Improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system and method

Abstract

An improved reverse-wound induction motor is provided that can achieve performance not previously possible and teach new methods for configuring and utilizing the reverse-wound class of motors. Embodiments can provide a reverse-wound induction motor (1) design having at least one drive stator-tuned reverse-magnetic system (8), at least one IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system (9), at least one rated full-load slip-minimized reverse-magnetic stator system (10), at least one reverse-magnetic effect-enhanced reverse-magnetic stator system (24) sized beyond the normal range, and at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (26). New factors and relationships for configuring the reverse-stator capacitor are disclosed that can achieve improvements in efficiency, slip, and power factor beyond what was previously understood as the performance limits for the reverse-wound class of induction motors.

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] This patent relates to designs, systems, and methods for a particular class of induction motors: reverse-wound induction motors. This class of induction motors has already been shown to provide motors with high efficiency and significantly better power factors, but this patent improves on those advantages. Through the realization and discovery of design configurations for this particular class of induction motors, this patent discloses arrangements, systems, and methods that improve on those advantages even further by going beyond and even overriding earlier understandings of recognized limitations. It shows that, with this new understanding, higher efficiency and better-performing results can be achieved for this class of induction motors. [Background technology]

[0002] Reverse-wound induction motors represent a unique class of induction motors. Introduced in U.S. Pat. No. 7,034,426 and expanded in U.S. Pat. No. 7,227,288 (each incorporated herein by reference), this class of induction motor was characterized by the use of not only primary or forward windings but also, specifically, secondary or reverse stator windings. Understanding of this class of motors progressed slowly. Even years after its introduction, additional discoveries and understanding remained significant. International PCT Patent Application No. US 2020 / 013538 and International Patent Publication No. WO 2021145864, entitled "Enhanced Reverse-Winding Induction Motor Designs, Systems, and Methods," (incorporated herein by reference), revealed that new understanding arose several years after its introduction. These included, at a minimum, how such motors can be enhanced, how they can be used to compensate for other effects, how they can be configured, how they can be utilized in networks, etc. These references demonstrate the rare and not easily anticipated properties of this entire class of induction motors. U.S. Patent No. 10,903,770 revealed that there was more to appreciate than a mere extension of earlier understanding. The patent clarified and expanded knowledge to provide new reverse-wound induction motor designs and uses. U.S. Patent No. 11,018,612, relating to a method for efficiently powering networks of electrical devices, continued those expansions. U.S. Patent Publication No. 202110320605, entitled "Systems for Networks of Efficiently Powered Enhanced Reverse-Winding Induction Motor," demonstrated how teachings and deeper understanding can often be counterintuitive.These enhancements, all of which are incorporated herein by reference, advance the state of this unique technology field and demonstrate their unique merits as appreciated through application experience and by measuring results in actual use. Although understanding has matured over the decades since its introduction, unexpected developments that exceed and sometimes shatter the limits of understanding continue for the reverse-wound induction motor class.

[0003] This patent disclosure shows that even further extensions are possible. While doing so is counterintuitive, it clearly shows that sometimes previously stated and recognized limitations can be abandoned to achieve even better performance and improved designs. This invention demonstrates that even now, decades after its initial introduction, there are still variations and new developments that are not only unexpected, but that still defy even previously understood limitations of this particular class of induction motor.

[0004] Thus, the present invention presents new and unique reverse-wound induction motor designs and methods as well as unique considerations for this particular class of induction motors. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0005] [Patent Document 1] U.S. Patent No. 7,034,426 [Patent Document 2] U.S. Patent No. 7,227,288 [Patent Document 3] International Publication No. 2020 / 013538 [Patent Document 4] International Publication No. 2021 / 145864 Summary of the Invention [Means for solving the problem]

[0006] This patent therefore discloses various new designs, systems, and methods that provide advantages for reverse-wound induction motors, presenting designs and configurations that can achieve higher efficiency, less slip, and better factors than previously achieved by this class of induction motor. Accordingly, one goal of embodiments of the present invention is to provide an improved reverse-wound induction motor that offers increased performance by coordinating a reverse-magnetic stator system with a more conventional drive stator present in conventional motors that do not have reverse stator windings or a reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0007] Another goal of the present invention is to provide a reverse wound design that achieves long sought efficiencies that are actually important from an overall motor efficiency standpoint. These currently achievable efficiencies may be at levels proposed as standards, but in many cases have previously been achieved only by ignoring elements or factors of what constitutes overall motor efficiency, which are all important considerations from an efficiency standpoint.

[0008] In line with this goal, it is an object of the present invention to provide a motor that provides a highly efficient reverse-magnetic stator system. More generally, the goal is to provide a motor that, surprisingly, actually achieves the newer standards of IE4 efficiency or NEMA Super Premium efficiency from an overall motor efficiency standpoint. Embodiments of the present invention actually achieve the newer standards of IE4 or NEMA Super Premium efficiency from an overall motor efficiency standpoint as never before achieved. Naturally, this includes achieving such aspects for the reverse-wound class of induction motors as well.

[0009] It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a motor that achieves significantly low slip under full load, always-on conditions. Necessarily, this includes achieving such an aspect for the back-wound class of induction motors.

[0010] Two other goals of these inventions fall into the categories of advancing the state of the art and advancing technical understanding of the entire field of reverse-wound induction motors. One goal is to overcome at least one previous limitation believed to exist with respect to reverse-wound class induction motors. Here, the goal is to demonstrate that recognized limitations with respect to reverse-magnetic stator systems need not apply and, in fact, to demonstrate that sizing elements beyond the usual range, particularly the size of the auxiliary stator capacitor in the system, can be beneficial. This is noteworthy because it was previously understood to be inadequate. In line with this goal, the present invention demonstrates that reverse-wound capacitor sizes beyond the usual range are not only possible but advantageous when properly selected to achieve a reverse-wound motor configured in accordance with embodiments of the present invention. This goal provides a method by which such levels can be established and demonstrates levels of performance that may be achievable when these newly discovered configurations are implemented.

[0011] In addition to providing a deeper theoretical understanding in the field of reverse-wound induction motors, the goal is to provide new relationships and new factors not previously understood as important for reverse-wound induction motor configurations. This goal not only clarifies the types of factors and relationships that are actually important, but also provides a method for setting beneficial values ​​for the reverse stator capacitors that will improve performance for such newly configured implementations. It includes the goal of providing alternative methods for assessing and setting reverse magnetic systems and reverse stator capacitance values ​​that can be applied when retrofitting or newly designing such optimal reverse-wound motors.

[0012] Naturally, other goals and objectives of the present invention will be disclosed throughout the text, appendices, and claims. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0013] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 depicts a cutaway view of an exemplary motor according to some embodiments of the present invention.

[0014] [Figure 2] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a motor with connections to electrical power according to some embodiments of the present invention.

[0015] [Figure 3] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a reverse magnetic stator system according to some embodiments of the present invention.

[0016] [Figure 4] FIG. 4 shows a typical design with adjacent forward and reverse windings in the stator portion of the motor enclosed within the motor frame.

[0017] [Figure 5] FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of a winding wire cross section according to an embodiment of the present invention.

[0018] [Figure 6] FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a step multiplier as applicable to determining and setting capacitor sizes for reverse wound motors in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.

[0019] [Figure 7] FIG. 7 shows Tables 1 and 2, which are values ​​for capacitors for typical frame sizes over a range of horsepower and kilowatt values. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0020] It should be understood that the embodiments include various aspects, which may be combined in different ways. The following description is provided to list elements and describe some of the embodiments of the present application. These elements are listed with the initial embodiment; however, it should be understood that they may be combined in any manner and in any number to create additional embodiments. The variously described examples and preferred embodiments should not be construed to limit the embodiments of the present application to only the explicitly described systems, techniques, and applications. The specific embodiment or embodiments shown are examples only. This specification should be understood and is intended to support not only the broad claims, but also each embodiment, and even claims from which other embodiments may be excluded. Importantly, the disclosure of merely exemplary embodiments is not meant to limit the scope of other, more comprehensive claims that may be made, which may be merely one of several ways or embodiments that may be employed in the broader claims, etc. Moreover, this description should be understood to support and encompass descriptions and claims of all various embodiments, systems, techniques, methods, devices, and applications, with any number of the disclosed elements, with each element alone, and with all the various permutations and combinations of all elements in this or any subsequent application.

[0021] As shown in Figures 1 and 4, a reverse-wound electric motor (1) operates as a typical induction motor, rotating a rotor (2) through the magnetic action of a drive stator (3), which has at least one drive stator winding (4) mounted therein and operating in conjunction with the rotor (2). As is well known, induction motors (1) can utilize magnetically permeable materials in both the rotor (2) and the drive stator (3), which together can be thought of as comprising a core (5). As is widely understood, there is at least one drive stator (3), and the at least one drive stator (3) has at least one drive stator winding (4). More commonly, there are as many drive stator windings as there are phases in the electrical AC power supply. Most commonly, a three-phase system has three drive stator windings (4). This also applies to the reverse stator windings (14) and reverse magnetic stator system (13), as will be discussed later. Thus, the drive stator (3) with its at least one drive stator winding (4) may be considered a forward winding or forward magnetic system.

[0022] As is common in standard induction motors, the rotor (2) and drive stator (3) are contained within a case or motor frame (6). This motor frame (6) typically encloses at least one drive stator (3) and the rotor (2). In the reverse-wound class of induction motors, the motor frame (6) also typically encloses at least a portion of at least one reverse-magnetic stator system (13), including one of its components, the reverse-magnetic stator (via a reverse stator winding (14)). As can be appreciated, the reverse-magnetic stator system (13) can therefore include at least one reverse stator winding (14).

[0023] As discussed below, it is worth noting that the industry has evolved with standardized motor frame sizing. For standard induction motors, these standardized motor frame sizes can generally establish the motor's characteristics (its horsepower or kilowatts), its full load current rating for a particular voltage, its efficiency, etc. Such motor frames (6) are currently standardized by standards-setting organizations such as NEMA and IEC. Embodiments of the present invention demonstrate that some of those predetermined values ​​are not appropriate for this class of motor, and certainly not appropriate for such motors according to embodiments of the present invention. Thus, the present invention may be considered, at least to some extent, to break the long-accepted paradigm that all motors have similar operating characteristics.

