Goal achievement evaluation device, goal achievement evaluation method, and goal achievement evaluation program

Abstract

To provide a device, a method, and a program for evaluating target achievement that can promote a person who exercises to continue the training.SOLUTION: A training result evaluation device changes the manner of notification based on a plurality of evaluation items showing the effect of a training according to the sense of purpose of a person who exercises in the training, in order to encourage the person to continue the training. With the device, a person who exercises with a higher sense of purpose receives a notification that rather tells the person whether the training is producing the result as expected while a person who exercises with a lower sense of purpose receives a notification that rather tells the person the effect of the training.SELECTED DRAWING: Figure 1

Description

[Technical Field]

[0001] The present invention relates to a goal achievement evaluation device, a goal achievement evaluation method, and a goal achievement evaluation program. [Background technology]

[0002] Exercisers who train for the purpose of dieting or the like often do so in order to achieve a desired body shape, etc. However, not all exercisers are able to continue training until they reach their goal, and some quit training before reaching their goal.

[0003] Therefore, the following methods have been proposed to encourage athletes to continue their training.

[0004] Patent Document 1 describes providing incentives to users according to the tasks they perform. This patent document describes that if a user tends not to perform high-intensity tasks, the points awarded for high-intensity tasks are increased on the condition that the user has not performed high-intensity tasks for a certain period of time, thereby increasing the incentive to perform high-intensity tasks.

[0005] Patent Document 2 describes generating example sentences from response information in response to inquiries from a person under health management, and correcting the example sentences based on biological information and the like of the person under health management.

[0006] Patent Document 3 describes that, among the achievement levels of behavioral goals related to weight control, the reason corresponding to the item corresponding to the smallest achievement level is displayed on a user terminal.

[0007] Patent Document 4 describes a method of comparing a current weight with a target weight at the time of measuring the current weight, determining whether the two match, and outputting information related to weight management based on the result.

[0008] Patent document 5 describes accumulating statistical data including a history of report data from customers to instructors and instruction data from instructors to customers, and outputting output data regarding appropriate instruction candidates or future predictions for new customers by referring to the accumulated data. [Prior art documents] [Patent documents]

[0009] [Patent Document 1] Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 2018-028889 [Patent Document 2] Patent No. 6630964 [Patent Document 3] JP 2010-092440 A [Patent Document 4] Patent No. 6268235 [Patent Document 5] JP 2017-010486 A Summary of the Invention [Problem to be solved by the invention]

[0010] However, each exerciser has a different sense of goal regarding training, and none of the methods in Patent Documents 1 to 5 take into account the exerciser's sense of goal and are designed to promote motivation maintenance, so exercisers with low sense of goal may lose motivation and be unable to continue training.Furthermore, they do not necessarily encourage exercisers with high sense of goal to continue training.

[0011] Therefore, an object of the present invention is to provide a goal achievement evaluation device, a goal achievement evaluation method, and a goal achievement evaluation program that can encourage athletes to continue their training. [Means for solving the problem]

[0012] A goal achievement evaluation device according to one embodiment of the present invention comprises a goal awareness derivation means for deriving the goal awareness of an athlete performing training, and a notification mode change means for changing a notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items indicating the results of the training by the athlete, in accordance with the goal awareness derived by the goal awareness derivation means.

[0013] According to this configuration, the notification mode based on multiple evaluation items indicating training effect changes depending on the exerciser's goal awareness for training. For example, for an exerciser with a high level of goal awareness, notification is provided that makes it easy to recognize whether the training is producing the expected results. This motivates an exerciser with a high level of goal awareness to continue training because it is easier for them to feel a sense of accomplishment toward their goal. On the other hand, for an exerciser with a low level of goal awareness, notification is provided that makes it easier for them to recognize the effects of training. This motivates an exerciser to continue training because it is easier for them to realize the effects of training even if they are less goal-conscious. Therefore, this configuration can encourage exercisers to continue training.

[0014] In the above-mentioned goal achievement evaluation device, the goal consciousness may be derived based on at least one of an evaluation based on the exerciser's training information, an evaluation based on the exerciser's biological information, an evaluation based on the exerciser's subjective judgment, and an evaluation based on the exerciser's self-development activities for exercise. With this configuration, the exerciser's goal consciousness can be more appropriately derived.

[0015] The above-mentioned goal achievement evaluation device may further include a priority derivation means for deriving a priority for each of the plurality of evaluation items that indicate the results of the training by the exerciser in accordance with the goal awareness of the exerciser, and the notification mode change means may change the notification mode based on the plurality of evaluation items in accordance with the priority.

[0016] According to this configuration, the priority of the evaluation items that indicate the training results is derived, and the priority of the evaluation items is corrected according to the exerciser's awareness of the goal, thereby changing the manner in which the training results are reported. Therefore, this configuration allows the training results to be reported in a way that is more suitable for the exerciser.

