characterized in that, The method, executed collaboratively by multiple vehicle-mounted terminals, optional edge nodes, and a server, includes: the server or the edge node generating a geofence window object, the geofence window object including at least one or more of a fence area reference, a time window reference, a group size threshold reference, and a rule version reference; multiple vehicle-mounted terminals located within the fenced area exchanging one or more of anonymous signaling digests, member commitment digests, and session random number digests via short-range links under the constraints of the geofence window object, respectively generating local group fragment objects; and the multiple vehicle-mounted terminals or the edge node normalizing the local group fragment objects into regional signaling aggregation proof objects according to threshold signature rules, aggregation digest rules, and restricted disclosure rules. The aggregated proof object includes at least one or more of the following: regional signaling statistical digest, member number proof digest, anonymity consistency result, and threshold signature result. The server verifies the regional signaling aggregated proof object and, after confirming that multiple local group fragment objects satisfy the fence window consistency, proximity co-existence witness validity, and member number threshold, outputs one or more of the following: regional signaling high concurrency early warning result, channel occupancy status proof result, or network node clustering event identification result. The regional signaling aggregated proof object is used to characterize the regional anonymity group co-existence and signaling aggregation validity, rather than the pairing and mutual verification result between a single terminal or the third-party node presence witness result. The server retains aggregated proof references and rule version references to support historical playback and dispute review.
2. A distributed spatial signaling anonymity fragment threshold aggregation and evidence storage system, characterized in that, The system includes multiple vehicle-mounted terminals, optional edge nodes, and a server; wherein the multiple vehicle-mounted terminals are used to generate local group fragment objects, the edge nodes are used to perform aggregation and threshold signature collaboration, and the server is used to perform verification and evidence storage; the system is configured to perform the method of claim 1.
3. A computer-readable storage medium having a computer program stored thereon, which, when executed by a processor, implements the method of claim 1.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the near-range link switching includes at least one or more of session random number broadcasting, member commitment digest exchange, anonymous signaling digest acknowledgment, and local group fragment object solidification.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the member commitment summary includes at least one or more of the following: anonymous member identifier commitment, window session commitment, geofence binding commitment, random number binding commitment, sub-window overlay binding commitment, or motion state bucketing binding commitment.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the threshold signature rule requires at least that the number of valid members participating in generating the regional signaling aggregation proof object reaches a preset threshold, and that different member fragment objects satisfy time window consistency, fenced area consistency, and uniqueness within the anonymous member label window; when the threshold signature rule is not satisfied, one or more of the following are output: partial aggregation failure status, fragment supplementation request, or low-confidence aggregation flag.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the server outputs only one or more of the following to the outside world: regional signaling statistical digest, proof result code, threshold signature verification result, or aggregated evidence reference, and does not output the original trajectory plaintext of the vehicle or the complete signaling plaintext of the vehicle to the low-privilege subject.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein when the anonymity consistency result shows one or more of the following: insufficient number of members, abnormal close-range interaction, templated fragment aggregation, or fence binding conflict, the server outputs one or more of the following: rejection result, observation result, or supplementary verification result.
9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aggregated evidence reference is at least bound to one or more of the following: geofence window object reference, regional signaling aggregated evidence object reference, threshold signature result reference, regional signaling statistical summary reference, and rule version reference.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein when a dispute is triggered, the server issues a restricted audit request to an edge node or multiple vehicle terminals, the restricted audit request including at least one or more of an authorization token, a field mask, a window random number, and an audit scope reference, to perform a controlled review of the consistency between the regional signaling aggregation proof object and the local group fragment object.