[0024] In operation, as initially shown in FIG. 2 , an induction motor (1) is operated by providing an electrical connection (17) to a power source (7). This power source (7) is typically a utility power source, such as a grid (20). The grid or other power source acts to energize at least one drive stator (3). The drive stator (3) acts on a rotor (2) and, through the interaction of the drive stator (3), causes the rotor (2) to rotate. In the reverse-wound induction motor class of motors, the power source (7) may also power at least one reverse-magnetic stator system (13). This may include powering or energizing the reverse-magnetic stator system (13) and reverse stator windings (14). For more general operation, powering the induction motor (1) often involves an induction motor drive system (16). The induction motor system drive system (16) may act to modify the way the motor operates in a known manner. The induction motor system drive system (16) can be a variable frequency drive (VFD) for speed regulation and control, which can, for example, modify the power factor, which can correct for power effects. Such a drive system (16) can be used with both conventional induction motors and reverse-wound classes of induction motors.

[0025] As mentioned above, a conventional induction motor has what may sometimes be referred to as at least one forward winding (12). In addition to at least one forward winding (12), the reverse-winding class of induction motors has at least one reverse-magnetic stator system (13), which may include at least one reverse-magnetic stator system (13). Adjacent forward (12) and reverse stator windings (14) are shown in FIG. 4. Co-wound forward and reverse stator windings may also be utilized. As shown through the connection diagram in FIG. 3, the reverse stator winding (14) may be configured or connected as a winding in the opposite direction to the forward winding (12) in that it provides an opposite magnetic field. This may also be achieved simply by reverse connection. Thus, such a motor may provide a reverse-winding electric motor, and a motor according to the present invention may have at least one drive stator reverse winding. The reverse magnetic direction winding may therefore operate in reverse fashion. Motors according to the present invention can generally have at least one opposing stator winding that is magnetically opposed, in that the magnetic field of the opposing stator is opposed to some degree relative to other elements in the motor, such as magnetic fields, to achieve a desired effect. They can also have at least one substantially driving stator that is magnetically matched with the opposing stator winding (14) in the sense that the two fields are at least partially simultaneous (i.e., taking into account current phase differences), may be close together, adjacent, and they not only interlock and drive the rotor, but also cause the desired effect of achieving improved efficiency, improved slip, improved power factor, or otherwise matching as desired.

[0026] FIG. 3 depicts a single reverse-magnetic stator system (13). The reverse-magnetic stator system (13) includes at least one reverse stator winding (14) (often three for a three-phase power supply). The at least one reverse-magnetic stator system (13) may also include at least one reverse stator capacitance (15), more generally a capacitor. As is now more fully appreciated and understood with respect to the reverse-wound class of induction motors, this at least one reverse stator capacitance (15) may be essential to the now-discovered improved operation of the reverse-wound class of induction motors. As will be discussed later, by appropriately selecting capacitance values ​​for each of the reverse stator capacitances (15), significant advantages can now be realized. Again, as with the reverse windings, there are often three reverse stator capacitances (15) for three-phase power supplies and the like. Finally, it should be noted that with this class of induction motors, the at least one inverted stator winding (14) may often be referred to as a generator winding because it is inverted, and therefore may be considered to produce results similar to that of a generator, as in a motor-generator. Importantly, in this class of motors, the rotor is rotated by the interaction of at least one drive stator (14) with at least one inverted magnetic stator system (13).

[0027] With this background in mind, one can further appreciate how the present invention provides an improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system and how the present invention provides power from or a method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system. These two parallel perspectives, an apparatus perspective (i.e., a motor system) and a process or method perspective (i.e., a method of providing power from a motor), similarly illustrate how the present invention can be described in apparatus claims, or method and process claims. The discussion in this patent, whether presented in apparatus element terms or method step terms, should be understood to support both. For example, above, electrical connection (17) to power source (7) should be understood to encompass the steps of electrically connecting, providing at least one electric motor, and powering the device, as would be well understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.

[0028] As stated, one of the goals of one embodiment of the present invention focuses on the aspects of having a drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic system (8). This understanding and discovery is significant because it changes the entire paradigm of how to design such motors, showing that there is now a way to optimize a class of reverse-wound induction motors beyond their already significant advantages. This aspect of the invention shows that the previous recognition of limitations in designing a reverse-magnetic stator system (13) in this class of motors is, in fact, not a limitation. To the extent that limitations were thought to exist depending on the currents and voltages expected for the reverse-magnetic stator system (13), those limitations are no longer necessary. Furthermore, new advantages can be achieved by designing other criteria and ignoring previously recognized limitations. And as a result, previous teachings that were viewed as limitations are, to some extent, no longer applicable.

[0029] As shown in FIG. 2 , in some embodiments, at least one reverse-magnetic stator system (13) can be configured as and considered to be at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system (8). This type of modeling and sizing criteria is particularly useful when there is an entirely new design with no previous frame values ​​to utilize. As is well known, a reverse-magnetic stator system (13) has an inverse reactance. This can be the result of the inverse stator winding (14) and the inverse stator capacitance (15), among other factors, as is well known in the art. In most reverse-wound class induction motors, a very important factor is the inverse stator capacitance (15), as it can govern the currents and effects of the reverse-magnetic stator system (13). Because the entire field of reverse-wound class induction motors is not supported by an extensive mathematical foundation and is largely experimental, the perspective of having at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic system (8) is an important recognition. And it is a realization (often through trial and error and experimental understanding) that enables significant increases in performance not previously expected to be achievable, a non-intuitive realization, and one that the prior art has taught away from. As noted, equivalent circuits and some estimates of performance and optimum parameters may eventually be developed and proven, but at this stage, reliably accurate theoretical modeling for the precise reverse-wound magnetic stator system 13 involved cannot be presented with a degree of confidence that they are unquestionably accurate and not in any way misleading; therefore, tabulated values ​​are provided. Instead, what is known is that coordinating aspects such as one or more of the capacitor reactance and the reverse-winding reactance with, among other things, such factors (e.g., reactance) of the drive stator 3 represents an extraordinary advance. These are not merely advances in degree.From some perspectives, these can ultimately be viewed as providing a reverse magnetic stator system (13) that acts to compensate for, enhance, oppose, generate, or cancel (to some extent) the effects from the drive stator (3) to achieve significant advances in overall motor (1) performance. From this perspective, the reverse magnetic stator system (13) (used in the singular, but throughout, it and other similar terms are meant in the context of "at least one") can function as, and be configured to function as, the drive stator-adjusted reverse magnetic stator system (8). Similarly, as shown in FIG. 3, the reverse stator capacitance (15) can function as, and be configured to function as, the drive stator-adjusted capacitance (18). The optimum value can be most accurately determined (set) through trial and error or by experimental testing. Improved performance can be achieved by powering the drive stator-tuned reverse-magnetic stator system 8 and then rotating the rotor 2 with the interaction of the drive stator 3 in conjunction with the drive stator-tuned reverse-magnetic stator system 8. Once the other elements of the motor are set, this can be accomplished by adjusting the drive stator-tuned capacitance 18 to obtain the desired performance from that particular motor configuration.

[0030] Yet another goal of another embodiment of the present invention focuses on the aspect of having at least IE4 overall motor efficiency or NEMA Super Premium overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system (9). An interesting attribute of embodiments of the present invention is that, perhaps for the first time, through these inventions, at least IE4 overall motor efficiency can actually be achieved by the motor alone. While other manufacturers also claim to have IE4 efficiency, upon full understanding, it is understood that their claimed efficiencies are generally not "total motor efficiencies" but rather efficiencies defined apart from any drive (16) elements, any network, or any ancillary components, and therefore not the true overall motor efficiency alone. For example, in some situations, the overall motor efficiency may be considered using apparent power, i.e., true power plus reactive power, or composite power, etc. Surprisingly, through this embodiment of the present invention, overall motor efficiencies at full load with the motor alone can now be achieved at or above IE4 or NEMA Super Premium established levels. As stated, this is accomplished by providing a reverse-wound induction class of motor, configuring the reverse magnetic stator system (13) as an IE4 total motor efficiency reverse magnetic stator system (9), and possibly configuring the reverse stator capacitance (15) as at least an IE4 total system efficiency capacitance (19). Again, This can be done experimentally by configuring components such as the inverse stator winding (14) and inverse stator capacitance (15) to obtain the desired efficiency and establishing them as an at least IE4 total motor efficiency inverse magnetic stator system (9) and at least IE4 total system efficiency capacitance (19). Similar to the drive stator-tuned embodiment, by powering an at least IE4 total motor efficiency inverse magnetic stator system (9) including or caused by the at least IE4 total system efficiency capacitance (19) and then using the interaction of the drive stator (3) in conjunction with the at least IE4 total motor efficiency inverse magnetic stator system (9) to rotate the rotor (2), improved efficiency and significant overall motor efficiency at or above IE4 levels can be achieved. Of course, the exact same is possible for NEMA Super Premium levels.

[0031] When considering efficiency and newer level sets, it can be important to understand the impact of standardized case or frame (6). Sizing, as set by standards-setting organizations such as NEMA and IEC, traditionally governs performance based on the motor type (pole count / speed, voltage, supply frequency, etc.). From this perspective, the frame establishes not only the motor's horsepower or kW rating, but also its other efficiencies. This is often accomplished through a nameplate installation process, where each motor has a nameplate (21) that specifies numerous parameters. While these may be considered minimum values ​​for economic and other reasons, they are often the only values ​​that are effectively met. And if a manufacturer fails to meet those standard nameplate (21) values ​​for that size frame (6) and those conditions (voltage, frequency, etc.) with that type of motor, those motors will not be sold. Interestingly, this nameplate installation process is performed by standards-setting organizations such as NEMA and IEC based on standardized case or frame (6) sizes. Newer efficiency levels of IE4 efficiency are established by IEC International Energy Efficiency Classifications (IE Codes), such as in IEC Standard 60034-30 (last revised in 2014), IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014, and NEMA 10011-22. NEMA also has an efficiency standard similar to the IEC's IE4 level, called "Super Premium" efficiency, which has a conceptually similar value. In the context of these inventive embodiments, the term "high efficiency" with respect to such reverse-magnetic stator systems should be understood, by analogy, to encompass similar IE4 or NEMA Super Premium levels and NEMA frame sizes.