[0017] In the above-mentioned goal achievement evaluation device, the priority derivation means may derive a high priority for the evaluation items to be achieved as indicated in the training plan when the exerciser has a relatively high level of goal awareness, and may derive a high priority for the evaluation items that have produced good training results when the exerciser has a relatively low level of goal awareness.

[0018] With this configuration, goal-conscious exercisers are notified so that they can easily recognize whether their training is producing the expected results, while goal-conscious exercisers are notified so that they can more easily recognize the effects of their training. Therefore, this configuration can encourage exercisers to continue their training.

[0019] In the above-described goal achievement evaluation device, the priority derivation means may derive a high priority for the evaluation item that is likely to change due to the training when the exerciser has a relatively low level of goal awareness. With this configuration, it is possible to prevent a decrease in motivation for training for an exerciser with a low level of goal awareness.

[0020] In the above-described goal achievement assessment device, the priority of each assessment item may be determined based on the time elapsed since the exerciser started the training. With this configuration, the priority of each assessment item can be more appropriately derived, for example, by giving a higher priority to an assessment item that is likely to produce results from the start of training.

[0021] In the above-described goal achievement evaluation device, the notification mode may be the display order of the plurality of evaluation items. With this configuration, the exerciser can easily recognize the results of their training.

[0022] In the above-described goal achievement evaluation device, the notification mode may be the degree of achievement of the exerciser in the training. With this configuration, the exerciser can easily recognize the results of the training.

[0023] In the above-described goal achievement evaluation device, the achievement level may be a sum of the achievement levels of the evaluation items, taking into account the priority of each evaluation item. With this configuration, the achievement level of training can be easily calculated.

[0024] The above-described goal achievement evaluation device may further comprise a display means for displaying information in accordance with the notification mode, which allows the exerciser to easily recognize the results of their training.

[0025] A goal achievement evaluation method according to one embodiment of the present invention includes a first step in which a goal awareness derivation means derives the goal awareness of an athlete performing training, and a second step in which a notification mode change means changes a notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items that indicate the results of the training by the athlete, in accordance with the goal awareness derived by the goal awareness derivation means.

[0026] A goal achievement evaluation program according to one embodiment of the present invention causes a computer to function as a goal awareness derivation means for deriving the goal awareness of an athlete performing training, and a notification mode change means for changing the notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items indicating the results of the training by the athlete, in accordance with the goal awareness derived by the goal awareness derivation means. [Effects of the Invention]

[0027] According to the present invention, it is possible to encourage exercisers to continue training. [Brief explanation of the drawings]

[0028] [Figure 1] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the training result evaluation system of this embodiment. [Figure 2] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a training plan. [Figure 3]FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a display mode of the training results of an exerciser with low goal awareness. [Figure 4] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing a display mode of the training results of a highly goal-oriented exerciser. [Figure 5] FIG. 5 shows data used to calculate the exerciser's achievement level. [Figure 6] FIG. 6 shows data used to calculate the exerciser's achievement level. [Figure 7] FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the flow of the training result evaluation process. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0029] Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. Note that the embodiment described below shows an example of how the present invention can be implemented, and the present invention is not limited to the specific configuration described below. When implementing the present invention, a specific configuration corresponding to the embodiment may be appropriately adopted.

[0030] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a training result evaluation system 10 according to this embodiment. Training result evaluation system 10 is installed in an exercise facility, such as a sports gym, for example. Therefore, in the following description, an athlete is a member user of the sports gym, and training result evaluation system 10 is operated by an employee (instruction user), such as an instructor, of the sports gym. Therefore, the instruction user is a provider of a service using training result evaluation system 10, and the member user is a beneficiary of a service using training result evaluation system 10. Furthermore, training results include changes in the athlete's body composition and changes in the load the athlete performs as training. Training results, in other words, are the degree of achievement of a goal. While the load in this embodiment is, for example, weight weight, it is not limited to this, and may also be running distance, swimming distance, or the like.

[0031] 1, a training result evaluation system 10 of the present embodiment includes a training result evaluation device 12, a body composition monitor 14, and a server 16. In the present embodiment, the training result evaluation device 12 is described as an independent information processing device as an example, but is not limited to this, and the training result evaluation device 12 may also be incorporated into the body composition monitor 14.

[0032] The training result evaluation device 12 is an information processing device, such as a laptop personal computer, a desktop personal computer, or a tablet terminal.

[0033] Body composition meter 14 is a biological information measuring device that measures biological information such as the body weight and body composition value based on bioelectrical impedance of the exerciser being measured. Body composition meter 14 calculates body composition values such as fat percentage, fat mass, lean mass, muscle mass, visceral fat mass, visceral fat level, visceral fat area, subcutaneous fat mass, basal metabolic rate, bone mass, total body water percentage, BMI, intracellular fluid volume, and extracellular fluid volume. Then, the body weight and body composition values for each exerciser are transmitted to server 16.

[0034] The server 16 stores personal information such as the height, age, and sex of each exerciser, the weight and body composition values of each exerciser measured by the body composition analyzer 14, and the exerciser's training plan.