[0032] For some current embodiments, efficiency, slip, and even power factor values ​​are given relative to a more conventional non-reverse wound class of motor. When used as a comparison, terms such as "at least IE4 overall motor efficiency," referred to as a reversed-magnetic stator system (9), are used to compare these embodiments of the present invention to a comparable non-reverse wound induction motor class of motor, a comparable motor with similar nameplate parameters (frame, number of poles, rpm, voltage, frequency, etc.) but without the modifications that would make it a reverse wound class motor. Modifications such as those required to provide space for and insert the reversed-magnetic stator system (13) are not included, but everything else, including operating conditions, is the same as a standard motor. For example, a NEMA frame size of 184T may have the following nameplate parameters: Horsepower 5, RPM 1,748, Enclosure TEFC, Design B, Frame 184T, Current 7.0A, Phase 3, Frequency 60Hz, Continuous Duty Rating Continuous, Voltage 460V, Type P, Ambient Temperature 40°C, Service Factor 1.15, Insulation Class F, Efficiency 82.5%, Power Factor 80%, DE Bearing 35BC02JGG30A26, ODE Bearing 3OBC02JGG3OA26. This nameplate indicates that the motor is a 5 horsepower motor operating at 82.5% efficiency. If this motor were brought into the reverse-wound class of induction motor, a similarly operating new motor (e.g., a 5 horsepower motor at 460V, 60Hz, 3-phase) according to these invention embodiments could be compared to this 82.5% efficiency, and the efficiency improvement could possibly be quantified. The myriad factors that go into determining likely nameplate values ​​are well known, can be calculated from design or signature analysis software, can be derived anew, and are published in various nameplate commentaries and standards for existing frames, and these are considered in assessing comparable motors and how improvements can be quantitatively determined.

[0033] In further understanding the improvements of embodiments of the present invention, it is also important to understand how the improvements exist and how difficult they are to achieve when performance levels are already high. While such embodiments of the present invention can add 3 to 5 absolute points of efficiency (over 100 horsepower) for larger motors and 5 to 7 points for smaller motors, these estimates are rough estimates. Instead, a better perspective is "percent of perfection." For example, for a motor already at 94% efficiency, adding an absolute additional 2 points of efficiency (94% to 96%) may not seem like a big deal, but in fact it needs to be considered in terms of how much those 2 points add to the remaining 6 percent. Adding 2 points to a motor that is already 94% efficient is very different from adding 2 points to a motor that is already 82.5% efficient. Those 2 points on a 94% efficient motor represent a 33% improvement (33% to perfection or 100% efficiency). Therefore, the difference from perfect 100% efficiency and the difficulty of achieving those last few percentage points are important. Therefore, the most important perspective for conceptually understanding the difficulty is the percentage from existing or non-inventive modified motor levels to perfection. 94% to 100% is only 6%, but it is difficult, and in fact, likely impossible, for isolated motors. Thus, while a 33 percent improvement over that 94% (toward 100% or perfection) is merely 2%, that amount is actually very large and is more appropriately understood as a 33 percent (33%) improvement over the existing amount of 94%. In this context, several types of improvement can be realized due to the benefits of these inventive embodiments: efficiency improvement, slip improvement, and power factor improvement. Each will be discussed in turn. It is also interesting to note that while some improvements to "perfect" represent levels of difficulty to achieve, some can actually be achieved (such as power factor, which is a special feature of the back-wound class of induction motors, and is therefore one of the reasons why they are all in a class by themselves).

[0034] In the context of embodiments including a reverse-magnetic stator system (9) or similar, the achieved level of overall motor efficiency improvement to at least IE4 standards can best be understood from a motor frame having a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor system motor frame (or its substantial equivalent, in the case of a newly designed frame) is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system (i.e., conventionally) in a comparable motor nameplate (21) situation. Thus, constant power efficiencies at rated full load that improve the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by at least 20% (e.g., 85%-88% or 95%-96%) of that amount toward perfect or 100% efficiency, and other values, are possible. Here, all embodiments can achieve such 20%, 33%, 40%, or even 50% improvements (e.g., 80%-90% or 94%-97%) compared to a comparable motor system motor frame when used without a reverse-magnetic stator system in such a comparable motor. It should be understood that such percentage improvements in efficiency can be achieved using the teachings of the present invention and by going beyond previously recognized limitations. In setting an appropriate at least IE4 overall motor efficiency capacitance (19), etc., in providing at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system (9), etc., and in providing at least one efficiency-optimized reverse-magnetic stator system, motor efficiency can be optimized for "high efficiency," even when more is achievable and the optimization does not achieve perfect overall motor efficiency.

[0035] Similar to the "percent of perfect" approach, absolute values ​​of efficiency can also be established for a motor of a given power and other conditions. In this regard, the overall motor efficiency at constant power and 100% of rated load can be selected from the following, to name a few: at least 98.5% efficiency for motors with a rated full load above 2 megawatts, at least 99% efficiency for motors with a rated full load above 2 megawatts, at least 98.5% efficiency for motors with a rated full load from 1 megawatt to 2 megawatts, at least 99% efficiency for motors with a rated full load from 1 megawatt to 2 megawatts, at least 98% efficiency for motors with a rated full load from 500 kilowatts to 1,000 kilowatts, at least 98.5% efficiency for motors with a rated full load from 500 kilowatts to 1,000 kilowatts, At least 97.5% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 100 kW to 500 kW, at least 98% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 100 kW to 500 kW, at least 97% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 20 kW to 100 kW, at least 97.5% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 20 kW to 100 kW, at least 96.5% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 5 kW to 20 kW, at least 97% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 5 kW to 20 kW, at least 96% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 1 kW to 5 kW, at least 96.5% efficiency for motors having a rated full load of 1 kW to 5 kW. Similarly, efficiency characteristics can be achieved that represent a transition towards perfect efficiency that exceeds the specific current IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for that motor type by an improvement towards perfect efficiency selected from at least a 20%, 33%, 40%, and 50% efficiency improvement towards perfect efficiency (compared to the IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for a comparable motor when the motor system motor frame is used without a reverse magnetic stator system in the comparable motor).Similarly, efficiency characteristics representing a transition towards perfect efficiency that exceeds the specific current IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for that motor type when the motor system motor frame is used without a reverse magnetic stator system in a comparable motor with an improvement towards perfect efficiency selected from at least 20%, 33%, 40%, and 50% efficiency improvement towards perfect efficiency can be achieved (compared to the IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for a comparable motor).

[0036] Similar to the improvements in efficiency just discussed, embodiments can be configured to improve slip (i.e., less slip under a given normal full rated load). Again, this can be viewed from a "percentage of perfect" improvement perspective and others. Here, embodiments can include at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system (10) and, possibly, at least one slip-minimizing capacitance (11). Again, this can be done experimentally by setting components such as the reverse stator winding (14), and particularly the reverse stator capacitance (15), as the slip-minimizing capacitance (11), obtaining the desired slip, and establishing them as the at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system (10) and at least one slip-minimizing capacitance (11). As with other embodiments, improved slip performance can be achieved by powering at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system (10) including or caused by at least one slip-minimizing capacitance (11), and then rotating the rotor (2) using the interaction of the drive stator (3) in conjunction with the at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system (10). Again, the achieved levels can be understood in the context of a motor frame having a comparable conventional non-reverse-wound induction motor standard nameplate or otherwise determined slip value (typically the difference between comparable motor nameplate (21) rpm at rated full load subtracted from the expected no-load drive speed (set by pole count and line frequency, typically apparent from nameplate load rpm)) when the motor system motor frame is used without a reverse-magnetic stator system (i.e., conventionally) in a comparable motor nameplate (21) situation. Here, embodiments of the present invention improve upon previous reverse wound motor designs and exceed previously anticipated limitations.Thus, when a motor frame is used in a comparable motor without a reverse-magnetic stator system, the slip at rated full load can be improved by at least 20%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and 95% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value at rated full load, i.e., that amount of slip improvement toward zero slip (e.g., the difference from perfect). Such values ​​can also be achieved at lower loads, such as 75% rated load. And, as with efficiency, there is also an absolute amount of slip improvement. Here, such embodiments can achieve less than 0.5%, 0.3%, or 0.1% slip at more than 75% of its rated full load, as well as less than 0.5%, 0.3%, 0.1%, or even 0.06% slip at a motor's rated full load.

[0037] Next, one can further consider power factor, whether from a "percentage of perfect improvement" perspective or otherwise. Again, each motor frame typically has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when used without a reversed magnetic stator system, with comparable motors and motor conditions. By experimentally or otherwise configuring the reversed magnetic stator system (13) and / or reversed stator capacitance (15) as described above, embodiments can now achieve a constant power, i.e., power factor at rated full load, that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value with a power factor improvement selected from at least 20%, 50%, 75%, 90%, and even 100% (i.e., 1.0 power factor!) power factor improvement (e.g., delta from perfect) of the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor toward 1.0 power factor.

[0038] As mentioned, setting the reverse stator capacitance (15) is a key element in constructing a reverse-wound motor according to embodiments of the present invention. One aspect that may be important in determining the appropriate reverse stator capacitance (15) may be the fact that the forward winding (12) and the reverse stator winding (14) may have different winding wire cross-sectional areas. This is accomplished to allow the reverse stator winding (14) to fit within the frame (6). Here, the ratio of the forward winding wire cross-sectional area, or drive stator wire cross-sectional area (22), to the reverse winding wire cross-sectional area, or reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area (23), may establish a ratio of approximately 2. This may represent a practical compromise between space, reactance, and efficiency for this class of reverse-wound induction motor. While many potential values ​​are illustrated using this ratio, it is not considered limiting unless explicitly stated.

[0039] As previously mentioned, previous reverse-wound motor component limitations are now no longer shown to be necessary. Previously understood relationships are now even shown to be suboptimal. By overcoming previous limitations and designing to newly understood relationships, new levels of performance can be achieved. This is most evident in the expected limitations and design relationships for reverse stator capacitance (15) to be optimal. These understandings and discoveries are important because they change the way such components are optimally configured for these motors. Importantly, the values ​​discovered to be optimal are significantly different from those previously considered appropriate. First, these new values ​​exceed previous limits. For some situations, they are different by one or even two orders of magnitude. This can result in significant improvements in performance, especially in areas (such as efficiency) that asymptotically approach ideal values, where a "percent of perfect" perspective is relevant such that small improvements represent large and increasing percentage improvements. Second, these new values ​​are based on relationships that are entirely different from those previously understood. These new relationships reveal that optimal design requires varying reverse stator capacitance (15) based on different parameters, particularly even voltage range. This aspect of the invention demonstrates that previous understanding of previous relationships and limitations in configuring reverse stator capacitance (15) for reverse magnetic stator systems (13) in this class of motors is no longer required, and that the actual components differ significantly (sometimes by several orders of magnitude) from those previously applied.

[0040] The unusual characteristics of exceeding those recognized limits are counterintuitive because they teach away from the embodiments of the present invention. Again, this is not simply a matter of degree, but rather a different relationship that sometimes provides significantly different sizing of one or more reverse stator capacitances (15). As is commonly understood with reverse-wound induction motors, at least one reverse stator winding (14) can be connected to at least one capacitor (15). Typically, one capacitor (15) is connected in series with each of the reverse stator windings (14). Surprisingly, to achieve new goals and achieve new types of reverse magnetic stator systems (13) and / or new types of reverse stator capacitances (15), as described with respect to various embodiments, the previous limits and relationships need to be abandoned. Now, in light of this discovery, embodiments can include capacitors that are well beyond the normal range, i.e., beyond those previously taught and without the previous maximum limits. In such embodiments, the present invention can be provided with a motor having at least one inverse stator winding (13) configured as a reverse magnetic effect enhanced inverse magnetic stator system (24) sized significantly beyond at least one normal range, where performance can be enhanced and improved to any extent beyond its assumed limits. By configuring at least one inverse stator capacitance (15) as a reverse magnetic effect enhanced capacitance (25) sized significantly beyond at least one normal range, embodiments can achieve the stated performance. Quantitatively, in some of these embodiments, this is an inverse stator capacitance (15) having a microfarad value as set forth in Tables 1 and 2. This can be determined more precisely by the relationships discussed later. While such values ​​are known to have not been attempted before (of course, it is a new relationship, and contingency efforts are not known), these values ​​are important because they result in significant improvements.At least one oversized reverse magnetic effect enhanced capacitance (25) can be sized to have a capacitance value in microfarads (MFD or μF) as shown in the tables for the stator-tuned configuration or via the relationships discussed below.

[0041] The teachings in U.S. Patent No. 10,903,770 establish that exceeding a specific value would be erroneous (even though much of this class of motor has been experimentally developed). Indeed, the present disclosure teaches, first, that such limits are not optimal for maximizing performance and actually limit achievable performance for the reverse-wound class of induction motors. Second, unlike previous teachings, the present disclosure teaches that even the use of a multiplier that is a constant value over a range of designed reverse-wound motor voltages is not optimal. Third, unlike previous teachings, the present disclosure teaches that even the use of previous complex conjugate or coupling terms is suboptimal. First, using a range multiplier that is very different and ultimately terminates at capacitance values ​​beyond the previous "limit" is not prohibited, and in fact is preferred. Second, the new range multiplier is not a fixed value, but rather varies within a specific voltage range in a ramp-step manner. Third, the previous complex conjugate or coupling terms are explicitly replaced with new relationships (which, surprisingly, are counterintuitive for retrofit designs or designs using existing frames, relating reverse winding parameters to frames when used for other than reverse wound motors). This type of new relationship results in very different values ​​and very different performance. While the prior art teaches a set multiplier, the new disclosure teaches that using an entirely different multiplier and one that ramps up over a particular motor supply voltage range (900V to 2,300V) is actually preferable for motor performance. It is noteworthy in this regard that the prior art teaches "Maximum reverse stator capacitance (15) value in microfarads = the old maximum multiplier x the motor's operating nominal motor current in amperes x ratio x the rated full-load motor current in amperes for the motor's RMS rated optimum operating motor voltage." Now, this new disclosure reveals that optimal capacitor sizing can be from one model that is actually derived from different and variable range multipliers times different factors for different motors for that model. Those factors can include the power, voltage, efficiency, and power factor of the different motors.And, surprisingly, the efficiency and power factor parameters are not even those that would apply to the final reverse-wound motor. In accordance with this new aspect of the invention, it has been discovered that reverse-wound motors and their performance can be optimized. This is accomplished by appropriately setting the reverse stator winding capacitors (15) to new values. The new relationships can even be realized with varying degrees of sophistication.

[0042] The new relationships for the existing frame can be understood in a methodical manner. First, it can be understood that the motors should have comparable supply (similar voltage and frequency) power, in some respects number of poles, but the inverse stator capacitance (15) of each phase with a microfarad value sized at an approximate value determined by the parameters for a dissimilar motor type induction motor. Interestingly, some of these parameters are not applicable to the modified reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor. Such parameters can be determined from known design criteria and calculations for standard comparable motors. As an example, these parameters could possibly be derived from induction motor design or Ansys Maxwell software currently available from ANSYS, Inc. TM as calculated by analytical software such as ALL-TEST PRO software, and as currently available from ALL-TEST Pro, LLC TM Software or its On-Line III TMThis can be determined using a traditional (non-reverse winding) relationship, such as derived from electrical signature analysis (ESA) software. It can also be determined from the nameplate, which would typically be found on the frame. With this new relationship, a more optimal capacitance value can be determined by the nameplate parameters of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor. Several parameters can be used. The capacitance size can be determined at least in part by the nameplate voltage of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor, at least in part by the inverse cube of the nameplate voltage of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor, at least in part by the nameplate power of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor, at least in part by the nameplate efficiency and power factor of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor, at least in part by the reciprocal of a quantity equal to the nameplate efficiency of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor times the nameplate power factor, and at least in part by a value determined by the multiplier times the nameplate parameters of the dissimilar motor-type induction motor. Each of these can be related in turn, but the preferred final relationship is to determine the capacitance value as a stepped variable multiplier that is stepped over a specific nameplate voltage range times the frame's standard nameplate motor power (in watts) times the reciprocal of a quantity equal to the cube of the frame's standard nameplate motor voltage (in volts) times the frame's standard nameplate motor efficiency (a decimal value) times the frame's standard nameplate motor power factor (a decimal value), each value having a microfarad value substantially equal to the frame's standard nameplate motor efficiency (a decimal value).

[0043] Three aspects are noteworthy and unusual in this regard. First, this relationship equates absolute values ​​that are not expected to be relatable units: microfarads, watts, and inverse cube volts. Certain composite values ​​of some motors result in inverse stator capacitance (15) in microfarads (μF, often referred to as MFD). As just two examples using preferred multipliers, if a suitable motor frame is rated at 5 horsepower (3,730 watts) at 460 volts with an efficiency of 89 percent (0.89 decimal) and a power factor of 83 (0.83 decimal), a capacitor of 10.6 MFD is optimal. Similarly, if another suitable motor frame is rated at 700 horsepower (522,000 watts) at 3,300 volts, with an efficiency of 95.5 percent (0.955 as a decimal) and a power factor of 88 (0.88 as a decimal), a capacitor of 27.1 MFD would be optimum. As noted below, this can be + or - 10%.

[0044] Next, with this model, it is not even the type of motor being designed that provides guidance; it is not a reverse-wound motor; it is an entirely different motor based on the frame size chosen for the design or construction. Dissimilar motors (meaning motors that are different in type) are used to find MFD values ​​that set the capacitance of very different motors. The capacitance has a magnitude determined by the magnitude of the induction motor, which has a comparable supply power but is a different motor type.

[0045] It is surprising that dissimilar motors set values ​​for this model and sizing criteria. For retrofits and for designs using a set motor frame, the previously reverse-wound designed motor using that particular frame determines the initial sizing of the reverse stator capacitor (15). The non-reverse-wound motor is comparable in that it has similar power and voltage, but it is still a different motor, and non-applicable efficiency and power factor values ​​are used because the final reverse-wound motor will have much better efficiency and a much better power factor. As is well known, motors typically have nameplates with various parameters when used as standard non-reverse-wound motors. These are the values ​​used in assessing the configuration of the reverse-wound motor reverse stator capacitor (15) value when using this model. For new designs where no existing frame exists, a similar frame can be used, or a separate model of stator tuning is provided. Both models yield similar values ​​and results, and therefore the qualifier "approximately or substantially equal" is appropriate.

[0046] As discussed with respect to the heterogeneous motor model, a further refinement of the relationship is to use a specific type of multiplier to determine the optimum size for the reverse stator capacitor (15) in a reverse-wound motor. As can be seen from the above, in the initial embodiment, this multiplier can vary with nameplate voltage or calculated supply power. A voltage-variable multiplier is preferred for some embodiments. Then, as discussed below, the sizing will achieve a near-Joule effect breakdown current (which is near-Joule effect breakdown capacitance). In this upper limit situation, the capacitor microfarad value can be approximately the capacitance value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in a reverse-wound, or more generally, reverse-magnetic stator system (13).

[0047] Another novel aspect regarding inverse stator capacitor (15) sizing is that the multiplier, for some embodiments, can be a multiplier that varies with a parameter or parameters. An example of this is shown in FIG. 6. In preferred embodiments of these inventions, the multiplier is a supply voltage variable multiplier in that it varies based on the frame nameplate voltage. Thus, the multiplier can be considered a voltage variable multiplier.

[0048] In still further embodiments, it has been discovered that the variation of the multiplier can be stepped (such as in a step function (39) at one location as shown in FIG. 6 on step function line (39), or in a stepped manner that simply varies the multiplier value over a range as shown by all the curves in FIG. 6) (these are but a few of the possibilities). Generally, such embodiments can include a stepped variable multiplier, which can progress from a lower level (31) to an upper level (32). As described above, this can apply to all multiplier options, so, for example, at the seemingly most desirable base or lower level (31) multiplier, there can be a lower step multiplier value of approximately 183,000. The upper level (32) can have an upper step multiplier value of approximately 1,358,000. Naturally, this relationship can be modified with respect to changes in units (such as horsepower to kilowatts and microfarads to farads), but such known quantitative changes are within the scope of the discussion herein. Furthermore, it should be understood that for purposes of determining capacitance values, the terms "about" and "substantially equal" can be quantitatively narrowed to values ​​within ten percent (10%) or fifteen percent (15%) of the originally determined value.