[0035] Next, details of training result evaluation device 12 will be described with reference to Fig. 1. Training result evaluation device 12 includes a calculation unit 20, a storage unit 22, a display unit 24, an operation unit 26, and a communication unit .

[0036] The calculation unit 20 is, for example, a CPU (Central Processing Unit) or the like, and executes various calculations and the like performed by the training result evaluation device 12 .

[0037] The storage unit 22 is, for example, a non-volatile memory such as a flash memory or an HDD (Hard Disk Drive), and stores various data and programs used in the processing of the calculation unit 20. The programs stored in the storage unit 22 are, for example, the OS (Operating System) of the training result evaluation device 12, various drivers for controlling various hardware components, software (application software) for executing the training result evaluation process of this embodiment, and the like.

[0038] The display unit 24 is, for example, an LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) or the like, and displays images based on processing by the calculation unit 20. The operation unit 26 is used to perform various input operations on the training result evaluation device 12, and is, for example, a touch panel, keyboard, mouse, touchpad, and buttons. The communication unit 28 transmits and receives various data to and from the body composition scale 14, other information processing devices such as the server 16, and a printer.

[0039] Here, in order to encourage the exerciser to continue training, the training result evaluation device 12 of this embodiment changes the notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items that indicate training effect according to the exerciser's goal awareness for training.

[0040] For example, if an athlete starts training for the purpose of losing weight, soon after starting training, there may be no or little change in weight or body composition that is directly related to the purpose of training.

[0041] For example, an exerciser with low goal awareness may lose motivation and give up on continuing training if the training does not result in any particular changes in weight or body composition, which are directly related to the purpose of training. Even in such cases, by prioritizing the training results that the exerciser can more easily recognize as the effects of training, such as an increase in the weight that can be lifted, it is expected that even an exerciser with low goal awareness will be able to maintain motivation and continue training.

[0042] On the other hand, a highly goal-conscious exerciser can continue training so that the training is progressing as planned, even if no particular changes in weight or body composition are seen as a result of the training. Therefore, by providing a notification that makes it easy for the exerciser to recognize whether the training is producing the expected results, the exerciser will easily feel a sense of accomplishment in reaching their goal, which will motivate them to continue training.

[0043] For example, for a highly goal-conscious exerciser, notifications are provided that make it easy to recognize whether the training is producing the expected results. This makes it easier for the highly goal-conscious exerciser to feel a sense of accomplishment in reaching the goal, which motivates them to continue training. On the other hand, for a less goal-conscious exerciser, notifications are provided that make it easier to recognize the effects of training. This makes it easier for even a less goal-conscious exerciser to realize the effects of training, which motivates them to continue training.

[0044] Therefore, the training result evaluation device 12 of this embodiment includes a goal information acquisition unit 30, a data acquisition unit 32, a plan generation unit 34, a goal awareness derivation unit 36, a priority derivation unit 38, an achievement level calculation unit 44, and a notification mode change unit 46. Each of these functions is realized by the calculation unit 20 executing a program, but is not limited to this, and each function may be realized by the training result evaluation device 12 including individual hardware such as an ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuit) corresponding to the function.

[0045] The goal information acquisition unit 30 acquires goal information of an exerciser (member user) from the server 16. The goal information is, for example, the exerciser's target body shape for a target period (several months from now), predetermined biological information (weight or predetermined body composition values), etc., and is indicated in a training plan (described later). For example, when an exerciser joins a sports gym or starts a new training session, the goal information is input by a gym employee (training user) via the training result evaluation device 12 or another information processing device, and is stored for each exerciser in the server 16.

[0046] The data acquisition unit 32 acquires the exerciser's current biological information (height, weight, body composition measurements, etc.) and the exerciser's training information from the server 16. The training information is information that indicates the training status of the exerciser, such as the date, time, and number of times for each training session that the exerciser has performed. The training information is input by the exerciser or a sports gym instructor via the training result evaluation device 12 or another information processing device, and is stored in the server 16 for each exerciser.

[0047] The plan generation unit 34 generates a plan for training to be performed by the exerciser (hereinafter referred to as a "training plan") based on the exerciser's goal information acquired by the goal information acquisition unit 30 and the exerciser's biological information acquired by the data acquisition unit 32. The generated training plan is stored in the server 16.

[0048] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing an example of a training plan. In the example of FIG. 2, the exerciser aims to have a more muscular body six months from now. A plan corresponding to this goal is then generated by the plan generation unit 34. In the example of FIG. 2, the plan generates monthly weight and body composition changes from now until six months from now, as well as training details. In other words, it shows that by the exerciser training according to this plan, weight and body composition will change and the exerciser will reach the target body shape.

[0049] The training plan may be generated automatically using a predetermined algorithm based on the exerciser's goal information and biological information, or may be generated by a gym employee with reference to the exerciser's goal information and biological information. The items prioritized in the training plan shown in Figure 2 are, in order, weight change, body composition change, and training content.