[0049] Interestingly, in the context of some embodiments, the variation can be, and presently is, preferably limited to a particular voltage range. Thus, embodiments can provide a supply voltage range variable multiplier. And, even further, within this range, the multiplier can increase in various ways, thus generally providing a supply voltage range ramp-up variable multiplier. The ramping can be limited to a particular supply voltage range in that values ​​outside that range (outside of (33) and (35)) are relatively constant at the upper (32) or lower (31) levels. Thus, embodiments include limited voltage range ramping variable multipliers. Again, the ranges and values ​​can be determined experimentally; however, this preferred embodiment of the present invention has a lower ramp range value of approximately 900 volts and an upper ramp range value of approximately 2,300 volts. This is more generally shown in FIG. 6. In variation magnitude or range, the change can be linear, as shown by the linear slope line (37). While the slope can vary, this describes a linearly varying stepped multiplier. Other lines, such as (36) and (38), depict smoothed versions, and known smoothing techniques can be applied in various ways. Both of these are part of a more general family, including smooth stepped multipliers. All of these can be performed within a specific range, such as the 900V to 2,300V range mentioned above. Thus, there can be linear voltage range ramping variable multipliers and smooth range ramping variable multipliers. The center of variation (34), whether stepped, linear ramp, or smooth stepped multiplier, can be at various values, including, but not limited to, the 900V value, the midpoint of the range value, the 1,550V value (as depicted by line (34) in FIG. 6), or even the 2,300V value. Thus, perhaps using a depiction interpreted as 1,550V, but by way of example only, there can be a ramp centered about the 1,550V value.

[0050] As noted above, the reverse stator capacitance (15) value can be up to a value near the capacitance value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding. By powering at least one oversized reverse magnetic effect enhanced reverse magnetic stator system (24) that includes or is caused by at least one oversized reverse magnetic effect enhanced capacitance (25), and then rotating the rotor (2) using the interaction of the drive stator (3) with the oversized reverse magnetic effect enhanced reverse magnetic stator system (24), improved performance can be achieved. Furthermore, as noted, in many cases, the results achieved are experimentally accomplished. They are not intuitive compared to previous understandings of the reverse-wound class of induction motors.

[0051] Setting the current in the reversed stator windings (14) to approach the Joule effect breakdown current density level is a completely new understanding for reversed wound motors. The Joule effect breakdown current density is the current density that typically occurs when a conductor begins to fail under certain conditions and circumstances, known as Joule effect heating (I 2R) is the level for the type and size of conductor at the point where breakdown occurs. For the reverse-wound class of induction motors, it has been determined to date that it is essential to avoid approaching the Joule effect breakdown current density, or excessive heat may be generated. Obviously, this may depend on the motor conditions (e.g., altitude) and the type of case employed, but improved performance is now possible by establishing a substantially maximum current density reverse-magnetic stator system or a near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (13) rather than simply exceeding previously recognized limits. And previously recognized limits are now understood to be suboptimal, as they are likely well below the near-Joule effect breakdown current densities currently understood to be desirable. Thus, embodiments may have at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (26) and at least one near-Joule effect breakdown capacitance (27). Improvements can be achieved by powering at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (26) and rotating the rotor (2) using the interaction of the at least one drive stator (3) and the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (26). To establish the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (26), the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown capacitance (27), or the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown capacitance, the motor can have a capacitance value selected from approximately 99%, 98%, 95%, 90%, 85%, and 80% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse stator winding (14). This can be considered to provide the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system (26).

[0052] Finally, the capacitance values ​​for some representative motors are presented as just a few examples of the types of capacitance that may represent the inverse stator capacitance (15) for some embodiments described herein shown in Tables 1 and 2. These may be a starting point for experimental efforts to find optimal values, and it should be understood that these are estimates for some configurations derived from stator-tuned approaches or models to determine capacitor values.

[0053] While the present invention has been described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, it is not intended to limit the scope of the invention to the particular forms described, but on the contrary, to cover alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the disclosed embodiments. Examples of alternative claims (presented as appendices) may include:

[0054] 1. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; at least one reverse magnetic stator system; - at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined at least in part by the nameplate power and at least in part by the inverse cube of the nameplate voltage of an induction motor of comparable supply power but different motor type; -Rotor and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0055] 2. The improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 1 or any other Claim, comprising at least one reverse stator capacitance having a size determined by parameters for a dissimilar motor type induction motor of comparable supply power but inapplicable to the improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor.

[0056] 3. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 1 or any other Claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance comprises at least one reverse stator capacitance having a size determined by nameplate parameters of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0057] 4. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1 or any other clause, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one substantially drive stator that is magnetically aligned with the reverse stator winding.

[0058] 5. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 4 or any other clause, wherein the at least one substantially driving stator that is magnetically aligned with a reverse stator winding includes at least one magnetically opposing reverse stator winding.

[0059] 6. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 5 or any other clause, wherein the drive stator has at least one drive stator winding, and the at least one magnetically opposed reverse stator winding comprises at least one drive stator counter winding.

[0060] 7. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 6 or any other Claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the reciprocal of a quantity equal to the nameplate efficiency times the nameplate power factor of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0061] 8. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 7 or any other Claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by a multiplier times a value determined by a nameplate parameter of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0062] 9. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 8 or any other claim, wherein the multiplier comprises a voltage-variable multiplier.

[0063] 10. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 9 or any other clause, wherein the voltage variable multiplier comprises a stepped variable multiplier.

[0064] 11. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 1 or any other Claim, wherein the at least one inverse stator capacitance comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a microfarad value substantially equal to a stepped variable multiplier that is stepped over a specific nameplate voltage range times the frame's standard nameplate motor power (in watts) times the reciprocal of a quantity equal to the cube of the frame's standard nameplate motor voltage times the frame's standard nameplate motor efficiency (as a decimal value) times the frame's standard nameplate motor power factor (as a decimal value).

[0065] 12. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 11 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier has a lower step multiplier value of about 183,000.

[0066] 13. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 12 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier has an upper step multiplier value of about 1,358,000.

[0067] 14. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 13 or any other clause, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier having a lower ramp range value of approximately 900 volts.

[0068] 15. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 14 or any other clause, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier has an upper ramp range value of approximately 2,300 volts.

[0069] 16. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6 or any other clause, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0070] 17. The improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6 or any other claim, wherein the at least one inverse stator capacitance comprises at least one inverse magnetic effect enhancing capacitance of an amount exceeding the normal range.

[0071] 18. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 6 or any other Claim, wherein the at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0072] 19. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1 or any other clause, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reversed stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reversed stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

[0073] 20. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1 or any other clause, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0074] 21. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a - an efficiency improvement of at least 33% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 40% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 50% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; 10. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1 or any other claim, having a constant power efficiency that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by an efficiency improvement selected from:

[0075] 22. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and a power factor improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 33% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 40% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; Power factor improvement of the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor to achieve a -1.0 power factor; 10. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1 or any other clause, having a constant power power factor that improves upon the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value by a power factor improvement selected from:

[0076] 23. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a - a slip improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - Slip improvement of at least 95% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; 10. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1 or any other claim, having a constant power slip that improves upon the comparable motor standard nameplate slip value by a slip improvement selected from:

[0077] 24. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 6 or any other Claim, wherein the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system includes at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0078] 25. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of Claim 6 or any other Claim, wherein the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system includes at least one NEMA Super Premium Overall Motor Efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0079] 26. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; at least one reverse magnetic stator system; - at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by an induction motor of comparable supply power but of a different motor type; -Rotor and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0080] 27. The improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reversed stator capacitance has a size determined by parameters for a dissimilar motor type induction motor of comparable supply power but inapplicable to the improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor.

[0081] 28. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 27 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance comprises at least one reverse stator capacitance having a size determined by nameplate parameters of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0082] 29. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 28 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the inverse cube of the nameplate voltage of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0083] 30. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 28 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the nameplate power of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0084] 31. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 30 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the reciprocal of a quantity equal to the nameplate efficiency times the nameplate power factor of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0085] 32. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 28 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by a multiplier times a value determined by a nameplate parameter of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0086] 33. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 32 or any other claim, wherein the at least 1.65x multiplier comprises a voltage variable multiplier of at least 1.65x.

[0087] 34. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 33 or any other claim, wherein the at least 1.65x voltage variable multiplier comprises a stepped variable multiplier.

[0088] 35. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 34 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier has a lower step multiplier value of about 183,000.

[0089] 36. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 35 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier has an upper step multiplier value of approximately 1,358,000.

[0090] 37. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 34 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a supply voltage range variable multiplier.

[0091] 38. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 37 or any other claim, wherein the supply voltage range variable multiplier comprises a supply voltage range ramp-up variable multiplier.

[0092] 39. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 38 or any other claim, wherein the supply voltage range ramping variable multiplier comprises a limited voltage range ramp-up variable multiplier.

[0093] 40. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 39 or any other clause, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier has a lower ramp range value of approximately 900 volts.

[0094] 41. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 40 or any other claim, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier has an upper ramp range value of approximately 2,300 volts.

[0095] 42. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 34 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a linearly varying stepped multiplier.

[0096] 43. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 34 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a smooth stepped multiplier.

[0097] 44. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 39 or any other claim, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier comprises a linear voltage range ramping variable multiplier.

[0098] 45. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 39 or any other clause, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier comprises a smooth range ramping variable multiplier.

[0099] 46. ​​The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 45 or any other claim, wherein the smooth range ramping variable multiplier comprises a ramp centered about a value of approximately 1,550 V.

[0100] 47. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 34 or any other clause, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reversed stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reversed stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

[0101] 48. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising: at least one driving stator; at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse magnetic stator system; a rotor, a motor frame encasing at least the at least one driving stator and the rotor; 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0102] 49. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48 or any other claim, wherein the at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system includes at least one drive stator-adjusted capacitance.

[0103] 50. The improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 49 or any other clause, wherein the reversed-magnetic stator system includes at least one reversed stator winding.

[0104] 51. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 50 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator winding comprises at least one substantially drive stator that is magnetically aligned with the reverse stator winding.

[0105] 52. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 51 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator winding comprises at least one substantially drive stator that is magnetically aligned with the reverse stator winding.

[0106] 53. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 52 or any other claim, wherein the at least one substantially driving stator that is magnetically aligned with a reverse stator winding includes at least one magnetically opposing reverse stator winding.

[0107] 54. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse magnetic stator system; -Rotor and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0108] 55. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 51 or any other claim, wherein the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system includes at least one near-Joule effect breakdown capacitance.

[0109] 56. The at least one near Joule effect breakdown current density reverse magnetic stator system comprises at least one reverse stator winding, and the at least one near Joule effect breakdown capacitance is: a capacitance value that is approximately 99% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is about 98% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 95% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 90% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 85% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 80% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; 5. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 55 or any other clause, comprising a capacitor having a capacitance value selected from:

[0110] 57. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 56 or any other claim, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

[0111] 58. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 54 or any other claim, wherein the reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0112] 59. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 54 or any other claim, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by a comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0113] 60. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator having at least one driving stator reactance; at least one reverse magnetic stator system; - at least one reverse magnetic effect enhanced capacitance of a size beyond the normal range; a rotor, -Motor frame and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0114] 61. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 60 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises reverse windings, and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one reverse-magnetic effect enhanced reverse-magnetic stator system of an out-of-normal size.

[0115] 62. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 61 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0116] 63. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 62 or any other claim, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

[0117] 64. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 60 or any other claim, wherein the reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0118] 65. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 60 or any other claim, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by a comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0119] 66. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; - at least one rated full load slip minimizing reverse magnetic stator system; -Rotor and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0120] 67. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 66 or any other claim, wherein the at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system includes at least one slip-minimizing capacitance.

[0121] 68. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 66 or any other addendum, wherein the motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has slip that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate slip value by at least 20% of that amount of slip improvement toward zero slip at its rated full load.

[0122] 69. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 66 or any other claim, wherein the reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0123] 70. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 66 or any other claim, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by a comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0124] 71. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; - at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse magnetic stator system; a rotor, - an induction motor system drive system; -Motor frame and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0125] 72. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; - at least one NEMA Super Premium Overall Motor Efficiency Reverse Magnetic Stator System; a rotor, - an induction motor system drive system; -Motor frame and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0126] 73. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one driving stator; - at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse magnetic stator system; a rotor, - an induction motor system drive system; -Motor frame and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

[0127] 74. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 73 or any other clause, wherein the at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0128] 75. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 73 or any other clause, wherein the at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one NEMA Super Premium overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0129] 76. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 71 or any other clause, wherein the at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least IE4 overall motor efficiency capacitance.

[0130] 77. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 71 or any other addendum, wherein the motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor system motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power efficiency at rated full load that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by at least 20% of that amount toward 100% efficiency.

[0131] 78. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a - an efficiency improvement of at least 20% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 33% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 40% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 50% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; 7. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 71 or any other claim, having a constant power efficiency that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by an efficiency improvement selected from:

[0132] 79. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and a power factor improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; power factor improvement of the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor to achieve a -1.0 power factor; 79. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 78 or any other clause, having a constant power power factor that improves upon the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value by a power factor improvement selected from:

[0133] 80. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a - a slip improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - Slip improvement of at least 95% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; 79. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 78 or any other claim, having a constant power slip that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate slip value by a slip improvement selected from:

[0134] 81. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 71 or any other clause, wherein the IE4 overall motor efficiency comprises a substantially constant power efficiency.

[0135] 82. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 71 or any other claim, wherein the reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0136] 83. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 71 or any other claim, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by an induction motor of comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type.

[0137] 84. The improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, wherein the reversed-magnetic stator system includes at least one reversed stator winding.

[0138] 85. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 84 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator winding comprises at least one substantially drive stator that is magnetically aligned with the reverse stator winding.

[0139] 86. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 85 or any other claim, wherein the at least one substantially driving stator that is magnetically aligned with a reverse stator winding includes at least one magnetically opposing reverse stator winding.

[0140] 87. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 86 or any other claim, wherein the drive stator has at least one drive stator winding, and the at least one magnetically opposed reverse stator winding comprises at least one drive stator counter winding.

[0141] 88. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 19, 55, 60, 67, 76, or any other note, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by a comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0142] 89. The improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 88 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reversed stator capacitance having a size determined at least in part by a comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor comprises at least one reversed stator capacitance having a size determined by parameters for the comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor that are not applicable to the improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor.

[0143] 90. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 88 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance having a size determined by a comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type induction motor comprises at least one reverse stator capacitance having a size determined by nameplate parameters of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0144] 91. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 90 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the nameplate voltage of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0145] 92. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 91 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the inverse cube of the nameplate voltage of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0146] 93. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 90 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the nameplate power of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0147] 94. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 93 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the nameplate efficiency and power factor of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0148] 95. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 94 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the reciprocal of a quantity equal to the nameplate efficiency times the nameplate power factor of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0149] 96. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 90 or any other claim, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by a multiplier times a value determined by a nameplate parameter of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

[0150] 97. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 96 or any other claim, wherein the multiplier comprises a voltage-variable multiplier.

[0151] 98. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 97 or any other claim, wherein the voltage variable multiplier comprises a stepped variable multiplier.

[0152] 99. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 98 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier has a lower step multiplier value of about 183,000.

[0153] 100. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 99 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier has an upper step multiplier value of approximately 1,358,000.

[0154] 101. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 98 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a supply voltage range variable multiplier.

[0155] 102. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 101 or any other claim, wherein the supply voltage range variable multiplier comprises a supply voltage range ramp-up variable multiplier.

[0156] 103. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 102 or any other claim, wherein the supply voltage range ramp-up variable multiplier comprises a limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier.

[0157] 104. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 103 or any other claim, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier has a lower ramp range value of approximately 900 volts.

[0158] 105. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 104 or any other claim, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier has an upper ramp range value of approximately 2,300 volts.

[0159] 106. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 98 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a linearly varying stepped multiplier.

[0160] 107. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 98 or any other claim, wherein the stepped variable multiplier comprises a smooth stepped multiplier.

[0161] 108. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 103 or any other claim, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier comprises a linear voltage range ramping variable multiplier.

[0162] 109. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 103 or any other claim, wherein the limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier comprises a smooth range ramping variable multiplier.

[0163] 110. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 109 or any other claim, wherein the smooth range ramping variable multiplier comprises a ramp centered about a value of approximately 1,550 V.

[0164] 111. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 98 or any other claim, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

[0165] 112. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other addendum, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the drive stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of about 2.

[0166] 113. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system as described in clause 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, further comprising at least one diamagnetic effect enhancing capacitance of an out-of-normal range size.

[0167] 114. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0168] 115. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 114 or any other claim, wherein the at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system includes at least one near-Joule effect breakdown capacitance.

[0169] 116. The at least one near Joule effect breakdown current density reverse magnetic stator system comprises at least one reverse stator winding, and the at least one near Joule effect breakdown capacitance is: a capacitance value that is approximately 99% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is about 98% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 95% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 90% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 85% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; a capacitance value that is approximately 80% of the value that results in a Joule effect breakdown current density in the reverse winding; 116. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 115 or any other clause, comprising a capacitor having a capacitance value selected from:

[0170] 117. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 116 or any other claim, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area, and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

[0171] 118. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, wherein the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one efficiency-optimized reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0172] 119. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, wherein the at least one efficiency-optimized reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least an IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

[0173] 120. The motor system has an overall motor efficiency at constant power at 100% of its rated load, the overall motor efficiency being: - an efficiency of at least 98.5% for motors with a rated full load of more than 2 megawatts; - an efficiency of at least 99% for motors with a rated full load of more than 2 megawatts; - Efficiency of at least 98.5% for motors with a rated full load of 1 megawatt to 2 megawatt; - Efficiency of at least 99% for motors with a rated full load of 1 megawatt to 2 megawatts; - Efficiency of at least 98% for motors with a rated full load of 500 kW to 1,000 kW; - Efficiency of at least 98.5% for motors with a rated full load of 500 kW to 1,000 kW; - an efficiency of at least 97.5% for motors with a rated full load of 500 kW to 1,000 kW; - Efficiency of at least 98% for motors with a rated full load of 100 kW to 500 kW; - Efficiency of at least 97% for motors with a rated full load of 20 kW to 100 kW; - Efficiency of at least 97.5% for motors with a rated full load of 20 kW to 100 kW; - an efficiency of at least 96.5% for motors with a rated full load of 5 kW to 20 kW; - Efficiency of at least 97% for motors with a rated full load of 5 kW to 20 kW; - an efficiency of at least 96% for motors with a rated full load of 1 kW to 5 kW; - Efficiency of at least 96.5% for motors with a rated full load of 1 kW to 5 kW 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, having an overall motor efficiency selected from:

[0174] 121. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has the following advantages when the motor system motor frame is used in a comparable motor without the reverse-magnetic stator system: - an efficiency improvement of at least 20% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; - an efficiency improvement of at least 33% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; - an efficiency improvement of at least 40% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; - an efficiency improvement of at least 50% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; Improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system as set forth in Appendix 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other Appendix, having efficiency characteristics representing a reduction from perfect efficiency that exceeds the specific current IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for that motor type, with the improvement towards perfect efficiency selected from:

[0175] 122. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load for that motor type when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load for that motor type when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and - an efficiency improvement of at least 20% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 33% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 40% over the comparable motor's standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; - an efficiency improvement of at least 50% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, having a constant power efficiency that improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by an efficiency improvement selected from:

[0176] 123. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and a power factor improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a -1.0 power factor; power factor improvement of the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor to achieve a -1.0 power factor; 71. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, having a constant power power factor that improves upon the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value by a power factor improvement selected from:

[0177] 124. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load for the motor type when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in the comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a - a slip improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - a slip improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; - Slip improvement of at least 95% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value towards zero slip; 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, having a constant power slip that improves upon the comparable motor standard nameplate slip value by a slip improvement selected from:

[0178] 125. The motor system has a motor slip at greater than 75% of its rated full load, and the motor system slip is - less than 0.5% slip at more than 75% of its full rated load; - a slip of less than 0.3% at more than 75% of its full rated load; - less than 0.1% slip at more than 75% of its full rated load; - a slip of less than 0.5% at its full rated load; - a slip of less than 0.3% at its full rated load; - Less than 0.1% slip at its full rated load 48, 54, 61, 66, 71, or any other clause, comprising a motor slip selected from:

[0179] 126. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 125 or any other claim, wherein the motor slip at greater than 75% of its rated full load is a maximum of 0.06% slip.