[0050] The goal awareness deriving unit 36 derives the goal awareness M of an exerciser who is undergoing training. The goal awareness is derived by calculation based on the exerciser's exercise habits, training frequency (e.g., hours / day or times / week), frequency or variability of visits to a sports gym (times / month), participation in seminars on exercise and health, results of a questionnaire about motivation to exercise (worried about whether they can continue, busy with work, waiting until their wedding, etc.), the exerciser's lifestyle during the training period (e.g., dietary content), changes in body composition during the training period, etc. In this way, the goal awareness is an index determined by an evaluation based on the exerciser's training information, an evaluation based on the exerciser's biological information, an evaluation based on the exerciser's subjective judgment (e.g., questionnaire results), an evaluation based on the exerciser's self-development activities for exercise (e.g., participation in seminars), etc.

[0051] The level of goal awareness may not be derived from only one evaluation, but may be derived comprehensively from multiple evaluations. Furthermore, without being limited to this, the instructor may determine the athlete's goal awareness by asking the athlete questions, etc., and input the determined level into training result evaluation device 12. In this way, the goal awareness of the present embodiment is derived based on at least one of an evaluation based on the athlete's training information, an evaluation based on the athlete's biological information, an evaluation based on the athlete's subjective judgment, an evaluation based on the athlete's self-development activities for exercise, etc., thereby making it possible to more appropriately derive the athlete's goal awareness.

[0052] For example, goal awareness may be expressed in multiple stages in increments of 1 between 1 and 10, with the lowest level being "1" and the highest level being "10," or it may be expressed in two stages: "high" or "low."

[0053] The priority derivation unit 38 derives priorities for multiple evaluation items that indicate the results of the exerciser's training, depending on the exerciser's awareness of goals. The evaluation items are body composition information and training information that the exerciser wants to change through training or that are expected to change through training. For example, the evaluation items are weight change, body composition change, and training implementation status in the training plan shown in Figure 2, and the exerciser's training results.

[0054] The priority derivation unit 38 also includes a weighting factor derivation unit 40 and a modification unit 42 .

[0055] The weighting factor deriving unit 40 derives a weighting factor for each of a plurality of evaluation items according to the exerciser's goal consciousness.

[0056] The modification unit 42 modifies the priority of each of the multiple evaluation items using the weighting coefficient derived by the weighting coefficient derivation unit 40. As an example, the priority is modified by multiplying the priority of each evaluation item by the weighting coefficient for each evaluation item, but the modification is not limited to this as long as the priority is modified using the weighting coefficient.

[0057] The timing at which the priority is derived by the priority derivation unit 38 and the timing at which the weighting coefficient is derived by the weighting coefficient derivation unit 40 may be different. For example, since the priority changes depending on the time from the start of training, the priority may be derived about once a month, whereas since the goal awareness may change frequently, the weighting coefficient may be derived every time training is performed or once a week.

[0058] Furthermore, the frequency of deriving the weighting coefficient may be changed depending on the goal awareness, for example, the frequency of deriving the weighting coefficient may be changed depending on the frequency of training of the exerciser. For example, for exercisers whose training frequency varies, the weighting coefficient may be changed frequently, while for exercisers whose training frequency is constant, the frequency of deriving the weighting coefficient may be relatively reduced.

[0059] The achievement level calculation unit 44 calculates the degree of achievement of the exerciser in accordance with the training plan. The achievement level calculation unit 44 of this embodiment calculates an overall achievement level (hereinafter referred to as an "overall achievement level") based on the achievement level for each evaluation item (hereinafter referred to as an "item-specific achievement level").

[0060] The notification mode changing unit 46 changes the notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items that indicate the training results of the exerciser, according to the goal consciousness derived by the target consciousness derivation unit 36. Therefore, the notification mode changing unit 46 of this embodiment changes the notification mode based on the plurality of evaluation items, according to the priority corrected by the correction unit 42. Then, the display unit 24 performs display according to the notification mode changed by the notification mode changing unit 46.

[0061] In this embodiment, the notification mode based on the evaluation items is, for example, at least one of the display order of multiple evaluation items and the overall achievement level of the exerciser's training, so that the exerciser can easily recognize the training results, but the notification mode is not limited to this and may be other modes.

[0062] In this way, training result evaluation device 12 derives the priority of evaluation items that indicate training results according to the exerciser's goal awareness. For example, weighting coefficients are derived according to the exerciser's goal awareness, and the priorities of evaluation items are modified using the weighting coefficients. This changes the manner in which training results are reported. Therefore, training result evaluation device 12 of this embodiment can report training results that are more suited to the exerciser.

[0063] Next, the derivation of the priority and weighting coefficient for each evaluation item by the training result evaluation device 12 will be described.

[0064] For example, the priority of the evaluation items is calculated in the order of the items that the exerciser prioritizes in the training plan. In the example of Figure 2, the priority is given to weight change, body composition change, and training content in that order, so the priority of weight change is 0.4, the priority of body composition change is 0.3, and the training implementation status is 0.3.