[0180] 127. A method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system, the method comprising: - energizing at least one driving stator; - energizing at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse magnetic stator system; - rotating a rotor using interaction of the at least one drive stator and the at least one drive stator-adjusted reverse magnetic stator system; A method comprising:

[0181] 128. A method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system, the method comprising: - providing an induction motor system drive system; - energizing at least one driving stator; - powering at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse magnetic stator system; - rotating a rotor using the interaction of said at least one driving stator and said at least one highly efficient reverse magnetic stator system; - encasing the drive stator, the reverse magnetic stator, and the rotor; - achieving an overall motor efficiency of at least IE4 with the motor system compared to the comparable motor; A method comprising:

[0182] 129. A method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system, the method comprising: - energizing at least one driving stator; - energizing at least one rated full load slip minimizing reverse magnetic stator system; rotating a rotor using the interaction of the at least one driving stator and the at least one rated full load slip minimizing reverse magnetic stator system; A method comprising:

[0183] 130. A method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system, the method comprising: - energizing at least one driving stator; - energizing at least one near-Joule effect breakdown current density reverse magnetic stator system; rotating a rotor using the interaction of the at least one driving stator and the at least one near Joule effect breakdown current density reverse magnetic stator system; A method comprising:

[0184] 131. A method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system, the method comprising: - energizing at least one driving stator; - energizing at least one reverse-magnetic stator; - providing power to the at least one diamagnetic stator by at least one diamagnetic effect enhanced capacitance of an out-of-normal size; - rotating a rotor using interaction of the at least one driving stator and the at least one contra-magnetic stator; A method comprising:

[0185] 132. A method of providing power from an asynchronous induction motor system, the method comprising: - energizing at least one driving stator; - energizing at least one reverse-magnetic stator; - providing power to at least one reverse magnetic stator by at least one reverse stator capacitance having a comparable supply power but a size determined by a different motor type induction motor; rotating a rotor using interaction of the at least one driving stator and the at least one contra-magnetic stator; A method comprising:

[0186] As can be readily appreciated, the basic concepts of various embodiments of the present invention can be embodied in a variety of ways. This involves both a reverse-wound induction motor power supply technique and a suitable reverse-wound induction motor to achieve the appropriate power supply. The power supply techniques are disclosed herein as steps inherent in the application as part of the results shown to be achieved by the various devices described. They are simply the natural result of using the devices as intended and described. Additionally, while several devices are disclosed, it should be understood that these not only perform a certain method but can also be varied in several ways. Importantly, with regard to all of the foregoing, all of these aspects should be understood to be encompassed by the present disclosure.

[0187] The discussion contained in this patent application is intended to serve as a basic description. Readers should recognize that the specific discussion may not explicitly describe every possible embodiment, and that many alternatives are implicit. It may not completely describe the general nature of various embodiments of the invention, nor may it explicitly indicate how each feature or element may actually represent a broader function or a wide variety of alternative or equivalent elements. As an example, terms of degree, approximation, and / or relative terms may be used. These may include terms such as "substantially," "about," "only," and the like. These words and word types are to be understood in their dictionary sense as terms encompassing a sufficient or substantial amount, quantity, size, etc., and terms encompassing a large portion, but not entirely, of what is specified. Furthermore, when or if used in connection with this application, terms of degree, approximation, and / or relative terms should also be understood to encompass the possibility of claims that recite more precise and even quantitative values, including various levels of precision, as well as several quantitative options and alternatives.

[0188] When this application is described in device-oriented terms, each element of the device implicitly performs a function. Not only may apparatus claims be included and added with respect to the described device, but method or process claims may also be included to recite the embodiments and the function each element performs. Neither the description nor the terminology is intended to limit the scope of the claims that may be included in any subsequent patent application.

[0189] It should also be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the nature of the various embodiments of the present invention. Such modifications are implicitly included in the description and still fall within the scope of the various embodiments of the present invention. With this understanding, the reader should appreciate that the present disclosure is understood to support any subsequently filed patent application that may seek examination of a claim basis as broad as deemed within the applicant's rights and that may be designed to result in a patent that covers multiple aspects of the embodiments of the present invention, both individually and as an overall system.

[0190] Furthermore, each of the various elements of the embodiments and claims of the present invention may be achieved in a variety of ways. In addition, when used or implied, elements are to be understood as encompassing individual and multiple structures that may or may not be physically connected. The present disclosure should be understood to encompass each such variation, whether it be a variation of any apparatus embodiment, method, or process embodiment, or even simply a variation of any of these elements. In particular, as the present disclosure relates to elements of various embodiments of the present invention, it should be understood that the words for each element may be expressed by equivalent apparatus terms or method terms, even if only the function or result is identical. Such equivalent, broader, or even more general terms should be considered to be encompassed in the description of each element or action. Such terms may be substituted where desired to make explicit the implicitly broad claims to which the embodiments of the present invention are entitled. By way of example only, it should be understood that any action may be expressed as a means for taking all actions or as an element that causes that action. Similarly, each physical element disclosed should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the action that that physical element facilitates. With respect to this last aspect, as one example only, a disclosure of a "power source" should be understood to encompass a disclosure of the act of "powering," whether or not explicitly discussed; conversely, if there is in fact a disclosure of the act of "powering," such disclosure should be understood to encompass a disclosure of a "power source" and, further, a "means for powering," if so desired by express language (recognizing the legal limitations therein). Such variations and alternative terms are to be understood as expressly included in the description. Moreover, each such means should be understood to encompass all elements that can perform a given function (whether or not expressly described as such by language having such limitations), and all descriptions of elements that perform a described function should be understood as non-limiting examples of means for performing that function.As another non-limiting example, it should be understood that claim elements may also be expressed as either elements configured or configured and arranged as components to provide or even achieve a particular result, use, object, state, function, or operation, or capable of achieving a particular activity, result, use, object, state, function, or operation, all of which may be understood to be within the scope of this disclosure and written description.

[0191] Any standards, regulations, or rules mentioned in this application for patent, and any patents, publications, or other references mentioned in this patent, are incorporated herein by reference. Any priority cases claimed by this application are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In addition, for each term used, common dictionary definitions should be understood to be incorporated for each term, unless their use in this application contradicts a broadly supporting interpretation, and all definitions, alternative terms, and synonyms, as contained in the Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, Second Edition, are understood to be incorporated herein by reference. Finally, all references listed in any list of references in the Information Disclosure Statement or in any list to be incorporated by reference pursuant to this application or other information statement filed herewith are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; however, with respect to each of the above, to the extent that such information or statements incorporated by reference may be considered to be inconsistent with the patenting of various embodiments of the present invention, such statements shall not be deemed to be expressly made by the applicant in the context of this disclosure and these inventions.

[0192] (References to be incorporated by reference) [Table 1] [Table 2] [Table 3] [Table 4-1] [Table 4-2]

[0193] Accordingly, Applicant hereby grants to at least: i) each of the induction motor devices as disclosed and described herein; ii) related methods as disclosed and described; iii) similar, equivalent, and even implicit variations of each of these devices and methods; iv) alternative designs thereof that perform each of the indicated functions as disclosed and described; v) alternative designs and methods thereof that perform each of the indicated functions as implicitly performing those disclosed and described; vi) each feature, component, and step shown as a separate and independent invention; vii) applications that are enhanced by the various systems or components disclosed; and viii) any effects or disadvantages caused by such processes, methods, systems, or components. ix) each system, method, and element shown or described as presently applied to any specific field or device mentioned; x) methods and apparatus substantially as described hereinabove and with reference to any of the accompanying examples; xi) apparatus for performing the methods described herein, comprising means for performing the steps; xii) the various combinations and permutations of each of the disclosed elements; xiii) each potentially dependent claim or concept as dependent on any and all presented independent claims or concepts; and xiv) support for claiming and asserting embodiments, including all inventions described herein.

[0194] With respect to claims, whether presented now or later for examination, it should be understood that for practical reasons and to avoid significantly expanding the examination burden, applicants may always present only the first claim, or perhaps only the first claim accompanied by only the first dependent claim. Offices and any third parties interested in the potential scope of this or any subsequent application should understand that broader claims may be presented later in this case, in any case claiming the benefit of this case, or in any continuation, regardless of any preliminary amendments, other amendments, claim language, or arguments presented, and that there is therefore no intention to assign or transfer any potential subject matter throughout the pendency of any case. It should be understood that if or when broader claims are presented, this is possible to the extent that any amendments, claim language, or arguments presented in this or any subsequent application are deemed to be made so as to avoid such prior art, and that such may require that any relevant prior art that may have been considered at any time prior thereto may need to be revisited, for such reasons may be precluded by later-presented claims, etc. Both examiners and any other individuals interested in existing or later potential coverage, or considering at any time any possibility of indicating a disclaimer or assignment of potential coverage, should recognize that no such assignment or disclaimer is intended or will ever exist in this or any subsequent application. Limitations such as those set forth in Hakim v. Cannon Avent Group, PLC, 479 F.3d 1313 (Fed.Cir. 2007), among others, are expressly not intended in this or any subsequent related matter. Additionally, support, to the extent required under new matter law (including, but not limited to, Article 123(2) of the European Patent Convention and 35 U.S.C. 132 or other such law), should be understood to permit the addition of any of various dependent claims or other elements presented under one independent claim or concept as dependent claims or elements under any other independent claim or concept.It should be understood that in drafting any claims at any time in this application or any subsequent application, applicant seeks to obtain as full and broad coverage as legally possible. Because applicant may simply not be able to anticipate all possible events, to the extent that insufficient substitution has been made, to the extent applicant has not actually drafted any claim to literally cover any particular embodiment, and to the extent otherwise applicable, applicant should not be understood to have in any way intended or actually assigned such coverage, and one of ordinary skill in the art should not be reasonably expected to have drafted claims that would literally cover such alternative embodiments.

[0195] Furthermore, the use of the transitional phrases "comprising," "including," "containing," "characterized by," and "having," if and when used, is used herein to maintain "open-ended" claims in accordance with conventional claim interpretation, including that discussed in MPEP § 2111.03. Thus, unless the context requires otherwise, it is to be understood that the terms "comprise" or "comprises" or "comprising" and variations thereof, "include" or "includes" or "including", "contain" or "contains" and "containing", "characterized by" or "characterizing by", "have" or "has" or "having" and variations thereof are intended to imply the inclusion of a stated element or step or group of elements or steps, but not the exclusion of any other element or step or group of elements or steps. Such terms are to be interpreted in their broadest form so that the applicant is legally entitled to the widest coverage. Furthermore, when the term "selected from" also needs to be explicitly limited to have a group "consisting of" or "consisting essentially of" items a, b, and c, etc., it should be understood in favor of the narrower group-oriented / Markush group terminology.

[0196] Use of the phrase "or any other claim" is used to provide support for any claim that depends on any other claim, such as another dependent claim, another independent claim, a previously listed claim, a subsequently listed claim, etc. As one clarifying example, if a claim depends on "claim 9 or any other claim," etc., it could be rephrased as depending on claim 1, claim 8, or even claim 11, if such exists, as desired, and still fall within the present disclosure. It should be understood that this phrase also provides support for any combination of elements within a claim, and further, that combinations of method, apparatus, process, etc. claims, etc., may be used to incorporate any desired appropriate antecedent for a given claim combination.

[0197] Finally, while any claims set forth may, at any time, be incorporated herein by reference as part of the present description of various embodiments of the present application, Applicant expressly reserves the right to use all or a portion of such incorporated content of such claims as additional description in support of any or all of the claims or any elements or components thereof, and Applicant expressly further reserves the right to move any portion or all of the incorporated content of such claims or any elements or components thereof from the description to the claims, or vice versa, as necessary to define the matter for which protection is sought by the present application or by any subsequent continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part thereof, or to obtain any benefit of, or to conform to, any fee reduction under any national or treaty patent law, rule, or regulation, and such incorporated-by-reference content shall survive the entire pendency of the present application, including any subsequent continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part thereof, or any reissue or extension thereto. To reduce the prosecution burden, Applicant presents the following claims for initial prosecution and filing, without waiving any right to submit additional appendices or other claims at a later date.

Claims

1. 1. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one drive stator; at least one reverse magnetic stator system; at least one reverse stator capacitance having a size determined at least in part by nameplate power and at least in part by the inverse cube of the nameplate voltage of a comparable supplied power but dissimilar motor type induction motor; Rotor and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

2. 2. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein the at least one inverse stator capacitance comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by parameters for a dissimilar motor type induction motor of comparable supply power but inapplicable to the improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor.

3. 10. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein said at least one inverse stator capacitance comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by nameplate parameters of said dissimilar motor type induction motor.

4. 10. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein said at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one substantially drive stator that is magnetically aligned with a reverse stator winding.

5. 5. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 4, wherein said at least one substantially driving stator in magnetic alignment with a reverse stator winding comprises at least one magnetically opposing reverse stator winding.

6. 6. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 5, wherein the drive stator has at least one drive stator winding, and the at least one magnetically opposed reverse stator winding comprises at least one drive stator counter winding.

7. 7. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6, wherein said at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by the reciprocal of an amount equal to said nameplate efficiency times said nameplate power factor of said dissimilar motor type induction motor.

8. 8. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 7, wherein the at least one reverse stator capacitance has a size determined at least in part by a multiplier times a value determined by a nameplate parameter of the dissimilar motor type induction motor.

9. 9. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 8, wherein the multiplier comprises a voltage variable multiplier.

10. 10. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 9, wherein said voltage variable multiplier comprises a stepped variable multiplier.

11. 2. The improved reverse-magnetism asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein said at least one reverse stator capacitance comprises at least one reverse stator capacitance having a microfarad value substantially equal to a stepped variable multiplier that is stepped over a specific nameplate voltage range times the standard nameplate motor power (in watts) for said frame times the reciprocal of an amount equal to the cube of the standard nameplate motor voltage for said frame times the standard nameplate motor efficiency (as a decimal value) for said frame times the standard nameplate motor power factor (as a decimal value) for said frame.

12. 12. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 11, wherein said stepped variable multiplier has a lower step multiplier value of approximately 183,000.

13. 13. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 12, wherein said stepped variable multiplier has an upper step multiplier value of approximately 1,358,000.

14. 14. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 13, wherein said stepped variable multiplier comprises a limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier having a lower ramp range value of approximately 900 volts.

15. 15. The improved inverse-magnet asynchronous induction motor system of claim 14, wherein said limited voltage range ramping variable multiplier has an upper ramp range value of approximately 2,300 volts.

16. 7. The improved reversed-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6, wherein said at least one reversed-magnetic stator system comprises at least one rated full-load slip-minimized reversed-magnetic stator system.

17. 7. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6, wherein the at least one inverse stator capacitance comprises at least one inverse magnetic effect enhancing capacitance of an out-of-normal range size.

18. 7. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6, wherein said at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

19. 2. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein the at least one drive stator has a drive stator wire cross-sectional area and the at least one reverse-magnetic stator system has a reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area, the stator winding wire cross-sectional area to the reverse stator winding wire cross-sectional area establishing a ratio of approximately 2.

20. 10. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein said at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one near Joule effect breakdown current density reverse-magnetic stator system.

21. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power efficiency at its rated full load, the constant power efficiency being: an efficiency improvement of at least 33% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 40% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 50% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; 10. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein the system improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by an efficiency improvement selected from:

22. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power power factor at its rated full load, and the constant power power factor is: a power factor improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 33% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 40% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; Power factor improvement of the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor to achieve a 1.0 power factor; 10. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein the system improves on the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value by a power factor improvement selected from:

23. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power slip at its rated full load, the constant power slip being: a slip improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; a slip improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; a slip improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; a slip improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; A slip improvement of at least 95% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; 10. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 1, wherein the slip improvement selected from:

24. 7. The improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6, wherein the improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprises at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse magnetic stator system.

25. 7. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 6, wherein the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprises at least one NEMA Super Premium Overall Motor Efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

26. 1. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one drive stator; at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse magnetic stator system; A rotor; an induction motor system drive system; Motor frame and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

27. 27. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26, wherein the at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

28. 27. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26, wherein the at least one high overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one NEMA Super Premium overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system.

29. 28. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 27, wherein said at least one at least IE4 overall motor efficiency reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least IE4 overall motor efficiency capacitance.

30. 28. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 27, wherein the motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor system motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power efficiency at its rated full load, the constant power efficiency improving the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by at least 20% of that amount toward 100% efficiency.

31. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power efficiency at its rated full load, the constant power efficiency being: an efficiency improvement of at least 20% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 33% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 40% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 50% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; 28. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 27, wherein the system improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by an efficiency improvement selected from:

32. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value at rated full load when the motor frame is used in a comparable motor without the reverse-magnetic stator system, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power power factor at its rated full load, and the constant power power factor is: a power factor improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; a power factor improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate power factor toward a 1.0 power factor; Power factor improvement of the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor to achieve a 1.0 power factor; 32. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 31, wherein the system improves on the comparable motor standard nameplate power factor value by a power factor improvement selected from:

33. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power slip at its rated full load, the constant power slip being: a slip improvement of at least 20% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; a slip improvement of at least 50% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; a slip improvement of at least 75% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; a slip improvement of at least 90% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; A slip improvement of at least 95% of the comparable motor's standard nameplate slip value toward zero slip; 32. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 31, wherein the slip improvement selected from: improves the comparable motor standard nameplate slip value.

34. 28. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 27, wherein the IE4 overall motor efficiency comprises a substantially constant power efficiency.

35. 27. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26, wherein said at least one reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one efficiency-optimized reverse-magnetic stator system.

36. The motor system has an overall motor efficiency at constant power at 100% of its rated load, the overall motor efficiency being: an efficiency of at least 98.5% for motors having a rated full load greater than 2 megawatts; an efficiency of at least 99% for motors having a rated full load greater than 2 megawatts; an efficiency of at least 98.5% for motors having a full load rating of 1 megawatt to 2 megawatts; an efficiency of at least 99% for motors having a full load rating of 1 megawatt to 2 megawatts; an efficiency of at least 98% for motors having a full load rating of 500 kilowatts to 1,000 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 98.5% for motors having a full load rating of 500 kilowatts to 1,000 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 97.5% for motors having a full load rating of 500 kilowatts to 1,000 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 98% for motors having a full load rating of 100 kilowatts to 500 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 97% for motors having a full load rating of 20 kilowatts to 100 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 97.5% for motors having a full load rating of 20 kilowatts to 100 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 96.5% for motors having a full load rating of 5 kilowatts to 20 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 97% for motors having a full load rating of 5 kilowatts to 20 kilowatts; an efficiency of at least 96% for motors having a full load rating of 1 kilowatt to 5 kilowatts; Efficiency of at least 96.5% for motors with rated full loads between 1 kilowatt and 5 kilowatts; 27. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26, having an overall motor efficiency selected from:

37. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has an efficiency characteristic that represents a reduction from perfect efficiency that exceeds the specific current IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for that motor type when the motor system motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, the efficiency characteristic comprising: an efficiency improvement of at least 20% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; an efficiency improvement of at least 33% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; an efficiency improvement of at least 40% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; an efficiency improvement of at least 50% towards perfect efficiency compared to the IEC / EN 60034-30-1:2014 IE4 efficiency standard for the comparable motor; 27. The improved inverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26, with improvements towards perfect efficiency selected from:

38. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value at rated full load for that motor type when the motor frame is used without the reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and the improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has a constant power efficiency at its rated full load, the constant power efficiency being: an efficiency improvement of at least 20% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 33% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 40% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; an efficiency improvement of at least 50% over the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency towards 100%; 27. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26, wherein the system improves the comparable motor standard nameplate efficiency value by an efficiency improvement selected from:

39. 27. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26 or any other clause, wherein the reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

40. 27. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 26 or any other clause, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by an induction motor of comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type.

41. 1. An improved diamagnetic asynchronous induction motor system, comprising: at least one drive stator; at least one rated full load slip minimizing reverse magnetic stator system; Rotor and 1. An improved reverse magnetic asynchronous induction motor system comprising:

42. 42. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 41, wherein said at least one rated full-load slip-minimizing reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one slip-minimizing capacitance.

43. 42. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 41, wherein said motor system has a motor frame that has a comparable motor standard nameplate slip value at rated full load when said motor frame is used without said reverse-magnetic stator system in a comparable motor, and wherein said improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system has slip at its rated full load that improves said comparable motor standard nameplate slip value by at least a 20% slip improvement in that amount toward zero slip.

44. 42. The improved reverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 41 or any other clause, wherein the reverse-magnetic stator system comprises at least one drive stator adjusted reverse-magnetic stator system.

45. 41. The improved inverse-magnetic asynchronous induction motor system of claim 41 or any other clause, wherein the at least one capacitor comprises at least one inverse stator capacitance having a size determined by an induction motor of comparable supply power but dissimilar motor type.

Images