[0065] The priority of each evaluation item may be calculated based on the number of evaluation items or the order of importance in the training plan, or may be determined in advance. As an example, the sum of the priorities of multiple evaluation items is set to "1." In other words, when the priority of one evaluation item is high, there is also an evaluation item whose priority becomes relatively low.

[0066] In addition, the priority of each evaluation item in this embodiment is W i It is expressed as (E, t) and may be changed depending on the training plan E and the time t that has elapsed since the start of training. For example, if an exerciser is working on a diet through aerobic exercise, the biological information on fat mass will be emphasized during the period when the effect is likely to be seen, so the priority of fat mass, which is a body composition value, may be higher.

[0067] In this way, the priority derivation unit 38 determines the priority of each evaluation item based on the elapsed time since the athlete started training, and can more appropriately derive the priority of each evaluation item, such as by giving a higher priority to evaluation items that are more likely to produce results starting from the start of training.

[0068] In addition, the priority derivation unit 38 of this embodiment derives a high priority for evaluation items to be achieved as indicated in the training plan when the exerciser has a relatively high level of goal awareness, and derives a high priority for evaluation items for which the training plan is favorable when the exerciser has a relatively low level of goal awareness.

[0069] Therefore, the priority W for each evaluation item i (E,t) is the goal consciousness M i Weighting coefficient C according to i Fixed by Priority W i (C i ,E,t). As an example, the weighting coefficient C i Priority W for each of the multiple evaluation items modified by i (C i ,E,t) is set to "1". That is, the weighting coefficient C of a certain evaluation item i When is increased, the weighting coefficient C of other evaluation items i is made smaller.

[0070] The weighting coefficient derivation unit 40 of this embodiment determines the weighting coefficient C so that the priority of the evaluation items to be achieved indicated in the training plan is relatively high when the exerciser has a relatively high level of goal awareness. i The weighting coefficient C is calculated so that when the exerciser's goal awareness is relatively low, the priority of the evaluation items with good training results is relatively high. i is derived.

[0071] According to this, for exercisers with a high level of goal awareness, notifications are provided that make it easy to recognize whether the training is producing the expected results, and for exercisers with a low level of goal awareness, notifications are provided that make it easier to recognize the effects of the training.

[0072] Good training results refer to positive changes due to training, regardless of priority. Positive changes include, for example, a decrease in weight, a decrease in body fat percentage, an increase in muscle mass, and an increase in training weight (load).

[0073] Here, for example, if the evaluation item is weight change, the specific priority W i (C i An example of derivation of the weighting coefficient C is given below. In the example below, Ci, E, t are discontinuous functions, but they are not limited to this and may be continuous functions. In the example below, the weighting coefficient C i If is greater than 5, the exerciser has a high level of goal awareness, and the weighting coefficient C i If the value is less than 5, the exerciser's sense of purpose is low. If Ci≧5 and E=“diet” and t<3 months, then priority W i (C i ,E,t)=0.5 If Ci<5 and E=“diet” and t<3 months, then priority W i (C i ,E,t)=0.3 If Ci≧5 and E=“diet” and t>3 months, then priority W i (C i ,E,t)=0.7 If Ci<5 and E=“diet” and t>3 months, then priority W i (C i ,E,t)=0.5 Furthermore, when the exerciser has a relatively low level of goal awareness, the priority derivation section 38 may derive a high priority for an evaluation item that is likely to change due to training.

[0074] Therefore, the weighting coefficient derivation unit 40 of this embodiment uses, as an example, the goal consciousness M i When the weighting coefficient C is relatively low, the priority of the evaluation items (biological information) that are likely to change with training is increased. iFor example, if training does not result in a change in body weight, but there is a large change in a certain body composition value, the weighting coefficient C i is increased, and the weighting coefficient C i is made relatively small.

[0075] In this way, the exerciser's goal consciousness M i Weighting coefficient C based on i Derive the priority W i By modifying the above, it becomes easier to emphasize not only the evaluation items that should be checked to get closer to the goal, but also evaluation items that have changed significantly over a certain period of time. This means that for exercisers with low goal awareness, even if progress toward the goal is not good, evaluation items with large changes will be displayed preferentially, which increases the exerciser's satisfaction and prevents a decrease in motivation to exercise.

[0076] 3 and 4 are diagrams showing display modes of a plurality of evaluation items showing the results of training carried out by an exerciser. FIG. 3 shows a display mode of the training results of an exerciser with low goal awareness, and FIG. 4 shows a display mode of the training results of an exerciser with high goal awareness. On the other hand, the overall achievement level shown in FIGS. 3 and 4 is, for example, a display mode of the training results of an exerciser with high goal awareness. i There is no weighting based on the level of goal awareness, and the results are the same regardless of the level of goal awareness.

[0077] Furthermore, the training results are the same in both Figures 3 and 4. For example, the training implementation status (changes shown as "Training" in Figures 3 and 4) is the same as that shown in the training plan (100% achievement for each item), while the achievement for each item in the weight change and body composition change is lower than that shown in the training plan.

[0078] As described above, for an exerciser with low goal awareness, priorities are derived so that evaluation items with good training results have a higher priority. Therefore, as shown in FIG. 3, for an exerciser with low goal awareness, the priority of the training implementation status for which the item achievement rate is 100% is derived to be high, and the training implementation status is displayed as "interesting information." Other evaluation items, such as weight change and body composition change, are displayed as "other information." The display order of evaluation items in "other information" is also determined based on the priority. As an example, the display order of the "other information" in FIG. 3 is such that the higher the priority, the further to the left it is displayed in FIG. 3.

[0079] On the other hand, for highly goal-conscious exercisers, as described above, the priority of the evaluation items to be achieved in the training plan is adjusted to be higher. Therefore, as shown in Figure 4, the priority of the exerciser's target weight change is adjusted to be higher, and weight change is displayed as "interesting information." Other evaluation items, such as changes in body composition and training implementation status, are displayed as "other information."

[0080] In Figures 3 and 4, for example, "attention information" is displayed larger than "other information." Also, for items with a high degree of achievement, in the example of Figures 3 and 4, "overall achievement level" is displayed with an additional display such as "Good." In this way, the display state of the evaluation items may be changed according to the degree of achievement, etc. This change is not limited to the form shown in Figures 3 and 4, and for example, the display color of the evaluation items may be changed, or the text of "attention information" may be made more prominent.

[0081] Next, calculation of the overall achievement level as a notification mode will be described with reference to Figures 5 and 6. In both Figures 5 and 6, the training plan targets a 10 kg weight loss from 90 kg to 80 kg and a 5% reduction in body fat percentage from 25% to 20%. Figure 5 shows a case where the weight and body fat percentage are steadily decreasing toward the training plan's goals. On the other hand, Figure 6 shows a case where the weight and body fat percentage are not steadily decreasing toward the training plan's goals. Each of Figures 5 and 6 also shows changes in weight (load) as part of the training content, with the weight increasing over time from a base weight of 40 kg in the training plan.

[0082] In the following example, based on Figures 5 and 6, the overall achievement level from Period 1 to Period 2 is calculated according to the level of the exerciser's goal awareness. The overall achievement level A is calculated by multiplying the individual achievement level A for each evaluation item by the following formula (1): i Priority W i It is calculated as the sum of the values taking into account the following: i Priority W i This allows you to easily calculate the overall achievement level A of the training. i is also the priority modified by the weighting factor.

[0083] A=Σ(W i ×A i ) ···(1) First, the calculation of the overall achievement level of an exerciser with low goal awareness will be described.

[0084] In the example of Figure 5, where an athlete's training is progressing smoothly toward the goals of the training plan, the achievement rate for each item of weight is 67%, the achievement rate for each item of body fat percentage is 100%, and the achievement rate for each item of weight is 100%.The priority and overall achievement rate before and after weighting adjustment according to goal awareness are as follows.

[0085] Priority (before weighting): Weight = 0.4, Body Fat = 0.3, Weight = 0.3 Overall achievement (before weighting): 67 x 0.4 + 100 x 0.3 + 100 x 0.3 = 87% Priority (after weighting adjustment): Weight = 0.2, Body Fat = 0.4, Weight = 0.4 Overall achievement (after weighting): 67 x 0.2 + 100 x 0.4 + 100 x 0.4 = 93% In the above example, because the exerciser has a low level of goal awareness, the body fat percentage and weight, which have a high level of achievement in each category, are adjusted to have a higher priority, while the weight, which has a low level of achievement in each category, is adjusted to have a lower priority. As a result, the overall achievement level before the weighting adjustment according to the exerciser's goal awareness was 87%, but after the adjustment, the overall achievement level increases to 93%.

[0086] On the other hand, in the example of Figure 6, where the training plan goals are not progressing smoothly, the achievement rate for each item in weight is 33%, the achievement rate for each item in body fat percentage is 0%, and the achievement rate for each item in weight is 150%.The priority and overall achievement rate before and after weighting adjustment according to goal awareness are as follows.

[0087] Priority (before weighting): Weight = 0.4, Body Fat = 0.3, Weight = 0.3 Overall achievement (before weighting): 33 x 0.4 + 0 x 0.3 + 150 x 0.3 = 58% Priority (after weighting): Weight = 0.3, Body Fat = 0.2, Weight = 0.5 Overall achievement (after weighting): 33 x 0.3 + 0 x 0.2 + 150 x 0.5 = 85% In the above example, because the exerciser has a low level of goal awareness, weights with a high level of achievement are adjusted to have a higher priority, while weights and body fat percentages with a low level of achievement are adjusted to have a lower priority. As a result, the overall achievement level before weighting adjustment according to the exerciser's goal awareness was 58%, but after adjustment the overall achievement level rises to 85%.

[0088] Next, calculation of the overall achievement level of a highly goal-conscious exerciser will be described.

[0089] In the example of Figure 5, where the training plan is progressing smoothly, the achievement rate for each item in weight is 67%, the achievement rate for each item in body fat percentage is 100%, and the achievement rate for each item in weight is 100% as mentioned above.The priority and overall achievement rate before and after weighting adjustment according to goal awareness are as follows.

[0090] Priority (before weighting): Weight = 0.4, Body Fat = 0.3, Weight = 0.3 Overall achievement (before weighting): 67 x 0.4 + 100 x 0.3 + 100 x 0.3 = 87% Priority (after weighting): Weight = 0.5, Body Fat = 0.4, Weight = 0.1 Overall achievement (after weighting): 67 x 0.5 + 100 x 0.4 + 100 x 0.1 = 74% In the above example, because the exerciser has a high level of goal awareness, the training plan is adjusted so that weight, body fat percentage, and weight are prioritized in that order. As a result, the overall achievement level before weighting adjustment according to the exerciser's goal awareness was 87%, but after adjustment, the overall achievement level drops to 74%.

[0091] On the other hand, in the example of Figure 6, where the training plan goals are not progressing smoothly, the achievement rate for each item in weight is 33%, the achievement rate for each item in body fat percentage is 0%, and the achievement rate for each item in weight is 150%, as mentioned above.The priority and overall achievement rate before and after weighting adjustment according to goal awareness are as follows.

[0092] Priority (before weighting): Weight = 0.4, Body Fat = 0.3, Weight = 0.3 Overall achievement (before weighting): 33 x 0.4 + 0 x 0.3 + 150 x 0.3 = 58% Priority (after weighting): Weight = 0.5, Body Fat = 0.4, Weight = 0.1 Overall achievement (after weighting): 33 x 0.5 + 0 x 0.4 + 150 x 0.1 = 32% In the above example, because the exerciser has a high level of goal awareness, the training plan is adjusted so that weight, body fat percentage, and weight are prioritized in that order. As a result, the overall achievement level before weighting adjustment according to the exerciser's goal awareness was 58%, but after adjustment, the overall achievement level drops to 32%, indicating a decrease in the overall achievement level.

[0093] As explained with reference to Figures 5 and 6, by adjusting the priorities with weighting according to goal awareness, exercisers with low goal awareness place more emphasis on items that are likely to change even if they have not reached their goal, resulting in a relatively higher overall achievement level than exercisers with high goal awareness. On the other hand, exercisers with high goal awareness place more emphasis on results up to the goal of reducing weight and body fat percentage, so even if they are approaching their goal, their overall achievement level will be relatively lower than that of exercisers with low goal awareness. This makes it possible to calculate an overall achievement level according to the exerciser's goal awareness, thereby maintaining the exerciser's motivation to exercise.

[0094] 7 is a flowchart showing the flow of the training result evaluation process executed by training result evaluation device 12. The training result evaluation process is executed when, for example, an instructor or the like starts application software installed in training result evaluation device 12 to display the training results of an exerciser on display unit 24 of training result evaluation device 12.

[0095] First, in step S100, the goal information acquisition unit 30 acquires the exerciser's goal information (training plan) from the server 16.

[0096] In the next step S102, the data acquisition unit 32 acquires the biological information and training information (information related to the evaluation items) of the exerciser.

[0097] In the next step S104, the priority derivation unit 38 derives the priority for each evaluation item of the training results based on the acquired information.

[0098] In the next step S106, it is determined whether or not to determine the priority for each evaluation item in accordance with the goal consciousness, and if the determination is affirmative, the process proceeds to step S108, and if the determination is negative, the process proceeds to step S112.

[0099] An image for selecting whether or not to modify the priorities of the evaluation items is displayed on the screen of training result evaluation device 12, and if the operator, such as an instructor, selects to modify, step S106 is determined as positive. On the other hand, if no modification is selected, step S106 is determined as negative. Alternatively, without being limited to this, whether or not to modify the priorities may be determined in advance for each exerciser based on the goal awareness of each exerciser.

[0100] In the next step S108, the weighting factor deriving section 40 derives a weighting factor for each of a plurality of evaluation items according to the exerciser's goal awareness.

[0101] In the next step S110, the modifying unit 42 modifies the priority of each of the multiple evaluation items using the weighting coefficient.

[0102] In the next step S112, the achievement level calculation unit 44 calculates the item achievement level and the overall achievement level for the revised priority.

[0103] In the next step S114, the display unit 24 performs a display (display of results in order of priority, display of overall achievement level) according to the notification mode changed by the notification mode change unit 46, and this training result evaluation process ends.

[0104] Although the present invention has been described above using the above-mentioned embodiment, the technical scope of the present invention is not limited to the scope described in the above-mentioned embodiment. Various changes or improvements can be made to the above-mentioned embodiment without departing from the gist of the invention, and such changes or improvements are also included in the technical scope of the present invention.

[0105] For example, in the above embodiment, the priority is adjusted regardless of whether the exerciser has a high or low goal consciousness, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, the priority may not be adjusted when the exerciser has a high goal consciousness, and the priority may be adjusted when the exerciser has a low goal consciousness.

[0106] Furthermore, in the above embodiment, an embodiment has been described in which information for each exerciser, including biometric information and training information for each exerciser, is stored in server 16, but the present invention is not limited to this. For example, training result evaluation system 10 may be composed of training result evaluation device 12 and body composition monitor 14, and training result evaluation device 12 may store information for each exerciser.

[0107] Furthermore, in the above embodiment, a form in which the priority is corrected using a weighting factor has been described, but the present invention is not limited to this, and the priority may be corrected by other methods instead of using a weighting factor.

[0108] Furthermore, the priorities derived by the priority derivation unit 38 may be changeable by a user such as an exerciser or an instructor as appropriate.

[0109] Furthermore, some or all of the functions of the goal-awareness derivation unit 36, priority derivation unit 38, weighting coefficient derivation unit 40, correction unit 42, and notification-mode change unit 46 may be provided by a device other than the training result evaluation device 12. For example, goal awareness may be derived by a training machine or body composition scale 14, and priority may be derived and corrected by an app installed on a smartphone or tablet device. The display unit 24 of this smartphone or tablet device displays training results as shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. Furthermore, some or all of the above functions may be performed by the server 16. [Explanation of symbols]

[0110] 10 Training result evaluation device (goal achievement evaluation device) 24 Display section (display means) 36 Goal awareness derivation unit (goal awareness derivation means) 38 Priority derivation unit (priority derivation means) 46 Notification mode change unit (notification mode change means)

Claims

1. a notification mode changing means for changing a notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items showing the results of the training by the exerciser on a display means for displaying images in accordance with the goal consciousness of the exerciser, which is shown in a plurality of stages based on one or a plurality of evaluations of the exerciser performing the training; A goal achievement evaluation device comprising:

2. The goal consciousness is displayed in a plurality of stages based on at least one of an evaluation based on the exerciser's training information, an evaluation based on the exerciser's biological information, an evaluation based on the exerciser's subjective judgment, and an evaluation based on the exerciser's self-development activities for exercise. The goal achievement assessment device according to claim 1 .

3. a priority derivation means for deriving priorities of the plurality of evaluation items that indicate the results of the training by the exerciser in accordance with the goal consciousness of the exerciser so that an item that the exerciser places importance on is prioritized; the notification mode changing means changes a notification mode based on the plurality of evaluation items in accordance with the priority.

3. The goal achievement evaluation device according to claim 1.

4. A priority derivation means is provided for deriving priorities of the plurality of evaluation items that indicate the results of the training by the exerciser in accordance with the exerciser's goal consciousness so that items that show the greatest change due to the training are given higher priorities; the notification mode changing means changes a notification mode based on the plurality of evaluation items in accordance with the priority.

3. The goal achievement evaluation device according to claim 1.

5. The priority derivation means When the exerciser's level of goal awareness is relatively high, the priority of the evaluation item that the exerciser values in the training plan is determined to be high; When the goal awareness of the exerciser is relatively low, the priority of the evaluation item for which the training results are good is determined to be high.

5. The goal achievement evaluation device according to claim 3 or 4.

6. the priority derivation means derives a high priority for the evaluation item that changes significantly due to the training over a predetermined period when the exerciser's level of gradual goal awareness is relatively low; 6. The target achievement evaluation device according to claim 3, wherein the target achievement evaluation device is a device for evaluating a target achievement level.

7. 7. The goal achievement evaluation device according to claim 3, wherein the priority for each evaluation item is determined based on a period from the start of the training by the exerciser when the training effect is likely to be seen.

8. 8. The goal achievement evaluation device according to claim 3, wherein the notification mode is a display order of the plurality of evaluation items that is determined based on the priority.

9. A goal achievement evaluation device as described in any one of claims 1 to 8, which displays the degree of achievement of the training by the athlete on the display means.

10. An achievement level calculation means for deriving an achievement level for each evaluation item, which is an achievement level for each evaluation item that indicates the results of the training by the exerciser; a priority deriving means for deriving a priority for each of the plurality of evaluation items indicating the results of the training by the exerciser in order of the items that the exerciser values according to the exerciser's goal consciousness; Equipped with 10. The device for evaluating a degree of goal achievement according to claim 9, wherein the degree of achievement is a sum of values obtained by adding the priority of each of the evaluation items to the degree of achievement for each of the evaluation items.

11. A goal achievement evaluation device described in any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the notification mode change means displays a specified evaluation item larger than other evaluation items on the display means.

12. a step in which an information processing device changes a notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items showing the results of the training by the exerciser on a display means that displays images, in accordance with the goal consciousness of the exerciser that is shown in a plurality of stages based on one or a plurality of evaluations of the exerciser performing the training; A method for evaluating the degree of goal achievement.

13. Computer, a notification mode changing means for changing a notification mode based on a plurality of evaluation items showing the results of the training by the exerciser on a display means for displaying images in accordance with the goal consciousness of the exerciser, which is shown in a plurality of stages based on one or a plurality of evaluations of the exerciser performing the training; A goal achievement evaluation program to function as a

Images